`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOHNSON MATTHEY INC., and JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`BASF CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Patent 9,039,982
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioners, Johnson Matthey Inc., and
`
`Johnson Matthey PLC, hereby submit their objections to certain evidence that
`
`Patent Owner, BASF Corporation, submitted in connection with IPR2015-01266.
`
`Exhibit 2008
`
`Exhibit 2010
`
`Exhibit 2011
`
`Exhibit 2015
`
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2016
`
`Exhibit 2017
`
`Exhibit 2018
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`3
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2020
`
`Exhibit 2022
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`Lack of Foundation: Patent Owner has not provided
`sufficient explanation of what the exhibit is or what it
`allegedly shows.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2023
`
`Exhibit 2024
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`Lack of Foundation: Patent Owner has not provided
`sufficient explanation of what the exhibit is or what it
`allegedly shows.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`Lack of Foundation: Patent Owner has not provided
`sufficient explanation of what the exhibit is or what it
`allegedly shows.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2028
`
`Exhibit 2029
`
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Exhibit 2031
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2032
`
`Exhibit 2033
`
`Exhibit 2034
`
`Exhibit 2035
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`
`7
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2036
`
`Exhibit 2038
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`Lack of Foundation: Patent Owner has not provided
`sufficient explanation of what the exhibit is or what it
`allegedly shows.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2039
`
`Exhibit 2040
`
`Exhibit 2041
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`
`9
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2042
`
`Exhibit 2043
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`
`10
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2044
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`FRE 402: the exhibit is not relevant to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted.
`FRE 403: the exhibit’s probative value to any ground upon
`which trial was instituted is substantially outweighed by the
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, undue
`delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative
`evidence.
`FRE 801/802: the exhibit is inadmissible hearsay if offered
`to prove the truth of any matter allegedly asserted therein.
`FRE 901: Patent Owner has not produced evidence sufficient
`to support a finding that the exhibit is what Patent Owner
`claims it is.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/Gwilym J. O. Attwell, Reg. No. 45,449/
`Reg. No. 45,449
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 11, 2016
`
`Customer Number 26171
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Telephone: (612) 337-2508
`Facsimile: (612) 288-9696
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01266
`Attorney Docket No: 38411-0005IP1
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e)(4), the undersigned certifies that on March 11,
`
`2016, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Notice of Objections to
`
`Evidence was provided via email to the Patent Owner by serving the
`
`correspondence email addresses of record as follows:
`
`Brian E. Ferguson
`Anish R. Desai
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`1300 Eye Street, NW
`Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Email: brian.ferguson@weil.com
`Email: anish.desai@weil.com
`Email: BASF.IPR.2015.1266@weil.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Edward G. Faeth/
`
`Edward G. Faeth
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(202) 626-6420
`
`
`
`
`
`12