throbber
Case3:14—cv-04312-JSC Document9 Fi|edO9/25/14 Pagel oil
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and 'l‘radcmark Officc
`I’.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`fiicd in the U8. District Court
`Northern District of California
`on the following
`[:1 Trademarks or MPalents.
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`‘DOCKET NO.
`3:14-cv-04312
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`9/24/2014
`
`_
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Northern District of Caiitornla
`DEFENDANT
`
`Cisco Systems. Inc.
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.,
`
`
`
`——
`
`in the above—cntiIlcd case, the following patenI(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`TR§gIT5‘:A":‘TR?(RNO
`
`[:1 Amendment
`%’;{TfR?‘FDl"E’::EE;
`
`I] Answer
`CI Cross Bill
`[:1 Other Pleading
`HOLDER or PATENT on TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`——
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the above——entiIied case. the following decision has been rendered orjudgcmcnt issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`Richard W.Wieking
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`Sheila Rash
`
`‘
`DATE
`9/25/2015
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3-~Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—-Upon tiling document ndiiing pntent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case lilo copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 1
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 1
`
`

`
`Case3:l4-cv-04309-NC Document?) Fiied09/25/14 Pagel oil
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`M ail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Tradentark Office
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`in Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § H16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`tiled in the U.S. District Court
`Northern District of California
`on the following
`
`[:1 Tmdctnnrks or
`
`[Z Patents.
`
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`
`
`
`HOLDER Oi’ PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Straight Path IP Group. Inc.
`Straight Path iP Group. inc.
`Straight Path IF’ Group, inc.
`Straight Path iP Group, inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`——
`T i
`
`n the above-—entiticd case, the following patent(s)/ trndemark(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`TRXg33‘fR(I’(RN0
`
`E] Amendment
`%’;T1I.3RC;FDPF’;1TIf]':I:
`
`A
`
`E] Answer
`C] Cross Bill
`C] Other Pleading
`HOLDER or PATENT on TRADEMARK
`
`in the above—entitied ease, the following decision has been rendered orjudgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`RICHARD WIEKING
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`D_ MERRY
`
`Copy l——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3——-Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding prttenI(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4--Case iiie copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 2
`
`
`
`DOCKET No.
`3:14-cv-04309
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`9/24/2014
`
`U.s. DISTRICT COURT
`Northern District of California
`DEFENDANT
`
`Straight Path IP Group, inc.
`
`Avaya inc.
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 2
`
`

`
`Case 6:14-cv—00534 Document 2 Filed 06/04/14 Page 1 of 1 PagelD #: 182
`A0 120 Rev, 08/10
`
` Mail Stop 8
`
`TO:
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`I] Trademarks or M Patents.
`
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`I:] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`'
`
`on the following
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:14-cv-534
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`6/4/2014
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, T Ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`BLACKBERRY LTD. & BLACKBERRY CORP.
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER _OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`'
`
`1 6,009,469
`2 6,108,704
`
`3 6,131,121
`
`12/28/1999
`8/22/2000
`
`10/10/2000
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`_
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`[:1 Other Pleading
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`El Amendment
`
`I] Answer
`
`[I Cross Bill
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`CLERK
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4-—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 3
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 3
`
`

`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1 l 16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`
`AR|ZONA, Phoenix Division
`
`on the following
`
`[21 Trademarks or
`
`Cl Patents.
`
`( |:I the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`ARIZONA, Phoenix Division
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Dallas Basketball Limited, d/b/a
`The Dallas Mavericks
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 291 1757
`
`4/15/2003
`
`Romel Bako
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`———
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`l Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`[:1 Answer
`
`E] Cross Bill
`
`[I Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`' E
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`
`
`——
`——
`
`_—
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`CLERK
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`
`
`6/3/2014
`
`Copy 1——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4F—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 4
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`PLAINTIFF
`All In Wear, inc. and Romel Bako
`
`DATE FILED
`6/2/2014
`@ 3 i Z_UH,
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 4
`
`

`
`us to. ov
`Trials
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`.
`
`Paper 12
`Entered: May 2, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE '
`
`'
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SONY CORPORATION
`
`_ Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`STRAIGHT PATH 11> GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2014-00229 (Patent 6,131,121),
`Case IPR2014-00230 (Patent 6,108,704)
`Case IPR2014-00231 (Patent 6,009,469)‘
`
`Before BRYAN F. MOORE, l\/[IRIAM L. QUINN, and STACEY G. WHITE,
`_Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WHITE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`
`Motion to Terminate
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`1 This Order addresses scheduling that is identical in the listed cases. We exercise
`our discretion to issue a single paper to be filed in each case. The parties are not
`_ authoficd to:-use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`;
`I
`
`.‘_‘-"1
`
`I .
`
`\
`
`LG. v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 5
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 5
`
`

`
`Cases IPR2014-00229, -230, -231
`
`Patents 6,131,121, 6,108,704, 6,009,464
`
`On April 28, 2014, the parties filed joint motions to terminate the trial in
`
`each of the instant proceedings under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).2 Along with the
`
`motions, the parties filed copies of a document they describe as the written
`
`settlement agreement,3 as well as separate joint requests to treat the settlement
`
`agreement as business confidential information under the provisions of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).4 As the motions and exhibits in all three
`proceedings are substantially similar, we refer herein to the papers filed in
`
`IPR2014-00229 for convenience.
`
`The instant proceedings are in the preliminary stage. Patent Owner has filed
`
`preliminary responses in each of the instant proceedings.5 The Board, however,
`
`has not determined whether trial will be instituted for any of the requests for inter
`
`partes review.
`
`_
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under this
`chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of
`
`the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits ofthe
`proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” In the motions to terminate,
`
`the parties state that they have settled their dispute with respect to the patents
`involved in the proceedings, and have reached agreement to terminate these
`
`proceedings. Paper 9, 1. Furthermore, the joint motion indicates that the parties
`
`have agreed to dismiss Petitioner and other real parties-in-interest identified by
`
`2 IPR2014-00229, Paper 9; IPR2014-00230, Paper 10, IPR2014-00231, Paper 9.
`
`3 IPR2014-00229, Ex. 1047; IPR2014-00230, Ex. 1047, IPR2014-00231, Ex.
`1047.
`
`4 IPR2014-00229, Paper 10; IPR20l4-00230, Paper 11, IPR20l4-00231, Paper 10.
`
`5 IPR2014-00229, Paper 7; IPR20l4-00230, Paper 8; IPR2014-00231, Paper 7.
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 6
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 6
`
`

`
`Cases IPR2014-00229, -230, -231
`
`Patents 6,131,121, 6,108,704, 6,009,464 '
`
`Petitioner as respondents in Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication
`
`Devices and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-892 (U.S.I.T.C.) and
`
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Sony Corp, No. 1:13-cv-01071-AJT (E.D. Va.).
`
`Paper 9, 1-2. The.parties argue that no other petitioner would remain in the instant
`
`proceedings, and that termination of these proceedings promotes judicial economy
`
`and furthers the policy of the Board. Id
`
`The Board" generally expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing
`
`of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Oflice Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`
`Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). Upon consideration of the parties’
`
`' arguments and the early stage of these proceedings, we agree with the parties that
`
`terminating the instant proceedings with respect to both Petitioner and Patent
`
`Owner, at this early juncture, promotes efficiency and minimizes unnecessary
`
`costs. The Board is persuaded that, under these circumstances, it is appropriate to
`
`enter judgment6 without rendering a final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a);
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`P
`.
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the joint motions to terminate these proceedings are
`
`granted, and that these proceedings are hereby terminated as to all parties,
`
`including Petitioner" and Patent Owner;
`
`.
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint requests that the settlement
`agreement (Ex. 1047) be treated as business confidential information, kept separate
`
`from the file of the involved patents, and made available only to Federal
`
`6 A judgment means a final written decision by the Board, or a termination ofa
`proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.2.
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2O15-OO198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 7
`
`‘
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 7
`
`

`
`Cases IPR2014-00229, -230, -231
`Patents 6,131,121, 6,108,704, 6,009,464
`
`Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good
`
`cause under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), are
`
`granted.
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198 .
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 8
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 8
`
`

`
`0 Cases IPR2014-00229, -230, -231
`Patents 6,131,121, 6,108,704, 6,009,464
`
`PETITIONERS:
`
`Michael Rader
`
`Edmund Walsh
`
`Randy Pritzker
`WOKF GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`MRader-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`EWalsh-PTAB@wolfgreenfleld.com
`RPritzker-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`PATENTOWNER:
`
`Patrick Lee
`
`Michelle Chatelain
`
`~
`
`FISCH HOFFMAN SIGLER LL
`
`patrick.lee@fischllp.com
`michelle.chatelain@fischllp.com
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 9
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 9
`
`

`
`Case 6:13—cv—00604 Document2
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`Filed 08/23/13 Pagei of1 Page|D #2 180
`
` Mail Stop 8
`
`TO:
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`on the following
`I] Trademarks or
`IZPatents.
`[:1 the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:13-cv-604
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`8/23/2013
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, T ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`BLACKBERRY LTD. & BLACKBERRY CORP.
`
`——
`——
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entit1ed case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`
`
`I] Answer
`
`|:l Cross Bill
`
`I] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`—
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`|:I Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`1—
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 10
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 10
`
`

`
`Filed 08/23/13 Page1 of1 Page|D #: 180
`Case 6:13—cv-00605 Document2
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`
`
`
`T0:
`
`Mai] stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`on the following
`|_—_I Trademarks or
`[1 Patents.
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`DOCKET NO.
`DATE FILED
`6:13-cv-605
`8/23/2013
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Eastern District of Texas, T Ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`
`
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING CO., LTD., ET AL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`%tTiR‘3$;ti§§£
`12/28/1999
`8/22/2000
`10/10/2000
`
`——
`
`_—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK N0.
`
` l:I Amendment
`I] Answer
`I: Cross Bill
`[3 Other Pleading
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`—_
`I _—
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 11
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 11
`
`

`
`Case 6:13-cv—00606 Document2
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`Filed 08/23/13 Page1 of1 Page|D #: 181
`
`
`
`To
`'
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`on the following
`I] Trademarks or
`[ZPatents.
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:13-cv-606
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`8/23/2013
`
`Eastern District of Texas, T Ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`
` U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ET AL
`
`
`
`
`
`%lJ%35;:;}§§£
`12/28/1999
`8/22/2000
`10/10/2000
`——
`——
`
`
`
`CI Answer
`
`[:1 Cross Bill
`
`I] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`In the above—-entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 12
`
`
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 12
`
`

`
`Case 6:13-cv-00607 Document 2
`A0 120 Rev. 08/10
`
`Filed 08/23/13 Page 1 of 1 Page|D #: 180
`
` Mail Stop 8
`
`TO:
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
`on the following
`[:1 Trademarks or
`[Z Patents.
`|:I the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`6:13-cv-607
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`8/23/2013
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Texas, T Ier Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.
`
`ZTE CORPORATION and ZTE USA, INC.
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 6,009,469
`
`2 6,108,704
`
`3 6,131,121
`
`12/28/1999
`
`8/22/2000
`
`10/10/2000
`
`
`
`El Answer
`B Cross Bill
`I:] Other Pleading
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`El Amendment
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`
`
`1— I
`
`n the above———entit1ed case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3——Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 13
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 13
`
`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00936-LMB-TRJ Document 3 Filed 08/01/13 Page 1 of 1 PagelD# 193
`
`A0 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Virginia
`on the following
`
`D Trademarks or
`
`[ZPatents.
`
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`1 :13cv936
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Straight Path IP Group, inc.
`
`DATE FILED
`8/1/2013
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Vir inia
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Sharp Corp., et al.
`
`
`
`
`——
`——
`
`HOLDER or PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`%’}‘{T§R(iFD};’:4T/511:1:
`TR[1:gg/TRI(iRN0
`———
`-—
`_—
`—_
`——
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`In the above~—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`
`I:i Amendment
`
`El Answer
`
`I] Cross Bill
`
`D Other Pleading
`
`
`
`l
`
`In the above——cntitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`DECISION/IUDGEMENT
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3———Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 14
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 14
`
`

`
`Case 1:13-cv—O0935—GBL—TCB Document 3 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 1 Page|D# 195
`
`A0 120 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`TO:
`
`Mail Stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in 313 U-5- District C01111
`__
`for the Eastern District of Virginia — Alexandria
`__
`0111116 f0l10Wing
`D Trademarks or
`Patents .
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`
`DATE FILED
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`l:13cv935-GBL/TCB
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Straight Path Group, Inc.
`
`8/1/2013
`
`
`
`Eastern District of Virginia - Alexandria Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, et al.
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`Netspeakcoworafion
`Netsveakcorporation
`Netsveakcoworation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—_ I
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`n the above——entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK N0.
`
`D Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`Answer
`
`El Cross Bill D Other Pleading
`.
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
` --
`FERNANDO GALINDO
`
`———— I
`
`n the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Up0n filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 15
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 15
`
`

`
`Case 1:13-cv—OO933-CMH-TRJ Document 3 Filed 08/06/13 Page 1 of 1 Page|D# 195
`
`A0 I20 (Rev. 08/Ill)
`
`TO;
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § lllb you are hereby advised that at court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Virginia
`on the following
`
`DOCKET NO.
`l:l3cv933
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Straight Path [P Group, lnc.
`
`DATE FILED
`8/1/2013
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`Eastern District of Virginia
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`LG Electronics, Inc.
`LG Electronics U.S.A., lnc.
`
`LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., lnc.
`
`
`
`masts:
`
`OmTj
`
`In the above—emilled case, the following patent(s)/ tradcmark(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK N0‘
`
`El Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`Answer B Cross Bill D Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
` _
`
`In the above-—cntitled case. the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`8/6/2013
`
`Fernando Galindo
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3——Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2——Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4——Case file copy
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 16
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 16
`
`

`
`Case 3:13-cv—00503-REP Document 3 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 1 PagelD# 194
`A0 I20 (Rev. 08/10)
`
`
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`To
`'
`
`Man stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or I5 U.S.C. § 1 I 16 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the US. District Court
`Eastern District ofvirginia
`on the following
`[I Trademarks or E Patents .
`the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`(
`
`DOCKET NO.
`3 : I 3CV503
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`
`DATE FILED
`8/2/20 I 3
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`
`Richmond
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Toshiba Corporation
`
`Toshiba America, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
`HOLDER or PATENT on TRADEMARK
`%§TfR?$g’:‘dTAE:g
`mxgfmtgfilgo
`61111111169—
`5,103,704_
`11131121—
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK N0.
`
`D Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`I: Answer
`
`[:1 Cross Bill
`
`El Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the above~—cntitled case, the following decision has been rendered orjudgement issued:
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
` (BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`
`
`CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Fernando Galindo
`
`Robert L. Walker
`Copy l——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2——Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 17
`
`8/8/2013
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 17
`
`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00934—TSE—|DD Document 3 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 1 Page|D# 193
`
`A0 120 (Rev. 08/10
`
`TO:
`
`Mai] stop 3
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § I I I6 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Virginia
`on the following
`
`[3 Trademarks or
`
`[2lPatents.
`
`( E] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`
`
`DATE FILED
`8/1/2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`1 :1 3cv9 34
`Eastern District of Vir inia
`
`DEFENDANT
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Vizio, Inc., et ai.
`
`Straight Path IP Group, inc.
`
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`12/28/1999
`
`
`
`.
`
`NetSpeak Corporation
`
`8/22/0200
`
`NetSpeak Corporation
`
`10/10/2000
`
`Netspeak Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`
`1 6,009,469
`
`2 6,108,704
`
`3 6,131,121
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`j—
`5 j_
`
`
`
`In the aboVe——entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`
`[:1 Answer
`C] Cross Bill
`C] Other Pleading
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`D Amendment
`
`O
`I —
`
`
`
`In the above—£ntitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`Copy l——Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Up0n filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 18
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 18
`
`

`
`Case 2:13—cv—OO427-AWA—LRL Document 3 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 1 PagelD# 196
`
`A0 I20 Rev. 08/10
`To
`'
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PO. Box I450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or I5 U.S.C. § I I I6 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of Virginia - Norfolk Division on the following
`
`
`I] Trademarks or
`DOCKET NO.
`2:13cv427
`PLAINTIFF
`
`[1 Patents.
`
`
`
`( D the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`u.s. DISTRICT COURT
`for the Eastern District of VII’ inia - Norfolk Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`8/1/2013
`
`
`
`SONY CORPORATION, et al
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP. INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case. the following pzttent(s)/ lr:tdemark(s) have been included:
`
`
`HOLDEROF PATENTOR TRADEMARK
`Straight Path IP Group, inc.
`
`
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
`
`——
`
`
`——
`
`
`
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT CLERK
`
`
`
`D Answer
`[3 Cross Bill
`D Other Pleading
`IIOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`C] Amendment
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`Tkgl/§£l;EIR?(RNo
`
`In the above—-entitled case. the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`Fernando Galindo
`
`(av) DEPUTY CLERK '
`Brad Newell
`‘
`
`‘
`
`DATE
`
`8/2/2013
`
`Copy l—Upon initiation of action. mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action. mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2-—Upon filing document adding patent(s). mail this copy to Director Copy -I--Case file copy
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 19
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 19
`
`

`
`Case 2:12—cv—OO0O8—RGD—DEM Document 50
`
`Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of1 PagelD# 1311
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director or the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or IS U.S.C. § 1 I I6 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Eastern District of Virginia
`on the following
`
`E] Trademarks or
`
`lZPatcnts.
`
`( E] the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`2:12cv8
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`1/4/2012
`
`
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Eastern District of Vir inia
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
`
`ooVoo, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`I 6,513,066
`
`
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`12/28/1999
`
`Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.
`
`2 6,701,365
`
`3 6,009,469
`
`3/2/2004
`
`Innovative Communications Technologies. Inc.
`
`1/28/2003
`
`Innovative Communications Technologies. Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D I
`
`
`
`
`
`n the above-—cntitled case, the following patent(s)/ lmdemark(s) have been included:
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`INCLUDED BY
`
`T 0
`TR§3:;3iRKRN0
`
`D Amendment
`D
`F P TEN
`0”l‘{T1‘I:R‘3\DE’;/MRI:
`
`CI Answer
`
`I] Cross Bill
`
`C] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER or PATENT on TRADEMARK
`
`——
`10/11/2012 Stipulation of Dismissal filed
`
`
`—_
`——
`
`in the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`
`Fernando Galindo
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`R. Simmons
`
`DATE
`
`10/12/2012
`
`Copy I—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2——Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 20
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 20
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-00008-AWA-DEM Document4
`
`Filed 01/11/12 Page 1 of1 Page|D# 144
`
`
` I -..
`_ J t._ ;_.
`R‘t:t'bm‘ oN "rm:
`FILING on DETERMINATION or AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT on
`
`
`
`A0 I20 Rev, 08I|0
`
`_
`T0‘
`
`_
`I
`than sxopls
`Director ofthe u.s. Pntent and Trademark Office
`P.0. Box 1450
`
`
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`5
`
`,
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`
`
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or I5 U.S.C. § I I I6 you are hereby advised thin in coun action lm:-I been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`for the Eastern District of .\/irginia
`I» on the i‘oIlm\'in;_:
`D Trademarks or M Patents. m( D the patent action involwics 35 U.S.C. § 292:):
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCKET NO.
`_
`I 7,c,;/ :
`I>L;\|N'r|I-‘I?
`
`DATE FILED
`I
`-V I /l}
`
`
`
`>
`U.S. DISTRICI‘ COURT
`for the Eastern District of Virinia 00 Cvzrcm - *
`DEFENDANT
`V 2 390
`
`OOV00, LLC
`
`INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATIONS TECHS., INC.
`
`HOLDER or l'A’|'I;'N'l' on TRADIEM/\RK
`
`
`
`.l.Rl'\”[‘)TE4"j\TR")(RN0_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_
`
`—
`
`
`DAT}-L INCl.UDF.D
`
`In lhc :Ibuve——cIItit|od case. the following pzIIenl(s)/ trndcInark(s) Imvc been included:
`|N(.‘LU|)l-Ll) av
`
`.
`
`[:1 Amendment
`
`D Answer
`
`[I Cross Bill
`
`I] 0Ihcr|’Icading
`
`
`
`HOLDER or IwI'I:N'r ox TRADlZ.\rlARK
`‘:)’;'1LIR‘3\FD':5"J:‘:;’|1<
`1.RX’3:3::j:R?;RN0
`__—
`_—
`_—
`——
`——
`
`
`
`In the above—cntiIlcd case. the following decision has been rendered orjudgcmcnt issued:
`l)Ii(‘|Sl0N/.lUDGl:'Ml£N'l'
`
`
`
`
`CLIERK
`
`Fernando GaIindo._
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`. S!‘VY7YYId7\5‘
`
`I)I\‘l-Ii
`
`.
`I /I‘ /1‘-"3
`
`Copy I-—-Upon initiation ufuclion. mail this copy to Director Copy 3—lipon tcrmiltntion ol':Icti0I1, mail this cop\' to Director
`Copy 2—lipon filing Ilocument ntltling putcnu.-I). mail this copy to Director Copy -I-—(':Isc file copy
`
`LG v. Straight Path, |PR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 21
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Ex. 2025 - Page 21
`
`

`
`U
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`PowER OF ATTORNEY,
`CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
`
`ANDREVOCATION,
`
`OR POWERS
`
`
`
`Hon. Commissioner of Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`
`
`-.~.~.».-.-.-«..—v.....‘......,.-—~............._.-.....»—...._....._u—.——-.......................—~..
`
`
`
`--~«v--—.~.i........-...—--~............—_,,......_....‘_,..--..—..,.............._........-.,...__..,...._._......,.
`
`
`--—-~—a--.....--........4.4..._...............................,...
`
`Revocation: I hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney given in the
`application identified in the attached statement under 37 CFR 3.73 (b).
`
`Power of Attorney: I hereby appoint the practitioners associated with customer
`number 42624, individually and collectively, as attorney(s) or agent(s) to represent the
`undersigned before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in
`connection with any and all patent applications assigned only to the undersigned
`according to th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket