1
`
`Sony Computer Entertainment America v. Aplix
`IPR2015-00230 (’245)
`IPR2015-00229 (’692)
`IPR2015-00396 (’313)
`IPR2015-00533 (’313)
`
`IPR2015-00476 (’313)
`
`ORAL HEARING
`January 19, 2016
`
`
`
`Sony Computer Entertainment America v. Aplix
`IPR2015-00230 (’245)
`IPR2015-00229 (’692)
`IPR2015-00396 (’313)
`IPR2015-00533 (’313)
`
`IPR2015-00476 (’313)
`
`ORAL HEARING
`January 19, 2016
`
`
`
`2
`
`Mattel’s Handheld, 1977
`(Source: Ex. 2025, Engadget:ABrief
`History of Handheld Video Games}
`
`Nintendo’s Game &
`Watch Series’
`
`1991
`
`NinE3nd(A,d”(';aId11(§-]30y,
`
`Sega Game Gear, 1990
`
`Atari Lynx, 1989
`
`Nintendo Game Boy
`Color, 1998
`
`
`
`Lim '245 declaration (ex 2005), 11 48
`
`3
`
`Nokia N-Gage, 2003
`
`
`
`Lim '245 declaration (ex 2005), 11 53
`
`4
`
`Ti
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`7
`
` No evidence of obviousness of claims 1, 7, 10-12, 17, 20
` Four § 103 combinations instituted:
`
`1 LIEBENOW–ANDREWS (claims 1-5, 7, 10-15, 17, 20)
`• Andrews is not analogous art (thus claims 2-5, 13-15 survive)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 2-5, 13-15 survive)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claims 1, 2, 3-5, 7, 10, 11, 12,
`13, 14, 15, 17, 20
`
`
`2 LIEBENOW–HEDBERG (claims 8, 9, 17-19)
`• Hedberg is not analogous art (thus claims 8, 9, 18-19 survive)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 8, 9, 18-19 survive)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claim 9
`
`
`
`8
`
`3 LIEBENOW–MARTIN ’260 (claim 6)
`• Should not be combined (thus claim 6 survives)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claim 6
`
`
`4 GRIFFIN–LIEBENOW (claim 16)
`• Should not be combined (thus claim 16 survives)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claim 16
`
`
`
` There are secondary considerations of non-obviousness
`
`
`
`9
`
` No evidence of obviousness of claims 1-3, 5, 7-10, 12, 13,
`15-18, 20
` Two § 103 combinations instituted:
`
`1 LIEBENOW–ARMSTRONG ’691 (claims 1-3, 5-10)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claims 3, 5
`
`
`2 LIEBENOW–HEDBERG (claims 11-13, 15-20)
`• Hedberg is not analogous art (thus claims 11, 19 survive)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 11, 19 survive)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claim 13
`
`
` There are secondary considerations of non-obviousness
`
`
`
`10
`
` Five § 103 combinations instituted:
`
`1 PALLAKOFF–ISHIHARA–MARTIN ’487 (claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8-10, 12)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 1, 6, 8, 9 survive)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8-10, 12
`
`
`2 PALLAKOFF–ISHIHARA–LIEBENOW (claim 4)
`• Should not be combined (thus claim 4 survives)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claim 4
`
`3 PALLAKOFF–ISHIHARA–ARMSTRONG ’691 (claim 7)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claim 7
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`4 PALLAKOFF–ISHIHARA–WILLNER (claim 11)
`• Willner is not analogous art (thus claim 11 survives)
`• Should not be combined (thus claim 11 survives)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claim 11
`
`
`5 PALLAKOFF–ISHIHARA–HEDBERG (claims 13, 14)
`• Hedberg is not analogous art (thus claims 13, 14 survive)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 13, 14 survive)
`
`
`
` There are secondary considerations of non-obviousness
`
`
`
`12
`
` No evidence of obviousness of claims 37-39, 49
` Five § 103 combinations instituted:
`
`1 PALLAKOFF–ISHIHARA (claims 15, 20)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 15, 20 survive)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claim 20
`
`
`2 PALLAKOFF–ISHIHARA–LIEBENOW (claim 16)
`• Should not be combined (thus claim 16 survives)
`
`3 LIEBENOW–ISHIHARA (claims 37-42, 46, 49)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 40-42, 46 survive)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose cls 37, 38-39, 40, 41-42, 46, 49
`
`
`
`13
`
`4 LIEBENOW–ARMSTRONG ’802 (claims 44, 45, 47, 48)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 44, 45, 47, 48 survive)
`• Even if combined, do not disclose claims 44, 45, 47, 48
`
`
`5 LIEBENOW–HEDBERG (claims 50, 51)
`• Hedberg is not analogous art (thus claims 50, 51 survive)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 50, 51 survive)
`
`
`
` There are secondary considerations of non-obviousness
`
`
`
`14
`
` No evidence of obviousness of claims 21, 22, 52-54
` Three § 103 combinations instituted:
`
`1 PALLAKOFF–LIEBENOW (claims 21-24, 26, 52-56, 58)
`• Should not be combined (thus claims 23, 24, 26, 55, 56 survive)
`
`
`2 PALLAKOFF–ARMSTRONG ’691 (claim 27)
`
`3 PALLAKOFF–HEDBERG (claims 28, 29, 59, 60)
`• Hedberg is not analogous art (thus claims 28, 29, 59, 60 survive)
`
`
`
` There are secondary considerations of non-obviousness
`
`
`
`Andrews — Fig 1
`
`15
`
`System Memory 22
`
`(ROM 24)
`BIOS 26
`
`(RAM 25)
`
`O5 35
`.-'-
`.".1
`PROGRAMS 36
`I
`I
`
`PROGRAM
`DATA 38
`
`INPUT DEVICE
`MAPPER 39
`
`Processing Unit
`
`Video Adapter
`
`Host Adapter
`
`scss Bus 55
`
`Storage Device
`
`21
`
`.
`
`48
`
`55
`
`i—
`
`Monitor 47
`
`Sy5tBl'TI BUS
`
`_
`_
`Hard Dusk Dl'lVe
`l."F 32
`
`_
`_
`Magnetic Dusk
`Drive [IF 33
`
`.
`
`_
`_
`Optical DFIVB HF
`34
`
`Hard Drive 27
`
`lnp me be
`
`-
`
`_.p
`
`--»-““'"‘w
`
`..«-""—
`OS 35 Apps‘ 36
`
`Floppy Drive 28
`1- “ “ — * — — W — — “ — — — " "" —
`;
`l
`:l
`I Removable
`__________________________ _ _l 519599 29
`
`1‘
`“~
`N.
`Program
`Other
`"1
`Frogs. 37 Data 38
`
`(‘by
`—"—
`$‘r’:§g'Igf'é':
`
`31
`
`-
`
`2
`
`—
`
`Keyboard 40
`
`Drawing pad 55 Mouse 42
`
`-
`
`Computer(s) 49
`
`Floppy Drive 50:
`
`
`
`16
`16
`
`Andrews — Fig 2
`
`Alication 36a
`
`_
`
`Alication 36b
`
`(driving game
`application)
`
`(architectural design
`application)
`
`A-SCorrelation231
`
`A-SCorrelation232
`
`A-8Correlation233
`
`Genre 211
`(driving
`simulation
`genre)
`
`Genre 212
`(role-playing
`genre)
`
`Genre 213
`
`(CAD genre)
`
`Inut Device
`Maer 39
`
` 22Q
`
`C-SCorrelation221
`
`C-3Correlation222
`
`C-8Correlation223
`
`C-5Correlation224
`
`C-5Correlation225
`
`got
`
`Driving game
`controller 66
`
`Joystick 67
`
`
`
`17
`
`Running Speed
`
`Enable Cloaking
`L“ 601
`
`
`
`
`
`lgfimm “£45 Lrflecc
`
`2©@E:)U wm “U’L7/
`
`18
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`Armstrong '802 — Fig 11
`
`20 20
`
`
`
`\\N\\\\ \ KK\ \
`
`21
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`"' us.
`
`-.
`
`23
`
`
`
`Lflebemow ~ mug “H
`
`24
`
`
`
`Liebenow
`
`Figs 2 8L 5
`
`25 25
`
`
`
`26
`
`
`
`Liebenow — Fig 15
`
`27
`
`
`
`Martin
`
`‘Z60 — Fig 3
`
`28 28
`
`.0.|U2.I
`I1.0_Lu01
`
`b
`
`k0
`
`DméflE
`4IT4
`
` R
`
`H%4GWWW*
`
`1
`
`A./_
`
`.|1mm4|
`
`U.|U.000..D|.
`
`1mmh1
`1C(T0.
`01..
`
`E
`
`m
`
`
`
`Martin '487 — Fig 1a
`
`29
`
`
`
`Pallakoff — Fig 3
`
`Figure 3 —— "Web—phone" handset that enables fast typing,
`and fast application navigation
`
`300 K\\\_
`
`30
`30
`
`Are we stiii on for Tuesday?
`
`W‘
`
`31
`
`_/(310
`shm
`m
`Jr ) g.304
`0
`
`312*»
`
`Eé;3'<$&
`1
`
`abc
`2
`
`d ef
`3
`
`2d
`L932,
`
`ghi
`4
`
`prs
`7
`
`iki
`5
`
`tuv
`8
`
`q
`
`I
`
`rnno
`6
`
`3rd
`Letter
`
`wxy
`9 ‘t
`
`Qerau back)
`
`Select
`
`\)
`
`'
`
`
`
`31
`
`
`
`
`
`Willner — Lim 00396 dec (ex 2009),
`
`
`1T 146 32
`
`32
`
`
`
`Lflmm
`
`Lies
`
`amgyu 1M M5
`
`33
`
`Pallakoff
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,463,245
`
`IPR2015-00230
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, I hereby certify that on this 13th day of
`January 2016, the foregoing Patent Owner Aplix IP Holdings Corporation’s
`demonstrative exhibits are being served via email on the following counsel of
`record for petitioner.
`
`
`Lead Counsel
`Eric A. Buresh (Reg. No. 50,394)
`Eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`
`Postal and Hand-Delivery Address:
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`6201 College Blvd., Suite 300
`Overland Park, Kansas 66211
`Telephone: (913) 777-5600
`Fax: (913) 777-5601
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`Abran J. Kean (Reg. No. 58,540)
`Abran.kean@eriseip.com
`
`Postal and Hand-Delivery Address:
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`5600 Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Suite
`200
`Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
`Telephone: (913) 777-5600
`Fax: (913) 777-5601
`
`_____/Sybil L. Dunlop/_________________________
`Robert J. Gilbertson (pro hac vice)
`Sybil L. Dunlop (pro hac vice)
`X. Kevin Zhao (pro hac vice)
`GREENE ESPEL PLLP
`222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 373-0830
`Facsimile: (612) 373-0929
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner Aplix IP Holdings
`Corporation
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 13, 2016.
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
