`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` ____________
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`APLIX IP HOLDINGS CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2015-00396
`Patent No. 7,218,313
` ____________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,218,313
`IPR2015-00396
`Pursuant to the Board’s June 22, 2015 Scheduling Order (Paper 12), Petitioner
`
`respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on January 19, 2016.
`
`Petitioner notes that oral argument for this IPR is scheduled on the same date as the oral
`
`argument for IPR2015-00229, IPR2015-00230, IPR2015-00476, and IPR2015-00533, for
`
`which Petitioner is filing similar requests for oral argument. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.70(a), Petitioner requests one hour of time and specifies the following issues, without
`
`intent to waive consideration of any issue not requested, to be argued for this proceeding:
`
`I.
`
`Whether Claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8-10, and 12 are Unpatentable Under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103 over Pallakoff in view of Ishihara in further view of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,563,487 to Martin et al.;
`
`II.
`
`Whether Claim 4 is Unpatentable Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`Pallakoff in view of Ishihara in further view of Liebenow;
`
`III.
`
`Whether Claim 7 is Unpatentable Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`Pallakoff in view of Ishihara in further view of U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,469,691 to Armstrong;
`
`IV.
`
`Whether Claim 11 is Unpatentable Under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
`
`V.
`
`VI.
`
`Pallakoff in view of Ishihara in further view of Willner;
`
`Whether Willner is Analogous Art;
`
`Whether Claims 13 and 14 are Unpatentable Under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`
`over Pallakoff in view of Ishihara in further view of Hedberg;
`
`
`
`VII. Whether Hedberg is Analogous Art; and
`
`VIII. Whether Patent Owner’s Secondary Considerations Show Non-
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,218,313
`IPR2015-00396
`
`Obviousness.
`
`Dated: December 23, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /s/ Abran J. Kean
`
`
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`
`Abran J. Kean, Reg. No. 58,540
`
`6201 College Blvd., Ste. 300
`
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,218,313
`IPR2015-00396
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on December 23,
`2015 the foregoing Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument was served via electronic
`filing with the Board on the following counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Michael Mauriel, USPTO Reg. No. 44,226
`Sherman W. Kahn (pro hac vice)
`MAURIEL KAPOUYTIAN WOODS LLP
`15 West 26th Street, Floor 7
`New York, NY 10010
`Telephone: (212) 529-5131 Ex. 101
`Facsimile:
`(212) 529-5132
`E-mail:
`mmauriel@mkwllp.com
`
`
`skahn@mkwllp.com
`
`Robert J. Gilbertson (pro hac vice)
`Sybil L. Dunlop (pro hac vice)
`X. Kevin Zhao (pro hac vice)
`GREENE ESPEL PLLP
`222 South Ninth Street, Ste. 2200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 373-0830
`Facsimile:
`(612) 373-0929
`E-mail:
`bgilbertson@greeneespel.com
`
`
`sdunlop@greeneespel.com
`
`
`kzhao@greeneespel.com
`
`Dated: December 23, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /s/ Abran J. Kean
`
`
`
`Eric A. Buresh, Reg. No. 50,394
`
`Abran J. Kean, Reg. No. 58,540