throbber
United States Patent [191
`Wittkower
`
`(54]
`
`[75}
`
`IMPLANTATION PROFILE CONTROL
`WITH SURFACE SPUTTERING
`Inventor: Andrew B. Wittkower, Rockport,
`Mass.
`IBIS Technology Corporation,
`Danvers, Mass.
`[21] Appl. No.: 342,484
`Apr. 24, 1989
`[22] Filed:
`Int. CJ,S .••.••••..........•..•....•.............•.• HOlL 21/ 265
`(51)
`[52] u.s. Cl ......................................... 148/ 33; 437/24;
`437/26; 437/62; 148/DIG. 158
`[58) Field of Search ....................... 437/24, 26, 61, 62;
`148/33, DIG. 158; 204/192.37, 192.25;
`250/492.21
`
`[73] Assignee:
`
`[56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,033,788 7/1977 Hunsperger et al. ................ 148/ 1.5
`4,241,359 12/1980 Izumi et al ............................ 357/49
`4,394,180 7/1983 Deamaley et al. .................. 148/1.5
`4,452,646 6/1984 Zuleeg ................................. 148/1.5
`4,704,302 11/1987 Bruel et al. ........................... 427/38
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2581795 11/1986 France .................................. 437/24
`0031971 3/1978 Japan ..................................... 437/61
`0059090 5/1979 Japan ..................................... 437/24
`
`llli~IIHIIIIMRIID
`US005080730A
`[11] Patent Number:
`(45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,080,730
`Jan. 14, 1992
`
`020885 I 11/ 1984 Japan ..................................... 437/62
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`"Sputter Etch Removal Rates of Insulators, Semicon·
`ductors, and Conductors", Larry L. Fritz, Solid State
`Technology, Dec. 1971, pp. 43-48.
`"Nucleation and Growth of Si02 Precipitates in SOV(cid:173)
`SIMOX Related Materials- Dependence Upon Damage
`and Atomic Oxygen Profll~s", Nuclear instruments and
`methods in Physics research, Section B (Beam interac(cid:173)
`tions with materials and Atoms) Mar. 1989, vol. B39,
`No. 1-4, Hemment et al., pp. 210-214.

`Primary Examiner-Olik Chaudhuri
`Assistant Examiner-Ourmafd Ojan
`Allomey, Agent, or Firm-Weingarten, Schurgin,
`Gagnebin & Hayes
`ABSTRACf
`[57]
`An ion implantation process for producing a buried
`insulating layer of silicon dioxide in a silicon substrate
`which takes advantage of the effects of surface erosion
`and sputtering inherent to the ion implantation process.
`The process a!Jows the production of an insulating layer
`buried within a silicon semiconductor wherein the
`width of the insulating layer can be contoured by con(cid:173)
`trolling the beam energy during implantation.
`
`8 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets
`
`IG
`
`BEAK SPIIHCE
`
`II
`
`I
`._It?'
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`001
`
`SONY 1013
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1992
`
`Sheet 1 of 3
`
`5,080,730
`
`IG
`
`BE All SOURCE
`
`/()
`
`FIG. JA
`
`/()
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`FIG.JB
`
`II
`
`I
`!,.-!()'
`
`FIG.JC
`
`002
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1992
`
`Sheet 2 of 3
`
`5,080,730
`
`11
`
`EKEHGf
`CONTROL
`
`BEAN SOURCE
`
`~---------------------~~!0'
`!G
`Si
`
`SiOt
`
`IP
`
`Si
`
`FIG.2A
`
`FIG.2B
`
`T/NEfQHDOSEJ
`
`II
`
`FIG . . 3A
`
`DEPTH (A)
`
`003
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1992
`
`Sheet 3 of 3
`
`5,080,730
`
`"'
`_,_.. CPKSTAIT PEPTH
`"'
`Of /JEPOS/T
`
`FIG. 3B
`
`r--------------------~M/0
`Si
`-' ~/J '6
`o FIG. 4A
`~ ~~
`- r-/J
`'I
`
`SiP!
`Si
`
`/OK PEIETIATIOK
`
`FIG. 4B
`
`FIG.5
`
`004
`
`

`
`1
`
`5,080,730
`
`IMPLANTATION PROFILE CONTROL WITH
`SURFACE SPUTIERING
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`This invention relates to a process used in semicon(cid:173)
`ductor production and, more particularly, relates to a
`process for contouring an insulating layer formed in a
`semiconductor substrate by ion implantation.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`Ion implantation is a process in which atomic parti(cid:173)
`cles are introduced into a substrate for the purpose of
`changing the electrical or chemical properties of the
`substrate. This process uses high energies to accelerate 15
`ions which enter the surface and are slowed down by
`electronic or nuclear collisions with the substrate
`atoms, and come to rest some small distance below the
`surface. Modem semiconductor technology is one field
`in which ion implantation is particularly useful and 20
`wherein implanted ions are used to alter the conductiv-
`ity of the base material as well as to form buried insulat(cid:173)
`ing layers. One object, in the case of buried insulating
`layers, is the minimization of the volume of electrically
`active semiconductor material to reduce parasitic ef- 25
`fects such as device-to-device effects (known as latch(cid:173)
`up), leakage capacitance, resistance, etc. and to mini(cid:173)
`mize sensitivity to radiation.
`In the early 1980's, a process known as separation by
`implanted oxygen or SIMOX was developed in which a 30
`high-dose of oxygen ions are implanted into a solid
`monocrystalline silicon substrate, making it possible to
`form a buried layer of silicon dioxide SiOz). The resul(cid:173)
`tant layer dielectrically isolates circuit elements, en(cid:173)
`abling the fabrication of smaller, closer and faster cir- 35
`cuits which are immune to the noted parasitic and radia(cid:173)
`tion effects which cause latch-up and add to circuit
`capacitance.
`Using the SIMOX process, oxygen ions are implanted
`into silicon at a constant beam energy between 150 and 40
`200 keV at a dose of approximately 1.6 X tots
`ions/cm2. After implantation, the material is annealed
`to form the chemically bonded silicon dioxide. A typi(cid:173)
`cal anneal cycle involves heating the substrate to ap(cid:173)
`proximately 1300 degrees for six hours. This annealing 45
`phase redistributes the oxygen ions which are implanted
`in a roughly Gaussian profile with respect to the most
`probable depth (range) such that the silicon/silicon
`dioxide boundary on either side of the silicon dioxide
`layer becomes markedly more abrupt, thus forming a 50
`sharp and well-defmed region centered at the most
`probable depth.
`During implantation, incoming high-speed oxygen
`ions sputter silicon ions from the surface resulting in
`surface erosion. Due to the effect of this surface erosion, ss
`the original surface of the silicon layer is displaced,
`causing ions implanted toward the end of the implant
`cycle to come to rest at a depth deeper than ions im(cid:173)
`planted at the start of the implant cycle. In practice, this
`erosion effect is magnified when a surface layer of sili- 60
`con dioxide is provided to protect surface features be(cid:173)
`cause silicon dioxide erodes more rapidly than silicon
`during implantation. As a result of the variation in im(cid:173)
`plantation depth of oxygen ions, a broader band of sili(cid:173)
`con oxide layer is created. This, in tum, increases the 65
`minimal acceptable dose of oxygen ions required to
`create the silicon dioxide layer, thereby causing even
`greater surface damage and longer processing times.
`
`2
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates to a process for produc(cid:173)
`ing a buried insulating layer, typically of silicon dioxide
`S (SiOz) or silicon nitride (Si3N4), within a silicon sub(cid:173)
`strate in a manner which advantageously regulates the
`implantation energies in response to the surface erosion
`to produce a thinner, low dosage insulating layer suit(cid:173)
`able for typical low voltage use, or a thicker, more even
`10 layer in a semiconductor substrate wherein the thick(cid:173)
`ness of the buried insulative layer is determined by
`controlling the beam energy used to implant ions into
`the silicon layer as a function of surface erosion. The
`silicon layer erodes at a rate which is dependent on the
`density of the ions being implanted into the silicon. The
`peak ion distribution is maintained at a constant position
`by reducing the beam energy and corresponding pene(cid:173)
`tration by an amount corresponding to the depth of
`erosion. This more rapidly achieves the ion density
`required to fully form an oxide barrier with less expo(cid:173)
`sure of the substrate to ion implantation effects. The
`oxide barrier thus formed, while thinner, provides pro(cid:173)
`tection for most semiconductor applications which are
`typically low voltage applications.
`Conversely, by increasing the beam energy over the
`implantation period, the peak of the ion implantation
`distribution occurs at progressively deeper depths, ad(cid:173)
`vantageously benefited by the surface erosion which
`allows the distribution to shift naturally. In this case, the
`oxide barrier is formed over a greater depth to provide
`additional insulative protection in high voltage applica-
`tions.
`The process for producing a buried insulating layer
`according to the present invention is advantageous for
`producing an active component of an integrated circuit
`positioned on crystalline silicon material above an insu-
`lating layer. This technique produces a radiation hard(cid:173)
`ened material and also dielectrically isolates circuit
`elements enabling smaller, closer and faster circuits to
`be fabricated with a marked reduction in stray capaci(cid:173)
`tance and an increase in the operating speed of the cir-
`cuits. Additionally, the material shows great promise
`for mixed application such as BI-CMOS circuits which
`combine power and logic on the same chip.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`The invention will be more fully understood from the
`following detailed description taken in conjunction
`with the accompanying drawings in which:
`Figs. lA to lB are diagrammatic representations
`showing a prior art ion implantation process for produc(cid:173)
`ing a buried insulating layer in a semiconductor sub(cid:173)
`strate at different stages in the process;
`FIG. lC is a graph of ion concentration with respect
`to the depth of deposition according to the prior art;
`FIG. 2A is a diagrammatic representation of a modi(cid:173)
`fied ion implantation process for producing a narrowed
`buried insulating layer according to a first embodiment
`of the invention;
`FIG. 2B is an energy profile diagram showing the
`energy tapering according to the first embodiment of
`the invention;
`FIGS. 3A and 3B are graphs showing the Gaussian
`distribution of the ions with respect to the distance from
`the top face of the silicon layer in the first embodiment
`of the invention;
`FIG. 4A is a diagrammatic representation of ion im(cid:173)
`plantation for producing a widened buried insulating
`
`005
`
`

`
`3
`layer according to a second embodiment of the inven(cid:173)
`tion;
`FIG. 4B is an energy profile diagram showing energy
`increasing with time according to the second embodi(cid:173)
`ment of the invention; and
`FIG. 5 is a graph showing the Gaussian distribution
`of the ions with respect to distance from the top face of
`the silicon layer in the second embodiment of the inven(cid:173)
`tion.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`The present invention contemplates energy control
`during oxygen or nitrogen ion implantation to produce
`a narrowed or a widened insulating layer in a silicon 15
`substrate. According to the prior art, as shown in FIG.
`1A, an initially uniform silicon layer 10 is bombarded
`with oxygen ions generated by a beam source 16
`wherein the oxygen ions travel through the silicon crys-
`tal structure 10 and come to rest in the crystal matrix of 20
`silicon atoms. Since the purpose of the implantation
`process is to create a buried layer of silicon dioxide
`(Si02), two oxygen atoms are implanted for each silicon
`atom to achieve the appropriate chemical structure.
`The oxygen ions come to rest as a broadened band 14 25
`buried in the silicon in a roughly Gaussian distribution
`with respect to depth where the depth is dependent
`upon the ion beam energy used to project the oxygen
`atoms into the silicon layer. Annealing subsequently
`forms a silicon dioxide layer having sharpened bound- 30
`aries.
`FIG. 1B shows the surface erosion resulting from the
`oxygen implantation on the silicon layer 10. The dotted
`line 18 represents the original top face of the silicon
`layer before ion implantation. As ions are bombarded 35
`against the surface of the silicon, the top face 18 of the
`silicon layer 12 is eroded or sputtered such that the top
`of the silicon layer progressively retreats toward a
`lower level 20. The effect of the erosion is that ions
`implanted in the course of an implant cycle come to rest 40
`at progressively deeper depths within the silicon layer
`and farther from the original top face 18 than the ions
`implanted at the start of the implant cycle.
`FIG. 1B also shows an additional characteristic of the
`prior art ion implantation process in that small islands 45
`22 of silicon dioxide may be formed in layer 14 and just
`above due to ions which are deposited in the tail of the
`Gaussian distribution to form a chemical bond outside
`of the sharpened Gaussian distribution formed during
`annealing. This is an undesirable phenomenon which 50
`alters the electrical conductivity characteristics of the
`silicon semiconductor layer.
`FIG. 1C shows the broadened Gaussian distribution
`of oxygen ions that would result from an ion implanta(cid:173)
`tion using constant. Under this prior art arrangement, it 55
`can be seen that the ion concentration is distributed
`over a broad Gaussian depth distribution 30.
`In simunary, the net effect of this surface erosion is
`that the distribution of ions is spread over a wide range
`which causes the buried silicon dioxide layer to be 60
`thicker and also creates islands of silicon dioxide depos-
`its outside of the insulating layer to be formed. Addi(cid:173)
`tionally, the minimum acceptable dose of ions necessary
`to create a quality insulating layer is high since the
`chemical bonding of the insulating layer must be 65
`achieved over a broader range.
`The present invention is adapted to controllably re(cid:173)
`duce or increase the beam energy during ion implanta-
`
`5,080,730
`
`4
`tion. Such controlled variation in beam energy permits
`specific contouring of the width of the buried insulator
`layer band. Moreover, by compensating for the known
`effects of surface erosion, greater regulation of the im-
`5 plantation process is achieved.
`FIG. 2A is a diagramatic sectional view of a first
`embodiment of the present invention wherein the ap(cid:173)
`plied beam energy from source 16 is controllably de(cid:173)
`creased by an energy control17 to decrease the implan-
`10 tation depth such that the peak of the ion distribution is
`maintained at the same depth despite the existence of
`surface erosion. Thus, after annealing, a buried 9 silicon
`dioxide layer 24 forms as a thin strata of insulating mate-
`rial which dielectrically separates the former silicon
`semiconductor 10 into two newly formed layers 28 and
`26. The energy decrease with time and ion sputtering is
`shown in FIG. 2B.
`FIG. 3A shows the effect of reducing beam energy
`with time, as surface 18 is eroded to a surface 20'. In
`FIG. 3B a three dimensional graph shows the roughly
`Gaussian distribution proflles 34a, b, c, d which repre-
`sent the ion concentration at different times as the beam
`energy is decreased during the implantation cycle. By
`using ion beam energy control to perform this energy
`reduction, it can be seen that the peak ion concentration
`can be limited to a very narrow range 32 within the
`silicon substrate as the surface 18 gradually recedes due
`to erosion thereof.
`As an illustration of the first embodiment of the pres(cid:173)
`ent invention, a beam energy of 150 keV will erode
`silicon at a rate of approximately 34/1017 ions/cm2.
`Further, it is inherent in this ion implantation process
`that ions are implanted at a peak depth of approximately
`19 A!keV. Thus, the depth of the peak of the ion distri(cid:173)
`bution can be maintained at a constant level by reducing
`the implant voltage by approximately 1.8 keV /1017
`ions/cm2 applied. For example, if a normal dose of ions
`is approximately 1.6 X 1Q18 ions/cm2, a controlled re(cid:173)
`duction of approximately 28.8 keV over the period of
`implantation will result in a constant peak depth distri(cid:173)
`bution at a level approximately 2850 A below the origi-
`nal top face of the silicon layer: This embodiment also
`allows processing time to be reduced from approxi(cid:173)
`mately five hours to approximately four hours.
`In a second embodiment of the present invention, as
`shown in FIG. 4A, and using the same relationships
`regarding erosion rate and peak depth, the process de(cid:173)
`scribed above is altered to form a thicker silicon dioxide
`band 40 by controllably increasing the beam energy
`used to implant ions. An increase in the beam energy, as
`illustrated in FIG. 4B, advantageously positions the
`peak distribution of ions at increasingly greater depths
`due to the combined effects of the increase in beam
`energy plus the surface erosion. For example, by in(cid:173)
`creasing the beam energy from 150 keV to 170 keV
`over the course of an implantation cycle, the peak distri-
`bution depth of the implanted ions is increased from a
`level 2850 A below the original top face of the silicon
`layer to a level 3230" A below the eroded top face of the
`silicon layer. At a dose of 1.6 X 1Q18 ions/cm2, this
`eroded top face sits at a level 544 A lower than the
`original top face. Thus, the peak distribution of ions lies
`in a band ranging from 2850 A to 3774 A below the
`original top face of the silicon layer.
`This second embodiment of the invention is further
`illustrated in FIG. 5 which shows the progressively
`deeper distribution curves in which the ions are im(cid:173)
`planted. This creates a far wider range 36 of distribution
`
`006
`
`

`
`5,080,730
`
`5
`and a far wider insulating layer. This wide insulating
`layer supports a higher voltage for high voltage appli(cid:173)
`cations.
`While the invention has been illustrated for oxygen
`implantation, it is to be understood that nitrogen or
`other implantable ions may be substituted. It will fur(cid:173)
`ther be appreciated that the embodiments described are
`illustrative only and are not to limit the invention, the
`scope of which is defined only in t.he following claims. 10
`I claim:
`1. A process for producing a buried insulation form(cid:173)
`ing implant layer disposed within a silicon substrate,
`comprising the steps of:
`implanting ions into a silicon substrate, from a source 15
`of controllable ion energy;
`simultaneously eroding a surface layer of said silicon
`substrate through which said implanting ions pass;
`and
`reducing the ion energy in compensation for erosion
`occurring in said eroding step to reduce the depth
`of ion penetration with respect to the surface ero(cid:173)
`sion of said substrate.
`2. The process of claim 1 wherein the silicon is of 25
`semiconductor grade.
`
`6
`3. The process of claim 1 wherein the implant is se(cid:173)
`lected from the group comprising oxygen and nitrogen.
`4. The process of claim 1 further including the step of
`annealing said substrate to create a continuous insulat-
`5 ing layer from the implant layer.
`5. A process for producing a buried insulation form(cid:173)
`ing implant layer disposed with a silicon substrate, com(cid:173)
`prising the steps of:
`implanting ions into a silicon substrate from a source
`of controllable ion energy;
`simultaneously eroding a surface layer of said silicon
`substrate through which said implanting ions pass;
`and
`increasing the ion energy in compensation for erosion
`occurring in said eroding step to increase the depth
`of ion penetration with respect to the surface ero-
`sion of said substrate.

`6. The process of claim 5 wherein the silicon is semi(cid:173)
`conductor grade.
`7. The process of claim 5 wherein the implant is se(cid:173)
`lected from the group consisting of oxygen and nitro(cid:173)
`gen.
`8. The process of claim 5 which further includes the
`steps of annealing said substrate to create a continuous
`insulating layer from the implant layer.
`* * * * *
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`007
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`: 5, 080,730
`PATENT NO.
`January 14, 1992
`DATED
`INVENTOR(S) : Andrew B. Wittkower
`It is certified that error appears in the above·identified patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby
`corrected as shown below:
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`On the Title page, item [ 56 ] , above the Abstract,
`Examiner-Ourmafd Ojan" should read ·· --Assistant
`Ourmazd Ojan--.
`
`"Assistant
`Examiner-
`
`Column 1, line 33, "dioxide Si02) 11 should read
`--dioxide (Si02) - - .
`Column 2, line 43, "application" should read
`--applications--.
`
`Column 3, line 55, "using constant" should read --using
`the prior art of Figs. 1A-1B where the beam energy remains
`constant--.
`
`Column 4, line 6, "diagramatic" should read
`--diagrammatic--.
`
`Column 4, line 12, "buried 9 silicon" should read
`--buried silicon--.
`
`Column 4, line 31, 1134/1017 ions/crn2" should read
`--34A/1017 ions/cm2
`- - .
`
`Column 4, line 37, "ions/crn2 applied. For" should read
`--ionsfcm2• For--.
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`: 5, 080, 7 30
`PATENT NO.
`January 14, 1992
`DATED
`INVENTOR(S) : Andrew B. Wi ttkower
`
`Page 2 of 2 .
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above-identifie(f'patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby
`corrected as shown below:
`
`Column 6, line 24, "s teps" shoul d read --s t ep--.
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`Twentieth Day of July, 1993
`
`Attest:
`
`Attesting Officer .
`
`Acting Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
`
`MICHAEL K. KI.RK

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket