throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`________________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DRAGON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC.
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________
`
`Case IPR2014-01252
`
`Patent No. 5,930,444
`
`_________________
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO EXPUNGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`
`
`Pursuant 37 C.F.R. § 42.56, Petitioner, Unified Patents Inc. (“Unified” or
`
`“Petitioner”), hereby requests that certain confidential information in the record be
`
`expunged. Specifically, Petitioner respectfully submits that (i) Paper 10, Patent
`
`Owner’s Preliminary Response to Petition; (ii) Paper 18, Petitioner’s Reply Brief
`
`on Real Party in Interest; (iii) Paper 21, Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC’s
`
`Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Seal; (iv) Paper 24, Dragon Intellectual
`
`Property, LLC’s Motion for Additional Discovery; (v) Paper 28, Petitioner’s
`
`Motion to Seal; (vi) Paper 31, Petitioner’s Motion to Seal; and (vii) Exhibits 1015,
`
`1017, 2001, 2003-2005, 2007-2009, 2011-2013, and 2015-2016 (collectively, the
`
`“Confidential Documents”) should be expunged from the record as these pleadings
`
`and exhibits contain Petitioner’s highly confidential business information.
`
`The deadline for filing a motion to expunge in this case is 45 days from the
`
`Final Written Decision. See Office Patent Trial Practice Guide (“OPTP Guide”),
`
`77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48761 (Aug. 14, 2012). While generally the Confidential
`
`Documents would become publicly available at this time, the Board made clear in
`
`its Final Written Decision that “[t]he record will be maintained undisturbed
`
`pending the outcome of any appeal taken from [the] Decision.” Paper 64 at 22.
`
`Accordingly, Petitioner requests that the Confidential Documents be expunged
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`after the conclusion of any appeal proceeding or, if neither party appeals the Final
`
`Written Decision, after the expiration of the time period for appealing.
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR RELIEF REQUESTED
`A.
`Petitioner filed four motions to seal in this proceeding and requested that the
`
`Procedural Background
`
`Board maintain the Confidential Documents under seal because they contain three
`
`categories of Petitioner’s confidential information: (1) Petitioner’s members’
`
`identities; (2) Petitioner’s membership terms and business strategy; and (3)
`
`Petitioner’s financial information. See Papers 12, 17, 27, and 30. Patent Owner
`
`opposed all four Motions. On February 27, 2015, the Board granted Petitioner’s
`
`motions to seal the Confidential Documents. See Paper 40. Specifically, the
`
`Board found that (1) Petitioner had “shown good cause to seal the identities of its
`
`members;” (2) Petitioner had “shown good cause for maintaining its membership
`
`terms and business strategy under seal;” and (3) that “the public’s interest in
`
`knowing Petitioner’s financial information is relativity low, such that it is
`
`outweighed by Petitioner’s interest in maintaining its financial information
`
`confidential.” Id. at 6-7.
`
`B. Applicable Legal Standards
`The OPTP Guide provides, in pertinent part, that:
`
`There is an expectation that information will be made public where the
`existence of the information is referred to . . . in a final written decision
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`following a trial. A party seeking to maintain the confidentiality of
`information, however, may file a motion to expunge the information from
`the record prior to the information becoming public.
`
`OPTP Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. at 48761. Additionally, 37 C.F.R. § 42.56 provides that
`
`“[a]fter a denial of a petition to institute a trial or after final judgment in a trial, a
`
`party may file a motion to expunge confidential information in the record.”
`
`C. Good Cause Exists for Expunging the Confidential Documents
`from the Record
`
`Good cause exists for expunging the Confidential Documents. All of the
`
`Confidential Documents contain Petitioner’s highly confidential business
`
`information, which Petitioner guards in order to protect its own business as well as
`
`its members. Specifically, the Confidential Documents contain information
`
`relating to Petitioner’s membership list, its membership terms and business
`
`strategy, and Petitioner’s financial information. Additionally, the Board has
`
`already agreed that good cause exists to maintain the Confidential Documents
`
`under seal. Moreover, the Board did not rely on any of the sealed Confidential
`
`Documents in its Final Written Decision (See Paper 64 at 22), so there is no public
`
`interest in now making the Confidential Documents publicly available.
`
`Accordingly, good cause exists to expunge the Confidential Documents.
`
`3
`
`

`
`
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`Because the Board has already found that the Confidential Documents
`
`should be maintained under seal, and because the Board did not rely on them in its
`
`Final Written Decision, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board protect
`
`Petitioner’s highly confidential business information and expunge the Confidential
`
`Documents pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Michael L. Kiklis/
`Michael L. Kiklis
`Reg. No. 38,939
`
`
`Dated: March 21, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a true copy of the foregoing PETITIONER’S
`
`MOTION TO EXPUNGE was served on counsel for the Patent Owner, on this
`
`21st day of March, by filing this document through the Patent Review Processing
`
`System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail to:
`
`Kai Zhu
`kz@dragonipllc.com
`
`Timothy Devlin
`tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Michael L. Kiklis/
`Michael L. Kiklis
`OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER &
`NEUSTADT, L.L.P.
`1940 Duke Street
`Alexandria, Virginia 22314
`703-413-3000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 21, 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket