`
`Ryan E. Hatch (SBN 235577)
`rhatch@linerlaw.com
`Jason L. Haas (SBN 217290)
`jhaas@linerlaw.com
`LINER LLP
`1100 Glendon Avenue, 14th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90024.3518
`Telephone: (310) 500-3500
`Facsimile:
`(310) 500-3501
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`SIGNAL IP, INC., a California
`corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.,
`INC., a California corporation;
`HONDA OF AMERICA MRG, INC.,
`an Ohio corporation,
`Defendants.
`
`AND RELATED CASES
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`(Related to 2:14-cv-02962-JAK
`(JEMx); CV14-00497-JAK (JEMx);
`8:14-cv-00491-JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-
`02963 JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-02457-
`JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-03111-JAK
`(JEMx); LA CV14-03109 JAK (JEMx);
`2:14-cv-03107-JAK (JEMx);)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR
`ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL
`JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`The Hon. John A. Kronstadt
`Trial Date:
`TBD
`
`Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc., (“Plaintiff” or “Signal”) and defendants American Honda
`Motor Co., Inc. and Honda of America Mfg., Inc. (collectively “Honda”), Nissan North
`America, Inc. (“Nissan”), Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (“Mitsubishi”),
`Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (“Mazda”), Subaru of America, Inc. (“Subaru”), Kia
`Motors America, Inc. (“KMA”), BMW of North America, LLC (“BMWNA”),
`Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“Mercedes”), and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and
`Bentley Motors, Inc. (together, “Volkswagen/Bentley”) (collectively, “Defendants”)
`American Honda et al. v. Signal IP IPR2015-01003
`Signal IP Ex. 2002
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`41406.001-2343734
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:4527
`
`hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:
`1.
`In 2014, Plaintiff filed suit against Mercedes, Subaru, KMA, Nissan,
`Volkswagen/Bentley, BMWNA, and Honda alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No.
`6,775,601 (“the ’601 patent”).
`2.
`In 2014, Plaintiff filed suit against Mercedes, Mazda, Subaru, KMA,
`Nissan, Mitsubishi, Volkswagen/Bentley, BMWNA, and Honda alleging infringement
`of U.S. Patent No. 6,012,007 (“the ’007 patent”)
`3.
`In 2014, Plaintiff filed suit against Mazda, KMA, Nissan, Mitsubishi,
`Volkswagen/Bentley, BMWNA, and Honda alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No.
`5,732,375 (“the ’375 patent”).
`4.
`Plaintiff asserted that certain Defendants infringed claims 8, 9, 10, 11, 13,
`15, and 17 of the ‘601 patent; claims 1 and 7 of the ’375 patent; and claims 1, 8, 9, 17,
`18, 19, 20, 21, and 22 of the ’007 patent (collectively, the “Asserted Claims”).
`5.
`Defendants denied Plaintiff’s claims of infringement and asserted various
`affirmative defenses or counterclaims, including that the Asserted Claims were invalid
`under 35 U.S.C. § 112.
`6.
`On April 17, 2015, the Court issued its claim construction order (Docket
`No. 77) holding, inter alia, that (i) certain terms in claims 8, 15, and 17 of the ’601
`patent are indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 2; (ii) certain terms in claims 1,
`17, and 20 of the ’007 patent are indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 2; and (iii)
`a term in claim 1 of the ’375 patent is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 2.
`7.
`In light of the Court’s claim construction order, Plaintiff and Defendants
`stipulate to entry of a partial final judgment that the following claims are invalid due to
`indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 2: (i) claims 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, and 17
`of the ‘601 patent; (ii) claims 1 and 7 of the ’375 patent; and (iii) claims 1, 8, 9, 17, 18,
`19, and 20 of the ’007 patent.
`8.
`Plaintiff and Defendants reserve all appellate rights, including, but not
`limited to, the right to appeal the Court’s April 17, 2015 claim construction order to the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`1
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:4528
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Plaintiff reserves all rights as to
`claims not addressed by the Court’s claim construction order, or any new claims that
`may be issued by the United States Patent Office.
`9.
`A partial final judgment reflecting the parties’ stipulation is submitted
`herewith.
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`LINER LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Ryan E. Hatch
`Ryan E. Hatch
`Jason L. Haas
`Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGNAL IP, INC.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Ralph A. Phillips
`Ralph A. Phillips (Pro Hac Vice)
`Ahmed J. Davis (Pro Hac Vice)
`Attorneys for Defendants
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC:
`and HONDA OF AMERICA MFG., INC.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`2
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:4529
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Patrick A. Lujin
`Patrick A. Lujin
`B. Trent Webb
`Richard D. Eiszner
`Gabriel S. Spooner
`Douglas W. Robinson
`Jamie H. Kitano
`Attorneys for Defendant NISSAN NORTH
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`CHRISTA & JACKSON
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Laura K. Christa
`Laura K. Christa
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`DLA PIPER, LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Matthew D. Satchwell
`Matthew D. Satchwell
`Clive McClintock
`Attorneys for MAZDA MOTOR OF
`AMERICA, INC. and SUBARU OF
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`3
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:4530
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Stephen Shahida
`Stephen Shahida
`Attorneys for Defendant
`KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC.
`
`Dated: May 20, 2015
`
`DLA PIPER LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Joseph P. Lavelle
`Joseph P. Lavelle
`Andrew N. Stein
`Clive McClintock
`Attorneys for BMW of North America, LLC
`
`Dated: May 2020, 2015
`
`GONZALEZ SAGGIO & HARLAN LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Don A. Hernandez
`Don A. Hernandez
`Christina D. Hernandez
`
`FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER &
`JACOBSON LLP
`Scott W. Doyle (pro hac vice)
`Jonathan DeFosse (pro hac vice)
`Attorneys for Defendant Mercedes-Benz
`USA, LLC
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`4
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 66 Filed 05/20/15 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:4531
`
`Dated: May 2020, 2015
`
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Ryan K. Yagura
`Ryan K. Yagura
`Kevin Murray
`
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`Michael J. Lennon (pro hac vice)
`Michael N. Zachary
`Susan A. Smith
`Attorneys for Defendant VOLKSWAGEN
`GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and
`BENTLEY MOTORS, INC.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.001-2343734
`
`5
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY