`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`CAMDEN VICINAGE
`
` SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,
`
`
`
`Civil No. 14-667-JBS-KMW
`
`ivil No. 14-4149-JBS-KMW
`
` C
`
`
`
`Civil No. 14-5144-JBS-KMW
`
`
`
`Civil No. 15-335-JBS-KMW
`
`
`
`LTD.,
`
`
`
` Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`
`LUPIN LTD., et al.,
` Defendants.
`______________________________
`
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,
`LTD.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`LUPIN, LTD., et al.,
` Defendants.
`______________________________
`
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,
`LTD.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`LUPIN, LTD., et al.,
` Defendants.
`
` _________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,
`LTD.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`LUPIN, LTD., et al.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2011
`INNOPHARMA v. SENJU
`IPR2015-00903
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-06893-JBS-KMW Document 30 Filed 04/16/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 213
`
` SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,
`
`LTD.,
`
`
`
` Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`
`INNOPHARMA LICENSING, INC.,
`et al.,
`
`
`
` Defendants.
`______________________________
`
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,
`LTD.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`METRICS, INC., et al.,
` Defendants.
`______________________________
`
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,
`LTD.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`v.
`
`METRICS, INC., et al.,
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
`CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR DISCOVERY PURPOSES ONLY
`
`
`This Scheduling Order confirms the directives given to
`
`counsel during the on the record in-person status conference held
`on April 16, 2015; and the Court noting the following appearances:
`Melissa Chuderewicz, Esquire, Bryan C. Diner, Esquire, and
`Justin J. Hasford, Esquire, all appearing on behalf of the
`plaintiffs; and Arnold Calman, Esquire, and Katherine Escanlar,
`Esquire, both appearing on behalf of the Innopharma defendants;
`and Mayra Tarantino, Esquire, and Daniel Margolis, Esquire, both
`appearing on behalf of the Lupin defendants; and Sandra Jeskie,
`
`
`
`Civil No. 14-6893-JBS-KMW
`
`ivil No. 14-3962-JBS-KMW
`
` C
`
`
`
`Civil No. 14-4964-JBS-KMW
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-06893-JBS-KMW Document 30 Filed 04/16/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 214
`
`Esquire, and Vince Capuano, Esquire, both appearing on behalf of
`the Metrics defendants; and for good cause shown:
`IT IS this 16th day of April, 2015, hereby ORDERED:
`
`1. The cases of Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v.
`Lupin, Ltd., et al., Civil Action Nos. 14-667 (JBS), 14-4149 (JBS),
`14-5144 (JBS), and 15-335 (JBS); Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v.
`Innopharma Licensing, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 14-6893 (JBS);
`and Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Metrics, Inc., et al., Civil
`Action Nos. 14-3962 (JBS) and 14-4964 (JBS), are consolidated
`solely for purposes of pretrial discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
`P. 42 and L. Civ. R. 42.1.
`
`2. On or before April 23, 2015, plaintiffs shall file
`written submissions setting forth the reasons they oppose
`defendants’ request that the Court establish a date by which the
`parties can amend without leave of Court.
`
`3. Defendants shall respond to same on or before
`April 27, 2015.
`
`4. Any application for an extension of time beyond the
`deadlines set herein shall be made in writing to the undersigned
`and served upon all counsel prior to expiration of the period
`sought to be extended, and shall disclose in the application all
`such extensions previously obtained, the precise reasons
`necessitating the application showing good cause under FED. R. CIV.
`P. 16(b), and whether adversary counsel agree with the application.
`The schedule set herein will not be extended unless good cause is
`shown.
`
`
`
`
`THE FAILURE OF A PARTY OR ATTORNEY TO OBEY THIS ORDER
`
`MAY RESULT IN IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.
`16(f).
`
`s/ Karen M. Williams
`KAREN M. WILLIAMS
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cc: Hon. Jerome B. Simandle
`
`Page 3 of 3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
