Damages Summary
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO001
`
`Lost Profits:
`
`$159.1 Million
`
`Reasonable Royalties:
`
`$101.9 Million
`
`RS-1
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 1
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO001
`
`Lost Profits:
`
`$159.1 Million
`
`Reasonable Royalties:
`
`$101.9 Million
`
`RS-1
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 1
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO002
`
`Lost Profits Analysis
`
`RS-2
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 2
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO003
`
`• Lost Profits are profits WesternGeco
`was prevented from making because
`ION supplied its infringing DigiFIN systems
`for WesternGeco’s competitors to use
`
`• If ION’s infringing DigiFIN systems had not
`been used by WesternGeco’s competitors,
`WesternGeco would have won additional
`surveys and would have earned revenues and
`profits on those surveys
`
`RS-3
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 3
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits On 25 Surveys
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO004
`
`207 Total Surveys Using DigiFIN Systems: $3.0 Billion Revenue
`
`
`182
`
`25
`
`Surveys WesternGeco
`Would Have Won
`
`Revenue on 25 Surveys:
`
`WesternGeco Cost:
`
`$319,334,996
`$160,261,436
`
`-
`
`WesternGeco Lost Profits:
`
`$159,073,560
`
`RS-4
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 4
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits Factors
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO005
`
`• Demand for patented product
`
`• Availability of acceptable, non-infringing
`alternatives
`
`• Capacity to meet demand
`
`• Quantification of lost profits
`
`RS-5
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 5
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`ION Admits Demand For
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO006
`
`ION’s Am. Resp. To WesternGeco Interrog. No.10
`
`PTX197
`
`RS-6
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 6
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Oil Companies Demand
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO007
`
`PTX463
`
`PTX028
`
`PTX463 at FGRPROD000368662 (Dec. 14, 2004)
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`PTX028 at FGRPROD115592 (July 7, 2011)
`
`RS-7
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 7
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Oil Companies Demand
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO008
`
`PTX388
`
`PTX403
`
`PTX457
`
`PTX380
`
`PTX388 at FGRPROD137977
`(Dec. 19, 2008)
`
`PTX403 at FGRPROD159603
`(May 29, 2008)
`
`PTX457 at FGRPROD325902
`(Dec. 1, 2009)
`
`PTX380 at FGRPROD000128418
`(Nov. 2, 2010)
`
`RS-8
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 8
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Defendants Recognized The Demand
`For Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO009
`
`PTX245 at ION731205
`
`RS-9
`
`PTX245
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 9
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Defendants Recognized The Demand And
`Targeted WesternGeco’s “Proprietary Market”
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO010
`
`PTX257
`
`PTX 257 at ION865867
`(Dec. 5, 2005)
`
`PTX006
`
`PTX 006 at ION016360
`(Aug. 3, 2006)
`
`PTX006 at ION016366
`(Aug. 3, 2006)
`
`RS-10
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 10
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Defendants Recognized The Demand And Targeted
`WesternGeco’s “Proprietary Market”
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO011
`
`PTX014 at FGRPROD1844928
`
`Q. Okay. And so as of 2007, Fugro’s view was WesternGeco was able to
`command premium rates from customers and get some jobs because of
`factors that included its ability at that time to be the one that could
`offer lateral steering, right?
`
`A. Correct.
`
`
`
`*
`*
`*
`Q. And so prior to November ’07, WesternGeco had an advantage that
`included being able to offer steerable streamers in a proprietary way,
`right?
`
`
`A. Yeah. Their advantage was the Q-Marine which incorporated the
`Q-Fin.
`
`PTX014
`
`Paul Winspear
`Managing
`Director
`
`
`
`Winspear 30(b)(6) Tr. at 66:23-67:3, 67:18-22
`
`RS-11
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 11
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Defendants Recognized The Demand And Targeted
`WesternGeco’s “Proprietary Market”
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO012
`
`PTX014
`
`PTX014 at FGRPROD1044920
`
`PTX016
`
`PTX429
`
`PTX016 at FGRPROD19974
`
`PTX429 at FGRPROD187792
`
`RS-12
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 12
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Survey Providers Win Jobs Because
`They Have Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO013
`
`PTX492
`
`PTX903
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`PTX492 at FGRPROD1488244 (May 2, 2008)
`
`PTX903 at ION730353 (Mar. 10, 2008)
`
`RS-13
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 13
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`ION’s Sales Reflect Demand
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO014
`
`Sims Supplemental Report at Ex. 9.15
`
`$63.3 M
`
`Lateral Controller
`Additional $3.0 Million
`
`DigiFIN Net Revenue
`
`Sims Supplemental
`Report
`
`‘07
`
`‘08
`
`‘09
`Year
`
`‘10
`
`‘11
`
`RS-14
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 14
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Revenue From Surveys Using
`DigiFin Reflects Demand
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO015
`
`207 Surveys Using DigiFIN Systems Generating $3.0 Billion in Revenue
`
`Sims Supplemental Report at Ex. 5.2S
`
`$3.0
`Billion
`
`‘08
`
`‘09
`
`‘10
`Year
`
`‘11
`
`‘12
`
`RS-15
`
`DigiFIN Survey Revenue
`
`Sims Supplemental
`Report
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 15
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Revenue From Fugro Surveys Using
`DigiFIN Reflects Demand
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO016
`
`106 Fugro Surveys Generating $1.4 Billion in Revenue
`
`Sims Supplemental Report at Ex. 6.2S
`
`$1.4
`Billion
`
`‘07
`
`‘08
`
`‘09
`Year
`
`‘10
`
`‘11
`
`RS-16
`
`Fugro DigiFIN Survey Revenue
`
`Sims Supplemental
`Report
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 16
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`WesternGeco’s Q Surveys Reflect Demand
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO017
`
`$2.7 Billion in Revenue from 2006-2011
`
`Sims Supplemental Report at Ex. 8.3S
`
`$2.7
`Billion
`
`‘08
`
`‘09
`
`‘10
`Year
`
`‘11
`
`‘12
`
`RS-17
`
`WesternGeco Q Survey Revenue
`
`Sims Supplemental
`Report
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 17
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits Factors
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO018
`
`• Demand for patented technology was strong
`
`RS-18
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 18
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`No Acceptable Non-Infringing
`Alternatives Available
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO019
`
`An acceptable non-infringing alternative would be a
`
`lateral steering system that provides the unique
`
`benefits of the patented steering system without
`
`infringing the Bittleston or Zajac Patents
`
`RS-19
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 19
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Fugro Said There Were No Alternatives
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO020
`
`PTX313
`
`PTX920
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`PTX313 at FGRPROD021483
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`PTX920 at FGRPROD73709,73713
`RS-20
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 20
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Fugro Admits eBird Is Not An Acceptable
`Non-Infringing Alternative
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO021
`
`Q.
`
`(BY MR. GILMAN) Has Fugro ever purchased eBird units?
`
`A. No, we haven't.
`
`Q. Has Fugro ever discussed the eBird?
`
`A. No, we haven't.
`
`Q. Are you aware if eBird is commercially available today?
`
`A.
`
`It is commercially available today, but there is -- there
`is an issue there with the connector to the streamer.
`
`Q. What do you mean there is an issue with the connector
`with eBird?
`
`A.
`
`It's not commercially available to fit the Sentinel streamer.
`
`7/12/2012 By Tr. at 176: 8-21
`
`Leif Morten By
`Navigation
`Manager
`
`
`
`RS-21
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 21
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`ION Says eBird Is Not An Acceptable
`Non-Infringing Alternative
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO022
`
`PTX233
`
`PTX250
`
`PTX233 at ION673078 (October 30, 2009)
`
`PTX250 at ION783248-49 (Nov. 18, 2009) RS-22
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 22
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`ION Says eBird Was Not Commercially
`Available At End Of 2011
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO023
`
`David Gentle
`Director of Sales
`
`A.
`
`A. Well, eBird is not a device that’s commercially available at
`the moment. Well it’s not -- it’s not commercially proven yet.
`
`Q. What do you mean by not commercially available?
`
`It hasn’t been sold to -- to anybody yet.
`
`Q. And what do you mean by not commercially proven?
`
`A. To my knowledge, it hasn’t been employed on a commercial
`survey to date.
`
`Q. As far as you are aware, no eBird units have been sold?
`
`A. As far as I am aware that’s correct, yes.
`
`
`10/27/2011 Gentle Tr. at 62:25-63:14
`
`RS-23
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 23
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`ION Says Nautilus Was Not
`Commercially Viable In Early 2010
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO024
`
`A. My recollection is that the beginning of 2010, Nautilus still
`wasn’t seen as commercially viable. And eBird to my
`knowledge still isn’t commercially viable.
`
`10/27/2011 Gentle Tr. at 282:16-19
`
`David Gentle
`Director of Sales
`
`RS-24
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 24
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Fugro Admits Nautilus Is Not An Acceptable
`Non-Infringing Alternative
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO025
`
`Q:
`
` (BY MR. GILMAN) The Nautilus device destroyed some of the
`streamers that you were testing on the device?
`
`A: Yeah, that’s what happened
`
`Q:
`
` (BY MR. GILMAN) You went back to Sercel and demanded money to
`replace the streamers that Nautilus had destroyed?
`
`A: I believe we did, yes.
`
`7/12/2012 By Tr. at 158:1-3, 6-10
`
`Leif Morten By
`Navigation
`Manager
`
`
`
`Q: Would you consider that evaluation of Nautilus a failure?
`
`A: That was a complete failure.
`
`7/12/2012 By Tr. at 59:9-11
`
`Q:
`
` (BY MR. GILMAN) You're not purchasing any Nautilus units or
`eBird units in substitution for the DigiFIN units, are you?
`
`A: We are not – not doing that, no.
`
`7/12/2012 By Tr. at 158:16-21
`
`RS-25
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 25
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Fugro Admits Nautilus Is Not An
`Acceptable Non-Infringing Alternative
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO026
`
`PTX458
`
`PTX458 at FGRPROD326451
`
`RS-26
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 26
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits Factors
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO027
`
`• Demand for patented technology was strong
`
`• There were no acceptable, non-infringing
`alternatives to the patented technology
`
`RS-27
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 27
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`WesternGeco Had Access To More Than
`59 Months Of Available Vessel Capacity
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO028
`
`Extra Vessel Capacity
`
`54 months of capacity needed
`to perform 25 lost surveys
`
`0
`
`59 Months
`
`Cook Q
`
`Pride Q
`
`Emerald Q
`
`Diamond Q
`
`Searcher Q
`
`Tasman Q
`
`Topaz Q
`
`RS-28
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 28
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`WesternGeco Had Access To More Than
`59 Months Of Available Vessel Capacity
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO029
`
`Cost of Extra Vessel Capacity= $19.2M Amortized
`
`54 months of capacity needed
`to perform 25 lost surveys
`
`0
`
`Boat
`
`Cook
`
`Tasman
`
`Pride
`
`Searcher
`
`Topaz
`
`Various Boats
`
`Charters
`
`Cost To Add Capacity
`
`Capacity Added
`
`59 Months
`
`$36M / $19.2M amortized (add Q equip)
`
`$0 (already equipped)
`
`$0 (do not convert to conventional)
`
`$0 (do not convert to conventional)
`
`$0 (do not convert to conventional)
`
`$0 (accelerate conversion to Q)
`
`$1.5M / month
`
`15 Months
`
`13 Months
`
`20 Months
`
`9 Months
`
`2 Months
`
`As Needed
`
`As Needed
`
`RS-29
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 29
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits Factors
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO030
`
`• Demand for patented technology was strong
`
`• There were no acceptable, non-infringing
`alternatives to the patented technology
`
`• WesternGeco had available capacity to
`conduct additional surveys
`
`RS-30
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 30
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`100%
`
`75%
`
`50%
`
`25%
`
`0%
`
`WesternGeco Lateral Steering
`Survey Market Share
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO031
`
`80%
`
`36%
`
`35%
`
`‘00
`
`‘01
`
`‘02
`
`‘03
`
`‘04
`
`‘05
`
`‘06
`
`‘07
`
`‘08
`
`‘09
`
`‘10
`
`Year
`
`RS-31
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 31
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`WesternGeco Lost Profits On 25 Surveys
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO032
`
`207 Total Surveys Using DigiFIN Systems: $3.0 Billion Revenue
`
`
`182
`
`25
`
`Surveys WesternGeco
`Would Have Won
`
`Revenue on 25 Surveys:
`
`WesternGeco Cost:
`
`$319,334,996
`$160,261,436
`
`-
`
`WesternGeco Lost Profits:
`
`$159,073,560
`
`RS-32
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 32
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Damages Summary
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO001A
`
`Lost Profits:
`
`$159.1 Million
`
`Reasonable Royalties:
`
`$101.1 Million
`
`RS-1
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 33
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`WesternGeco Lost Profits On 25 Surveys
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO032
`
`207 Total Surveys Using DigiFIN Systems: $3.0 Billion Revenue
`
`
`182
`
`25
`
`Surveys WesternGeco
`Would Have Won
`
`Revenue on 25 Surveys:
`
`WesternGeco Cost:
`
`$319,334,996
`$160,261,436
`
`-
`
`WesternGeco Lost Profits:
`
`$159,073,560
`
`RS-32
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 34
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`WesternGeco Lost Surveys Due To
`ION’s and Fugro’s Infringement
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO033
`
`1. 4D Surveys for Statoil, Total, and BP (6)
`
`2. All Apache Surveys done by Fugro (9)
`
`3. Other Surveys that required Lateral Steering (10)
`
`182
`
`25
`
`207 Total Surveys using
`DigiFIN Systems
`
`Lost Surveys
`
`RS-33
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 35
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`4D Surveys For Statoil, Total, And BP
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO034
`
`Survey
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Total Angola 4D
`
`Total Nigeria 4D
`
`BP Angola 4D
`
`Winning
`Contractor
`
`Revenue
`
`Polarcus
`
`$6,100,000
`
`PGS
`
`$11,800,000
`
`PGS
`
`$13,000,000
`
`PGS
`
`$15,808,540
`
`Polarcus
`
`$7,249,300
`
`PGS
`
`$18,000,000
`
`RS-34
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 36
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lateral Steering Is Vital For 4D
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO035
`
`PTX094
`
`PTX094 at WG38742
`(2003)
`
`RS-35
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 37
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lateral Steering Is Vital For 4D
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO036
`
`Paul Winspear
`Managing
`Director
`
`
`
`Kevin Stiver
`U.S. Regional Mgr.
`Sales & Marketing
`
`
`
`Q. Does this indicate another example, this one September of
`2011, of a customer requiring lateral steering technology of the
`sort that’s at issue in this case?
`
`A. Hopefully, this reinforces my earlier testimony that it is
`typically 4D surveys where we see an absolute requirement
`specified in these terms. But, yes, I absolutely agree that for
`this 4D survey, it’s clear that steerable bids are required.
`
`Winspear 30(b)(6) Tr. at 195:20-196:3
`
`Q.
`
`Is the capability to steer streamers laterally a typical
`requirement for 4D surveys?
`
`A. Yes, it is.
`
`Stiver Tr. at 203:11-14
`
`RS-36
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 38
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lateral Steering Is Required For 4D By Statoil
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO037
`
`Q.
`
`It's your understanding that clients believe lateral steering
`is important for 4D surveys?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Q.
`
`If lateral steering -- so lateral steering was important for
`customers for 4D?
`
`Ronny Bohn
`Vice President
`Western Hemisphere
`
`
`
`A.
`
`It's important for Statoil for 4D.
`
` Bohn Tr. at 25: 18-20, 29: 5-7
`
`RS-37
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 39
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lateral Steering Is Required For 4D By Statoil
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO038
`
`Q. While you were at WesternGeco, Statoil was one of the oil
`companies that you were aware of that would always prefer
`a contractor that could provide lateral steering?
`
`A.
`
`For – for 4D surveys.
`
`Williamson Tr. at 105:1-5
`
`Ken Williamson
`Sr. Vice President
`Geo Ventures Group
`
`RS-38
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 40
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`4D Surveys For Statoil, Total, And BP
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO039
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Total Angola 4D
`
`Total Nigeria 4D
`
`BP Angola 4D
`
`PTX473 at FGRPROD599961
`
`PTX473
`
`RS-39
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 41
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`4D Surveys For Statoil, Total, And BP
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO040
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Total Angola 4D
`
`Total Nigeria 4D
`
`BP Angola 4D
`
`PTX680 at FGRPROD1125928
`
`PTX680 at FGRPROD1125934
`
`PTX680 at FGRPROD1125939
`
`PTX680
`
`RS-40
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 42
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`4D Surveys For Statoil, Total, And BP
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO041
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Total Angola 4D
`
`Total Nigeria 4D
`
`BP Angola 4D
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`PTX655 at FGRPROD547926
`
`PTX655 at FGRPROD547921
`
`PTX655
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`PTX680 at FGRPROD000547923
`
`RS-41
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 43
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`4D Surveys For Statoil, Total, And BP
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO042
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Statoil Norway 4D
`
`Total Angola 4D
`
`Total Nigeria 4D
`
`BP Angola 4D
`
`PTX725 at WG508689
`
`PTX725 at WG508689
`
`PTX725
`
`RS-42
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 44
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Apache Surveys
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO043
`
`Survey
`
`Winning Contractor
`
`Revenue
`
`Apache Australia
`
`Apache Australia
`
`Apache Australia
`
`Apache Australia
`
`Apache Australia
`
`Apache Australia
`
`Apache Australia
`
`Apache Australia
`
`Apache Kenya
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`$25,606,935
`
`$0
`
`$5,524,622
`
`$5,521,875
`
`$2,757,978
`
`$2,296,051
`
`$2,282,745
`
`$1,572,427
`
`$15,751,316
`
`RS-43
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 45
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Apache Surveys
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO044
`
`PTX7 Intelligent Acquisition - Marine Streamer Steering Video
`
`RS-44
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 46
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Apache Surveys
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO045
`
`PTX380 at FGRPROD128418
`(Nov. 2, 2010)
`
`PTX903 at ION730352
`(Mar. 10, 2010)
`
`PTX543 at WG92900
`
`PTX543 at WG92908
`(Feburuary 3, 2010)
`
`RS-45
`
`PTX380
`
`PTX903
`
`PTX543
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 47
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Other Surveys That Required
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO046
`
`Survey
`
`Winning
`Contractor
`
`Revenue
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`CGGV
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`PGS
`
`CGGV
`
`Fugro
`
`PGS
`
`Fugro
`
`Fugro
`
`$24,500,000
`
`$25,580,935
`
`$7,634,967
`
`$6,188,252
`
`$10,000,000
`
`$13,000,000
`
`$21,206,982
`
`$45,000,000
`
`$15,475,820
`
`$17,476,250
`
`RS-46
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 48
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Surveys That Required
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO047
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`PTX742
`
`PTX742 at WG694419
`
`PTX742 at WG694502
`
`RS-47
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 49
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Surveys That Required
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO048
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`PTX388
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`PTX388 at FGRPROD137977
`
`Ronny Bohn
`
`
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`Is it consistent with you recollection that for this job, Tullow
`required steerable streamers?
`
`Yes, from what I can see here and from what we looked at
`previously today, yes, they wanted steerable streamers.
`
`Bohn Tr. At 171:9-13
`
`PTX682 at FGRPROD1451809
`
`RS-48
`
`PTX682
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 50
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Surveys That Required
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO049
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`PTX388
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`PTX388 at FGRPROD137977
`(Dec. 19, 2008 Tullow French Guiana)
`
`PTX822 at WG710870
`
`PTX822
`
`RS-49
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 51
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Surveys That Required
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO050
`
`PTX544
`
`RS-50
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 52
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`Surveys That Required
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO051
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`PTX834 at WG931735
`
`PTX834 at WG931747
`
`PTX834 at WG931748
`
`PTX834
`
`RS-51
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 53
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Surveys That Required Lateral Steering
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO052
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`PTX650
`
`PTX650 at FGRPROD000453802
`
`RS-52
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 54
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Surveys That Required
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO053
`
`Q. Okay. You can confirm that for the Statoil project in the
`Chukchi Sea that GEO CELTIC with DigiFIN did perform
`fan mode during that survey?
`
`A.
`
`Yes.
`
`Kevin Stiver
`U.S. Regional Mgr.
`
`
`
`Q.
`
`Is it your understanding that fan mode can only be achieved
`using DigiFIN or lateral steering devices?
`
`A.
`
`That’s my understanding, yes.
`
`Stiver Tr. At 167:19-168:-2
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`PTX359 at FGRPROD at 115102
`
`RS-53
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 55
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`PTX485
`
`Surveys That Required
`Lateral Steering Systems
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO054
`
`PTX485 at FGRPROD1122516
`
`PTX485 at FGRPROD1122528
`
`PTX485 at FGRPROD1122545
`
`RS-54
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 56
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Surveys That Required Lateral Steering
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO055
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`PTX857
`
`* * *
`
`PTX857 at WG939683
`
`PTX857 at WG939612
`
`PTX857
`
`PTX852
`
`RS-55
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 57
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Surveys That Required Lateral Steering
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO056
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`PTX544
`
`PTX945 at WG00930568
`
`RS-56
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 58
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Surveys That Required Lateral Steering
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO057
`
`ConocoPhillips Australia
`
`Q. What’s your understanding of what fan mode acquisition is?
`
`Tullow French Guiana
`
`Tullow Ivory Coast
`
`Anadarko Ivory Coast
`
`ExxonMobil Angola
`
`Petronas Malaysia
`
`Statoil Alaska
`
`BP Australia
`
`Eni Togo
`
`TGS-NOPEC Australia
`
`A.
`
`It’s that you are – that you are increasing your streamer separation
`in the last part of the streamer.
`
`Q. Okay. And does – is steerable – is the ability to steer streamers
`required to perform fan mode acquisition?
`
`A. Yes
`
`*
`*
`*
`Q. Without any kind of laterally steerable bird, you would not be able to
`perform fan mode acquisition?
`
`A. To my knowledge that is correct
`
`Vaage Tr. At 51:6-13, 52:1-3
`
`Hans Christian Vaage
`President
`Fugro Geoteam, Inc.
`
`PTX359 at FGRPROD115102
`
`RS-57
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 59
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO058
`
`Lost Sales Revenue
`
`Cost Of Making
`Lost Sales
`
`Lost Profits
`
`RS-58
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 60
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Sales Revenue
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO059
`
`207 Surveys Using DigiFIN
`
`182
`
`25
`
`25 Surveys
`$319 Million Revenue
`
`RS-59
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 61
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO060
`
`$319 Million
`
`Cost Of Making
`Lost Sales
`
`Lost Profits
`
`RS-60
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 62
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Cost Of Making Lost Sales
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO061
`
`• Cost of performing 25 more surveys
`from 2009-2012
`
`– Costs that vary directly with number of surveys
`
`– $141.0 Million
`
`•
`
`Incremental cost of adding/accelerating capacity
`
`– Cost of depreciation of new equipment
`
`– $19.2 Million
`
`• Total cost: $160.2 Million
`
`RS-61
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 63
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO062
`
`$319.3 Million
`
`$160.2 Million
`
`RS-62
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 64
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits Summary
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO063
`
`207 Total Surveys Using
`DigiFIN Systems
`
`25 Lost Profits Surveys
`
`182
`
`25
`
`15
`
`10
`
`Other
`
`Fugro
`
`RS-63
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 65
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Lost Profits Summary
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO064
`
`207 Total Surveys Using
`DigiFIN Systems
`
`25 Lost Profits Surveys
`
`182
`
`25
`
`$65.7
`Million
`
`$93.4
`Million
`
`Total Lost Profits = $159.1 Million
`
`Other
`
`Fugro
`
`RS-64
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 66
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO065
`
`Reasonable Royalty
`
`RS-65
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 67
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Reasonable Royalties
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO066
`
`$14.9 Million
`
`$87 Million
`
`Total
`
`RS-66
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 68
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`What Is a Reasonable Royalty?
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO067
`
`A reasonable royalty is the amount of money
`that the owner of the patents (WesternGeco)
`and the infringer (ION/Fugro) would have agreed
`to had they negotiated a license agreement
`before infringement
`
`RS-67
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 69
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Hypothetical Negotiation
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO068
`
`WesternGeco And ION
`
`WesternGeco And Fugro
`
`Reasonable
`Royalty
`
`RS-68
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 70
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Hypothetical Negotiation
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO069
`
`• Parties would know patent is valid and infringed
`
`• Full and complete information, present and future
`
`• Must reach an agreement
`
`RS-69
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 71
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Hypothetical Negotiation
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO070
`
`
`
`
`
`Objective:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. Determine the profit premium
`
`or value contributed by the
`
`patented technology to the
`
`licensees (ION/Fugro)
`
`
`
`
`
`2. Determine how that value
`
`should be shared between
` WesternGeco and the infringers
`
`
`
`RS-70
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 72
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Calculating The Value Of
`The Patented Technology
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO071
`
`• Identify the benefits of the
`patented technology
`
`• Quantify the value of the benefits of the
`patented technology
`
`RS-71
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 73
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Benefits Of Using
`The Patented Technology
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO072
`
`PTX394 at FGRPROD151743
`
`PTX394
`
`PTX902 at ION707589
`RS-72
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 74
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Benefits Of Using
`The Patented Technology
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO073
`
`PTX309 at FGRPROD13056
`
`PTX309
`
`RS-73
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 75
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Quantifiable Benefits Of Using
`The Patented Technology
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO074
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Feather matching
`Feather reduction
`Infill reduction
`Line change efficiency
`Elimination of “trouser” effect
`Faster and safer deployment/recovery
`Safer workboat operation
`Uniform cross-line spacing
`Enable reduced cross-line spacing
`•
`• Mitigates risk in obstructed areas
`• Mitigates risk of cable entanglement
`Denser streamer depth sampling
`•
`
`RS-74
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 76
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Quantifiable Benefits Of Using
`The Patented Technology
`Value = 19.9%-21.8% of Total Survey Revenue
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO075
`
`Sims Second Supplemental Report at Ex 7.1S
`
`Sims 2nd
`Supplemental Report
`
`RS-75
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 77
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Expected Infill
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO076
`
`PTX375
`
`PTX164
`
`PTX375 at FGRPROD000126967
`
`PTX164 at 3
`
`RS-76
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 78
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Infill Reduction
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO077
`
`Q. With regard to the oil companies, which are the most important
`benefits?
`
`A. Their most important is reduced in-fill, and that's a direct
`impact of their cost reduction.
`
` Cunkleman Tr. at 111:18-21
`
`Q.
`
`In any ION Marketing material or promotional material, have you
`put forward quantitative analyses of the savings or benefits of
`reduced in-fill?
`
`A. Yes, we have.
`
`Q. And what quantitative values have you associated with reduced in-
`fill?
`
`A. Well, we've talked about, you know, reducing in-fill 20 to 30
`percent. And then if you look at a typical survey and the cost of
`the survey, you can calculate a -- a dollar, a Euro amount.
`
` Cunkleman Tr. at 118:5-14
`
`RS-77
`
`Jeff Cunkleman
`Vice President of
`Product Marketing
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 79
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Infill Reduction
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO078
`
`* * *
`
`PTX398 at FGRPROD000154147
`
`PTX398
`
`RS-78
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 80
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Infill Reduction
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO079
`
`PTX385 at FGRPROD136383
`
`PTX385
`
`RS-79
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 81
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Infill Reduction
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO080
`
`PTX164 at 3
`
`PTX164
`
`RS-80
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 82
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Infill Reduction
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO081
`
`PTX230
`
`PTX386
`
`PTX230 at ION632146
`
`PTX386 at FGRPROD136876
`
`RS-81
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 83
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Value Of Infill Reduction As A Percentage
`Of Total Survey Revenue
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO082
`
`Sims Supplemental Report at Ex. 7.35
`
`Sims Supplemental
`Report
`
`RS-82
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 84
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Line Change Efficiency (Faster Turns)
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO083
`
`Q.
`
`So you're familiar with a client that used ORCA and positioning systems together
`and there was a quantifiable benefit that they perceived?
`
`A. We believe there was a quantifiable benefit, yes.
`
`Q. And how do you know there was a benefit?
`
`A.
`
`The turn appeared to be faster.
`
`Kevin Sweetman
`
`Sales Manager and
`Director of I/O
`Marine Systems
`Limited
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`*
`Q. Do you recall how many minutes were saved per turn?
`
`*
`
`A.
`
`I believe it was in the area of ten minutes.
`
`Sweetman Tr. at 70:14-20, 70:25-71:2
`
`RS-83
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 85
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Line Change Efficiency (Faster Turns)
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO084
`
`PTX214
`
`PTX214 at ION15213
`
`RS-84
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 86
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Line Change Efficiency (Faster Turns)
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO085
`
`PTX386 at FGRPROD136876
`
`PTX386
`
`RS-85
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 87
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Line Change Efficiency (Faster Turns)
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO086
`
`PTX385 at FGRPROD136383
`
`PTX385
`
`RS-86
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 88
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Value Of Line Change Efficiency (Faster Turns)
`As A Percentage Of Total Survey Revenue
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO087
`
`Sims 2nd Supplemental Report at 7.4S
`
`Sims 2nd Supplemental Report
`
`RS-87
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 89
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Faster And Safer Deployment/Recovery
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO088
`
`PTX398 at FGRPROD000154145
`
`PTX398
`
`RS-88
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 90
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Value Of Time Saved On Streamer Deployment
`As A Percentage Of Total Survey Revenue
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO089
`
`Sims 2nd Supplemental Report at Ex 7.2S
`
`Sims 2nd
`Supplemental Report
`
`RS-89
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 91
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Value Of Quantifiable Benefits Of
`Lateral Steering Systems
`Value = 19.9%-21.8% of Total Survey Revenue
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO090
`
`Sims Second Supplemental Report at Ex 7.1S
`
`Sims 2nd
`Supplemental Report
`
`RS-90
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 92
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Quantifiable Benefit - Fugro
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO091
`
`20.8% Of Quantifiable Benefits
`
`91 Fugro Reasonable Royalty Surveys
`$1.25 Billion Revenue
`
`Quantifiable Benefit
`
`$260.2 Million
`Quantifiable Benefit
`
`Sims 2nd Supplemental Report at Ex 17.0
`RS-91
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 93
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Value Of Quantifiable Benefits - Fugro
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO092
`
`Total Quantifiable Benefits
`from Fugro’s use of Infringing
`DigiFIN Systems
`
`$260.2 Million
`
`Cost of Infringing DigiFIN Systems
`
`$27.9 Million
`
`Net Contribution
`of DigiFIN Systems
`
`$232.3 Million
`
`RS-92
`
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2123, pg. 94
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO
`IPR2014-01477
`
`
`
`Value Of Quantifiable Benefits - Fugro
`
`Sims
`
`DEMO093
`
`Net
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
