`
`IPR2015-01046
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund Ltd. & Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
`IPR2015-01047
`Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Ltd., Apple Inc., and Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.
`Exhibit 1046, page 1
`1
`
`
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`135 Patent
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`2
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`3
`
`Kiuchi at 64
`135 Pet. at 18-19, 26
`151 Pet. at 17-18
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Pet. (Paper 5) at 20; Ex. 1003 at ¶21
`151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 19; Ex. 1003 at ¶19
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`4
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Pet. (Paper 5) at 21; Ex. 1003 at ¶25
`151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 20; Ex. 1003 at ¶24
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`5
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Preamble
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`6
`
`
`
`135 Claim 1: Preamble
`
`135 Patent Claim 1
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petition
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Pet. at 26-27; see Reply at 3-4
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`7
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Client Computer
`
`135 Patent Claim 1
`{{
`
`Client Computer
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Petitioners’ Construction
`Construction
`A computer from which a data
`User’s Computer
`{{
`request to a server is
`generated
`
`135 Petition at 15-16; Resp. at 15
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`8
`
`
`
`The Patent Describes a “Conventional Client”
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Patent at Fig. 26, 38:13-17;
`Reply at 9
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`9
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin: A “Client” Makes Requests
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`Dr. Guerin
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`10
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶19; Pet. at 19, 26-27; Reply at 10
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin: A “Client” Makes Requests
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`RFC 1945
`Dr. Guerin
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`Ex. 1014 at 5-6; Pet. at 26-27 (citing Ex. 1003 ¶19); Reply at 10
`
`RFC 1945
`Ex. 1014
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`11
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶19; Pet. at 19, 26-27; Reply at 10
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose: Petitioners’ Construction of Client Computer
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1036 at 101:1-10
`135 Reply at 9
`
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`12
`
`
`
`Apple’s Position In District Court: Client Computer
`Ex. 2048 – Transcript of Trial, Morning Session (E.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2012)
`
`Trial Transcript
`Ex. 2048
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 2048 at 51:18-52:8
`135 Reply at 11
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`13
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00404: “Client” Computer”
` Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, Final Written Decision (Paper 42)
`
`IPR2014-00404
`Paper 42
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`14
`
`Final Written Decision (Paper 42) at 16
`135 Reply at 3
`151 Reply at 3
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00404: “Client” Computer”
` Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, Final Written Decision (Paper 42)
`
`IPR2014-00404
`Paper 42
`
`{{
`
`Final Written Decision (Paper 42) at 9
`135 Reply at 3
`151 Reply at 3
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`15
`
`
`
`The Federal Circuit Upheld Denial of JMOL
` It Did Not Find Kiuchi’s User Agent Is the Client
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco
`(Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`{{
`
`767 F.3d 1308 at 1323-1324 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
`135 Reply at 1-2
`151 Reply at 1-2
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`16
`
`
`
`Different Legal Standards and a Different Record
`In re Baxter Intern., Inc., 678 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
`
`In re Baxter
`(Fed. Cir. 2012)
`
`More fundamentally, the PTO in reexamination proceedings and the
`court system in patent infringement actions "take different approaches
`in determining validity and on the same evidence could quite correctly
`come to different conclusions." Swanson, 540 F.3d at 1377 (quoting
`Ethicon, 849 F.2d at 1428). In particular, a challenger that attacks the
`validity of patent claims in civil litigation has a statutory burden to
`prove invalidity by clear and convincing evidence. Id. (citing 35 U.S.C.
`§ 282); see also Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd., ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct.
`2238, 2242, 180 L.Ed.2d 131 (2011). Should the challenger fail to
`{{
`meet that burden, the court will not find the patent "valid," only that
`"the patent challenger did not carry the ‘burden of establishing
`invalidity in the particular case before the court.'" Swanson, 540 F.3d
`at 1377 (quoting Ethicon, 849 F.2d at 1429 n. 3 (internal citations
`omitted)). In contrast, in PTO reexaminations "the standard of proof —
`a preponderance of the evidence — is substantially lower than in a
`civil case" and there is no presumption of validity in reexamination
`proceedings. Id. at 1378.
`
`678 F.3d at 1364
`135 Reply at 2
`151 Reply at 2
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`17
`
`
`
`135 Patent: VPN
`
`135 Patent Claim 1
`{{
`
`{{ VPN
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners’ Construction
`A secure network that
`includes portions of a public
`network
`
`Patent Owner’s Construction
`
`{{
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Construction
`A network of computers
`which privately and directly
`{{
`communicate with each other
`by encrypting traffic over
`insecure communication
`paths between the computers
`
`135 Petition at 7; Resp. at 4
`
`135 PO Resp. at 5
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`18
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00404: VPN Communication Link
` Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, Final Written Decision (Paper 42)
`
`IPR2014-00404
`Paper 42
`
`{{
`
`Final Written Decision (Paper 42) at 4; 135 Reply at 3; 151 Reply at 3
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`19
`
`
`
`Kiuchi: Encryption
`
`Petition
`Paper 5
`
`Petition
`{{
`
`135 Pet. at 29
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`20
`
`Kiuchi at 64; 135 Pet. at 26
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi: Network
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 64; 135 Pet. at 19
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`21
`
`Kiuchi at 69; 135 Pet. at 19
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi: Network
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 65; 135 Pet. at 22
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`22
`
`Kiuchi at 67; 135 Reply at 13
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose: Network
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1036 at 85:22-86:7
`135 Reply at 12
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`23
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00404: “Network”
` Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, Final Written Decision (Paper 42)
`
`IPR2014-00404
`Paper 42
`
`{{
`
`Page 14
`Final Written Decision (Paper 42) at 14
`135 Reply at 3
`135 Reply at 3, 13
`151 Reply at XX
`151 Reply at 3
`
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`24
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`Kiuchi vs 135 Patent: Direct
`
`Kiuchi at 66; Reply at 14-15
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Patent at 13:33-39; Reply at 14-15
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`25
`
`
`
`Claim Construction: Direct
`Ex. 1001 – 135 Patent
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1001 at 41:56-65, Fig. 29;
`135 PO Resp. at 8;
`135 Reply at 14
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`26
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose Did Not Know What “Direct” Requires
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`27
`
`Ex. 1036 at 263:3-15
`135 Reply at 13
`
`
`
`VirnetX’s Litigation Position: “Direct” Means “Direct Addressability”
`Ex. 1044 –Transcript of Trial, Afternoon Session (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2012)
`
`Trial Transcript
`Ex. 1044
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1044 at 50:25-51:5
`135 Reply at 16
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`28
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose: Kiuchi’s URL Contains the Actual Address of the Resource on Origin Server
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036
`
`{{
`
`***
`
`Ex. 1036 at 240:21-241:14
`135 Reply at 16
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`29
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi: Direct
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 66; Ex. 1003, ¶33; Reply at 14-15
`
`Kiuchi at 66; Ex. 1003, ¶32; Reply at 14-15, 16
`
`Kiuchi at 66; Ex. 1003, ¶33; Reply at 14-15
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`30
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00404: “Direct” Communications
` Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, Final Written Decision (Paper 42)
`
`IPR2014-00404
`Paper 42
`
`{{
`
`Page 15
`Final Written Decision (Paper 42) at 15
`135 Reply at 3
`135 Reply at 3, 13
`151 Reply at XX
`151 Reply at 3
`
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`31
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Step 1
` “generating from the client computer a [DNS] request”
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`32
`
`
`
`135 Patent: DNS Request
`Claim Construction
`DNS Request
`{{
`
`135 Patent Claim 1
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners’ Construction
`A request for a resource
`corresponding to a network
`address
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Construction
`A request for a resource
`{{
`corresponding to a domain
`name
`
`135 Petition at 14; Resp. at 13
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`33
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “generating from the client computer a [DNS] request”
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Reply at 7
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`34
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “generating from the client computer a [DNS] request”
`{{ Petition
`
`Petition
`Paper 5
`
`{{
`
`135 Pet. (Paper 5) at 27; see id. at 20-21
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`35
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “generating from the client computer a [DNS] request”
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Pet. (Paper 5) at 20; Ex. 1003 at ¶20
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`36
`
`
`
`VirnetX: C-HTTP Does Not Follow the DNS Protocol
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Response
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 PO Resp. at 20
`
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`37
`
`135 PO Resp. at 21
`
`
`
`
`VirnetX: DNS Not Limited to the IETF DNS Protocol
`Ex. 1038 (VirnetX’s District Court Claim Construction Brief) & Ex. 1036 (Dr. Monrose)
`
`VirnetX Brief
`Ex. 1038
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1038 at 12
`135 Reply at 5
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`38
`
`Ex. 1036 at 104:18-22
`135 Reply at 5
`
`
`
`VirnetX: C-HTTP Name Server Does Not Return the Address
`“Corresponding” to the Domain Name
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Response
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`135 Patent
`
`{{
`
`135 PO Resp. at 23
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`39
`
`135 Patent at 38:36-42; Reply at 6
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00404: Kiuchi’s Server-Side Proxy Is the “Host”
` Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, Final Written Decision (Paper 42)
`
`IPR2014-00404
`Paper 42
`
`{{
`
`Final Written Decision (Paper 42) at 11-12; 135 Reply at 7; 151 Reply at 6
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`40
`
`
`
`Kiuchi: the Host Is the Server-Side Proxy
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 65; 135 Pet. at 27-28; 135 Reply at 4-5
`151 Pet. at 20, 21
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`41
`
`
`
`Kiuchi: the Host Is the Server-Side Proxy
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 68; 135 Ex. 1003, ¶31; 135 Reply at 4, 7;
`151 Reply at 6; 151 Ex. 1003, ¶30
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`42
`
`
`
`Kiuchi: the Host Is the Server-Side Proxy
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 71; Ex. 1003, ¶32; 135 Reply at 7
`151 Reply at 6-7
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`43
`
`
`
`Dr. Monrose Considered Materials Not of Record
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1036 at 172:13-20
`135 Reply at 8
`151 Reply at 7
`
`Ex. 1036 at 205:18-22
`135 Reply at 8
`151 Reply at 7
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`44
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Step 2
` “determining whether… access to a secure web site [was requested]”
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`45
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “determining whether… access to a secure web site [was requested]”
`{{ Petition
`
`Petition
`Paper 5
`
`
`{{
`
`135 Pet. (Paper 5) at 28
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`46
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “determining whether… access to a secure web site [was requested]”
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 65; 135 Pet. at 27-28
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`47
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “determining whether… access to a secure web site [was requested]”
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 Pet. (Paper 5) at 21
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`48
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Step 3
` “in response… automatically initiating the VPN”
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`49
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “in response… automatically initiating the VPN”
`Petition
`{{
`
`Petition
`Paper 5
`
`
`{{
`
`135 Pet. at 29
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`50
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “in response… automatically initiating the VPN”
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 66; 135 Pet. at 29
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 65; 135 Pet. at 28-29
`
`135 Pet. (Paper 5) at 20
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`51
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “transparently creating” or “automatically initiating” the VPN
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Ex. 1003, ¶31; 135 Pet. at 26-27
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`52
`
`Kiuchi at 68; Ex. 1003 ¶31
`
`
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco, 767 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco
`(Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`{{
`
`VirnetX, 767 F.3d at 1321
`135 Reply at 12
`151 Reply at 14
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`53
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Claim 7
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`54
`
`
`
`Gatekeeper and DNS Server Can Be on Same Device
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Response
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`135 PO Resp. at 36
`
`135 Patent at Fig. 26, 38:53-65;
`135 Reply at 17, 19
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`55
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Claim 10
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`56
`
`
`
`DNS Proxy Server and Client Can Be on Same Device
`Ex. 1038 – Plaintiff VirnetX’s Opening Brief ISO Construction of Claims
`
`VirnetX Brief
`Ex. 1038
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1038 at 29
`135 Reply at 17
`
`Ex. 1038 at 29
`135 Reply at 17
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`57
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Claims 1 & 2
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`58
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`59
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`60
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Reply
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`61
`
`151 Reply at 4
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petition
`
`{{
`
`151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 25
`See also BlackSwamp 151 Pet. at 13-14
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`62
`
`
`
`The Patent Describes Several DNS Proxy Configurations
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Patent at Fig. 26, 38:22-24, 30-34;
`Reply at 8-9
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`63
`
`
`
`Patent Owner: C-HTTP Does Not Follow “DNS” Protocol
`
`Response
`Paper 48
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 PO Resp. at 15
`
`151 PO Resp. at 15
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`64
`
`
`
`VirnetX: DNS Not Limited to IETF Protocols
`Ex. 1038 (VirnetX’s District Court Claim Construction Brief) & Ex. 1036 (Dr. Monrose)
`
`VirnetX Brief
`Ex. 1038
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1038 at 12
`151 Reply at 5
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`65
`
`Ex. 1036 at 104:18-22
`151 Reply at 5
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Client
`Patent Owner’s
`Petitioners’ Construction
`Construction
`{{
`A device, computer, system,
`User’s computer
`or program from which a data
`request to a server is
`generated
`
`Petition at 15; Resp. at 15
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`66
`
`
`
`The Patent Describes a “Conventional Client”
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Patent at Fig. 26, 37:50-54;
`Reply at 10-11
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`67
`
`
`
`For ’135 Patent, DNS Proxy Server and Client Can Be on Same Device
`Ex. 1038 – Plaintiff VirnetX’s Opening Brief ISO Construction of Claims
`
`VirnetX Brief
`Ex. 1038
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1038 at 29
`151 Reply at 9-10
`
`Ex. 1038 at 29
`151 Reply at 9-10
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`68
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin: A “Client” Makes Requests
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`Dr. Guerin
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`69
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶18; Pet. at 18, 25; Reply at 10-11
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin: A “Client” Makes Requests
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`RFC 1945
`Dr. Guerin
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1014 at 5-6
`
`RFC 1945
`Ex. 1014
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`70
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶18; Pet. at 18, 25; Reply at 10-11
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`DNS Request
`
`Patent Owner’s and Black
`Mangrove’s and Apple’s
`Swamp’s Construction
`Construction
`{{
`A request for a resource
`A request for a resource
`corresponding to a domain
`corresponding to a network
`address
`name
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`71
`
`151 Petition at 9; Resp. at 13
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “a DNS request sent by a client”
`{{ Petition
`
`Petition Paper 5
`
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 26
`
`Black Swamp
`IPR2016-00167, Paper 1
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`72
`
`BlackSwamp 151 Pet. (Paper 1) at 14
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “a DNS request sent by a client”
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 19; Ex. 1003 at ¶19
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`73
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi
` “a DNS request sent by a client”
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Reply at 7
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`74
`
`
`
`VirnetX: C-HTTP Name Server Does Not Return the Address
`“Corresponding” to the Domain Name
`
`Response
`Paper 48
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`151 PO Resp. at 15
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`75
`
`151 Patent at 38:6-11; 151 Reply at 6
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00404: Kiuchi’s Server-Side Proxy Is the “Host”
` Apple Inc. v. VirnetX, Final Written Decision (Paper 42)
`
`IPR2014-00404
`Paper 42
`
`{{
`
`Final Written Decision (Paper 42) at 11-12; 135 Reply at 7; 151 Reply at 6
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`76
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`77
`
`
`
`Petition
`Paper 5
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “determining”
`{{ Petition
`
`{{
`
`151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 28-29
`See also BlackSwamp 151 Pet. at 15-16
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`78
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi
` “determining”
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 65; 151 Pet. at 28-29
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`79
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`80
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi
` “forwarding the DNS request”
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 20
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`81
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`82
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
` “automatically creating a secure channel”
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 65; 151 Pet. at 30, 34
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`83
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Does not address “secure channel” with respect to user agent and origin server
`
`Response
`Paper 48
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`151 Resp. at 18-19
`
`151 Resp. at 25; see 151 Reply at 14
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`84
`
`
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco, 767 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco
`(Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`{{
`
`VirnetX, 767 F.3d at 1321
`135 Reply at 12
`151 Reply at 14
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`85
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`VirnetX CC Br.
`Ex. 1009
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 64; Pet. at 28
`
`Ex. 1009 at 10; 151 Reply at 13
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`86
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1036 – Deposition Transcript of Dr. Fabian Monrose (April 28, 2016)
`
`Monrose Dep.
`Ex. 1036
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`87
`
`Ex. 1036 at 268:3-17
`151 Reply at 14
`
`
`
`151 Patent
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`88
`
`
`
`Kiuchi Works with Other Security Protocols
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 69; 151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 39
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`89
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin: Rescorla Teaches End-to-End Encryption
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`Dr. Guerin
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Ex. 1003 at ¶34; Pet. (Paper 5) at 38-40
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`90
`
`
`
`VirnetX Does Not Contest Rescorla Teaches End-to-End Encryption
`151 Patent Owner Response (Paper 48)
`
`Response
`Paper 48
`
`{{
`
`151 PO Resp. at 28
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`91
`
`
`
`The Federal Circuit Upheld Denial of JMOL
` It Did Not Make Factual Findings on Kiuchi’s Disclosure
`
`VirnetX v. Cisco
`(Fed. Cir. 2014)
`
`{{
`
`767 F.3d at 1323-1324
`135, 151 Reply at 1-2
`
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`92
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 66; 151 Pet. (Paper 5) at 37
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`93
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 66; 135 Ex. 1003, p33; 135 Reply at 16
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`94
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 67; 135 Reply at 16
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`95
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 73
`135 Reply at 4, 7, 10
`151 Reply at 4, 7
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`96
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 73; 135 Reply at 4, 7, 10; 151 Reply at 4, 7
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`97
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 73; 135 Reply at 4, 7, 10; 151 Reply at 4, 7
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`98
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`Kiuchi
`
`{{
`
`Petition at 26; Kiuchi at 64
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`99
`
`
`
`Kiuchi
`
`Kiuchi
`Ex. 1002
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Kiuchi at 69-70
`135 Reply at 21
`151 Reply at 19-20
`
`Petition at 26; Kiuchi at 64
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`100
`
`
`
`Dr. Guerin
`Ex. 1003
`
`Ginoza
`Ex. 1031
`
`RFCs
`
`135 Ex. 1003, ¶44; see 151 Ex. 1003, ¶48
`
`Ex. 1029 at ¶11
`
`Ex. 1031 at 10:5-11
`101
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Claims 3 and 8
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`
`
`102 102
`
`
`
`135 Patent: Claims 4 and 12
`
`135 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`103
`
`
`
`151 Patent: Claim 7
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`104
`
`
`
`151 Patent: Claims 2, 8, 14
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`105
`
`
`
`151 Patent: Clams 6 and 12
`
`151 Patent
`Ex. 1001
`
`{{
`
`{{
`
`Petitioners Mangrove Partners Master Fund, Apple & Black Swamp IP - Ex. 1046
`
`106