`
`IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.68, 1, Michael Maas, hereby attest to the following:
`
`I am a member in good standing of the District of Columbia Bar (2005) and
`
`the Maryland Bar (1999), as well as the following Federal Courts:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2009);
`
`United States District Court for the District of Columbia (2007); and
`
`United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2013).
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body;
`
`1 have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied;
`
`1 have never had sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or
`
`administrative body against me;
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`
`Board’s Rules of Practice forlrfrials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`
`1 will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R.
`
`11.101 ea‘. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`
`I am currently applying for pro but me status before the Board in connection
`
`with the following matters: lPR2015—00321, lPR2015~OO322, IPR2015—O0323,
`
`LG Ex. 1010, pg 1
`
`
`
`II’R2015~00324, IPR2015-00325, IPR2015—00326, II’R2015~00327,
`
`IPR2015—
`
`00328, IPR2015-00329, and II3R2015—00330;
`
`Other than the proceedings listed in paragraph 7, I have not applied for pro /vac
`
`zaice status before the Board in any other proceeding in the last three (3) years;
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney and have been involved in numerous
`
`patent infringement cases in the US. International Trade Commission and in
`
`federal District Courts across the country;
`
`I have significant experience in all aspects of patent infringement matters
`
`including depositions, claim construction hearings, and various stages of trial;
`
`I have served as counsel for Petitioner LG Electronics, Inc.
`
`in numerous
`
`litigation matters at the US. International Trade Commission and in federal
`
`District Courts involving electrical technologies ranging from integrated circuit
`
`packaging, to bi—directional display communication interfaces, to liquid crystal
`
`display panel technology, to LTE standards;
`
`W/hile I am not a counsel of record in co—pending litigation (Advanced Micro
`
`Devices, Inc. et cl/. n. LG Electronics, Inc. ez‘ cz/., Case No. 5:14~cv-1012 (N.D. Cal.)), I
`
`have reviewed and am familiar with the claim construction and invalidity
`
`contentions made so far in the co»pending litigation;
`
`I have reviewed and am familiar with the challenged patents (US. Patent Nos.
`
`7,095,945, 6,784,879, 6,889,332, 6,895,520, 7,742,053, 6,897,871, 5,898,849,
`
`LG Ex. 1010, pg 2
`
`
`
`lPR2015~OO322,
`
`lPR2015~0O323, IPR2015-00324,
`
`lPR2015—OO325, IPR2015-
`
`00326, lPR20l5—OO327, IPR2015-00328, IPR201S-00329, and IPR2015—OO330),
`
`as well as the prosecution histories of the challenged patents;
`
`I have reviewed and am familiar with each Petition for the challenged patents;
`
`and
`
`l have reviewed all accompanying exhibits for each of the Petitions, including
`
`the prior art references.
`
`Accordingly, I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in the zfiter painter
`
`review proceedings for the challenged patents.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Respectfully ubmitted,
`
` Dated: February 4, 2015
`
`Michael
`
`. Maas
`
`Mayer Brown LLP
`1999 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`(202) 263-3138
`
`LG Ex. 1010, pg 3