throbber
EXHIBIT 1052
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 5,892,540 TO KOZLOWSKI et al.
`
`(“the ‘540 Patent” or “KOZLOWSKI”)
`
`TRW Automotive U.S. LLC: EXHIBIT 1052
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NUMBER 8,599,001
`IPR2015-00436
`
`

`
`United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,892,540
`
`Kozlowski et al.
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Apr. 6, 1999
`
`US005892540A
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Degrauwe et al., “A Micropower CMOS—Instrumentation
`Amplifier,” IEEE Journal of Solid—State Circuits, vol.
`SC—20, No. 3, pp. 805-807, Jun. 1985.
`
`Primary Examiner—Wendy Garber
`Assistant Examiner—Ngoc-Yen Vu
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—James P. O’Shaughnessey; John
`J. Deinken
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A CMOS imaging system provides low noise read out and
`amplification for an array of passive pixels, each of which
`comprises a photodetector, an access MOSFET, and a sec-
`ond MOSFET that functions as a signal overflow shunt and
`a means for electrically injecting a test signal. The read out
`circuit for each column of pixels includes a high gain, Wide
`bandwidth, CMOS differential amplifier, a reset switch and
`selectable feedback capacitors, selectable load capacitors,
`correlated double sampling and sample-and-hold circuits, an
`optional pipelining circuit, and an offset cancellation circuit
`connected to an output bus to suppress the input offset
`nonuniformity of the amplifier. For full process compatibil-
`ity with standard silicided submicron CMOS and to maxi-
`mize yield and minimize die cost, each photodiode may
`comprise the lightly doped source of its access MOSFET.
`Circuit complexity is restricted to the column buffers, which
`exploit signal processing capability inherent
`in CMOS.
`Advantages include high fabrication yield, broadband spec-
`tral response from near-UV to near-IR, low read noise at
`HDTV data rates, large charge-handling capacity, variable
`sensitivity with simple controls, and reduced power con-
`sumption.
`
`20 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`—lC'U-ICO
`
`1052-001
`
`[54] LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER FOR PASSIVE
`PIXEL CMOS IMAGER
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Lester J. Kozlowski, Simi Valley;
`William A. Kleinhans, Westlake
`Village, both of Calif.
`
`[73] Assignee: Rockwell International Corporation,
`Costa Mesa, Calif.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 662,382
`
`[22]
`
`Filed:
`
`Jun. 13, 1996
`
`
`Int. Cl.5
`[51]
`[52] U.S. Cl.
`
`H04N 5/217; H04N 5/335
`........................ .. 348/300; 348/241; 348/308;
`348/310; 250/208.1
`[58] Field of Search ........................... .. 330/86, 282, 308;
`348/207, 222, 241, 243, 244, 245, 250,
`294, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 300,
`301; 250/208.1; H04N 5/335, 5/217
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`6/1983 Lewis .................................... .. 358/213
`11/1988 Morse et al.
`307/490
`. 358/213.28
`8/1991 Wyles et al.
`250/208.1
`10/1992 Tandon et al.
`3/1994 Uno .......... ..
`250/208.1
`9/1994 Denyer .................................. .. 348/300
`9/1994 Stein ..................................... .. 348/250
`10/1995 Fowler et al.
`348/294
`4/1997 Uno .......... ..
`348/297
`3/1998 Chi et al.
`257/462
`5/1998 Shyu et al.
`................................ .. 330/9
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`4,387,402
`4,786,831
`5,043,820
`5,153,421
`5,296,696
`5,345,266
`5,349,380
`5,461,425
`5,619,262
`5,734,191
`5,751,189
`
`1052-001
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Apr. 6,1999
`
`Sheet 1 of2
`
`5,892,540
`
`ODHQDF
`
`~.,§m.£
`
`1052-002
`
`--~mr
`IIIIL
`
`1052-002
`
`

`
`U
`
`tneta
`
`D..A
`
`9
`
`D0S>
`
`D1
`
`.............--_2mooom<o+_M_:|.
`-2T.EmaH2_wSo__h___Sm_ooom<o_T1-2I_H
`9mooom<o-n__9_9_1_6,_r._
`
`v:\__
`
`_
`
`_
`
`___
`
`8/_5U
`
`m.MMPS~_5,mm>NE21
`
`1052-003
`
`
`

`
`1
`LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER FOR PASSIVE
`PIXEL CMOS IMAGER
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`
`invention relates to electronic imaging
`The present
`devices and, in particular, to a low noise amplifier system
`having charge integrating column buffers for a passive pixel
`CMOS imager.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Most currently available video cameras use charge
`coupled devices (CCDs)
`for generating video images.
`Although these cameras are suitable for many applications,
`the relatively high cost of CCD—based camera technology
`limits its use in high volume commercial markets, such as
`personal computer teleconferencing, for example.
`The higher cost of CCD camera systems results from a
`combination of factors, such as many mask levels for CCD
`processes;
`lower yields for the photosensor due to high
`complexity; shared pixel real estate for the photosensor and
`CCD shift register, which requires micro-optics or alterna-
`tive die-area doubling frame transfer schemes (or otherwise
`limits the optical fill factor); front-illuminated designs that
`may require photodetection through overlying polysilicon
`layers, which generally degrade response in the blue and
`near-UV regions of the spectrum; complex interface and
`signal processing electronics that may not be compatible
`with battery operation; support electronics functions that are
`not readily integrated onto the CCD imager; and interface
`electronics that require high voltage clock drivers and DC
`biases to operate the CCD and the video signal conditioning
`amplifier (including correlated double samplers and other
`circuitry needed to manipulate the video into the proper
`protocol).
`Various MOSFET-based alternatives to CCD sensors are
`also known in the prior art for lower cost applications.
`Hitachi, for example, has produced a MOS-based photo-
`diode imaging array for high-volume applications, including
`camcorders (Hitachi Part No. HE98221). This basic scheme,
`commonly referred to as a passive pixel sensor, typically
`includes an array of pixels connected to an amplifier by
`horizontal and vertical scanners. Each passive pixel (i.e.,
`having no pixel-based amplification) comprises a silicon
`photodiode and a pixel access transistor.
`Early passive pixel devices fabricated using n-MOS tech-
`nology were not competitive with emerging CCD—based
`imagers, except for niche applications such as spectrometry,
`because the read noise (including blooming and fixed pattern
`noise) was too high. Furthermore, the circuitry servicing
`each column did not adequately extract the low-level signal
`current in the presence of switching noise, vertical smear
`noise, and random noise. The column buffer, generally
`comprising a bipolar transistor in emitter follower configu-
`ration with a correlated double sampler, typically yielded
`temporal and fixed pattern noise that was about an order of
`magnitude higher than that produced by competing CCDs.
`Nevertheless, companies such as EG&G Reticon continue to
`produce MOS photodiode arrays having passive pixel
`designs with various multiplexing schemes.
`The advantage of producing imagers using conventional
`MOS fabrication technologies, rather than esoteric CCD
`processes requiring many implantation steps and complex
`interface circuitry, has led to successive improvements. The
`column buffer was refined by using an enhancement-
`depletion inverter to provide greater amplification with a
`small area of wafer “real estate.” The amplifier gain effec-
`
`5,892,540
`
`2
`
`tively reduced the column capacitance, and thus suppressed
`kTC noise and pattern noise. Low-light level performance
`was improved by about a factor of three (to a minimum
`scene illumination of 40 lux) relative to previous MOS
`imagers.
`Subsequently, amplification was relocated to the pixel by
`means of a phototransistor. Cell-based amplification imagers
`are sometimes referred to as active pixel sensors. The
`Base-Stored Image Sensor (BASIS) used a bipolar transistor
`in emitter follower configuration, with a downstream cor-
`related sampler, to suppress random and temporal noise. By
`storing the photogenerated signal on the phototransistor’s
`base to provide cell-based charge amplification, the mini-
`mum scene illumination was reduced to 10‘3 lux in a linear
`sensor array. The minimum scene illumination was higher
`(z0.01 lux) in a related two-dimensional BASIS imager
`having 310,000 pixels because the photoresponse nonuni-
`formity was relatively high (§2%). Although this MOS
`imager had adequate sensitivity, the pixel pitch was consid-
`ered too large (at about 13 gm).
`An active pixel sensor comprising a three-transistor pixel
`is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,696 (Uno). The cell-
`based source-follower amplifier is augmented with a CMOS
`column buffer providing fixed pattern noise cancellation. In
`this scheme, at least one of the three transistors in the pixel
`is relatively large to minimize amplifier 1/f noise. A large
`S/N ratio with low pattern noise can be achieved, but the
`pixel optical fill factor is relatively small.
`A compact passive pixel image sensor that can be fabri-
`cated using various technologies, including CMOS, NMOS,
`Bipolar, BiMOS, BiCMOS, or amorphous silicon,
`is
`described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,345,266 (Denyer). Denyer
`buffers the output signal from the passive pixels with charge-
`integrating column amplifiers to extract the signal from each
`pixel. However, Denyer does not disclose circuitry to mini-
`mize vertical streak noise, minimize random thermal noise,
`suppress fixed pattern noise, or improve testability.
`Because of the complexity and relatively high cost that
`limit use of CCD—based imaging systems in high volume
`commercial markets, and the limitations of prior art active
`and passive pixel sensors, there is a need for new electronic
`imaging systems that offer significant reductions in cost and
`power requirements. Because the amplification require-
`ments of a sensor system are quite formidable, considering
`the small charge originating at each pixel within an array, the
`amplifier design, whether realized in on-chip or external
`circuitry, must be rather sophisticated.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`invention comprises a low noise readout
`The present
`system for a CMOS imager. The system provides low noise
`amplification for an array of passive pixels, each of which
`comprises a photodetector, an access MOSFET to read the
`signal and multiplex the outputs from the array of pixels, and
`a second MOSFET that serves as a signal overflow shunt and
`a means for electrically injecting a test signal. In a typical
`two-dimensional array, multiplexing may be performed by
`horizontal and vertical shift registers, for example, as is
`known in the prior art. The low noise amplifier of the present
`invention forms a column buffer for reading out each column
`(or row) of pixels. The low noise column buffer comprises
`a robust CMOS capacitive transimpedance amplifier
`(CTIA), gain-setting feedback capacitors, selectable load
`capacitors, correlated double sampling and sample-and-hold
`circuits, an optional pipelining circuit, and an offset cancel-
`lation circuit connected to an output bus to suppress the
`input offset nonuniformity of the amplifier.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`1052-004
`
`1052-004
`
`

`
`5,892,540
`
`3
`Each passive pixel interfaced by the read out system has
`the following features: (1) a high fill-factor photodetector
`preferably formed by the lightly-doped drain (LDD) n-type
`implant into the p-type foundation common to most com-
`mercial CMOS processes; (2) a signal overflow MOSFET
`that drains excess charge under large signal conditions to
`prevent vertical streak noise, provides a means for electri-
`cally injecting a signal onto the photodiode capacitance with
`well-controlled charge equilibration for a low-cost built-in
`test, and provides optimum management of integration time;
`and (3) an access MOSFET that enables read out of the
`electrically or optically induced signal.
`The low noise read out system of the present invention
`includes the following features: (1) sufficient bandwidth and
`transient response to avoid generation of fixed pattern noise
`due to variations in amplifier time constants and stray
`capacitances; (2) on-chip sensitivity control by means of
`multiple feedback capacitances that may be programmed
`using an n-bit digital word read in and stored on-chip on a
`frame-by-frame basis; (3) adequate power supply rejection
`to enable development of a single-chip camera without
`elaborate support electronics such as extensive noise decou-
`pling circuitry; (4) suppression of kTC noise associated with
`the column capacitance; (5) suppression of pattern noise
`associated with parasitic clock feed-through and nonunifor-
`mity in signal settling; (6) selectable band-limiting to mini-
`mize the broadband channel noise associated with the wide-
`
`band charge-integrating CTIA; (7) optional signal pipeline
`to alleviate amplifier bandwidth requirements and minimize
`power dissipation; (8) amplifier offset cancellation to sup-
`press pattern noise from threshold nonuniformity; and (9)
`high tolerance to parametric variations, which allows ampli-
`fier partitioning and subsequent application to imaging
`arrays having pixel pitch of 5 microns or less.
`The present invention has the advantage of full process
`compatibility with standard silicided submicron CMOS. The
`system exploits the signal processing capability inherent in
`CMOS and maximizes yield and minimizes die cost by
`restricting circuit complexity to the column buffers. The use
`of an overflow MOSFET to manage integration time and
`provide automatic gain control is preferred to the vertical
`blooming control used in many CCDs and some MOS
`imaging arrays because an additional reset MOSFET is not
`needed, the spectral response is broad from the near-UV to
`the near-IR (alternatively pulsing the substrate reduces the
`absorption depth and thus degrades the near-IR
`photoresponse), and the scheme allows optimizing the
`design of the column buffer for low total noise. In addition,
`the offset cancellation circuit improves compatibility with
`disparate CMOS processes having larger threshold voltage
`nonuniformity.
`Because the low noise CMOS imaging system of the
`present invention has only two small MOSFETs in each
`pixel, the device has an “as-drawn” fill factor of greater than
`50% at 10 gm pixel pitch using 0.6 gm design rules in
`CMOS. The actual optical fill factor is somewhat larger
`because of lateral collection and the approximately 100 ,um
`diffusion length of commercial CMOS processes. The inven-
`tion has additional advantages, including flexibility to col-
`locate much digital logic and signal-processing (due to the
`robust amplifier design); read noise below 60 e- and 95 e- for
`288-element and 488-element column lengths, respectively,
`at data rates compatible with high definition television
`(HDTV);
`fixed pattern noise significantly below 0.1%
`(which is comparable to competing CCD imagers); less than
`0.5% nonlinearity over 1.2 V signal swing for 3.3 V power
`supply;
`large handling capacity; and variable sensitivity
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`
`using a serial interface updated digitally on a frame-by-
`frame basis. The design of the invention also permits incor-
`poration of other signal-processing features onto each die
`while maintaining sensitivity and tolerance to clocking
`noise. As an example, a high-speed analog-to-digital con-
`verter can be added after the output amplifier to interface
`directly with a microprocessor.
`A principal object of the invention is an improved elec-
`tronic imaging system. A feature of the invention is an
`integrated low noise amplifier for read out of a passive pixel
`sensor system. An advantage of the invention is reduced
`noise, cost, and power consumption in a electronic imaging
`system implemented in CMOS.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`For a more complete understanding of the present inven-
`tion and for
`further advantages thereof,
`the following
`Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments makes
`reference to the accompanying Drawings, in which:
`FIG. 1 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating a low
`noise CMOS amplification system for readout of a passive
`pixel imaging array; and
`FIG. 2 is a schematic circuit diagram illustrating a pre-
`ferred embodiment of a high gain, wide bandwidth, differ-
`ential amplifier incorporated in the system of FIG. 1.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`
`Visible imaging systems implemented in CMOS have the
`potential
`for significant reductions in cost and power
`requirements in components such as image sensors, drive
`electronics, and output signal conditioning electronics. An
`objective is a video camera that can be configured as a single
`CMOS integrated circuit supported by only an oscillator and
`a battery. Such a CMOS imaging system would require
`lower voltages and would dissipate less power than a
`CCD-based system, providing improvements that translate
`into smaller size and longer battery life.
`Because of the advantages offered by CMOS visible
`imagers, there have been ongoing efforts to develop active
`pixel sensor (APS) devices. Active pixel sensors can provide
`low read noise comparable to scientific grade CCD systems.
`The active circuits in each pixel of APS devices, however,
`utilize cell “real estate” that could otherwise be used to
`
`maximize the sensor optical fill factor. Active pixel circuits
`also tend to increase power dissipation, increase fixed pat-
`tern noise (possibly requiring additional circuitry to suppress
`the noise), and limit the scalability of the technology.
`In contrast to APS systems, CMOS sensors with passive
`pixels offer advantages such as high optical fill factor and
`pixel density without microlenses, minimal power
`dissipation, imager scalability, and lower fixed pattern noise.
`However, passive pixel systems generally exhibit undesir-
`able read noise as well as compatibility problems with
`standard CMOS processes. The total read noise that must be
`reduced to make a CMOS imager practical includes tempo-
`ral noise associated with capacitance of the column bus,
`vertical streak noise resulting from signal overflow, and
`fixed pattern noise from various sources such as clock
`feed-through during pixel access.
`The CMOS read out and amplification system of the
`present invention includes a practical design for a passive
`pixel array, including a low noise charge integrating ampli-
`fier to extract the photodetector signals. Prototype embodi-
`ments of the low noise amplifier have included a visible
`
`1052-005
`
`1052-005
`
`

`
`5,892,540
`
`5
`
`imager comprising an array of 648 (columns) by 488 (rows)
`of visible light detectors (photodetectors) and another
`imager comprising 356 (columns) by 288 (rows). In these
`embodiments, the rows were spaced 10 microns center-to-
`center, but the even rows were shifted 5 microns to the right
`of the odd rows. Several columns and rows of detectors
`
`(typically up to six) at the perimeter of the light-sensitive
`region may be covered with metal and used to establish the
`dark level for on-chip signal processing, including suppres-
`sion of column-to-column pattern noise. In addition,
`the
`detectors in each row may be covered with color filters. For
`example, the odd rows may begin at the left with red, green,
`then blue filters, and the even rows may begin with blue, red,
`then green filters, with these patterns repeating to fill the
`respective rows.
`A low noise CMOS read out amplifier 10 of the present
`invention is illustrated in the schematic diagram of FIG. 1.
`In the preferred embodiment, each pixel 12 of the sensor
`array comprises a photodetector, such as a photodiode 14,
`connected to an access MOSFET 16 and a signal overflow
`MOSFET 18. The signal from photodiode 14 is read through
`access MOSFET 16 to a column bus 20. Column bus 20
`
`connects all pixels in a column of the photodetector array to
`the read out amplifier 10. Aseparate read out amplifier 10 is
`provided for each column in the photodetector array. Pho-
`todiode 14 may comprise a substrate diode, for example,
`with the silicide cleared. In this embodiment, it is necessary
`to clear the silicide because it is opaque to visible light. Pixel
`12 is designed in the simplest form to obtain the largest
`available light detecting area while providing broad spectral
`response, control of blooming and signal integration time,
`and compatibility with CMOS production processes.
`For maximum compatibility with standard submicron
`CMOS processes, photodiode 14 may be formed by using
`the lightly doped drain (LDD) implant of MOSFET 16 to
`create a p-n junction. In this embodiment, each photodiode
`14 comprises the lightly doped source of access MOSFET
`16. Since no additional ion implantation is necessary, the
`process and wafer cost for circuit 10 are the same as those
`of standard, high volume digital electronic products.
`Because the LDD implant is deeper than a standard source/
`drain implant, the spectral response of photodiode 14 is high
`for near-IR radiation.
`
`In the prototype embodiment, the signals from photode-
`tectors 12 were read out one row at a time, from bottom to
`top of the array. Within each row, photodetectors 12 were
`read out from left to right. Readout is initiated by turning on
`the access MOSFETs 16 of all the photodetectors 12 in a
`selected row. This connects each photodetector 12 in the
`selected row to its corresponding column bus 20. Each
`column bus 20 is connected to a charge integrating amplifier
`circuit, which comprises a capacitive transimpedance ampli-
`fier (CTIA) 22. Thus,
`the photocharge from each row-
`selected photodiode 14 is transferred to its corresponding
`CTIA 22 by its column bus 20.
`Capacitive transimpedance amplifier (CTIA) 22 includes
`a high gain, wide bandwidth, CMOS differential amplifier
`24 with a small feedback capacitor 26 connected in parallel
`to form a charge amplifier. The sensitivity of CTIA 22 can
`be adjusted by selecting one or more gain-setting, parallel
`feedback capacitors 30A—30D, in any combination, with the
`minimum feedback capacitance 26. A reset switch 32 con-
`nected across the parallel feedback capacitors allows the
`signal (i.e., the photo-generated charge) to be cleared from
`CTIA 22 after it has been read. An optimum load capaci-
`tance 34 (which may include a semiconductor capacitance
`34A and a switchable semiconductor capacitance 34B) is
`
`6
`connected to the output of CTIA 22 and can be selected as
`required to limit
`the bandwidth and thus control noise,
`particularly the broadband channel noise of CTIA 22.
`After a signal from photodetector 12 has been transferred
`to CTIA 22, photodetector voltage is set by REF1 to about
`2 volts for a 5 V power supply (or to about 1.4 volts for a
`3.3 V power supply). The voltage on the photodetector
`capacitance 26 (and 30A—30D) will subsequently discharge
`toward zero at a rate proportional
`to the incident
`light
`intensity. The photodetector signal is prevented from reach-
`ing zero by the turn-on of overflow MOSFET 18 as the
`gate-to-source voltage reaches the threshold voltage of
`MOSFET 18. Otherwise isolation would fail, resulting in
`crosstalk and vertical streak noise. The gate of overflow
`MOSFET 18 is set at about 1.2 Vby an internally generated
`bias. When the photodetector signal reaches about 0.4 V, the
`excess signal begins shunting through overflow MOSFET
`18 to the supply bus. As a result, the maximum photode-
`tector signal is limited to about 0.1 picocoulomb.
`The positive (+) (noninverting) terminal of differential
`amplifier 24 is connected to a low noise reference (REF1).
`REF1 is typically generated on-chip by a bandgap reference
`circuit (for lowest possible temporal noise) and sampled by
`a sample-and-hold (S/H) circuit consisting of a MOSFET
`switch 36 and a capacitor 38. By sampling reference voltage
`REF1, wideband noise of the reference is band-limited to the
`Nyquist bandwidth established by the S/H clock frequency.
`In an alternative embodiment, the noninverting (+) terminal
`of each differential amplifier 24 (i.e., one amplifier for each
`column in a two-dimensional imaging array, as explained
`above)
`is connected to a “black” reference pixel
`(constituting REF1 in this embodiment) to suppress column-
`to-column offsets and other common mode noise. Each
`
`“black” reference pixel comprises a standard pixel that is
`converted with light-absorbing material so that its output is
`generated primarily by dark signal mechanisms. This con-
`figuration provides low spatial noise by removing the noise
`associated with column-to-column offsets at the front end of
`CTIA 22.
`
`In a preferred embodiment of system 10, two correlated
`double sampling circuits are used to improve circuit sensi-
`tivity. A first correlated double sampling circuit 42 includes
`a series capacitor 44 connected between the output of CTIA
`22 and a clamp switch 46. Immediately after a passive pixel
`(such as pixel 12) has been read and reset, clamp switch 46
`is connected to a reference (REF2) and CTIA 22 is held at
`reset (with reset switch 32 closed). Capacitor clamp switch
`46 is released (opened) only after reset switch 32 is opened
`and CTIA 22 is allowed to settle. Thus, when CTIA 22 is at
`its final reset level, the far side of capacitor 44 will be at the
`reference level REF2. Temporal reset noise associated with
`column bus capacitance and amplifier 24 is suppressed at
`this point.
`The far terminal of capacitor 44 is connected to a buffer
`stage 50 comprising a unity gain buffer amplifier 52, a
`CMOS sample-and-hold (S/H) switch 54, and a S/H capaci-
`tor 56. A second correlated double sampling circuit 62
`includes a series capacitor 64 connected between S/H buffer
`50 (the sampled-and-held o11tp11t of CTIA 22) and a clamp
`switch 66 to suppress column-to-column fixed pattern noise.
`At the start of each frame, when the settled reset signals from
`the “blac ” pixels are read out through the signal processing
`chain comprising CTIA 22, clamp circuit 42, and S/H buffer
`50, clamp switch 66 connects series capacitor 64 to a
`reference (REF3). Capacitor clamp switch 66 is released
`(opened) only after reset switch 32 has been opened, CTIA
`22 has been allowed to settle, and clamping switch 46 has
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`1052-006
`
`1052-006
`
`

`
`5,892,540
`
`7
`been opened. Thus, when CTIA 22 is at its settled reset level,
`the far side of capacitor 64 will be at reference level REF3.
`Column-to-column pattern noise is suppressed at this point.
`The far terminal of capacitor 64 is connected to an offset
`cancellation circuit 70, which includes a main amplifier 72
`comprising a single stage transconductor with a high output
`impedance connected to an output bus. A unity gain buffer
`is obtained by connecting the output of amplifier 72 to its
`inverting (—)
`input
`through feedback connection offset
`switch 74, unhooking REF3 by means of reference switch
`76, and connecting the photocharge signal from clamp
`circuit 62 to the noninverting (+) input. Threshold adjust-
`ment is obtained by placing a low transconductance ampli-
`fier 82 in parallel with main amplifier 72. To cancel the
`offset, amplifier 72 is put in a high gain mode by opening a
`feedback connection switch 74. The inverting (—) input to
`amplifier 82 is tied to reference voltage REF3, and the
`output is connected to filter capacitor 84 and sample capaci-
`tor 86 through offset switch 88. Amplifier 82 thus generates
`a current to cancel the unbalance current of main amplifier
`72. The correction voltage is trapped on capacitor 86, and
`main amplifier 72 is restored to its unity gain configuration.
`This technique of offset cancellation of the output bus driver
`is further described in Degrauwe et al., “A Micropower
`CMOS-Instrumentation Amplifier,” IEEE Journal of Solid-
`State Circuits, Vol. SC-20, No. 3, pp. 805-807 (June 1985).
`As an option, the output of buffer amplifier 52 may be
`connected, by the addition of at least one parallel circuit 90,
`to an analog pipeline that includes at least two parallel
`branches. Circuit 90 is simply a duplicate of the sample-
`and-hold (S/H) and correlated double sampling circuits that
`it parallels. With appropriate switching, pipelined sample-
`and-hold circuitry allows a photodetector signal from the
`currently selected row of the photodetector array to be
`transferred to CTIA 22 while data from the previously
`selected row is being multiplexed onto the output bus. Final
`multiplexing may be used to distribute the red, green, and
`blue signals.
`As further illustrated in FIG. 2, a preferred embodiment of
`differential amplifier 24 comprises a folded cascode archi-
`tecture that maximizes the closed-loop drive capability,
`adequately settles the signal
`independent of parametric
`variations, minimizes Miller capacitance of the charge-
`integrating stage, minimizes amplifier noise, and provides
`robust signal-handling capability in a mixed-signal environ-
`ment. Core amplifier stage 100 comprises differencing
`n-type amplifier FETs 104 and 106 in combination with
`current source n-FET 102. Current source FET 102 is
`internally set by AMP BIAS to sink 20 yA, for example, for
`operation at video frame rates. Amplifier stage 100, with
`cascoded negative leg comprising n-FET 108, drives a
`folded cascode current mirror active load 114. A pair of
`p-FETs 110 and 112 comprise balanced current sources that
`supply a quiescent bias current of 12 uA at video frame rates,
`and by setting MIRROR at
`the appropriate bias level,
`amplifier load 114 sinks approximately 2 ,uA for each leg.
`The reduced current in active load 114 enhances open-loop
`gain as compared to other differential amplifier schemes,
`which require additional chip “real estate” to achieve similar
`performance gains. This type of differential amplifier 24 is
`necessary in a low noise system in order to suppress both 1/f
`and broadband noise while simultaneously increasing gain.
`The design of amplifier 24 illustrated in FIG. 2 avoids
`generation of fixed pattern noise from subtle signal fluct11a-
`tions. Amplifier 24 also provides adequate power supply
`rejection and immunity to possible clocking noise from
`collocated signal-processing circuitry, and its robust prop-
`
`8
`erties enable column-to-column partitioning of low noise
`CTIAs 22 as pixel pitch is reduced below 20 ,um.
`In
`preferred embodiments of system 10 having 10 pm pixel
`pitch in the horizontal direction, alternating columns of
`pixels may be serviced by low noise CTIAs 22 having
`column buffers (laid out in 20 gm pitch) that are alternately
`located along the top and bottom of the imaging area. With
`this scheme, the signals read from alternating columns are
`split between the top and bottom banks of CTIAs 22.
`In the present invention, all clock signals for circuit 10,
`including pixel access and reset, charge integrating amplifier
`readout and reset, correlated double sampling, and column
`offset cancellation, are generated on-chip using standard
`CMOS digital
`logic. This digital
`logic scheme enables
`“windowing,” wherein a user can read out the imager in
`various formats simply by selecting the appropriate support
`logic. With windowing, the 648><488 format of the prototype
`embodiment can be read out as one or more arbitrarily sized
`and positioned M><N arrays without having to read out the
`entire array. For example, a user might desire to change a
`computer compatible “VGA” format (i.e., approximately
`640><480) to either Common Interface Format (CIF; nomi-
`nally 352x240) or Quarter Common Interface Format
`(QCIF; nominally 176><120) without having to read out all
`the pixels in the entire array. This feature simplifies support
`electronics to reduce cost and match the needs of the
`particular communication medium. As an example, a per-
`sonal teleconference link to a remote user having only QCIF
`capability could be optimized to provide QCIF resolution
`and thus reduce bandwidth requirements throughout
`the
`teleconference link. As a further example, an imager con-
`figured in Common Interface Format (CIF) could provide
`full-CIF images while supplying windowed information for
`the portions of the image having the highest interest for
`signal processing and data compression. During teleconfer-
`encing the window around a person’s mouth (for example)
`could be supplied more frequently than the entire CIF image.
`This scheme would reduce bandwidth requirements
`throughout the conference link.
`As mentioned above, an important feature of the present
`invention is the ability to test the device by using electrically
`generated signals (as opposed to optically-generated
`signals). Overflow MOSFET 18 can be configured
`(alternatively) to supply minority carriers rather than to
`dump excess photo-generated charge. A built-in test mode
`can be enabled by applying a positive pulse to the “drain” of
`overflow MOSFET 18, which now acts as a source, and
`modulating the gate voltage to meter a precise packet of
`charge onto the photodiode capacitance by charge equili-
`bration. This technique is further described in M. F.
`Tompsett, “Surface Potential Equilibration Method of Set-
`ting Charge in Charge-Coupled Devices,” IEEE Trans. on
`Electron Devices, Vol. ED-22, No. 6, pp. 305-309 (June
`1975). By further modulating the metering gate on a row-
`by-row basis and the REF1 voltage on a column-by-column
`basis, a checkerboard pattern can be programmed into a
`two-dimensional embodiment of the invention. This feature
`
`enables testing of the im

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket