`IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR PRO HAC VICEADMISSION
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.68, I,]amie B. Beaber, hereby attest to the following:
`
`I am a member in good standing of the District of Columbia Bar (2003) and
`
`the Michigan Bar (2001), as well as the following Federal Courts:
`
`a.
`
`1).
`
`c.
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2003);
`
`District of Columbia Court of Appeals (2003);
`
`United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2013);
`
`and
`
`d.
`
`United States District Court for the District of Columbia (2013).
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body;
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied;
`
`I have never had sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or
`
`administrative body against me;
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`CFR.
`
`11.101 ea‘. rag. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`
`LG Ex. 1009, pg 1
`
`
`
`I previously applied for, and was granted, pm /mt vice status before the Board in
`
`connection with the following matters:
`
`IPR2014—O1092,
`
`lPR20l4-01094,
`
`IPR2014—O1095, IPRIZOI4-01096, and IPRZOI4-01097‘,
`
`I previously applied for pro /mt vice status before the Board in connection with
`
`the following matters: IPR2014—Ol357, IPR2014~O1359, and IPR2014-O1362;
`
`pm /am" vice motions for these matters are currently pending;
`
`I am currently applying for pro /9526 zrzre status before the Board in connection
`
`with the following matters: IPR20l5«OO32l, lI’R20l5—OO322, IPR20l5—OO323,
`
`II-"R20l5—OO324, II’R2015-00325, Il’R20l5—OO326, IPR20l5—OO327, IPR2015—
`
`00328, IPRZOIS-00329, and IPRZOIS-00330;
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney and have been involved in numerous
`
`patent infringement cases in the US. International Trade Commission and in
`
`federal District Courts across the country;
`
`I have significant experience in all aspects of patent infringement matters
`
`including depositions, claim construction hearings, and Various stages of trial;
`
`I have served as lead counsel for Petitioner LG Electronics, Inc. in numerous
`
`litigation matters at the U.S. International Trade Comrmssion and in federal
`
`District Courts involving electrical technologies ranging from integrated circuit
`
`packaging, to bi—directional display communication interfaces, to liquid cystal
`
`display panel technology, to LTE standards;
`
`LG Ex. 1009, pg 2
`
`
`
`While I am not a counsel of record in co-pending litigation (Advanced Micro
`
`Dezxices, Inc. at 52/.
`
`22. LG E/eczromm‘, I225. ex‘ rz/., Case No. 5:14—cv~1012 (N.D. Cal.)), 1
`
`have reviewed and am familiar with the claim construction and invalidity
`
`contentions made so far in the co-pending litigation;
`
`1 have reviewed and am familiar with the challenged patents (U .8. Patent Nos.
`
`7,095,945, 6,784,879, 6,889,332, 6,895,520, 7,742,053, 6,897,871, 5,898,849,
`
`6,266,715, and 7,327,369) in each of the IPR proceedings (lPR2015-00321,
`
`lPR2015-00322, IPR2015~OO323, IPR2015—O0324, IPR2015~OO325, 1PR2015—
`
`00326, IPR2015-00327, IPR2015—OO328, lPR2015-00329, and lPR2015—OO330),
`
`as well as the prosecution histories of the challenged patents; and
`
`l have reviewed and am familiar with each Petition for the challenged patents;
`
`and
`
`I have reviewed all accompanying exhibits for each of the Petitions, including
`
`the prior art references.
`
`Accordingly, I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in the infer partes
`
`review proceedings for the challenged patents.
`
`LG Ex. 1009, pg 3
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Respectfully subrnitted,
`
` Date: February 04, 2015
`
`B. Beaber
`Mayer Brown LLP
`1999 K Street, NW
`\§C’asln'r1gtor1, DC 20006
`(202) 263-3153
`
`LG Ex. 1009, pg 4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
