throbber
QXc[ FOFHCYfCEENHICPUWCTRR RbYe‘[ad FLF S^_[Z FEDGMDFI VX][ F b\ L VX][TRB HHHI
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
`Alexandria Division
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.,
`
`Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-934 (AJT/IDD)
`
`v.
`
`VIZIO, INC., et al.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TOSHIBA CORPORATION, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-934 (AJT/IDD)
`[formerly No. 3:13-cv-503, No. 1:13-cv-1070]
`
`Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-934 (AJT/IDD)
`[formerly No. 1:13-cv-933]
`
`HULU, LLC’S COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Exhibit 2003 - Page 1
`
`

`

`QXc[ FOFHCYfCEENHICPUWCTRR RbYe‘[ad FLF S^_[Z FEDGMDFI VX][ G b\ L VX][TRB HHHJ
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(c), Intervenor Hulu, LLC (“Hulu”) hereby
`
`alleges for its Complaint in Intervention as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Hulu seeks a declaratory judgment of non-infringement pursuant to the
`
`Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201(a) and 2202.
`
`Parties
`
`2.
`
`Hulu is a Delaware limited liability company with its headquarters and principal
`
`place of business located at 2500 Broadway, Santa Monica, California 90404. Hulu offers its
`
`millions of users a premium streaming video experience that offers a wide selection of television
`
`shows, clips, movies, original programming, and more. Through its website www.hulu.com and
`
`via applications offered by its many technology partners, Hulu offers a free ad-supported
`
`streaming service as well as a subscription service that offers subscribers access to the current
`
`season of scores of the hottest prime-time television shows.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant-in-Intervention Straight Path is a
`
`Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 5300 Hickory Park Drive, Suite 218,
`
`Glen Allen, Virginia 23059.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`4.
`
`This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 et
`
`seq., and the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. This Court has
`
`subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(a), (b), and (c).
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Straight Path by virtue of, inter alia,
`
`Straight Path’s principal place of business, which is in Glen Allen, Virginia, and its filing and
`
`pursuit of related patent infringement litigation in this district.
`
`Background and Hulu’s Interest in This Lawsuit
`
`7.
`
`Straight Path has accused Hulu technology partners (hereinafter, “the Hulu
`
`Partners”) LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics MobileComm
`
`U.S.A., Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information
`
`1
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Exhibit 2003 - Page 2
`
`

`

`QXc[ FOFHCYfCEENHICPUWCTRR RbYe‘[ad FLF S^_[Z FEDGMDFI VX][ H b\ L VX][TRB HHHK
`
`Systems, Inc., and VIZIO, Inc., of making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing
`
`products that allegedly infringe several patents: United States Patent No. 6,009,469 (the “’469
`
`Patent”), entitled “Graphic User Interface for Internet Telephony Application,” United States
`
`Patent No. 6,108,704 (the “’704 Patent”), entitled “Point-to-Point Protocol,” and United States
`
`Patent No. 6,131,121 (the “’121 Patent”), entitled “Point-to-Point Computer Network
`
`Communication Utility Utilizing Dynamically Assigned Network Protocol Addresses.”
`
`8.
`
`The Hulu Partners design, manufacture, or sell devices that incorporate Hulu
`
`functionality.
`
`9.
`
`Hulu is informed and believes that Straight Path asserts or intends to assert that
`
`the ’469, ’121, and ’704 Patents are infringed by the Hulu Partners’ devices by virtue of their
`
`Hulu functionality. For example, on information and belief, Straight Path has informed several
`
`Hulu Partners that they infringe the patents-in-suit by virtue of Hulu functionality allegedly
`
`offered on the Hulu Partners’ accused devices. Moreover, Hulu is informed and believes that
`
`Straight Path has served infringement charts in this action accusing inter alia Hulu applications
`
`on the Hulu Partners’ devices.
`
`10.
`
`Straight Path seeks damages from the Hulu Partners for making or selling devices
`
`that incorporate Hulu functionality. Thus, Hulu has a direct and substantial interest in defending
`
`against and defeating Straight Path’s claims with regard to the ’469, ’121, and ’704 Patents. By
`
`intervening in this action, Hulu seeks the Court’s assistance and declaration concerning these
`
`matters, which have been and are subjects of disagreement among the parties.
`
`11.
`
`As a result of Straight Path’s infringement allegations against the Hulu Partners
`
`regarding the ’469, ’121, and ’704 Patents, an actual controversy exists between Hulu and
`
`Straight Path. By intervening in this action, Hulu seeks the Court’s assistance and declaration
`
`concerning these matters, which have been and are subjects of disagreement among the parties.
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`Count for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ’469 Patent
`
`12.
`
`Hulu incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1-11.
`
`2
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Exhibit 2003 - Page 3
`
`

`

`QXc[ FOFHCYfCEENHICPUWCTRR RbYe‘[ad FLF S^_[Z FEDGMDFI VX][ I b\ L VX][TRB HHHL
`
`13.
`
`Straight Path has sued the Hulu Partners in the present action alleging
`
`infringement of the ’469 Patent.
`
`14.
`
`By making, using, selling, offering to sell, marketing, licensing, or importing
`
`Hulu’s technology for use with the Hulu Partners’ products, Hulu does not infringe, directly,
`
`indirectly, literally or otherwise, a valid claim, if any, of the ’469 Patent.
`
`15.
`
`The Hulu Partners do not directly or indirectly infringe a valid claim, if any, of
`
`the ’469 Patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell, marketing, licensing, or importing
`
`products that incorporate Hulu functionality.
`
`16.
`
`Thus, an immediate, real, and justiciable controversy exists between Straight Path,
`
`on the one hand, and Hulu, on the other hand, with respect to the alleged infringement of the
`
`’469 Patent. A judicial declaration concerning these matters is necessary and appropriate at this
`
`time so that Hulu can ascertain its rights and duties with regard to the parties and with regard to
`
`designing, developing, manufacturing, marketing, and selling its products.
`
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`Count for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ’121 Patent
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`Hulu incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1-16.
`
`Straight Path has sued the Hulu Partners in the present action alleging
`
`infringement of the ’121 Patent.
`
`19.
`
`By making, using, selling, offering to sell, marketing, licensing, or importing
`
`Hulu’s technology for use with the Hulu Partners’ products, Hulu does not infringe, directly,
`
`indirectly, literally or otherwise, a valid claim, if any, of the ’121 Patent.
`
`20.
`
`The Hulu Partners do not directly or indirectly infringe a valid claim, if any, of
`
`the ’121 Patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell, marketing, licensing, or importing
`
`products that incorporate Hulu functionality.
`
`21.
`
`Thus, an immediate, real, and justiciable controversy exists between Straight Path,
`
`on the one hand, and Hulu, on the other hand, with respect to the alleged infringement of the
`
`’121 Patent. A judicial declaration concerning these matters is necessary and appropriate at this
`
`3
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Exhibit 2003 - Page 4
`
`

`

`QXc[ FOFHCYfCEENHICPUWCTRR RbYe‘[ad FLF S^_[Z FEDGMDFI VX][ J b\ L VX][TRB HHHM
`
`time so that Hulu can ascertain its rights and duties with regard to the parties and with regard to
`
`designing, developing, manufacturing, marketing, and selling its products.
`
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`Count for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ’704 Patent
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`Hulu incorporates by reference the allegations in paragraphs 1-21.
`
`Straight Path has sued the Hulu Partners in the present action alleging
`
`infringement of the ’704 Patent.
`
`24.
`
`By making, using, selling, offering to sell, marketing, licensing, or importing
`
`Hulu’s technology for use with the Hulu Partners’ products, Hulu does not infringe, directly,
`
`indirectly, literally or otherwise, a valid claim, if any, of the ’704 Patent.
`
`25.
`
`The Hulu Partners do not directly or indirectly infringe a valid claim, if any, of
`
`the ’704 Patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell, marketing, licensing, or importing
`
`products that incorporate Hulu functionality.
`
`26.
`
`Thus, an immediate, real, and justiciable controversy exists between Straight Path,
`
`on the one hand, and Hulu, on the other hand, with respect to the alleged infringement of the
`
`’704 Patent. A judicial declaration concerning these matters is necessary and appropriate at this
`
`time so that Hulu can ascertain its rights and duties with regard to the parties and with regard to
`
`designing, developing, manufacturing, marketing, and selling its products.
`
`Therefore, Hulu requests declaratory judgment as follows:
`
`Request for Relief
`
`a) For a declaration that by making, using, selling, offering to sell, marketing, licensing,
`
`or importing Hulu’s technology for use with the Hulu Partners’ products, Hulu does
`
`not infringe, directly, indirectly, literally or otherwise, a valid claim, if any, of the
`
`’469 Patent;
`
`b) For a declaration that no valid claim of the ’469 Patent is infringed, directly,
`
`indirectly, literally, and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by Hulu or by any of the
`
`4
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Exhibit 2003 - Page 5
`
`

`

`QXc[ FOFHCYfCEENHICPUWCTRR RbYe‘[ad FLF S^_[Z FEDGMDFI VX][ K b\ L VX][TRB HHHN
`
`Hulu Partners by virtue of incorporating any Hulu product into those Partners’
`
`products;
`
`c) For a declaration that by making, using, selling, offering to sell, marketing, licensing,
`
`or importing Hulu’s technology for use with the Hulu Partners’ products, Hulu does
`
`not infringe, directly, indirectly, literally or otherwise, a valid claim, if any, of the
`
`’121 Patent;
`
`d) For a declaration that no valid claim of the ’121 Patent is infringed, directly,
`
`indirectly, literally, and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by Hulu or by any of the
`
`Hulu Partners by virtue of incorporating any Hulu product into those Partners’
`
`products;
`
`e) For a declaration that by making, using, selling, offering to sell, marketing, licensing,
`
`or importing Hulu’s technology for use with the Hulu Partners’ products, Hulu does
`
`not infringe, directly, indirectly, literally or otherwise, a valid claim, if any, of the
`
`’704 Patent;
`
`f) For a declaration that no valid claim of the ’704 Patent is infringed, directly,
`
`indirectly, literally, and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by Hulu or by any of the
`
`Hulu Partners by virtue of incorporating any Hulu product into those Partners’
`
`products;
`
`g) For a determination that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and an award
`
`to Hulu of its attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses in connection with this action; and
`
`h) Such other and further equitable or legal relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`Demand for Jury Trial
`
`Hulu hereby demands a jury trial as to all issues triable to a jury.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`HULU, LLC
`
`5
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Exhibit 2003 - Page 6
`
`

`

`QXc[ FOFHCYfCEENHICPUWCTRR RbYe‘[ad FLF S^_[Z FEDGMDFI VX][ L b\ L VX][TRB HHIE
`
`Dated: October 28, 2014
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Robert A. Angle
`Robert A. Angle (VSB No. 37691)
`robert.angle@troutmansanders.com
`Mary Catherine Zinsner (VSB No. 31397)
`mary.zinsner@troutmansanders.com
`K. Nicola Harrison (VSB No. 82194)
`nicola.harrison@troutmansanders.com
`TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
`1850 Towers Crescent Plaza, Suite 500
`Tysons Corner, Virginia 22182
`Telephone: (703) 734-4334
`Facsimile: (703) 734-4340
`
`Ashok Ramani (pro hac vice)
`Matthias Kamber (pro hac vice)
`Sharif E. Jacob (pro hac vice)
`Katherine M. Lovett (pro hac vice)
`KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
`633 Battery Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
`Telephone: 415 391 5400
`Facsimile: 415 397 7188
`
`Attorneys for Intervenor
`HULU, LLC
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on the 28th day of October, 2014, I filed the foregoing with the Clerk
`
`of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all
`
`counsel of record.
`
`By: /s/ Robert A. Angle
`Robert A. Angle (VSB No. 37691)
`robert.angle@troutmansanders.com
`TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
`1850 Towers Crescent Plaza, Suite 500
`Tysons Corner, Virginia 22182
`Telephone: (703) 734-4334
`Facsimile: (703) 734-4340
`
`23705399v1
`
`6
`
`LG v. Straight Path, IPR2015-00198
`Straight Path - Exhibit 2003 - Page 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket