throbber
AJG - August, 1999 (cid:9)
`
`Brief Case Reports • (cid:9)
`
`2299
`
`sucrase-isomaltase deficiency. It is tempting to postulate
`that it represents a genetically determined condition, which
`was unmasked by an episode of gastroenteritis. The alter-
`native that it may represent a truly acquired condition pos-
`sibly, precipitated by an enteric infection, has also to be
`considered.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`We thank the Department of Gastroenterology, University
`College Hospital, Galway, for their assistance with this case.
`
`Reprint requests and correspondence: Professor F. Gleeson,
`James Connolly Memorial Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15,
`Ireland.
`Received June 27. 1997; accepted Jan. 11, 1999.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`I. Weijers HA, Van De Kamer JH, Mosel DAA, et al. Diarrhoea
`caused by deficiency of sugar splitting enzymes. Lancet 1960;
`2:296.
`2. Auricchio S, Rubino A, Prade A, et al. Intestinal glycosidase
`activities in congenital malabsorption of disaccharides. J Pe-
`diatr 1965;66:555.
`3. Sonntag WM, Brill ML, Troyer ME, et al. Sucrase-isomaltase
`malabsorption in an adult woman. Gastroenterology 1964;47:
`18.
`4. Neale G, Clark M, Levin B. Intestinal sucrase deficiency
`presenting as sucrose intolerance in adult life. Br Med J
`1965;2:1223.
`5. Santagelo WC, Dueno MI, Krejs GJ. Pseudopancreatic cholera
`syndrome: Effect of a synthetic Somatostatin analogue. SMS
`201-995. Am J Med 1987;82(suppl 58):84.
`6. Stevens F, Lloyd R, Geraghty S, et al. Schizophrenia and
`coeliac disease-The nature of the relationship. Psychol Med
`1977;7:259-63.
`7. Cooper BT, Scott J, Hopkins J, et al. Adult onset sucrase-
`isomaltase deficiency with secondary disaccharidase defi-
`ciency resulting from severe dietary carbohydrate restriction.
`Dig Dis Sci 1983;28:473.
`8. Ringrose RE, Preiser H, Welsh JD. Sucrase-isomaltase (Pala-
`tinase) deficiency diagnosed during adulthood. Dig Dis Sci
`1980;25:384.
`9. Gudmand-Hoyer E. Sucrase malabsorption in children: A re-
`port of thirty one Greenlanders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
`1985;4:873.
`10. Gray GM, Conklin KA, Townley RR. Sucrase-isomaltase de-
`ficiency. N Engl J Med 1976;294:750-3.
`11. Prader A, Aurrichio S. Defects of intestinal disaccharide ab-
`sorption. Annu Rev Med 1965;13:345.
`12. Smith MW, Phillips AD, Walker-Smith JA. Selective inhibi-
`tion of brush border hydrolase development in coeliac disease
`and cows milk protein intolerance. Paediatr Res 1986;20:693
`(abstract).
`13. Lifshitz F. Perspectives of carbohydrate intolerance in infants
`with diarrhoea. In: Lifshitz F, ed. Carbohydrate intolerance in
`infancy. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1982:3.
`14. Dahlqvist A. Assay of intestinal disaccharidases. Anal Bio-
`chem 1968;22:99-107.
`
`Bromfenac(Duract)-Associated
`Hepatic Failure Requiring
`Liver Transplantation
`
`Philip E. Johnston, Pharm.D.,
`Ellen B. Hunter, M. (cid:9)
`• • (cid:9)
`Gordon Tanner, M.D., C. •• (cid:9)
`Joseph A. Awad, M.D.
`Departments of Medicine, Surgery, and Pharmacology,
`Divisions of Gastroenterology, Clinical Pharmacology, and
`Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Vanderbilt
`University, Nashville, Tennessee
`
`., and
`
`ABSTRACT
`Bromfenac sodium (Duract) is a phenylacetic acid-derived
`nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent introduced in the
`United States in 1997 and withdrawn in 1998. We describe
`the first case of fulminant hepatic failure associated with this
`agent treated successfully with liver transplantation. Simi-
`larities to hepatotoxicity with related agents is discussed.
`(Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2299-2301. © 1999 by Am.
`Coll. of Gastroenterology)
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Bromfenac sodium (Duract) is a phenylacetic acid-derived,
`nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID). It was ap-
`proved by the United States Food and Drug Administration
`(FDA) July 15, 1997, and withdrawn by the manufacturer
`June 22, 1998, after drug-associated severe hepatic injury
`resulted in death or liver transplantation. We describe the
`first case of fulminant hepatic failure associated with brom-
`fenac sodium reported to the FDA that was treated success-
`fully with liver transplantation, and discuss the similarities
`of this case to liver dysfunction reported with other mem-
`bers of this class of NSAIDs.
`
`CASE REPORT
`
`A 36-yr-old man was transferred to Vanderbilt University
`Hospital with severe hepatic dysfunction. Past medical his-
`tory was significant only for osteoarthritis treated with
`bromfenac sodium 50 mg t.i.d. for 3 months. He was ad-
`mitted to a local hospital 8 days before transfer with jaun-
`dice and epigastric pain. Bromfenac was discontinued at that
`time. His serum bilirubin was 11.4 mg/dl, alkaline phospha-
`tase 130 U/L, AST 1805 U/L, ALT 1451 U/L, prothrombin
`time 5 s prolonged, and albumin 3.0 mg/dl. Computed
`tomography of the abdomen was notable for edema and
`thickening of the gallbladder wall. Endoscopic retrograde
`cholangiography was normal. Hepatitis B surface antigen,
`and IgM antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen and hepatitis
`A were not detected. Antibodies to hepatitis B surface
`antigen and hepatitis C (ELISA II) were also not detected.
`Continued nausea and vomiting, development of grade I-II
`
`

`
`2300 (cid:9)
`
`Brief Case Reports (cid:9)
`
`AJG - Vol. 94, No. 8, 1999
`
`encephalopathy, and scrum glucoses <55 nig/di prompted
`transfer of the patient.
`The patient denied a history of significant alcohol use,
`injection drug use, blood transfusion, mushroom ingestion,
`or toxin exposure. He had no personal or family history of
`liver disease. Vital signs were within normal limits with no
`recorded fever. He was jaundiced, but without tattoos, cu-
`taneous stigmata of chronic liver disease, or hypersensitivity
`reaction. Kaiser-Fleischer rings were absent and cardiopul-
`monary examination was within normal limits. The liver
`was palpable just below the costal margin, but the spleen
`was not. The patient was somnolent with asterixis. The
`serum bilirubin had increased to 29 mg/dl and prothrombin
`time was 12 s prolonged. The AST was 892 U/L, ALT 1480
`U/L, and alkaline phosphatase 144 U/L. Factor V activity
`was 26%. Hematocrit was 44% with a reticulocyte count of
`2.4%, and creatinine was 0.7 mg/dl.
`The FDA was contacted November 25, 1997, and a Med-
`Watch report was subsequently filed because of concern
`regarding hepatic failure related to bromfenac. At that point,
`no similar reports had been filed. The patient's condition
`continued to deteriorate and he underwent orthotopic liver
`transplantation December 17, 1997, 31 days after presentation.
`Pretransplant evaluation at our facility revealed no other
`cause of liver disease, although repeat serological testing for
`viral hepatitis was confusing. Hepatitis B surface antigen
`and hepatitis C ELISA II testing were both positive at low
`levels despite the absence of all other serological markers of
`hepatitis B, negative DNA testing for hepatitis B (<5 pg/
`ml), and negative RNA detection for hepatitis C (qualitative
`polymerase chain reaction). Antinuclear and antismooth
`muscle antibodies were absent. Histological examination of
`the explanted liver showed hepatic necrosis and parenchy-
`mal collapse with only scant fibrous tissue within the bridg-
`ing necrosis consistent with severe acute injury. There was
`marked subacute inflammation, cholangiolar proliferation,
`and extensive bile ductular stasis with plugging. An orcein
`stain was negative. One year posttransplant, the patient has
`normal allograft function. Hepatitis B surface antigen and core
`antibody remain negative. Testing for hepatitis C by ELISA II
`and polymerase chain reaction also remain negative.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Bromfenac sodium (Duract) is a phenylacetic acid NSAID
`related to diclofenac sodium (Voltaren) approved by the
`FDA July 15, 1997, and withdrawn voluntarily by the man-
`ufacturer June 22, 1998, after >2.5 million prescriptions for
`the drug were written (1). Bromfenac sodium was approved
`only for short term treatment of pain (cid:9)
`days). The
`package insert reported a 15% rate of AST or ALT elevation
`of up to three times the upper limit of normal (ULN) in short
`term clinical trials of bromfenac including 926 patients.
`Transaminase elevations of more than three times the ULN
`were noted in 2.7% of patients, and elevations more than
`eight times the ULN were seen in 0.4% of patients in short
`
`and longer term trials. The package insert advised monitor-
`ing hepatic biochemistries of patients treated for >4 wk (2).
`NSAIDs are among the most commonly used medications
`worldwide. Liver injury does not appear to be common, but
`severe hepatic injury and death have been reported sporad-
`ically with many agents representing a variety of chemical
`classes (3, 4). However, at least two other phenylacetic acid
`derivatives, diclofenac sodium and ibufenac, cause hepatic
`biochemical abnormalities in >10% of patients, and ibufe-
`nac was abandoned in the late 1960s (3). Diclofenac sodium
`received attention because of reports of severe hepatic in-
`jury shortly after its introduction in the United States (5, 6).
`The pattern of liver injury in our patient was similar to that
`described in most patients with diclofenac-induced hepato-
`toxicity. He presented with severe hepatitis that progressed
`to fulminant hepatic failure without signs of hypersensitiv-
`ity, had no history or histological evidence of chronic liver
`disease, and no other recognizable cause of hepatitis was
`identified. The common occurrence of hepatic biochemical
`abnormalities after treatment with phenylacetic NSAIDs
`suggests a definable mechanism of injury in some patients
`that may result in hepatic failure in a rare patient.
`This is the first case of fulminant hepatic failure in a
`patient treated with bromfenac sodium after its approval by
`the FDA. Reporting of this and other cases to the MedWatch
`program caused issuance of a letter by Wyeth-Ayerst Lab-
`oratories in February 1998, informing health care providers
`of revised product labeling including a new boxed warning
`of severe hepatitis and liver failure in patients taking brom-
`fenac sodium (7). On June 22, 1998 bromfenac sodium was
`withdrawn voluntarily from the market by the manufacturer
`because of four liver failure-related deaths and eight liver
`transplantations of patients using bromfenac sodium, most
`for longer than the recommended length of time (1).
`We believe that this case illustrates why health care
`providers should exercise caution when prescribing new
`medications, especially if the drug has recognized organ
`toxicity and there are efficacious alternatives. This case also
`emphasizes the need for gastroenterologists to be vigilant
`for cases of gastrointestinal and hepatic injury that may be
`related to new medications, and the importance of reporting
`these cases to the MedWatch program.
`
`Reprint requests and correspondence: Joseph A. Awad, M.D..
`Division of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University, MCN/C-
`2104, Nashville, TN 37232-2279.
`Received July 14, /998; accepted Jan. 26, 1999.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`I. Dear Health Professional Letter-Duract. Philadelphia, PA:
`Wyeth Laboratories Inc., June 22, 1998.
`2. Package insert, Duract (bromfenac sodium capsules). Philadel-
`phia, PA: Wyeth Laboratories Inc., May 16, 1997.
`3. Rabinowitz M, Van Thiel DH. Hepalotoxicity of nonsteroidal
`anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:1696-
`1704.
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`AJG - August, 1999 (cid:9)
`
`Brief Case Reports (cid:9)
`
`2301
`
`4. Boerlstcrli UA, Zimmerman HJ, Kretz-Rommel A. Idiosyn-
`cratic liver toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinllammatory drugs:
`Molecular mechanisms and pathology. Crit Rev Toxicol 1995;
`25:207-35.
`5. Helfgott SM, Sandberg-Cook J, Zakim D, et al. Diclofenac-
`associated hepatotoxicity. JAMA 1990;264:2660-2.
`6. Scully LJ, Clarke D, Barr RJ. Diclofcnac induced hepatitis: 3
`Cases with features of autoimmunc chronic active hepatitis. Dig
`Dis Sci [993;38:744-51.
`7. Dear Health Professional Letter-Duract. Philadelphia, PA:
`Wyeth Laboratories Inc., February 1998.
`
`Pancreatitis Associated With Crohn's
`Disease: A Premalignant State for
`Cystadenocarcinoma of Pancreas?
`Amnon Gotian, M.D., and
`Seymour Katz, M.D., F.A.C.G., F.A.C.P.
`Department of Medicine, North Shore University Hospital,
`Manhasset, New York; and New York University School of
`Medicine, New York, New York
`
`ABSTRACT
`We report a 74-yr-old woman with Crohn's disease and
`acute pancreatitis who, 3 yr after resolution of the latter,
`developed cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas. No drug,
`toxin, or other etiologies including contiguous duodenal
`involvement were identified as responsible for the pancre-
`atitis, suggesting that pancreatitis was an extraintestinal
`manifestation of her Crohn's disease. Could Crohn's-asso-
`ciated pancreatitis be a premalignant state for cystadenocar-
`cinoma of the pancreas? (Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:
`1999 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology)
`2301-2302. (cid:9)
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The association between pancreatitis and Crohn's disease
`has been increasingly recognized (1-3). In several studies,
`pancreatitis as an extraluminal manifestation of Crohn's
`disease itself was the only explanation. We report the first
`case of Crohn's-related pancreatitis without contiguous du-
`odenal involvement and with subsequent development of
`cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
`
`CASE REPORT
`
`A 74-yr-old white woman of Hungarian descent was admit-
`ted in 1987 to the hospital with intermittent melena and
`black stool. Her past medical history included mitral valve
`prolapse, uterine prolapse, chronic urinary tract infections,
`bilateral carotid disease, and bilateral subtotal thyroidec-
`tomy for benign nodules, and 15 years of "irritable bowel
`syndrome." Esophagogastroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and sub-
`sequent colonoscopy were all negative. Enteroclysis showed
`extensive ileitis, ulcerations, and pseudopolyposis consis-
`tent with Crohn's disease.
`
`In March 1988 she was readmitted for anemia, weakness,
`and fatigue. Biopsies of colonic mucosa were negative for
`inflammation. Subsequent CT of the abdomen and pelvis
`demonstrated a thickened wall and narrowed lumen of the
`terminal ileum consistent with inflammatory bowel disease.
`A small focal abnormality was found in the liver consistent
`with a small hcmangioma. The pancreas was normal.
`In June 1988, the patient underwent a resection of 31 cm
`of the terminal ileum with a 5-cm-long segment of attached
`cecum because of persistent debility. The pathology report
`described extensive ulcerations and pseudopolyp formation
`with a small fistula into the mesentery. A follow-up small
`bowel series in October 1989 showed no evidence of recur-
`rence. A colonoscopy performed in July 1991 revealed
`normal colonic mucosa. The patient remained asymptomatic
`and off all medications.
`In March of 1994, while not taking any medications, the
`patient developed abdominal pain and underwent ultra-
`sonography of the abdomen. A focal lesion on right lobe of
`liver was found to be consistent with small hemangioma and
`dilatation of the pancreatic duct with no discrete mass in the
`pancreas. The pancreatic body was slightly heterogeneous,
`consistent with pancreatitis. Her amylase level was 1188
`(24-97 normal), her white blood cells 13,600 with 90%
`polymorphonuclears, hemoglobin 12.7, hematocrit 38.0,
`and platelets 231. Serum amylase fell to 346 (normal 34 —
`122), lipase 130 (normal < 60), total bilirubin 0.8, albumin
`3.3, alkaline phosphatase 58, AST 18, ALT 18, CPK 45,
`LDH 154, and calcium 8.8.
`A computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis
`was consistent with the clinical history of pancreatitis. No
`biliary tract stones or disease were identified. A suggestion
`of possible duodenal wall thickening was believed to be
`secondary to the surrounding peripancreatic inflammation.
`The pancreatitis resolved shortly afterward, and the patient
`was discharged 6 days later with an amylase level of 44. The
`patient continued to remain asymptomatic with normal amy-
`lase levels until June 1997, when she noted weight loss and
`
`kV :20
`mil 260
`
`Large
`5.0 ora/1.0:3 (cid:9)
`
`L (cid:9)
`
`
`
`Figure 1. CT scan of abdomen demonstrating 6 X 3-cm mass on
`the head of the pancreas.
`
`Page 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket