`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`Complete if Known a
`
`
`
`137336,790
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`fFiingDate[SSaRROTT
`BY APPLICANT
`
`
`
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fTDocketNumber 77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`
`
`
`ramones
`Krisna Lim
`
`Exhibit 41, SecureConnect' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent?
`
`D355|Exhibit 42,SecureConnect' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent”
`
`D356|Exhibit 43, SFS-HTTP' vs.Claims of the ‘135 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 48, US ‘883" vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent”
`
`D D
`
`364|Exhibit 51, US 132' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`0365|Exhibit 52, US ‘213' vs. Claimsofthe ‘135 Patent”
`D366|Exhibit 53, US ‘213' vs. Claims ofthe ‘211 Patent”
`2
`
`D
`
`
`
`Exhibit 54, US ‘213' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent
`:
`1
`D368|Exhibit 55, B&M VPNs vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent?
`
`D
`
`'
`
`
`
`07/20/2012
`/Krisna Lim/
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1290
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1290
`
`

`

`
`
`Subst. forform 1449/PTO
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`Completeif Kacae38 £9
`13/336,790
`;
`
`Victor Larson
`
`ication Numb
`
`[FilingDate
`First Named Inventor
`Art Unit
`
`
`
`Krisna Lim
`Sn a
`D374|Exhibit 61, Prestige 128 Plus' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent?
`
`D375|Exhibit 62, Prestige 128 Plus' vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent?
`
`D376|Exhibit 63, Prestige 128 Plus'vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent
`
`D377|Exhibit 64, RFC 2401’ vs. Claimsofthe ‘135 Patent”
`
`D378|Exhibit 65, RFC 2401' vs. Claimsof the '211 Patent?
`
`D379}Exhibit 66, RFC 2401' vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent’
`
`D380|Exhibit 67, RFC 2486' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D381|Exhibit 68, RFC 2486'vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent”
`
`D382|Exhibit 69, RFC 2486'vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`
`D383|Exhibit 70, Understanding IPSec’vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent?
`
`D384|Exhibit 71, Understanding IPSec’vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 72, Understanding IPSec’vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`
`D386|Exhibit 73, US ‘820' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent”
`
`
`
`D387|Exhibit 74, US ‘820' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’ -
`
`0388|Exhibit 75, US ‘820’ vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent”
`
`D389|Exhibit 76, US ‘019' vs. Claims ofthe ‘211 Patent’
`
`D391|Exhibit 78, US ‘049' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 77, US ‘019"vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 79, US ‘049' vs. Claims of the '211 Patent’
`
`D393|Exhibit 80, US ‘049' vs. Claims ofthe ‘504 Patent’
`
`D395|Exhibit 82, US ‘261' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 81, US ‘748' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 83, US '261' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent”
`
`D397|Exhibit 84, US ‘261' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent’
`
`
`
`
`
`D398|Exhibit 85, US ‘900' vs. Claims ofthe ‘135 Patent”
`
`D399|Exhibit 86, US ‘900'vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent”
`
`67/20/2012
`/Krisna Lim/
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1291
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1291
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT }™o=
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`Complete ifKnown
`137396,790
`
`Victor Larson
`
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`D400
`
`Exhibit 87, US '900' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent?
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Krisna Lim
`77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`
`
`
`D401|Exhibit 88, US ‘671' vs. Claims ofthe ‘135 Patent”
`
`D402|Exhibit 89, US '671' vs. Claims ofthe ‘211 Patent”
`
`D403|Exhibit 90, US ‘671' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`
`
`
`D404|Exhibit 91, JP ‘704’ vs. Claims ofthe ‘135 Patent*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D405
`
`Exhibit 92, JP ‘704' vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D406|Exhibit 93, JP ‘704' vs. Claims ofthe ‘504 Patent?
`
`D407|Exhibit 94, GB '841' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent*
`
`D408|Exhibit 95, GB ‘841'vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent?
`
`D409|Exhibit 96, GB ‘841' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`
`
`
`
`D410|Exhibit 97, US ‘318vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent*
`
`D411|Exhibit 98, US ‘318’ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent
`
`D412|Exhibit 99, US '318' vs. Claims ofthe ‘504 Patent?
`
`D413|Exhibit 100, VPN/VLAN’ vs.Claimsof the ‘135 Patent”
`
`D414|Exhibit 101, Nikkei' vs. Claimsofthe ‘135 Patent?
`
`D415|Exhibit 102, NIKKEI' vs. Claims ofthe ‘211 Patent?
`
`D416|Exhibit 103, NIKKEI' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent”
`S
`D417|Exhibit 104, Special Anthology’ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent”
`
`D418|Exhibit 105, Omron’vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent”
`
`D419|Exhibit 106, Gauntlet System’ vs. Claimsofthe ‘135 Patent
`
`D420|Exhibit 107, Gauntlet System’ vs. Claimsofthe ‘151 Patent*
`
`D421|Exhibit 108, Gauntlet System’ vs. Claimsof the ‘180 Patent”
`
`D422|Exhibit 109, Gauntlet System’ vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent”
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 110, Gauntlet System’ vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 111, Gauntlet System’ vs. Claims of the '759 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 112, IntraPort System’ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent
`
`
`
`07/20/2012
`/Krisna Lim/
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH. /K.L./
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1292
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1292
`
`

`

`
`
`Subst. forform 1449/PTO
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`Complete 3 Kane
`
`licati
`
`13/336,790
`
`First Named Inventor
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Victor Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`
`
`
`|D426|Exhibit 113, IntraPort System’vs. Claims ofthe ‘151 Patent”
`
`D427|Exhibit 114, IntraPort System' vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent”
`
`D428|Exhibit 115, IntraPort System’ vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent?
`
`0429|Exhibit 116, IntraPort System’ vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D430|Exhibit 117, IntraPort System’vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 118, Altiga VPN System’vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 119, Altiga VPN System’vs. Claimsof the ‘151 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 120, Altiga VPN System’vs. Claimsof the ‘180 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 121, Altiga VPN System’vs. Claims of the '211 Patent”
`
`D435|Exhibit 122, Altiga VPN System’vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`
`D436|Exhibit 123, Altiga VPN System’vs. Claimsof the ‘759 Patent?
`
`D437|Exhibit 124, Kiuchi’ vs. Claims ofthe ‘135 Patent?
`
`D439|Exhibit 126, Kiuchi' vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 125, Kiuchi' vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 127, Kiuchi' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 128, Kiuchi' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent”
`
`|Dasa|Exhibit 129, Kiuchi’ vs. Claimsof the '759 Patent?
`Exhibit 130,Overview ofAccess VPNs and Tunneling Technologies (‘Overview’)' vs. Claimsof the
`
`‘135 Paten
`
`Exhibit 131, Overview of Access VPNs and Tunneling Technologies (“Overview’)' vs. Claims of the
`‘151 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 132, Overview of Access VPNs and Tunneling Technologies (“Overview’)' vs. Claims of the
`‘180 Patent
`
`Exhibit 133, Overview of Access VPNs and Tunneling Technologies (“Overview’)' vs. Claims of the
`‘211 Patent*
`
`Exhibit 134, Overview of Access VPNs and Tunneling Technologies (‘Overview’)' vs. Claims of the
`‘504 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 135, Overview’vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 136, RFC 2401' vs. Claimsofthe ‘759 Patent?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`07/20/2012
`/Krisna Lim/
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1293
`
`
`
`
`
`448
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1293
`
`

`

`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT i
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`Application
`
`Numb
`
`:
`First Named Inventor
`Art Unit
`
`Complete if Known
`13/336,790
`
`Victor Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`Exhibit 137, Schulzrinne’ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 138, Schulzrinne’ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 139, Schulzrinne’ vs. Claimsof the ‘180 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 140, Schulzrinne’ vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 141, Schulzrinne’ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 142, Schulzrinne’ vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 143, Solana’vs. Claims ofthe '135 Patent*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D457|Exhibit 144, Solana’ vs. Claims ofthe ‘151 Patent?
`
`D458|Exhibit 145, Solana’vs. Claimsof the ‘180 Patent*
`
`Exhibit 146, Solana’ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent?
`
`D460|Exhibit 147, Solana’vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 148, Solana’ vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 149, Atkinson’ vs. Claimsof the '135 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 150, Atkinson’ vs. Claimsof the ‘151 Patent
`
`D464
`
`Exhibit 151, Atkinson’ vs. Claimsof the ‘180 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 152, Atkinson’ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent?
`
`D466|Exhibit 153, Atkinson’ vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent
`
`D467|Exhibit 154, Atkinson’ vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent”
`
`D468|Exhibit 155, Marino’ vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent”
`
`D469|Exhibit 156, Marino’ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent”
`
`D470|Exhibit 157, Marino’ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent”
`
`
`
`D471|Exhibit 158, Marino’ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent?
`
`D472|Exhibit 159, Marino’ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D473}Exhibit 160, Marino‘ vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent”
`
`D474|Exhibit 161, Aziz (‘646)' vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent?
`
`
`
`D475
`
`Exhibit 162, Wesinger’ vs. Claimsof the '135 Patent?
`
`
`
`07/20/2012
`Krsna Lim/
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH. /K.L./
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1294
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1294
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`
`(Use as manysheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`[ner|77sTTVRNI000TEPSCHFTA)
`
`Exhibit 163 Wesinger' vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent?
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`
`Completeif Known’ ©
`
`131336,790
`
`FiingDaie[CSCO
`
`a
`
`Exhibit 164, Wesinger' vs. Claimsof the ‘180 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 165 Wesinger’ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 166, Wesinger'vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent
`
`Exhibit 167, Wesinger'vs. Claimsof the ‘759 Patent
`.
`‘
`1
`.
`Exhibit 168, Aziz ('234)' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent?
`:
`1
`.
`Exhibit 169, Aziz ('234)' vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 170, Aziz ('234)' vs. Claimsof the ‘180 Patent’
`.
`‘
`1
`:
`Exhibit 171, Aziz ('234)' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 172, Aziz ('234)' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`pe
`‘
`1
`.
`
`.
`
`:
`
`1
`
`.
`
`D493|Exhibit 180, RFC 2401 in Combination with U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867' vs. Claims of the ‘180
`Paten
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 ’
`
`ns em
`
`ome
`
`Exhibit 182, Davison’ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent’
`
`
`
`
`
`
`07/20/2014
`/Krisna Lim/
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1295
`
`
`
`D494|Exhibit 181, Davison’ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent”
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1295
`
`

`

`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`Complete 7 Known
`13/336,780
`
`-
`Victor Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`Exhibit 189, AutoSOCKSv2.1 Administrator's Guide’ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent”
`
`D503|Exhibit 190, AutoSOCKS'vs. Claimsof the ‘759 Patent*
`
`D504|Exhibit 191, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.51' vs. Claims of the '135 Patent*
`
`Exhibit 192, Aventail Connect v3.01/2.51' vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 193, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.51' vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent?
`
`D507|Exhibit 194, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.51' vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent”
`
`D508|Exhibit 195, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6 Administrator's Guide’vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 196, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6 Administrator's Guide’ vs. Claims of the '151 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 197, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6' vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 198, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6" vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent”
`
`Exhibit199, BinGO! User's User’s Guide/Extended Features Reference'vs. Claims of the ‘151
`Patent
`
`D513|Exhibit 200, BinGO! User’s User’s Guide/Extended Features Reference’ vs. Claimsof the ‘135
`Paten
`
`
`
`
`
`D514|Exhibit 201, BinGO!vs. Claimsofthe ‘180 Patent”
`
`Exhibit 202, BinGO! vs. Claimsofthe ‘759 Patent?
`
`om
`
`xhibit 203, Broadband Forum Technical Report TR-025 (Issue 1.0/5.0)" vs. Claims of the ‘135
`atent
`
`D517|Exhibit 204, Domain Name System (DNS) Security’ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 205, Domain Name System (DNS) Security’ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent”
`
`D519|Exhibit 206, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS'vs. Claimsof the ‘211
`nw
`Paten
`
`Exhibit 207, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Recordfor the DNS’vs. Claims ofthe ‘504
`ww
`Paten
`
`Exhibit 208, RFC 2538,Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)'vs.Claimsof the
`‘211 Patent
`
`Exhibit 209, RFC 2538, Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)' vs. Claims of the
`‘504 Paten
`
`wes
`
`
`
`
`
`D523|Exhibit 210, IETF RFC 2065: Domain Name System Security Extensions; Published January 1997'
`vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent”
`
`iKrisna Lim/
`
`o7/e0/2012
`
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1296
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1296
`
`

`

`
`Complete if Known >
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`Fingbaie|or_—i
`
`BY APPLICANT
`
`(Use as manysheets as necessary)
`a|
`
`iirTURNIPS
`
`Exhibit 211, IETF RFC 2065: Domain Name System Secuntty Extensions; Published January 1997'
`vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent?
`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`Exhibit 212, RFC 2486, RFC 2661, RFC 2401, and Internet-Draft, “Secure Remote Access with
`L2TP"' vs. Claimsof the '135 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 213, U.S. Patent No. 7,100,195 in Combination with RFC 2401 and U.S. Patent No.
`6,496,867’ vs. Claimsofthe ‘135 Patent?
`
`
`
`
`po D527|Exhibit214, U.S. PatentNo.7,100,195inCombinationwithRFC2401 and U.S. PatentNo.
`6,496,867'vs. Claimsof the ‘151 Patent
`0528|Exhibit 215, U.S. Patent No. 6,643,701" vs. Claimsofthe ‘135 Patent*
`529° Exhibit 216, U.S. Patent No. 6,643,701'vs. Claimsofthe ‘151 Patent®
`D530|Exhibit 217, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867 in Combination with RFC 2401' vs. Claims of the ‘151
`Patent”
`
`D531|Exhibit 218, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867 in Combination with RFC 2401' vs. Claims of the ‘135
`Paten
`
`D532|Exhibit 219, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867" vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`L2TP"' vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent?
`
`Paten
`
`D533|Exhibit 220, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867"vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`Exhibit221, RFC2486, RFC2661, RFC2401,and Internet-Draft,“SecureRemoteAccesswith po
`
`
`D535|Exhibit 222, U.S. Patent No. 6,557,037’ vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent”
`
`D536|Exhibit 223, U.S. Patent No. 6,557,037" vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent”
`D537
`naileda RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS'vs.Claimsofthe ‘135
`
`D538|Exhibit 225, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS'vs. Claimsof the ‘151
`Patent*
`
`D539|Exhibit Cisco-1, Cisco’s Prior Art Systems’ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent
`.
`.
`’
`.
`1
`|osa0|Exhibit Cisco-2, Cisco’s Prior Art Systems vs. Claims ofthe ‘151 Patent
`sat|Exhibit Cisco-3, Cisco's Prior Art Systems’ vs. Claims ofthe ‘180 Patent
`Exhibit Cisco-4, Cisco's Prior Art Systems'vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent
`
`.
`
`.
`
`’
`
`.
`
`1
`
`545
`
`,
`Cisco's
`Pri
`'
`Exhibit Cisco-7, Cisco's Prior Art PIX System vs. Ciaims of the ‘759 Patent
`
`/Krisna Lim/
`07/20/2012
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1297
`
`D543|Exhibit Cisco-5, Cisco's Prior Art Systems’vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent
`se
`:
`.
`'
`.
`1
`Exhibit Cisco-6, Cisco's Prior Art Systems vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent.
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1297
`
`

`

`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`Completeif Known
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`fFiingDate|ROTTS
`
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PtDeccketNumber|77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`0546 ExhibitA: Copyof U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`Exhibit A: Copyof U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151
`
`g|Exhibit B: Certificate of Service to Request ForInter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. § 311
`D54.
`(Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
` Exhibit B: Certificate of Service to Request For Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. § 311
`
`(Patent No. 7,490,151)
`Exhibit B-1: File History of U.S. Patent 6,502,135
`.
`D551|Exhibit B-2: Reexamination Record No. 95/001,269
`
`Exhibit C1: Claim Chart - Aventail Connect v3.1 (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`D553|Exhibit C2: Claim Chart Aventail Connect V3.01 (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`D554 Exhibit C-1: Copyof U.S. Patent No. 7,010,604
`oss|Exhibit C2: Claim Chart Aventail Autosocks (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`|D556|Exhibit C1: Claim Chart Aventail Connect v3.01 (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`D557|Exhibit C-2: Provisional Application 60/106 261
`
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit C3: Claim Chart Aventail AutoSOCKS(Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`Exhibit C3: Claim Chart BinGO (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`Exhibit C-3: Provisional Application 60/137,704
`
`Exhibit C4: Claim Chart Wang (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`|D562|Exhibit C4: Claim Chart Beser (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D563|Exhibit C5: Claim Chart Beser (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`ES Exhibit C5: Claim Chart Wang (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`056s|Exhibit C6: Claim Chart BinGO (PatentNo. 6,502,135)
`0566 Exhibit D: Memorandum Opinion in VimetX v. Microsoft.
`.
`
`
`D567|Exhibit D-1: Takahiro Kiuchi and Shigekoto Kaihara, “C-HTTP — The Developmentof a Secure,
`Closed HPPT-Based Network on the Internet,” Published in the Proceedings of SNDSS 1996.
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-10: D.E. Denning and G.M. Sacco, “Time-stampsin Key Distribution Protocols,”
`
`Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24, N.8, pp. 533-536. August 1981.
`
`
`Exhibit D-11: C.{. Dalton and J.F. Griffin, “Applying Military Grade Security to the Internet,”
`
`
`Proceedingsof the 8th Joint European Networking Conference (JENC 8), (May 12-15 1997).
`
`
`/Krisna Lim/
`
`07/20/2012
`
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1298
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1298
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Complete if Known
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`13/336,790
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`
`
`
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`.
`Krisna Lim
`
`
`
`fT[DocketNumber|77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`D570|Exhibit D-12: Steven M.Bellovin and Michael Merritt, “Encrypted Key Exchange: Password-Based
`protocols Secure against Dictionary Attacks,” 1992 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
`(1992).
`D571|Exhibit D-2: Copy of U.S. Pat. No. 5,898,830
`
`Victor Larson
`
`
`
`D572|Exhibit D-3: Eduardo Solana and Jiirgen Harms,“Flexible Internet Secure Transactions Based on
`ollaborative Domains,”, Security Protocols Workshop 1997, pp. 37-51.
`
`E C
`
`D573|Exhibit D-4: Copy of U.S. Pat. No. 6,119,234
`
`D574|Exhibit D-5: Jeff Sedayao, “Mosaic Will Kill My Network!’ — Studying Network Traffic Patterns of
`
`
`Mosaic Use,” in Electron. Proc. 2nd World Wide Web Conf.’94: Mosaic and the Web, Chicago,IL,
`Oct. 1994.
`
`
`
`
`D575|Exhibit D-6: M. Luby Juels and R. Ostrovsky, “Security of Blind Digital Signatures,” Crypto '97,
`LNCS 1294, pages 150-164, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
`
`
`
`D576|Exhibit 0-8: David M. Martin, “A Framework for Local Anonymity in the Intemet,” Technical Report.
`Boston University, Boston, MA, USA (Feb 21, 1998).
`D577|Exhibit D-9: Copyof U.S. Pat. No. 7,764,231
`
`D578|Exhibit E-1: Claim Charts Applying Kiuchi and Other References to Claimsof the ‘135 Patent.
`
`D579|Exhibit E1: Declaration of Chris Hopen (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`ps80|Exhibit E1: Declaration of Chris Hopen (Patent No. 7,490,151) -
`Ea Exhibit E-2: Claim Charts Applying Wesingerand Other References to Claimsofthe ‘135 Patent.
`|0582 Exhibit E2: Declaration of Michael Fratto (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`D583|Exhibit E2: Declaration of Michael Fratto (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D584|Exhibit E-3: Claim Charts Applying Solana and Other References to Claims of the ‘135 Patent.
`|058s|Exhibit E3: Declaration of James Chester(Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`D5a6|Exhibit E3: Declaration of James Chester (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D587|Exhibit E-4: Claim Charts Applying Aziz and Other References to Claimsof the ‘135 Patent.
`
`D588|Exhibit X1: Aventail Connect Administrator's Guide v3.1/v2.6., PP 1-20 (1996-1999)
`
`ps589|Exhibit X10: Copy of U.S. Patent No. 4,885,778
`
`0590|Exhibit X11: Copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,615,357
`
`
`
` Exhibit X4: Reed et al., "Proxies for Anonymous Routine,” 12th Annuary Computer Security
`
`Applications Conference, San Diego, CA, December-9-13, pp 1-10 (1996).
`
`
`Exhibit X2: Aventail Connect Administrator's Guide v3.01/v2.51., PP 1-116 (1996-1999)
`
`Exhibit X3: Aventail AutoSOCKS Administration & Users Guide v2.1., PP 1-70 (1996-1999)
`
`D593
`
`
`
`07/20/2012
`iKrisna Lim/
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1299
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1299
`
`

`

`
`13336 790
`
`
`
`Subst.for form 1449/PTO
`Complete if Known
`’
`13/336,790
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`Filing Date COT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`First Named inventor
`i
`Victor Larson
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`ieeeeee Docket Number
`ps594|Exhibit X5: Wang, The Broadband Forum Technical Report, “TR-025 — Core Network Architecture
`Recommendations for Access to Legacy Data Networks over ADSL,” Issue 1.0; pp. 1-24 , v1.0
`(1999).
`
`Art Unit
`
`ExaminerNarre
`
`2453
`
`
`
`
`
`
` po ps9|Exhibit x8: Copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,182,141
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`||bse|Exhibit X6: Copyof U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867 po
`
`Exhibit X7: BinGO! User's Guide Incorporating by Reference BinGO! Extended Feature Reference.
`
`D597|Exhibit X7: Kentetal., “Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol, “ Network Working Group
`
`
`Request for Comments (RFC) 2401, pp 1-70 (1998).
`
`0580|Exhibit X9: BinGO!User's Guide v1.6 (1999).
`
`P| peoo|Exhibit Y1: Aventail Extranet Server 3.0 Administrator's Guide. Po
`
`Exhibit Y10: Hanks,S., et al., RFC1701, “Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE),” 1994,Is
`Accessbile at http:/Avww.ietf.org/rfc/ric1 701 bt.
`
`||802 Exhibit Y10: Socolofsky, T.et al., RFC 1180, “A TCP/IP Tutorial,” January 1991.
`P| D603|Exhibit Y11: Simpson, W., editor, RFC 1661, “The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP),” July 1994.
`
`
`
`D604|Exhibit Y11: Simpson, W., RFC1994, “PPP Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocal (CHAP),”
`1996, http:/Avww.ietf.org/rdc/ric1 994. txt.
`
`||805 Exhibit Y12: Meyer, G., RFC 1968, “The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP),” June 1996.
`
`peo6g|Exhibit ¥12: Perkins, D., RFC1171, “The Point-To-Point Protocol for the Transmission of Multi-
`Protocol Datagrams over Point-To-Point Links,” 1990, Is Accessible at
`http:/Avww.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1 171 tet.
`
`
`
`D607|Exhibit Y13: Kummert, H., RFC 2420, “The PPP Triple-DES Encryption Protocol (3DESE),”
`
`September, 1998.
`
`S| Deos|Exhibit Y14: Townsley, W.M., et al., RFC 2661, “LayerTwo Tunneling Protocol ‘L2TP’,” August
`
`
`
` Exhibit Y17: Srisuresh, P., RFC 2663, “IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and
`Considerations,” August 1999.
`
`
`
`Exhibit Y18: Heinanen, J., RFC 1483, “Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer5,”
`
`July 1993.
` Exhibit Y4: Ferguson, P. and Huston, G., “What Is a VPN’, The Internet Protocol Journal, Vol 1.,
`
`
`No. 1 (June 1998 (“Ferguson”).
`
`
`Exhibit Y5: Mockapetris, P., RFC 1034, “Domain Names — Concepts and Facilities,” November
`1987 ("RFC 1034’).
`
`07/20/2012
`/Krisna Lim/
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH. /K.L./
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1300
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1300
`
`

`

`Subst. for form 14495/PTO
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`Completeif Known
`
`Victor Larson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D618
`
`http:/Avw.ietf.org/rfc/ric1583.tet.
`
`Form PTO/SB/42, Listing Each Patent and Printed Publication Relied Upon to Provide a Substantial
`New Question of Patentability (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`
`
`Form PTO/SB/42, Listing Each Patent and Printed Publication Relied Upon to Provide a Substantial
`New Question of Patentability (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D623
`
`
`p617|Exhibit Y6: Mockapetris, P., RFC 1035, “Domain Names— Implementation and Specification,”
`
`November 1987 (*RFC1035").
`
`Exhibit Y8: Fielding, R., et al., RFC 2068, “Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1,” January 1997.
`
`
` Exhibit Y8: Woodbum, R.A., et al., RFC1241, “A Schemefor an Internet Encapsulation Protocol:
`Version 1,” 1991.
`
`Exhibit Y9: Leech, M., et al., RFC 1928, “Socks Protocol Version 5,” March 1996.
`
` Exhibit Y9: Simpson, W., RFC1853, “IP in IP Tunneling,” 1995, Is Accessible at
`
`
`D630|Transmittal Letter (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D631|Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`D632|Exhibit A: Agreed Upon Terms; P.R. 4-3 Joint Claims Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`D633|Exhibit 8: Disputed Claim Terms; P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`
`
`D634|Exhibit C; VirnetX’s Proposed Construction of Claim Terms and Supporting Evidence
`
`D635|Exhibit D; Defendants’intrinsic and Extrinsic Support; P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement
`
`
`
`D636|File History of U.S. Patent 6,839,759
`
`D637|Exhibit B-4; VirnetX,Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 6:07-cv-80, Microsoft's Motion for Partial
`Summary Judgmentof Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,839,759 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2009)
`
`
`
`
`
`D638
`
`Exhibit D-2; Kent et al., “Security Architecture for the Internet Protoco!,” Internet Engineering Task
`Force, Internet Draft, (Feb. 1998)
`
`
`p639|Exhibit D-3; Aziz et al., U.S. Patent 5,548,646 to Aziz et al., “System for Signatureless Transmission
`and Reception of Data Packets Between Computer Networks,” Filed Sept. 15, 1994 and issued Aug.
`
`
`20, 1996
`
`/KrisnaLim/
`
`07/20/2012
`
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1301
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1301
`
`

`

`fFiingDate[SCOTS
`
`a
`
`
`
`Completeif Known
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`Applications on a Computer on an as neededbasis, Filed on October 28, 1996 and Issued
`September 28, 1999
`
`Hierarchical Security with Selectable Common Trust Realms and Corresponding Security
`Protocols,” Filed on June 25, 1990 and Issued Apni 20, 1993
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-12; RFC 1122, Braden, “Requirementsfor Internet Hosts - Communication Layers,” RFC
`1122 (Oct. 1989)
`
`Exhibit D-13; RFC 791; Information SciencesInstitute, “Intemet Protocol,” DARPA Internet Program
`Specification RFC 791 (Sept. 1981)
`
`Exhibit D-14; Caronniet al., “SKIP — Securing the Internet,” 5th International Workshops on
`Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE '96) (June 19-21,
`1996)
`
`Exhibit D-15; Maughanetal., “Internet Security Association and Key ManagementProtocol
`(ISAKMP), ” IPSEC Work Group Draft (July 26, 1997)
`
`Exhibit E-1; Claim Charts Applying Kiuchi as a Primary Reference to the ‘759 Patent.
`
`Exhibit E-2; Claim Charts Applying Kent as a Primary Reference to the ‘759 Patent
`
`Exhibit E-3; Claim Charts Applying Aziz as a Primary Referenceto the ‘759 Patent
`
`D649|Exhibit E-4; Claim Charts Applying Kentin view of Caronni as a Primary Combination of References
`to the ‘759 Patent
`
`Exhibit D-5; Edwards etal., “High Security Web Servers and Gateways,” Computer Networks and ISDN System 29, pages 927-938 (Sept. 1997)
`0851|Exhibit D-10; Lee et al., ‘Hypertext Transfer Protocol — HTTP/1.0," RFC 1945 (May 1996)
`Ea Exhibit E-3; Claim Charts Applying Blumto Claimsofthe '151 Patent
`
`
`
`ou ExhibitD-8;Barlow;U.S.Patent5,204,961 toBarlow,“ComputerNetworkOperatingwithMultilevel
`
`
` pe40|Exhibit D-4; Yinger; U.S. Patent 5,960,204 to Yingeretal., “System and Method forinstalling
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit B-1, File History of U.S. Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit E-1, Claim Charts Applying Kiuchi, and Kiuchi and Martin to Claims of the ‘151 Patent
`
`
`
`Exhibit E-2, Claim Charts Applying Wesinger, and Wesinger and Martin to Claims of the ‘151 Patent
`
`0286 Exhibit E-4, Claim Charts Applying Aziz and Edwards, and Aziz, Edwards, and Martin to Claims of
`
`
`the ‘151 Patent
`
`Exhibit E-6, Claim Charts Applying Wesinger and Edwards, and Wesinger, Edwards, and Martin to
`Claims of the ‘151 Patent
`
`
`
`VirnetX Inc., V. Mitel Networks Corp.; Defendants’ Joint Invalidity Contentions||
`Ea
`
`Ea
`
`marcaomer
`
`
`
`
`i /
`
`07/20/2012
`Krisna Lim/
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1302
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1302
`
`

`

`
`13356790
`
`Complete if Known
`13/336,790
`Application Number
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`Fiingdae|_——S—SOTT—*S
`
`BY APPLICANT
`
`
`First Named vero
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`A Un ts
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pees|Exhibit 46, US ‘883' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent?
`
`Deeg|Exhibit 47, US ‘883' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent ?
`
`D670|Exhibit 48, US ‘883' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent?
`
`D671|Exhibit 49, Chuah'vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent ”
`
`D672|Exhibit 50, Chuah'vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent”
`
`0673|Exhibit 51, Chuah'vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent ?
`
`pe74|Exhibit 52, U.S. ‘648' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent ”
`
`
`0675|Exhibit 53, U.S. ‘648' vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent? os
`pe76|Exhibit57, B&M VPNs'vs. Claims ofthe ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D677|Exhibit 58, BorderManager'vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent ”
`
`D678|Exhibit 59, BorderManager' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent ?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pe7g|Exhibit 60, BorderManager'vs.Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent ”
`
`peso|Exhibit 61, Prestige 128 Plus’ vs. Claims ofthe ‘135 Patent”
`
`Des2|Exhibit 63, Prestige 128 Plus’ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent”
`
`pese|Exhibit 67, US ‘072'vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent ”
`
`Des7|Exhibit 68, RFC 2486'vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent?
`
`
`
`Desg|Exhibit 69, RFC 2486'vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent ?
`
`07/20/2012
`/Krisna Lim/
`/K.L/-
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1303
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1303
`
`

`

`
`
` Complete if Known
`t. for form 1449/PTO
`Subs
`Application Number
`13/336,790
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`Fiingate=|CC~*~sOT«SY
`
`BY APPLICANT
`First Named Ivenior
`(Use as manysheets as necessary)
`AR Uni as
`
`
`Examiner Narie
`
`
`i Docket Number
`
`2
`pego0|Exhibit 71, Understanding iPSec' vs. Claimsofthe ‘211 Patent
`EI Exhibit 72, Understanding IPSec’vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 73, US ‘820' vs. Claimsofthe ‘135 Patent ?
`
`p693|Exhibit 74, US ‘820' vs. Claims ofthe ‘211 Patent ?
`
`D694|Exhibit 75, US ‘820' vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent7
`|0695 Exhibit 76, US ‘019' vs. Claimsofthe ‘211 Patent ?
`
`Exhibit 77, US ‘019' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent ?
`
`D701|Exhibit 82, US ‘261" vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent 7
`
`0702|Exhibit 83, US ‘261 vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent ?
`
`D703|Exhibit 84, US 261" vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent
`
`Exhibit 87, US ‘900' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent2
`
`
`
`77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`
`
`
`p709|Exhibit 90, US ‘671' vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent ?
`
`0710|Exhibit 91, JP ‘704' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent ?
`
`D711|Exhibit 92, JP ‘704' vs. Claimsof the '211 Patent?
`
`D712|Exhibit 93, JP ‘704' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent ?
`
`D713|Exhibit 94, GB ‘841' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent *
`
`D714|Exhibit 95, GB ‘841' vs. Claimsofthe ‘211 Patent ?
`
`
`07/20/2012
`/Krisna Lim/
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LINED THROUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1304
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1304
`
`

`

`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`Complete if Known
`13/336,790
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT =[FilingDate|12-23-2010
`
`
`
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`—7
`Foe
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`fAtUnit|S
`
`FtpDetcketNumber|77580-154(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`0715|Exhibit 96, GB ‘841' vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent *
`
`
`
`Exhibit 97, US ‘318' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent ”
`
`Exhibit 98, US ‘318' vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent ?
`
`Exhibit 99, US ‘318'vs.Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent ?
`
`Exhibit 100, VPN/VLAN' vs.Claimsof the ‘135 Patent ”
`
`Exhibit 101, Nikkei’ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent ”
`
`Exhibit 102, Nikkei' vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent?
`
`D722|Exhibit 103, Nikkei’ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent ”
`
`D723|Exhibit 104, Special Anthology’vs. Claimsof the '135 Patent 2
`
`D724|Exhibit 106-A, Gauntlet System’vs. Claimsofthe ‘135 Patent°
`
`0726|Exhibit 110-A, Gauntlet System!vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent°
`
`D725
`
`Exhibit 109-A, Gauntlet System’ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent?
`
`0727 | Exhibit 112, IntraPort System! vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent ?
`
`D728|Exhibit 115, IntraPort System’vs. Claimsofthe ‘211 Patent?
`
`D729|Exhibit 116, IntraPort System’ vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent ”
`
`D730|Exhibit 118, Altiga VPN System’vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent ”
`
`D731|Exhibit 121, Altiga VPN System’vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent?
`
`D732|Exhibit 122, Altiga VPN System’vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D733|Exhibit 124, Kiuchi' vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 127, Kiuchi' vs. Claimsof the ‘211 Patent2
`
`D735|Exhibit 128, Kiuchi’ vs. Claimsof the ‘504 Patent ?
`
`D736|Exhibit 137, Schulzrinne’ vs. Claimsof the ‘135 Patent 7
`
`0737|Exhibit 137, Schulzrinne’ vs. Claims ofthe ‘135 (Final) Patent 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D738|Exhibit 140, Schulzrinnevs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent *
`
`D739|Exhibit 141, Schulzrinne’vs. Claimsofthe ‘504 Patent7
`
`D740|Exhibit 143