throbber
Presentation of Petitioner Owens Corning
`
`Owens Corning v. Fast Felt Corporation
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2015-00650
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`1
`
`

`
`Background and Prior Art
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`
`Nozzle(s) 26
`
`Nail Tabs (29a ... 29x)
`
`Roofing Felt (17)
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1 (annotated (Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 6)).
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`2
`
`

`
`Background and Prior Art
`
`Allman (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1006, Allman, Figs. 1a & 2.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`3
`
`

`
`Background and Prior Art
`Bohan (Ex. 1021)
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep. 57:14-22, cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 3.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`4
`
`

`
`Background and Prior Art
`
`Hefele (Ex. 1004)
`
`Bayer (Ex. 1007)
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`Levenson
`(Ex. 1014)
`
`Ex. 1004, Hefele, Fig. 1; Ex. 1007, Bayer, Fig. 4; Ex. 1005, Eaton, Figs. 11 & 25; Ex. 1012, p. 361; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶27.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`5
`
`

`
`Institution Decision
`
`Paper No. 9, Institution of Inter Partes Review, p. 26.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`6
`
`

`
`Claims 1 and 7 of the ‘757 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claims 1 & 7.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`7
`
`

`
`The ‘757 Patent Is Clearly Directed
`to Printing Technology
`
`Title
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, Title & Summary of the Invention.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`8
`
`

`
`The ‘757 Patent Is Directed to
`Printing Technology
`
`Bohan Dep.
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 75:14-81:12, 90:5-10, cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 23.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`9
`
`

`
`The ‘757 Patent Is Clearly Directed
`to Printing Technology
`
`Bohan Dep.
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 75:14-81:12, 90:5-10, cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 23.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`10
`
`

`
`The ‘757 Patent Is Clearly Directed
`to Printing Technology
`
`Bohan Dep.
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 75:14-81:12, 90:5-10, cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 23.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`11
`
`

`
`No Claim Construction Necessary
`
`Institution
`Decision
`
`Patent Owner’s
`Response
`
`Paper No. 9, Institution of Inter Partes Review, p. 5; Paper No. 16, Patent Owner’s Response, p. 19.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`12
`
`

`
`Asphalt Saturated Substrates Are
`Not Recited In The Claims
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claims 1 & 7.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`13
`
`

`
`Asphalt Saturated Substrates Are
`Not Recited In The Claims
`
`Bohan Dep.
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 71:13-72:12; Ex. 1022, Todd Dep., 16:21-17:11; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 4.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`14
`
`

`
`Asphalt Saturated Substrates Are
`Not Recited In The Claims
`
`Todd Dep.
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 71:13-72:12; Ex. 1022, Todd Dep., 16:21-17:11; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 4.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`15
`
`

`
`Asphalt Saturated Substrates Are Not New
`And Are Indisputably Disclosed by Lassiter
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`
`Nozzle(s) 26
`
`Nail Tabs (29a ... 29x)
`
`Bohan Dep.
`
`Roofing Felt (17)
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1 (annotated (Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 6)), 3:32-35; Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 112:7-11; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 5.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`16
`
`

`
`The ‘757 Patent Prints Nail Tabs on
`Unsaturated Substrates
`
`“base substrate material”
`
`“roofing material prior to its saturation ....”
`
`“substrate material and/or the saturated ....”
`
`“immediately before or after dipping ....”
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, 4:41-45, 3:64-67, 7:26-32 & 6:65-7:3; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, pp. 5-6.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`17
`
`

`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003) Also Prints Nails
`Tabs On Unsaturated Substrates
`
`“siding materials ....”
`
`“cover sheets of
`siding materials ....”
`
`“styrofoam board ...”
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, 2:57-62 & 7:25-8-2; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 6.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`18
`
`

`
`The ‘757 Patent Also Discloses Printing Nail
`Tabs on Building Cover Material for Stud Walls
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, 1:29-31; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 6.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`19
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s experts ... only considered a
`validity analysis where the substrate was heavily
`asphalt saturated ....
`
`Bohan Dep.
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 68:13-18, 69:11-70:16; Ex. 1022, Todd Dep., 14:12-15:6; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 25.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`20
`
`

`
`Patent Owner’s experts ... only considered a
`validity analysis where the substrate was heavily
`asphalt saturated ....
`
`Todd Dep.
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 68:13-18, 69:11-70:16; Ex. 1022, Todd Dep., 14:12-15:6; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 25.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`21
`
`

`
`Hefele, Bayer and Eaton ... deposit polymer
`nail tabs using gravure-based methods on a
`wide range of substrates
`
`Hefele (Ex. 1004)
`
`Bayer (Ex. 1007)
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`Ex. 1004, Hefele, Fig. 1; Ex. 1007, Bayer, Fig. 4; Ex. 1005, Eaton, Fig. 11; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, pp. 7-8.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`22
`
`

`
`Hot Asphalt Environment Is Not A
`Limitation Of The Claims
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claims 1 & 7; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 8.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`23
`
`

`
` ... Lassiter is Not Limited to a Hot
`Asphalt Environment
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`
`“chill roll 16” & “cool ambient environment”
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1, 5:9-12 & 4:60-65; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, pp. 8-9.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`24
`
`

`
`Lassiter Discloses Building Materials
`Having Unsaturated Substrates
`
`“styrofoam board sheathing”
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1; 7:25-8-2; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 9.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`25
`
`

`
`Lassiter Discloses a Closed Polymer
`Supply
`
`“pressurized tank and pump 28”
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1; 6:37-40; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 9.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`26
`
`

`
` ... neither “high temperature” nor “heavily
`asphalt coated web” are recited in the claims
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claims 1 & 7; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 10.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`27
`
`

`
`Nail Tab Limitations Not Recited In The
`Claims Are Not Germane To Patentability
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claims 1 & 7; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, pp. 16-17.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`28
`
`

`
`... conceding none of these limitations are
`claimed
`
`Bohan Dep.
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 124:6-127:6; Ex. 1022, Todd Dep., 25:20-26:18; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 17.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`29
`
`

`
`... conceding none of these limitations are
`claimed
`
`Todd Dep.
`
`Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 124:6-127:6; Ex. 1022, Todd Dep., 25:20-26:18; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 17.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`30
`
`

`
`The Unrecited Nail Tab Limitations Are
`All Taught By Lassiter
`
`“size,” “width,” “thickness [volume],”
`and “shape”
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Abstract, 6:44-45; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, pp. 17-18.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`31
`
`

`
`The Unrecited Nail Tab Limitations Are
`All Taught By Lassiter
`
`“pulling out,” “tearing [pull-through]”,
`and “reinforced”
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, 1:46-50, 2:63-3:2, 3:42-43; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 18.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`32
`
`

`
`The Unrecited Nail Tab Limitations Are
`All Taught By Lassiter
`
`“color contrasting dye,”
`“readily visible”
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, 3:42-47; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 18.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`33
`
`

`
`Paper Is A Category Of Building Cover
`Material
`
`Todd Dep.
`
`Bohan Dep.
`
`Ex. 1022, Todd Dep., 15:19-16:5; Ex. 1021, Bohan Dep., 20:24-21:7, 57: 14-16; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 19.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`34
`
`

`
`Sadler (Ex. 2017) by Patent Owner
`
`“felt roofing paper”
`
`“felt paper”
`
`“felt roofing paper”
`
`Ex. 2017, Sadler, 1:13-15, 1:42-44 & 2:48-49; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 19.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`35
`
`

`
`Lassiter and “tar paper”
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, 1:34-35; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 19.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`36
`
`

`
`The Law of Teaching Away
`
`• The law states that disclosed examples and preferred
`embodiments do not constitute a teaching away. In re Susi,
`440 F.2d 442 (CCPA 1971).
`
`•
`
`In order for a teaching away to exist, the prior art must
`criticize, discredit, or otherwise indicate the undesirability of a
`particular solution. In re Fulton, 391 F.3d 1195, 1201 (Fed. Cir.
`2004).
`
`Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 11.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`37
`
`

`
`Eaton ... Does Not Teach Away from
`Using Gravure-Based Systems
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`Ex. 1005, Eaton, Fig. 11, 6:28-33; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 13.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`38
`
`

`
`Lassiter ... the tab material is molten ... and
`deposited on a cooled saturated ( or unsaturated)
`substrate
`
`“As the saturated felt exits ..., it may be cooled ....”
`
`“... material is also heated to a liquid state ....”
`
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 1, 4:60-65; 5:19-24; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, pp. 13-15.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`39
`
`

`
`Lassiter Does Not Teach Away from Using
`Gravure-Based Systems
`
`Ex. 1003, Fig. 1, 6:4-9; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 15.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`40
`
`

`
`Hefele, Bayer, and Eaton “... various
`methods of printing polymer ...”
`
`Ex. 1012, Levenson Dec., ¶12; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 15.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`41
`
`

`
`Bayer’s Prosecution History Does Not Teach
`Away from Using Gravure-Based Systems
`
`Ex. 1007, Fig. 4; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 12.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`42
`
`

`
`Patent Owner Concedes Hefele and Bayer
`Teach Pressure Bonding and Adhering
`
`“Hefele ... very slightly presses ...”
`
`“Hefele refers to ‘slight application
`of pressure’ ...”
`
`“... Bayer ... employs the lightest of
`pressure ...”
`
`Paper No. 16, Patent Response, pp. 35-36, 43-44; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 20.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`43
`
`

`
`... Eaton ... lamination rolls 1240 subsequently
`pressure adhere the already deposited tab material
`...
`
`Ex. 1005, Eaton, Fig. 25, 22:43-62; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, p. 21.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`44
`
`

`
`Claim 6 Is Obvious As Proposed
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`
`Bayer (Ex. 1007)
`
`Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 2; Ex. 1007, Bayer, Fig. 4; Ex. 1005, Eaton, Fig. 11; cited Paper No. 20, Petitioner’s Reply, pp. 21-22.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`45
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`

`
`The Prior Art Bohan Article
`
`Ex. 2009, Bohan Article, Fig. 2.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`46
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 1: Lassiter and Hefele
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`Nozzle(s) 26
`Nail Tabs (29a ... 29x)
`
`Roofing Felt (17)
`
`Hefele (Ex. 1004)
`
`Substrate (8)
`
`Pressure between
`Lamination roll (5)
`and Substrate (8)
`
`Tab Material (7)
`
`Lamination
`Roll (5)
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claim 1; Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1 (annotated (Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 6)); Ex. 1004, Hefele, Fig. 1 (annotated
`(Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 24)).
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`47
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 1: Lassiter and Hefele,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Allman (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1006, Allman, Figs. 1a & 2; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶42.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`48
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 1: Lassiter and Hefele,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Hefele (Ex. 1004)
`
`Ex. 1004, Hefele, Fig. 1; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶¶40 & 41.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`49
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 1: Lassiter and Hefele,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Hefele (Ex. 1004)
`
`Ex. 1004, Hefele, Fig. 1; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶43.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`50
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 1: Lassiter and Hefele,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Hefele (Ex. 1004)
`
`Ex. 1004, Hefele, Fig. 1; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶44.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`51
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 2: Lassiter and Bayer
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`Nozzle(s) 26
`Nail Tabs (29a ... 29x)
`
`Roofing Felt (17)
`
`Bayer (Ex. 1007)
`Substrate (58)
`
`Tab Material (56)
`
`Pressure
`between Roll
`(55) and
`Substrate (58)
`
`Lamination
`Roll (55)
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claim 1; Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1 (annotated (Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 6)); Ex. 1007, Bayer, Fig. 4 (annotated
`(Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 37).
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`52
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 2: Lassiter and Bayer,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Allman (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1006, Allman, Figs. 1a & 2; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶71.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`53
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 2: Lassiter and Bayer,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Bayer (Ex. 1007)
`
`Ex. 1007, Bayer, Fig. 4; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶¶69-70.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`54
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 2: Lassiter and Bayer,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Bayer (Ex. 1007)
`
`Ex. 1007, Bayer, Fig. 4; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶72.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`55
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 3: Lassiter and Eaton
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`Nozzle(s) 26
`Nail Tabs (29a ... 29x)
`
`Roofing Felt (17)
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`Substrate
`
`Lamination
`Roll (1240)
`
`Tab/Material
`
`Substrate
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claim 1; Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1 (annotated (Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 6)); Ex. 1005, Eaton, Fig. 25 (annotated
`(Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 53).
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`56
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 3: Lassiter and Eaton,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Allman (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1006, Allman, Figs. 1a & 2; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶93.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`57
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 3: Lassiter and Eaton,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`Ex. 1005, Eaton, Fig. 25; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶90.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`58
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 3: Lassiter and Eaton,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`Ex. 1005, Eaton, Fig. 25; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶¶91-92.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`59
`
`

`
`Claim 1, Ground 3: Lassiter and Eaton,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`Ex. 1005, Eaton, Fig. 25; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶94.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`60
`
`

`
`Claim 7, Ground 1: Lassiter and Hefele
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`Nozzle(s) 26
`Nail Tabs (29a ... 29x)
`
`Roofing Felt (17)
`
`Hefele (Ex. 1004)
`
`Subsequently Pressure
`Adhering Polymer Tab
`Material with Roll
`
`First Depositing
`Polymer Tab Material
`
`Polymer Tab Material (7)
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claim 7; Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1 (annotated (Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 6)); Ex. 1004, Hefele, Fig. 1 (annotated
`(Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 32)).
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`61
`
`

`
`Claim 7, Ground 1: Lassiter and Hefele,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Hefele (Ex. 1004)
`
`Ex. 1004, Hefele, Fig. 1; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶58.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`62
`
`

`
`Claim 7, Ground 1: Lassiter and Hefele,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Hefele (Ex. 1004)
`
`Ex. 1004, Hefele, Fig. 1; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶¶59-61.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`63
`
`

`
`Claim 7, Ground 3: Lassiter and Eaton
`
`Lassiter (Ex. 1003)
`Nozzle(s) 26
`Nail Tabs (29a ... 29x)
`
`Roofing Felt (17)
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`Subsequently
`Pressure Adhering
`Polymer with Roll
`
`First Depositing
`Polymer
`
`Ex. 1001, U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, claim 7; Ex. 1003, Lassiter, Fig. 1 (annotated (Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 6)); Ex. 1005, Eaton, Figs. 11&25
`(annotated (Paper No. 1, Petition, p. 49)).
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`64
`
`

`
`Claim 7, Ground 3: Lassiter and Eaton,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Allman (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1006, Allman, Figs. 1a & 2; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶110.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`65
`
`

`
`Claim 7, Ground 3: Lassiter and Eaton,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`Ex. 1005, Eaton, Figs. 11 & 25; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶109.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`66
`
`

`
`Claim 7, Ground 3: Lassiter and Eaton,
`Rational to Combine
`
`Eaton (Ex. 1005)
`
`Ex. 1005, Eaton, Figs. 11 & 25; Ex. 1014, Levenson Dec., ¶111.
`
`Petitioner - Owens Corning - Ex. 1023
`
`67

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket