throbber
ISSCC94 I SESSION 13 I NEURAL NETWORKS AND IMAGE SENSORS I PAPER TP 13.5
`
`TP 13.5: A CMOS Area image Sensor
`with Pixel-Level AfD Conversion
`Boyd Fowler, Abbas El Gamal, David X. D. Yang
`
`Infomation Systems Lab., Electrical Engineering Dept., Stanford University, CA
`
`Charge-coupled devices (CCD) are at present the most widely
`used technology for implementing area image sensors. How-
`ever, they suffer from low yields, consume too much power, and
`are plagued with SNR limitations due to the shifting and
`detection of analog charge packets, and the fact that data is
`communicated off chip in analog form [l].
`
`Several alternatives to CCD area image sensors use standard
`CMOS technology. Self scanned photodiode arrays are used to
`produce both binary and gray-scale image sensors [l, 21. Bipo-
`lar junction phototransistor arrays, and charge injection ar-
`rays are used [3, 41. However, these alternatives can suffer
`from low resolution due to limited pixel observation time,
`limited SNR due to analog sensing, and, as with CCDs, data is
`communicated off chip in analog form.
`
`This paper describes an area image sensor that can potentially
`circumvent the limitations of CCDs and their alternatives.It
`uses a standard CMOS process and can therefore be manufac-
`tured with high yield. Digital circuitry for control and signal
`processingcan be integrated with the sensor. Moreover, CMOS
`technology advances such as scaling and extra layers of metal
`can be used to improve pixel density and sensor performance.
`The analog image data is immediately converted to digital at
`each pixel using a one-bit sigma-delta modulator [51. The use
`of sigma-delta modulation allows the data-conversion circuitry
`to be simple and insensitive to process variations [51. A global
`"shutter" provides variable light input attenuation to achieve
`wide dynamic range [21. Data is communicated off chip in a
`digital form, eliminating the SNR degradation of analog data
`communication. (Figure 1)
`
`To demonstrate the viability of the approach, an area image
`sensor chip is fabricated in a 1.2pm CMOS technology. A
`functional block diagram of the chip is given in Figure 2. It
`consists of an array of 64x64 pixel blocks, a clock driver, a 6:64
`POW address decoder, 64 latched sense amplifiers, and 16 4:P
`column multiplexers. The chip also contains data compression
`circuitry not described in this paper. A die micrograph is given
`in Figure 3 and a summary of the main characteristics of the
`chip are listed in Table 1.
`
`A circuit schematic of the function implemented at each pixel
`is given in Figure 1. The phototransistor is a vertical bipolar
`pnp transistor. The emitter is formed using source-drain p"
`diffusion, the base is the n-well surrounding the emitter and
`the collector is the p-substrate. The n-well is exposed to light,
`while the rest of the circuitry is covered with the second level
`of metal to reduce the chance of photon-induced latch-up.
`Physical construction and operation ofbipolar phototransistors
`are described in References 7 and 6. Control of the input
`photocurrent is by setting the duty cycle (the ratio between the
`on and off times) of the shutter input SHU'ITER - the higher
`the duty cycle, the larger the input photocurrent. Current from
`the phototransistor is integrated on C1 and quantized using a
`regenerative latch clocked via PHI2. The quantized value is
`converted into a current using a l b D/A converter and fed back
`to the input capacitor C1. The duty cycle of PHI1 and the
`voltage VBIASl control the magnitude of the feedback signal
`Delta. PHI1 and PHI2 constitute a two-phase nonoverlapping
`
`clock. At the completion of each two-phase dock cycle 21 siirgle
`bit is produced. The bit is read by enabling the word lhc
`WORD. If the bit is high the precharged bit line BIT is puilcd
`down and sensed by a simple single-ended sense amplifier.
`
`The operation of the area image sensor chip is as follows: after
`an image is focused on the chip the sigma-delta modulators are
`reset via the global RESET signal. SHU"ER is then globally
`set to maximize image SNR without saturating the data ron-
`version circuitry. Next the sigma-delta modulators are glo-
`bally clocked at a rate Fa above the image frame rate ZF,. This
`is necessary since a sigma-delta modulator reduces quantiza-
`tionerror at the cost ofextra data. At the endofeach clock cycle
`the outputs of the sigma-delta modulators form a 64x64 array
`ofbits referredto as a"bit plane." Each bit planeis read out row
`by row. The image is fully capturedusing a number of bit planes
`determined by the target SNR. Using the theoretical analysis
`in Reference 5, the number of bit planes L needed versus SNR
`is given by
`SNR = 910g,L - 5.2dB.
`
`The maximum achievable SNR is measured at 61dB. SNR
`degradation due to charge injection of digital circuitry close to
`analog sensors is negligible since the frequency of operation is
`very low (1kHz) and the circuitry consumes less than 20nA per
`pixel.
`
`Figure 4 shows the output from a single-pixel sigma-delta
`modulator.
`
`Thedigitized pixelvaluesarereconstructed usingadecimation
`filter [51. Depending on the application, this reconstruction
`may be implemented in software, using special-purpose hard-
`ware external to the sensor, or integrated with the sensor. In
`a low-resolution application where no local reconstruction is
`needed, e.g. video phone or surveillance camera, the sensor
`digital output is compressed and immediately transmitted.
`Reconstruction is at the receiving end using general- or spe-
`cial-purpose hardware. If the image is to be displayed or
`processed locally one or more decimation filters are integrated
`with the sensor and an external RAM is used. Pixel values
`stored in RAM are recursively updated by reading into the
`sensor, updating their values using the decimation filters and
`the new bits from the corresponding sigma-delta modulators,
`and storing the new values back into the RAM. This scheme
`appears feasible even for a sensor with as many as 1M pixels
`operating at 30 frames per second at 8b-per-pixel resolution.
`
`The sensor can achieve a dynamic range (ratio of maximum
`non-saturating photocurrent to dark current) potentially
`greater than 93dB. This is because the magnitude of the
`photocurrent can be vaned by a factor of 1000, or 60dB, and the
`maximum measured SNR is approximately 33dB with the
`SHUTTER duty cycle set at loo%, the framc samplingrate set
`at 30H.z. and the oversampling ratio set at 64.
`
`print, and the image
`Figure 5 shows a scan from a 35"
`obtained by the sensor when contact exposed to the 35"
`negative. The sensor estimated total power ofless than 1mW is
`significantly lower than that of other types of image sensors.
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`The authors thank B. P. Wong and D. How for test-bed
`contributions, M. Godfrey, B. Wooley, and L. Hesselink for
`support and encouragement, and MOSIS for fabrication.
`
`Magna 2074
`TRW v. Magna
`IPR2015-00436
`
`

`
`ISSCC94 /THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 17,1994 / SUNSET / 3:45 PM
`
`ill
`
`VBI,\SZt-----
`
`Figure 1: Pixel schematic.
`
`Two Pharc Cluck l n p i i u
`
`Clock IhtrerY
`
`64 x 64 lmsge Scnwr Core
`
`a
`
`a
`
`0
`
`a
`
`a
`
`U
`
`L
`
`
`
`I
`
`16 bil Output Data
`Figure 2: Image sensor chip functional block diagram.
`Figure 3: See page 344.
`
`0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0006 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 9
`Seconds
`
`I
`0 0 1
`
`-2'
`0
`
`6 !
`
`0
`
`0001 0 002 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0005 0006 0007 0008 0 009 0 01
`
`Seconds
`
`I l l
`
`Figure 5: 300dpi scan of print from negative
`(top). 64x64 image by sensor using
`35"
`negative contact exposure (bot.).
`
`CMOS technology
`Die area
`Pixel area
`Transistoridpixel
`Phototransistor area
`Package
`Supply
`Maximum SNR
`Dynamic range
`Dissipation wlo pads
`Measurement T
`
`1.2pm 2-metal, 1-poly, n-well
`6.5~5.0"~
`60x60pm2
`22
`105pm2
`84-pin PGA
`5 v
`61dB
`93dB
`<lmW
`23°C
`
`Table 1: 64x64 area image sensor characteristics.
`
`References
`[l] Image Sensing Products 199211993, EG&G Reticon, Sunnyvale
`,CA, 1992.
`[21 Denyer, P. B., et al., "On-Chip CMOS Sensors for VLSI Imaging
`Systems," VLSI 91, Aug., 1991.
`[31 Michon, G. J., and H. IC Burke, "Charge Injection Imaging," ISSCC
`Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 138-139, Feb., 1973.
`[41 Tanaka, N., et al., "A310k Pixel Bipolar Imager (BASIS)," ISSCC
`Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 96-97, Feb., 1989.
`[5] Candy, J. C., "A Use of Double Integration in Delta Sigma
`Modulation," IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 249-258, March,
`1985.
`[61 Mead, C., "A Sensitive Electronic Percepter," Chapel Hill Confer-
`ence on VLSI, 1985.
`[71 Tanaka, N., et al., "A Novel Bipolar Imaging Device with Self-Noise
`
`Jan., Reduction 1989. Capability," IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 31-38,
`
`Figure 4 Single-pixel sigma-delta modulator output
`from HP54601A. PHU (top), pixel output (bottom).
`
`[81 Akiyama, I, et al, "A 1280x980 Pixel CCD Image Sensor," ISSCC
`Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 96-97, Feb., 1986.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket