throbber
1/18/2016
`
`OneStat Website Statistics and website metrics ­ Press Room
`
`Home
`
`About Us
`
`Services
`
`Partners
`
`White Label
`
`Privacy
`
`Contact Us
`
`Customer Support
`
`Login
`
`With our web analytics we help more than 75,000 customers.
`Our web analytics improve the visitor experience of today's largest online businesses.
`
`About Us
`
`About Us
`Press Room
`Careers
`Investor Relations
`Contact Us
`
`News and press releases
`Higher screen resolutions more popular for exploring the internet according to OneStat.com
`Amsterdam ­ July 24 2002 ­ OneStat.com ( http://www.onestat.com ), the number one provider of real­time website analysis
`software, today reported that more users are moving toward higher screen resolutions for exploring the internet. The finding has
`important implications for website designers because most websites are designed for a screen resolution of 800 x 600 pixels.
`Users with 1024 x 768 screen resolution have a global usage share of 43 percent. Users with monitors set to the most common
`resolution 800 x 600 have an approximate 37 percent global usage share.
`"Our software is the ultimate solution for each webmaster to measure screen resolutions or color palettes of  your website
`visitors," said Niels Brinkman, co­founder of OneStat.com. The most popular screen resolutions on the web are: 
`
`1. 1024 x 768
`2. 800 x 600
`3. 1280 x 1024
`4. 1152 x 864
`5. 640 x 480
`6. 1600 x 1200
`7. 1152 x 870
`
`43%
`37%
`12.9%
`3.8%
`1.3%
`1%
`0.2%
`
`OneStat.com is the number one provider of real­time website analytics in the world. Our superior technology powers more than
`50,000 websites in 100 countries. With our accurate, detailed & reliable reports we will be able to answer questions about visitor
`behaviour, site performance and retention.
`The OneStat.com solutions provide executives, marketers and webmasters with answers to critical e­business questions such as:
`
`Who is visiting my web site?
`How many pageviews, visits (sessions) and visitors are coming on a daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly or yearly basis?
`What content, products, and services do my visitors prefer?
`How many visitors return to the website and how often?
`What kind of search engine do they use?
`What kind of technology do your visitors use to view the web site?
`How much time do they spent on the website?
`
`OneStat.com has the intention to become the number one and largest pan­European provider of real­time website analysis
`software. The web analytics ASP market totalled $49 million in 2000 and could be worth over $700 million in 2004, according to
`research agencies.
`Methodology: A global usage share of xx percent for screen resolution Y means that xx percent of the visitors of Internet users
`arrived at sites that are using one of OneStat.com's services by using screen resolution Y. All numbers mentioned in the
`research are averages of last month and all measurements are normalised to the GMT timezone. Research is based on a sample
`of 2 million visitors divided into 20,000 visitors of 100 countries each day.
`Note for editors: for more information, please contact OneStat.com, Keizershof 31, 2402 DA Alphen aan den Rijn, the
`Netherlands. Phone: +31 (0)172 244 043 E­mail: click here Website : www.onestat.com
`
`Copyright ©2002­2008 OneStat.com | Site Map | Terms & Conditions
`
`http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox8.html
`
`1/1
`
`1
`
`VALMONT 2008
`Lindsay v. Valmont
`IPR2015-01039

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket