`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and 'l‘radcmark Officc
`I’.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`fiicd in the U8. District Court
`Northern District of California
`on the following
`[:1 Trademarks or MPalents.
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`‘DOCKET NO.
`3:14-cv-04312
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`9/24/2014
`
`_
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Northern District of Caiitornla
`DEFENDANT
`
`Cisco Systems. Inc.
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.,
`
`
`
`——
`
`in the above—cntiIlcd case, the following patenI(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`TR§gIT5‘:A":‘TR?(RNO
`
`[:1 Amendment
`%’;{TfR?‘FDl"E’::EE;
`
`I] Answer
`CI Cross Bill
`[:1 Other Pleading
`HOLDER or PATENT on TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`——
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the above——entiIied case. the following decision has been rendered orjudgcmcnt issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`Richard W.Wieking
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`Sheila Rash
`
`‘
`DATE
`9/25/2015
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3-~Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—-Upon tiling document ndiiing pntent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case lilo copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 1
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 1
`
`
`
`Case3:l4-cv-04309-NC Document?) Fiied09/25/14 Pagel oil
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`M ail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Tradentark Office
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § H16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`tiled in the U.S. District Court
`Northern District of California
`on the following
`
`[:1 Tmdctnnrks or
`
`[Z Patents.
`
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`
`
`
`HOLDER Oi’ PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Straight Path IP Group. Inc.
`Straight Path iP Group. inc.
`Straight Path IF’ Group, inc.
`Straight Path iP Group, inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`——
`T i
`
`n the above-—entiticd case, the following patent(s)/ trndemark(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`TRXg33‘fR(I’(RN0
`
`E] Amendment
`%’;T1I.3RC;FDPF’;1TIf]':I:
`
`A
`
`E] Answer
`C] Cross Bill
`C] Other Pleading
`HOLDER or PATENT on TRADEMARK
`
`in the above—entitied ease, the following decision has been rendered orjudgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`RICHARD WIEKING
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`D_ MERRY
`
`Copy l——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3——-Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding prttenI(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4--Case iiie copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 2
`
`
`
`DOCKET No.
`3:14-cv-04309
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`9/24/2014
`
`U.s. DISTRICT COURT
`Northern District of California
`DEFENDANT
`
`Straight Path IP Group, inc.
`
`Avaya inc.
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 2
`
`
`
`Case 6:14-cv—00534 Document 2 Filed 06/04/14 Page 1 of 1 PagelD #: 182
`A0 120 Rev, 08/10
`
` Mail Stop 8
`
`TO:
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`I] Trademarks or M Patents.
`
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`I:] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`'
`
`on the following
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:14-cv-534
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`6/4/2014
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, T Ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`BLACKBERRY LTD. & BLACKBERRY CORP.
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER _OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`'
`
`1 6,009,469
`2 6,108,704
`
`3 6,131,121
`
`12/28/1999
`8/22/2000
`
`10/10/2000
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`_
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`[:1 Other Pleading
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`El Amendment
`
`I] Answer
`
`[I Cross Bill
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`CLERK
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 3
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 3
`
`
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1 l 16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`
`AR|ZONA, Phoenix Division
`
`on the following
`
`[21 Trademarks or
`
`Cl Patents.
`
`( |:I the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`ARIZONA, Phoenix Division
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Dallas Basketball Limited, d/b/a
`The Dallas Mavericks
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 291 1757
`
`4/15/2003
`
`Romel Bako
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`———
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`l Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[:1 Answer
`
`E] Cross Bill
`
`[I Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`' E
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`
`
`——
`——
`
`_—
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`CLERK
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`
`
`6/3/2014
`
`Copy 1——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4F—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 4
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`PLAINTIFF
`All In Wear, inc. and Romel Bako
`
`DATE FILED
`6/2/2014
`@ 3 i Z_UH,
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 4
`
`
`
`us to. ov
`Trials
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`.
`
`Paper 12
`Entered: May 2, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE '
`
`'
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SONY CORPORATION
`
`_ Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`STRAIGHT PATH 11> GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2014-00229 (Patent 6,131,121),
`Case IPR2014-00230 (Patent 6,108,704)
`Case IPR2014-00231 (Patent 6,009,469)‘
`
`Before BRYAN F. MOORE, l\/[IRIAM L. QUINN, and STACEY G. WHITE,
`_Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WHITE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`
`Motion to Terminate
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`1 This Order addresses scheduling that is identical in the listed cases. We exercise
`our discretion to issue a single paper to be filed in each case. The parties are not
`_ authoficd to:-use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`;
`I
`
`.‘_‘-"1
`
`I .
`
`\
`
`LG. v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 5
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 5
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2014-00229, -230, -231
`
`Patents 6,131,121, 6,108,704, 6,009,464
`
`On April 28, 2014, the parties filed joint motions to terminate the trial in
`
`each of the instant proceedings under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).2 Along with the
`
`motions, the parties filed copies of a document they describe as the written
`
`settlement agreement,3 as well as separate joint requests to treat the settlement
`
`agreement as business confidential information under the provisions of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).4 As the motions and exhibits in all three
`proceedings are substantially similar, we refer herein to the papers filed in
`
`IPR2014-00229 for convenience.
`
`The instant proceedings are in the preliminary stage. Patent Owner has filed
`
`preliminary responses in each of the instant proceedings.5 The Board, however,
`
`has not determined whether trial will be instituted for any of the requests for inter
`
`partes review.
`
`_
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under this
`chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of
`
`the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits ofthe
`proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” In the motions to terminate,
`
`the parties state that they have settled their dispute with respect to the patents
`involved in the proceedings, and have reached agreement to terminate these
`
`proceedings. Paper 9, 1. Furthermore, the joint motion indicates that the parties
`
`have agreed to dismiss Petitioner and other real parties-in-interest identified by
`
`2 IPR2014-00229, Paper 9; IPR2014-00230, Paper 10, IPR2014-00231, Paper 9.
`
`3 IPR2014-00229, Ex. 1047; IPR2014-00230, Ex. 1047, IPR2014-00231, Ex.
`1047.
`
`4 IPR2014-00229, Paper 10; IPR20l4-00230, Paper 11, IPR20l4-00231, Paper 10.
`
`5 IPR2014-00229, Paper 7; IPR20l4-00230, Paper 8; IPR2014-00231, Paper 7.
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 6
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 6
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2014-00229, -230, -231
`
`Patents 6,131,121, 6,108,704, 6,009,464 '
`
`Petitioner as respondents in Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication
`
`Devices and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-892 (U.S.I.T.C.) and
`
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Sony Corp, No. 1:13-cv-01071-AJT (E.D. Va.).
`
`Paper 9, 1-2. The.parties argue that no other petitioner would remain in the instant
`
`proceedings, and that termination of these proceedings promotes judicial economy
`
`and furthers the policy of the Board. Id
`
`The Board" generally expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing
`
`of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Oflice Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`
`Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). Upon consideration of the parties’
`
`' arguments and the early stage of these proceedings, we agree with the parties that
`
`terminating the instant proceedings with respect to both Petitioner and Patent
`
`Owner, at this early juncture, promotes efficiency and minimizes unnecessary
`
`costs. The Board is persuaded that, under these circumstances, it is appropriate to
`
`enter judgment6 without rendering a final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a);
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`P
`.
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the joint motions to terminate these proceedings are
`
`granted, and that these proceedings are hereby terminated as to all parties,
`
`including Petitioner" and Patent Owner;
`
`.
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint requests that the settlement
`agreement (Ex. 1047) be treated as business confidential information, kept separate
`
`from the file of the involved patents, and made available only to Federal
`
`6 A judgment means a final written decision by the Board, or a termination ofa
`proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.2.
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2O15-OO198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 7
`
`‘
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 7
`
`
`
`Cases IPR2014-00229, -230, -231
`Patents 6,131,121, 6,108,704, 6,009,464
`
`Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good
`
`cause under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), are
`
`granted.
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198 .
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 8
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 8
`
`
`
`0 Cases IPR2014-00229, -230, -231
`Patents 6,131,121, 6,108,704, 6,009,464
`
`PETITIONERS:
`
`Michael Rader
`
`Edmund Walsh
`
`Randy Pritzker
`WOKF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`MRader-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`EWalsh-PTAB@wolfgreenfleld.com
`RPritzker-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`PATENTOWNER:
`
`Patrick Lee
`
`Michelle Chatelain
`
`~
`
`FISCH HOFFMAN SIGLER LL
`
`patrick.lee@fischllp.com
`michelle.chatelain@fischllp.com
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 9
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 9
`
`
`
`Case 6:13—cv—00604 Document2
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`Filed 08/23/13 Pagei of1 Page|D #2 180
`
` Mail Stop 8
`
`TO:
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`on the following
`I] Trademarks or
`IZPatents.
`[:1 the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:13-cv-604
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`8/23/2013
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, T ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`BLACKBERRY LTD. & BLACKBERRY CORP.
`
`——
`——
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entit1ed case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`
`
`I] Answer
`
`|:l Cross Bill
`
`I] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`—
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`|:I Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`1—
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 10
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 10
`
`
`
`Filed 08/23/13 Page1 of1 Page|D #: 180
`Case 6:13—cv-00605 Document2
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`
`
`
`T0:
`
`Mai] stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`on the following
`|_—_I Trademarks or
`[1 Patents.
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`DOCKET NO.
`DATE FILED
`6:13-cv-605
`8/23/2013
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Eastern District of Texas, T Ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`
`
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING CO., LTD., ET AL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`%tTiR‘3$;ti§§£
`12/28/1999
`8/22/2000
`10/10/2000
`
`——
`
`_—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK N0.
`
` l:I Amendment
`I] Answer
`I: Cross Bill
`[3 Other Pleading
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`—_
`I _—
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 11
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 11
`
`
`
`Case 6:13-cv—00606 Document2
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`Filed 08/23/13 Page1 of1 Page|D #: 181
`
`
`
`To
`'
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`on the following
`I] Trademarks or
`[ZPatents.
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:13-cv-606
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`8/23/2013
`
`Eastern District of Texas, T Ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`
` U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ET AL
`
`
`
`
`
`%lJ%35;:;}§§£
`12/28/1999
`8/22/2000
`10/10/2000
`——
`——
`
`
`
`CI Answer
`
`[:1 Cross Bill
`
`I] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`In the above—-entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 12
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 12
`
`
`
`Case 6:13-cv-00607 Document 2
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`Filed 08/23/13 Page 1 of 1 Page|D #: 180
`
` Mail Stop 8
`
`TO:
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`on the following
`[:1 Trademarks or
`[Z Patents.
`|:I the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:13-cv-607
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`8/23/2013
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, T Ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`ZTE CORPORATION and ZTE USA, INC.
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 6,009,469
`
`2 6,108,704
`
`3 6,131,121
`
`12/28/1999
`
`8/22/2000
`
`10/10/2000
`
`
`
`El Answer
`B Cross Bill
`I:] Other Pleading
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`El Amendment
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`
`1— I
`
`n the above———entit1ed case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3——Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 13
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 13
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00936-LMB-TRJ Document 3 Filed 08/01/13 Page 1 of 1 PagelD# 193
`
`A0 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Virginia
`on the following
`
`D Trademarks or
`
`[ZPatents.
`
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`1 :13cv936
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Straight Path IP Group, inc.
`
`DATE FILED
`8/1/2013
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Vir inia
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Sharp Corp., et al.
`
`
`
`
`——
`——
`
`HOLDER or PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`%’}‘{T§R(iFD};’:4T/511:1:
`TR[1:gg/TRI(iRN0
`———
`-—
`_—
`—_
`——
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`In the above~—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`
`I:i Amendment
`
`El Answer
`
`I] Cross Bill
`
`D Other Pleading
`
`
`
`l
`
`In the above——cntitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/IUDGEMENT
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3———Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 14
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 14
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv—O0935—GBL—TCB Document 3 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 1 Page|D# 195
`
`A0 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in 313 U-5- District C01111
`__
`for the Eastern District of Virginia — Alexandria
`__
`0111116 f0l10Wing
`D Trademarks or
`Patents .
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`DATE FILED
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`l:13cv935-GBL/TCB
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Straight Path Group, Inc.
`
`8/1/2013
`
`
`
`Eastern District of Virginia - Alexandria Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al.
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Netspeakcoworafion
`Netsveakcorporation
`Netsveakcoworation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—_ I
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`n the above——entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK N0.
`
`D Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`Answer
`
`El Cross Bill D Other Pleading
`.
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
` --
`FERNANDO GALINDO
`
`———— I
`
`n the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Up0n filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 15
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 15
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv—OO933-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 08/06/13 Page 1 of 1 Page|D# 195
`
`A0 I20 (Rev. 08/Ill)
`
`TO;
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § lllb you are hereby advised that at court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Virginia
`on the following
`
`DOCKET NO.
`l:l3cv933
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Straight Path [P Group, lnc.
`
`DATE FILED
`8/1/2013
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`Eastern District of Virginia
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`LG Electronics, Inc.
`LG Electronics U.S.A., lnc.
`
`LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., lnc.
`
`
`
`masts:
`
`OmTj
`
`In the above—emilled case, the following patent(s)/ tradcmark(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK N0‘
`
`El Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`Answer B Cross Bill D Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
` _
`
`In the above-—cntitled case. the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`8/6/2013
`
`Fernando Galindo
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3——Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2——Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case file copy
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 16
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 16
`
`
`
`Case 3:13-cv—00503-REP Document 3 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 1 PagelD# 194
`A0 I20 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`To
`'
`
`Man stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or I5 U.S.C. § 1 I 16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the US. District Court
`Eastern District ofvirginia
`on the following
`[I Trademarks or E Patents .
`the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`3 : I 3CV503
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`
`DATE FILED
`8/2/20 I 3
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`Richmond
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Toshiba Corporation
`
`Toshiba America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
`HOLDER or PATENT on TRADEMARK
`%§TfR?$g’:‘dTAE:g
`mxgfmtgfilgo
`61111111169—
`5,103,704_
`11131121—
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK N0.
`
`D Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`I: Answer
`
`[:1 Cross Bill
`
`El Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the above~—cntitled case, the following decision has been rendered orjudgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
` (BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`
`
`CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Fernando Galindo
`
`Robert L. Walker
`Copy l——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2——Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 17
`
`8/8/2013
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 17
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00934—TSE—|DD Document 3 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 1 Page|D# 193
`
`A0 120 (Rev. 08/10
`
`TO:
`
`Mai] stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § I I I6 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Virginia
`on the following
`
`[3 Trademarks or
`
`[2lPatents.
`
`( E] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`
`
`DATE FILED
`8/1/2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`1 :1 3cv9 34
`Eastern District of Vir inia
`
`DEFENDANT
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Vizio, Inc., et ai.
`
`Straight Path IP Group, inc.
`
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`12/28/1999
`
`
`
`.
`
`NetSpeak Corporation
`
`8/22/0200
`
`NetSpeak Corporation
`
`10/10/2000
`
`Netspeak Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`
`1 6,009,469
`
`2 6,108,704
`
`3 6,131,121
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`j—
`5 j_
`
`
`
`In the aboVe——entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`
`[:1 Answer
`C] Cross Bill
`C] Other Pleading
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`D Amendment
`
`O
`I —
`
`
`
`In the above—£ntitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Up0n filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 18
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 18
`
`
`
`Case 2:13—cv—OO427-AWA—LRL Document 3 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 1 PagelD# 196
`
`A0 I20 Rev. 08/10
`To
`'
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PO. Box I450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or I5 U.S.C. § I I I6 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Virginia - Norfolk Division on the following
`
`
`I] Trademarks or
`DOCKET NO.
`2:13cv427
`PLAINTIFF
`
`[1 Patents.
`
`
`
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`u.s. DISTRICT COURT
`for the Eastern District of VII’ inia - Norfolk Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`8/1/2013
`
`
`
`SONY CORPORATION, et al
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP. INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case. the following pzttent(s)/ lr:tdemark(s) have been included:
`
`
`HOLDEROF PATENTOR TRADEMARK
`Straight Path IP Group, inc.
`
`
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`
`——
`
`
`——
`
`
`
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT CLERK
`
`
`
`D Answer
`[3 Cross Bill
`D Other Pleading
`IIOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`C] Amendment
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`Tkgl/§£l;EIR?(RNo
`
`In the above—-entitled case. the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`Fernando Galindo
`
`(av) DEPUTY CLERK '
`Brad Newell
`‘
`
`‘
`
`DATE
`
`8/2/2013
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action. mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action. mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-—Upon filing document adding patent(s). mail this copy to Director Copy -I--Case file copy
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 19
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 19
`
`
`
`Case 2:12—cv—OO0O8—RGD—DEM Document 50
`
`Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of1 PagelD# 1311
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director or the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or IS U.S.C. § 1 I I6 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Virginia
`on the following
`
`E] Trademarks or
`
`lZPatcnts.
`
`( E] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`2:12cv8
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`1/4/2012
`
`
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Vir inia
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
`
`ooVoo, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`I 6,513,066
`
`
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`12/28/1999
`
`Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
`
`2 6,701,365
`
`3 6,009,469
`
`3/2/2004
`
`Innovative Communications Technologies. Inc.
`
`1/28/2003
`
`Innovative Communications Technologies. Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D I
`
`
`
`
`
`n the above-—cntitled case, the following patent(s)/ lmdemark(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`T 0
`TR§3:;3iRKRN0
`
`D Amendment
`D
`F P TEN
`0”l‘{T1‘I:R‘3\DE’;/MRI:
`
`CI Answer
`
`I] Cross Bill
`
`C] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER or PATENT on TRADEMARK
`
`——
`10/11/2012 Stipulation of Dismissal filed
`
`
`—_
`——
`
`in the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`
`Fernando Galindo
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`R. Simmons
`
`DATE
`
`10/12/2012
`
`Copy I—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2——Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 20
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 20
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-00008-AWA-DEM Document4
`
`Filed 01/11/12 Page 1 of1 Page|D# 144
`
`
` I -..
`_ J t._ ;_.
`R‘t:t'bm‘ oN "rm:
`FILING on DETERMINATION or AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT on
`
`
`
`A0 I20 Rev, 08I|0
`
`_
`T0‘
`
`_
`I
`than sxopls
`Director ofthe u.s. Pntent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`
`
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`5
`
`,
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or I5 U.S.C. § I I I6 you are hereby advised thin in coun action lm:-I been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of .\/irginia
`I» on the i‘oIlm\'in;_:
`D Trademarks or M Patents. m( D the patent action involwics 35 U.S.C. § 292:):
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.
`_
`I 7,c,;/ :
`I>L;\|N'r|I-‘I?
`
`DATE FILED
`I
`-V I /l}
`
`
`
`>
`U.S. DISTRICI‘ COURT
`for the Eastern District of Virinia 00 Cvzrcm - *
`DEFENDANT
`V 2 390
`
`OOV00, LLC
`
`INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATIONS TECHS., INC.
`
`HOLDER or l'A’|'I;'N'l' on TRADIEM/\RK
`
`
`
`.l.Rl'\”[‘)TE4"j\TR")(RN0_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_
`
`—
`
`
`DAT}-L INCl.UDF.D
`
`In lhc :Ibuve——cIItit|od case. the following pzIIenl(s)/ trndcInark(s) Imvc been included:
`|N(.‘LU|)l-Ll) av
`
`.
`
`[:1 Amendment
`
`D Answer
`
`[I Cross Bill
`
`I] 0Ihcr|’Icading
`
`
`
`HOLDER or IwI'I:N'r ox TRADlZ.\rlARK
`‘:)’;'1LIR‘3\FD':5"J:‘:;’|1<
`1.RX’3:3::j:R?;RN0
`__—
`_—
`_—
`——
`——
`
`
`
`In the above—cntiIlcd case. the following decision has been rendered orjudgcmcnt issued:
`l)Ii(‘|Sl0N/.lUDGl:'Ml£N'l'
`
`
`
`
`CLIERK
`
`Fernando GaIindo._
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`. S!‘VY7YYId7\5‘
`
`I)I\‘l-Ii
`
`.
`I /I‘ /1‘-"3
`
`Copy I-—-Upon initiation ufuclion. mail this copy to Director Copy 3—lipon tcrmiltntion ol':Icti0I1, mail this cop\' to Director
`Copy 2—lipon filing Ilocument ntltling putcnu.-I). mail this copy to Director Copy -I-—(':Isc file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 21
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 21
`
`
`
`U
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`PowER OF ATTORNEY,
`CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
`
`ANDREVOCATION,
`
`OR POWERS
`
`
`
`Hon. Commissioner of Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`
`
`-.~.~.».-.-.-«..—v.....‘......,.-—~............._.-.....»—...._....._u—.——-.......................—~..
`
`
`
`--~«v--—.~.i........-...—--~............—_,,......_....‘_,..--..—..,.............._........-.,...__..,...._._......,.
`
`
`--—-~—a--.....--........4.4..._...............................,...
`
`Revocation: I hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney given in the
`application identified in the attached statement under 37 CFR 3.73 (b).
`
`Power of Attorney: I hereby appoint the practitioners associated with customer
`number 42624, individually and collectively, as attorney(s) or agent(s) to represent the
`undersigned before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in
`connection with any and all patent applications assigned only to the undersigned
`according to th