`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`––––––––––––––––––
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`––––––––––––––––––
`
`OWENS CORNING,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FAST FELT CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`––––––––––––––––––
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00650
`U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757 B2
`
`––––––––––––––––––
`
`PETITIONER OWENS CORNING’S NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`{03936360.DOCX;1 }
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00650
`
`Notice of Appeal
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 141, 142, and 319, and in accordance with 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 90.2-3, Petitioner Owens Corning appeals to the United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Final Written Decision of the Patent Trial
`
`and Appeal Board (“Board”) entered on August 11, 2016 (Paper No. 32) (“Final
`
`Written Decision”), and from all underlying findings, determinations, rulings,
`
`opinions, orders and decisions regarding the inter partes review of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,137,757 (“ ’757 patent”). A copy of the Final Written Decision is attached.
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(3)(ii), Owens Corning states that the
`
`issues on appeal include, but are not limited to: the Board’s construction of the
`
`terms in claims 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 of the ’757 patent; the Board’s determination that
`
`claims 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 of the ’757 patent have not been shown by a preponderance
`
`of the evidence to be unpatentable as obvious by U.S. Patent No. 6,451,409
`
`(“Lassiter”) in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,101,759 (“Hefele”); the Board’s
`
`determination that claims 1, 2, 4, and 6 of the ’757 patent have not been shown by
`
`a preponderance of the evidence to be unpatentable as obvious by Lassiter in view
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 5,597,618 (“Bayer”); the Board’s determination that claims 1, 2,
`
`4, 6 and 7 of the ’757 patent have not been shown by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence to be unpatentable as obvious by Lassiter in view of U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,875,710 (“Eaton”); the Board’s consideration of the level of skill in the art,
`
`expert testimony, prior art, the state of the art, and other evidence in the record;
`
`{03936360.DOCX;1 }
`
`1
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
