`
`IV. (2)
`
`Federal Circuit Has Held Obvious To Combine
`Features From Two Microchips Into One Microchip
`
`MCM Portfolio LLC
`
`Federal circuit affirms Board’s conclusion “that one
`of ordinary skill in the art would have had both the
`knowledge and the inclination to place the functionality
`taught by Kobayashi and Kikuchi on a single chip.”
`
`MCM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company, 812 F.3d 1284, 1294 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 3
`
`59
`
`Ex. 1040-0059
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`60
`
`Ex. 1040-0060
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (3)
`
`Claims Require Activating and Deactivating a Function
`
`’726 Patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 6
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 33, 40-44, Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 29-32, Rep. at 18-19; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 32-39, 42-44, Rep. at 10-11;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 32-36, 40-42, Rep. at 14-15; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 32, 36-42, 52-54 Rep. at 14-16; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 35-39, Rep. at 19-20
`
`61
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 9
`
`Ex. 1040-0061
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (3)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Whether Beard ’290’s Display of Remaining Battery
`Capacity is a Visible Indication
`
`Whether Beard ’290’s Disclosure of Remaining Time
`Estimates for Remaining Battery Life is a Function
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 18-19; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 14-15; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 14-16; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 19-20
`
`62
`
`Ex. 1040-0062
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (3)
`
`PO Contends Remaining Battery Capacity And Time Estimates
`Are A Single Function
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 43
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 43; IPR2015-01172 Resp. at 14; IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 21; IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 47; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 50;
`IPR2015-01603 Resp. at 14
`
`63
`
`Ex. 1040-0063
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`IV. (3)
`Beard ’290 Repeatedly Describes Calculating And Displaying Battery Capacity As
`A Different Function From Calculating And Displaying A Remaining Time Estimate
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 11:45-48 (see also Abstract, 10:37-40, 12:59-65)
`
`See, e.g.,
`
`IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 12-13, 40-44, Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01172 Pet. at 12, 32, Rep. at 18-19; IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 13, 42-44, Rep. at 10-11;
`IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 12-13, 32-33, Rep. at 14-15; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 11-12, 33-34, 41-42, 53 Rep. at 14-16; IPR2015-01603 Pet. at 14, Rep. at 19-20
`
`64
`
`Ex. 1040-0064
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (3)
`
`PO’s Expert Concedes That Each Of These Are Different “Functions”
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`12
`
`Q. Determining remaining time in a battery
`is
`a
`different
`function
`than
`just
`determining battery capacity, right?
`
`A. Correct. The -- determining the time, you
`would need to know what the draw is, and if
`you know the capacity and the draw, you can
`estimate the time until it's discharged.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 126:16-22
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 14; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 18-19; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 10-11; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 14-15;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 15
`
`65
`
`Ex. 1040-0065
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`66
`
`Ex. 1040-0066
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`Claims Require “An Activation Signal”
`
`’726 Patent
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 6
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 19
`
`PO argues repeated references to “an activation signal”
`must refer to different signals
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 22-23; IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 22-23; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 28-29
`
`67
`
`Ex. 1040-0067
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`PO Argues Repeated References To “An Activation Signal”
`Must Refer To Different Signals
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 22
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 22-23; IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 22-23; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 28-29
`
`68
`
`Ex. 1040-0068
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`“An Activation Signal” Means One Or More Activation Signals
`
`• Indefinite article “an” means only
`each signal may be the same
`or different
`
`• Nothing in the claims or
`specification requires these
`activation signals to be different
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 6
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 19
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 18; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 18-19
`
`69
`
`Ex. 1040-0069
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`“An Activation Signal” (’970 Patent)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 14-15
`
`70
`
`Ex. 1040-0070
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (4)
`
`The Claims Of The ’970 Patent Simply Define
`The Signal In A More Specific Way In Each Claim
`
`’970 Patent
`
`• All three are “activation signals”
`
`• Dependent claims narrow to
`specific types of activation signals
`
`• Indefinite article means
`each signal could be the same
`or different
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent) Claim 1 (excerpt)
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent) Claim 12
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent) Claim 19
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 14-15
`
`71
`
`Ex. 1040-0071
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`72
`
`Ex. 1040-0072
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (5)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses That The Power Source
`Is Enclosed In The Product Housing
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 3
`
`PO’s Response
`
`Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 40
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 40; IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 43; IPR2015-01175 Resp. at 52
`
`73
`
`Ex. 1040-0073
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (5)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses That The Power Source
`Is Enclosed In The Product Housing
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 9:15-16
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 38-39, Rep. at 23-25; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 36-38, Rep. at 22-24; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 42-43, Rep. at 20-22
`
`74
`
`Ex. 1040-0074
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (5)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses That The Power Source
`Is Enclosed In The Product Housing
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 9:15-16
`
`product
`housing
`
`(annotated)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 38-39, Rep. at 23-25; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 36-38, Rep. at 22-24; IPR2015-01175 Pet. at 42-43, Rep. at 20-22
`
`75
`
`Ex. 1040-0075
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`76
`
`Ex. 1040-0076
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`PO Seeks To Create Another New Limitation,
`The Single User Interface, Where None Exists
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 (‘726 Patent) Claim 4
`
`PO’s Response
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Resp. at 47; IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 49
`
`77
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 47
`
`Ex. 1040-0077
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`The “User Interface” Is Not Limited To A Single Component—It Can Have
`Multiple Parts, One Of Which Must Be A Touch Sensor According To The Claims
`
`IV. (6)
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 (‘726 Patent) Claim 1
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 (‘726 Patent) Claim 4
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 50-51, Rep. at 19-21
`
`78
`
`Ex. 1040-0078
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses A Touch Sensor Used To Activate Visible Indications And
`Danielson Discloses An “On/Off Switch” Used To Activate Or Deactivate The Product
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at Fig. 11
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Pet. at 50-51, Rep. at 19-21; IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 39-42, Rep. at 17-19
`
`79
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1007 (Danielson) at 22:65-66
`
`Ex. 1040-0079
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`PO’s Expert Confirmed That A User Interface Is Simply “An Interface
`On A Device That Allows A User To Interact With The Device”
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`A. To me, a user interface is what it says in the plain
`use of the language. It's an interface on a device
`that allows a user to interact with the device. So
`it's something that a user interacts with on a
`product, user interface.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1036 (Morley Microsoft Tr.) at 151:24-152:3
`
`Q. So you wouldn't consider a desktop computer that had
`
`both a keyboard and a mouse to have a single user
`
`interface? You'd consider those multiple interfaces?
`
`A. Those might be combined into one, and the mouse
`might even be plugged into the keyboard in that
`case.
`
`Q. How about the on/off switch above a keyboard on a
`
`laptop? Would that be part of the user interface?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 136:16-137:4
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 20; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 17-18
`
`80
`
`Ex. 1040-0080
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`’980 Patent
`
`81
`
`Ex. 1040-0081
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (6)
`
`The “ON/OFF” Switch In Danielson Meets This Limitation
`
`’980 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex.1001 (‘980 Patent) Claim 4
`
`Danielson ’728 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1007 (Danielson) at 22:65-66
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 39-42, Rep. at 17-19
`
`82
`
`Ex. 1040-0082
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`IV. (6)
`Beard ’290’s Disclosure Of Activating And Deactivating Display Of Battery
`Capacity And Remaining Time Estimates Also Meets This Limitation
`
`’980 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex.1001 (‘980 Patent) Claim 4
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 39-42, Rep. at 17-19
`
`83
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 10:37-40
`
`Ex. 1040-0083
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`84
`
`Ex. 1040-0084
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`Claims Require A
`“Location Indicator”
`
`’970 Patent, Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 32-35, Rep. at 5-9
`
`85
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 (‘970 Patent), Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1040-0085
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses A
`“Location Indicator”
`
`’970 Patent, Claim 1 (excerpt)
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 (‘970 Patent), Claim 1 (excerpt)
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 32-35, Rep. at 5-9
`
`86
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard), 4:59-67
`
`Ex. 1040-0086
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`PO Would Interpret “Location Indicator”
`To Preclude Activation by User Interface
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 13
`
`87
`
`Ex. 1040-0087
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`PO Would Interpret “Location Indicator”
`To Preclude Activation by User Interface
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01173 Paper 19 (PO Resp.) at 13
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 2003 (Morley Decl.) at ¶69
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Resp. at 13, 16
`
`88
`
`Ex. 1040-0088
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`’970 Patent Claims Expressly Contradict PO’s
`Narrow Interpretation Of A Location Indicator
`
`’970 Patent, Claim 1
`
`Claims state
`that the “location
`indicator” can
`be activated by
`user interface
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 (‘970 Patent), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 6-7
`
`89
`
`Ex. 1040-0089
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`’970 Patent Specification Discloses
`Indicator Being Activated By Touch Sensor
`
`’970 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent), 9:49-58
`
`Specification describes
`“location indicator” can be
`activated by user interface
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Reply 7-8
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001, (’970 patent), Fig 11
`
`90
`
`Ex. 1040-0090
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`’970 Patent Specification Discloses
`Indicator Being Activated By Touch Sensor
`
`’970 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1001 (’970 patent), 9:49-58
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Pet. at 32-35, Rep. at 7-8
`
`91
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1005 (Beard), 4:63-67
`
`Ex. 1040-0091
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (7)
`
`PO’s Expert Admits Beard ’290’s LEDs Are A Location Indicator
`
`Morley, Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. Let me give you a hypothetical. Let’s suppose you and
`I were in this room and it was totally dark and we
`couldn’t see each other. And in your hand was a battery
`pack as described in the Beard prior art reference. And
`in the dark, you touched the contacts and illuminated the
`LEDs. Are you with me so far?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And let’s say they stayed on for a period of ten seconds.
`If I looked at you in the dark and my view was
`unobstructed, wouldn’t it tell me the location of the
`battery pack that was in your hand?
`
`A. It would.
`
`Q. And I didn’t need to touch it for that to happen, did I?
`
`A. No, you didn’t.
`
`Q. Or to know where the device was beforehand, right?
`
`A. Correct.
`
`IPR2015-01173 Ex. 1036 (Morley Tr.) at 160:15-161:12
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 9
`
`92
`
`Ex. 1040-0092
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`93
`
`Ex. 1040-0093
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (8)
`
`Prior Art Discloses Activation Of
`A Visual Indication Without Activating Load
`
`The issue is whether Beard ’290 describes controlling a
`“visible indicator . . . when the load is not activated by the user”
`
`’980 Patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1001 (‘980 Patent), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 32-36, Rep. at 19-22
`
`94
`
`Ex. 1040-0094
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. (8)
`
`Prior Art Discloses Activation Of A Visual Indication On Battery
`Pack Even When Battery Pack Not Connected To Load
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`1
`
`2
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 9:16-33
`
`Because the visible indication can be displayed when
`the battery pack is removed, the indication can also be
`displayed when inserted but the load is not activated
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1005 (Beard), Fig. 8
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 34-37, Rep. at 19-20
`
`95
`
`Ex. 1040-0095
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`Beard ’290 Expressly States That The Device Is Not Always On—
`It Is Only Operational “When The Operator So Desires”
`
`IV. (8)
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01174 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 38
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 38, Rep. at 20
`
`96
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 12:2-4
`
`Ex. 1040-0096
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`PO Argues That Visible Indication Only Activated When Load Is Active
`In Beard ’290 Because Every Component Of The Beard ’290 Device Is Always On
`
`IV. (8)
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01174 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 38
`
`’980 Patent
`
`Nothing in
`the claim
`requires terminal
`device in an
`operational state
`
`1
`
`2
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 38, Rep. at 20-21
`
`97
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1001 (‘980 Patent), Claim 1
`
`Ex. 1040-0097
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies
`
`IV. Purported Deficiencies Raised By Patent Owner
`
`(1) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Energy Consuming Load” (’726, ’749, ’952, ’980)
`
`(2) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`Microchip Control Of Both The “Energy Consuming Load” And The Indicator (’970)
`
`(3) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Deactivation Of A “Function” In Addition To The Visible Indicator (All Patents)
`
`(4) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Different Activation Signal For The Function (’726, ’952, ’970)
`
`(5) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`A Power Source Enclosed In The Product Housing (’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`(6) Beard And Rathmann In View Of Danielson Does Not Disclose
`A Touch Sensor And On/Off Switch In The Same User Interface (’726, '980)
`
`(7) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`The Claimed “Location Indicator” (’970)
`
`(8) Beard In View Of Rathmann Does Not Disclose
`Activation Of A Visible Indication Without Activating Load (’980)
`
`98
`
`Ex. 1040-0098
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Board Should Decline To Construe “User Interface”
`(’726, ’952, ’980)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 22; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 20
`
`99
`
`Ex. 1040-0099
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Board Should Decline To Construe “User Interface”
`
`Term
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“user interface”
`
`“an interface between a
`device and its operator
`to receive and manage
`an input command from
`the operator”
`
`PO never applies this construction in its analysis and never explains why this
`construction could be relevant to any issue in this proceeding
`
`Only terms which are in controversy need to be construed and only to the extent
`necessary to resolve the controversy
`
`Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng’g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 803 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 22; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 20
`
`100
`
`Ex. 1040-0100
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Board Should Decline To Construe
`“Touch Sens[or/ing] Functions” (’952)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 19
`
`101
`
`Ex. 1040-0101
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Board Should Decline To Construe
`“Touch Sens[or/ing] Functions”
`
`Term
`
`“touch sens[or/ing]
`functions”
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“functions of the device
`that are activated or
`controlled in response
`to touch sensor inputs”
`
`PO never applies this construction in its analysis and never explains why this
`construction could be relevant to any issue in this proceeding
`
`Only terms which are in controversy need to be construed and only to the extent
`necessary to resolve the controversy
`
`Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng’g, Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 803 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 19
`
`102
`
`Ex. 1040-0102
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Construction of “Function”
`
`103
`
`Ex. 1040-0103
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO’s Proposed Construction Should Be Rejected
`
`Term
`
`Petitioner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`plain meaning
`
`“A function
`that was activated in
`response to an activation
`signal, received from said
`user interface”
`
`(Claims 6 and 19)
`
`“a function, different from
`activation of a visible
`indication, that was
`activated in response to
`an activation signal,
`different from an
`activation signal for
`activating the visible
`indication, received from
`the same user interface
`as the activation signal
`for activating the visible
`indication”
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15-16; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 15-16; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 12-13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 15-16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 15-16
`
`104
`
`Ex. 1040-0104
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`The Specification Uses “Function” Very Broadly
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent) at 8:58-63
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1001 ('726 Patent) at 1:55-58
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 13-14; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 18; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 18
`
`105
`
`Ex. 1040-0105
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO Reads In Negative Limitations Without Justification
`
`Term
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Proposed Construction
`
`“A Function
`
`“a function,
`
`That Was Activated In Response
`To An Activation Signal,
`
`that was activated in response
`to an activation signal,
`
`different from activation of a visible
`indication,
`
`different from an activation signal for
`activating the visible indication,
`
`Received From Said User Interface”
`
`received from the same user interface
`
`(Claims 6 and 19)
`
`as the activation signal for activating the
`visible indication”
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15-16; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 15-16; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 12-13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 15-16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 15-16
`
`106
`
`Ex. 1040-0106
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Patent Owner Argues “Function” Must Have
`A Different Meaning From Activation Of The Visible Indication
`
`PO’s Response
`
`IPR2015-01171 Paper 19 (PO Resp.) at 22
`
`Petitioners Agree “Function” Is Broader Than
`“Activation Of A Visible Indication”
`
`Function
`
`activation of the
`visible indication
`
`Car
`
`sedan
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 16; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 16; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 12-13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 15-16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 17
`
`107
`
`Ex. 1040-0107
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO’s Own Expert Acknowledges
`Activation Of The Indicator Is A Function
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. So indicating a condition of the battery,
`whether it’s good or bad, is another example
`of a function according to the Global Touch
`patents, right?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 118:21-119:3
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 16; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 17-18; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 17
`
`108
`
`Ex. 1040-0108
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO’s Own Expert Acknowledges
`Activation Of The Indicator Is A Function
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`IPR2015-01172 Ex. 2002 (Morley Decl.) at ¶50
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 16-17; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 13; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 18; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 17-18
`
`109
`
`Ex. 1040-0109
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`When PO Intended To Claim Only
`“Other Functions,” It Did So Expressly
`
`’749 Patent
`
`U.S. Patent Application No. 09/169,395
`
`IPR2015-01172 Ex. 1001 ('749 Patent), Claim 21
`
`IPR2015-01172 Ex. 1038 (395 Application), Claim 1
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 17; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 18
`
`110
`
`Ex. 1040-0110
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Beard ’290’s Timing Circuit
`
`111
`
`Ex. 1040-0111
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Beard ’290 Discloses A Timing Circuit
`To Time How Long The Display Is Active
`
`Beard ’290 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1005 (Beard) at 10:51-56
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 20; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 11; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 16
`
`112
`
`Ex. 1040-0112
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Use Of This Timing Circuit Is A Function
`
`Patent Owner’s Expert
`
`Q. At line 50, the specification of the Beard patent
`describes that, quote, A timing circuit prevents
`the contact 155 from holding the display 157 and
`associated circuitry in an active state for more
`than a ten-second interval. After the ten-second
`display period, deactivation occurs whether or not
`the contact 155 is being touched, close quote. Did
`I read that correctly?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`in
`discussed
`we
`as
`function
`timing
`a
`Q. Using
`reference to the Global Touch patents is another
`example of a function according to those Global
`Touch patents, right?
`
`A. That was cited as a function there, yes.
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1035 (Morley Tr.) at 125:4-18
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 19; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 20; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 11; IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 15
`
`113
`
`Ex. 1040-0113
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Beard ’290’s Timing Circuit Meets the Other Claim Limitations
`
`’726 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex.1001 ('726 Patent) Claim 6
`
`Beard, Petitioners’ Expert
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01171 Rep. at 15; IPR2015-01172 Rep. at 20; IPR2015-01173 Rep. at 12; IPR2015-01174 Rep. at 16;
`IPR2015-01175 Rep. at 16; IPR2015-01603 Rep. at 20-21
`
`114
`
`IPR2015-01171 Ex. 1034 (Beard Suppl. Decl.) at ¶¶9-10
`
`Ex. 1040-0114
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Rathmann Discloses Activating A Visual Indication
`Without Activating Load
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 34-36, Rep. at 21-22
`
`115
`
`Ex. 1040-0115
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`PO Argues Rathmann Does Not Disclose Visible Indicator
`Activated “When The Load Is Not Activated By The User”
`
`PO’s Response
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`IPR2015-01174 Paper 14 (PO Resp.) at 37-41
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Resp. at 37, 41
`
`116
`
`Ex. 1040-0116
`
`
`
`Petitioners' Demonstratives
`
`Rathmann Displays The Visible Indication
`When The Load Is Not Activated By The User
`
`Rathmann ’869 Patent
`
`IPR2015-01174 Ex. 1006 (Rathmann) at 16:24-29
`
`Because the visible indication can be displayed when
`the battery module is removed, the indication can also
`be displayed when inserted but the load is not activated
`
`See, e.g., IPR2015-01174 Pet. at 34-36, Rep. at 21-22
`
`117
`
`Ex. 1040-0117