`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 38
` Entered January 5, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00643 (Patent 8,232,250 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00644 (Patent 8,399,413 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00830 (Patent 8,969,302 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before ZHENYU YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Patent Owner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`1 Cases IPR2015-01976, IPR2015-01980, and IPR2015-01981 have been
`joined with IPR2015-00643, IPR2015-00644, and IPR2015-00830,
`respectively. This order addresses issues that are common to each
`referenced case. We, therefore, issue a single order that has been entered in
`each case. For convenience, paper numbers refer to those filed in IPR2015-
`00643. The parties may use this style caption when filing a single paper in
`multiple proceedings, provided that such caption includes a footnote
`attesting that “the word-for-word identical paper is filed in each proceeding
`identified in the caption.”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00643 (Patent 8,232,250 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00644 (Patent 8,399,413 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00830 (Patent 8,969,302 B2)
`
`
`Patent Owner has filed unopposed Motions for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of John T. Bennett, Daryl L. Wiesen, and Nicholas K.
`Mitrokostas. Papers 29, 31, 33. The Motions are supported by the
`Declarations of Messrs. Bennett, Wiesen, and Mitrokostas. Exs. 2136–38.
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Messrs. Bennett, Wiesen, and Mitrokostas pro hac vice in each
`proceeding.
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission
`of John T. Bennett, Daryl L. Wiesen, and Nicholas K. Mitrokostas are
`granted in each proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Messrs. Bennett, Wiesen, and
`Mitrokostas shall comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of the C.F.R.; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Messrs. Bennett, Wiesen, and
`Mitrokostas shall be subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the Office’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in
`37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101-11.901.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00643 (Patent 8,232,250 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00644 (Patent 8,399,413 B2)
`Case IPR2015-00830 (Patent 8,969,302 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Jeffrey W. Guise
`jguise@wsgr.com
`
`Richard Torczon
`rtorczon@wsgr.com
`
`Brandon M. White
`bmwhite@perkinscoie.com
`
`Shannon Bloodworth
`sbloodworth@perkinscoie.com
`
`David Anstaett
`danstaett@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Elizabeth J. Holland
`eholland@goodwinprocter.com
`
`William G. James
`wjames@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Eleanor M. Yost
`eyost@goodwinproter.com
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`