throbber
EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`References cited herein:
`
`0 U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759 (“‘759 Patent”)
`
`Dischar e in a
`-Current Low-Pressure uasi-Station
`0 D.V. Mozgrin, et al, Hi
`Magnetic Field: Experimental Research, Plasma Physics Reports, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1995
`(“Mozgrin”)
`
`- A. A. Kudryavtsev, et al, Ionization relaxation in a plasma produced by a pulsed inert-gas
`discharge, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 28(1), January 1983 (“Kudryavtsev”)
`
`Claims 1_3, 5_10, 13_16,
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`[1 pre.] A magnetically
`enhanced sputtering
`Source comprising:
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses a
`magnetically enhanced sputtering source.
`Mozgrin 403, right col, 114 (“Regime 2 was characterized by
`intense cathode sputtering. . .”)
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 1
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(b)
`shaped-electrode configuration.
`(1) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`[la.] an anode;
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses an
`anode.
`
`ActiVeUS l22249422V.l
`
`1
`
`INTEL 1417
`
`INTEL 1417
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 1_3, 5_10, 13_16,
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 1
`
`PUL SED
`POWER
`SUPPLY
`
`PRIOR ART
`FIG. 1
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 1 (‘‘FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional View of a
`known magnetron sputtering apparatus having a pulsed power
`source.”
`
`‘759 Patent at 3:40-41 (“an anode 130 is positioned in the Vacuum
`chamber 104 proximate to the cathode assembly.”)
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. l
`
`VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZ
`
`ActiVeUS l22249422V.l
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 1_3, 5_10, 13_16,
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`[1b.] a cathode assembly
`that is positioned
`adjacent to the anode, the
`cathode assembly
`including a sputtering
`target;
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(b)
`shaped-electrode configuration.
`(1) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses a
`cathode assembly that is positioned adjacent to the anode, the
`cathode assembly including a sputtering target.
`.759 Patent at Fig 1
`
`mn
`‘
`
`.
`-
`PULSED
`POWER
`SUPPLY
`
`PRIOR ART
`FIG. 1
`
`‘759 Patent at 3: 10-12 (“FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional View
`of a known magnetron sputtering apparatus having a pulsed power
`source.”
`
`ActiVeUS 122249422V.l
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`‘759 Patent at 3:23-24 (“magnetron sputtering apparatus 100 also
`includes a cathode assembly 114 having a target material 116.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 403, right col, 1] 4 (“Regime 2 was characterized by
`intense cathode sputtering. . .”).
`
`Mozgrin at 403, right col, 1] 4 (“. . .The pulsed deposition rate of
`the cathode material. . .”).
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 1
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(b)
`shaped-electrode configuration.
`(1) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`[lc.] an ionization source
`that generates a weakly-
`ionized plasma proximate
`to the anode and the
`
`cathode assembly;
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses an
`ionization source that generates a weakly-ionized plasma
`proximate to the anode and the cathode assembly.
`
`‘759 Patent at 6:30-32 (“The weakly-ionized plasma is also
`referred to as a pre-ionized plasma.”)
`
`‘759 Patent at claim 32 (“wherein the peak plasma density of the
`weakly-ionized plasma is less than about 1012 cm‘3”).
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, 112 (“For pre-ionization, we used a
`stationary magnetron discharge; the discharge current ranged up to
`300 mA. . .. We found out that onl
`the re '
`'
`'
`
`ActiVeUS l22249422V.l
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 1_3, 5_10, 13_16,
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`field strength not lower than 400 G provided the initial plasma
`density in the 109 — 10” cm'3 range.”). (emphasis added).
`
`(“The [plasma] discharge had an
`Mozgrin at 401, left col, 1] l
`armular shape and was adjacent to the cathode.”). (emphasis
`added)
`
`Mozgrin at 402, right col, 112 (“Figure 3 shows typical Voltage and
`current oscillograms.. .. Part I in the voltage oscillogram
`represents the Voltage of the stationary discharge (pre-ionization
`stage).”).
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 6
`
`Fig. 6. High-current quasi-stationary discharge regimes. (a) planar magnetron: (I) high-current magnetron regime (p = S X [0 3'
`Ar. Id = 70 A. U4 = 900 V); (2) high-current diffuse regime (p = 10'' torr. Ar. I4 = 700 A. Ud = 80 V); (3) are regime (p = 10"
`Ar, Id = l00O A, U‘, = 45 V). (b) Shaped-electrode system: (I) high-current diffuse regime (p = 104 torr, Ar. Id = 1000 A. U‘, = 90
`(2) contracted arc regime (p = I0 ' torr. Ar. Id = I500 A. Ud= 50 V).
`
`
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses a magnet
`[ld.] a magnet that is
`that is positioned to generate a magnetic field proximate to the
`positioned to generate a
`magnetic field proximate weakly-ionized plasma, the magnetic field substantially trapping
`to the weakly-ionized
`electrons in the weakly-ionized plasma proximate to the sputtering
`plasma, the magnetic
`target.
`field substantially
`
`‘759 Patent at 3: 10-12 “FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional View of a
`
`ActiVeUS l22249422V.l
`
`

`
`Claims 1_3, 5_10, 13_16,
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`trapping electrons in the
`weakly-ionized plasma
`proximate to the
`Sputtering target; and
`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`known magnetron sputtering apparatus 100. . .” that has a magnet
`126.”)
`
`‘759 Patent at 4:4-l0 [describing theprior art Fig. I] (“The
`electrons, which cause ionization, are generally confined by the
`magnetic fields produced by the magnet 126. The magnetic
`confinement is strongest in a confinement region 142. . _.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, left col, 1] l (“The electrodes were immersed in a
`magnetic field of armular permanent magnets.”).
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, 112 (“We found out that only the regimes
`with magnetic field strength not lower than 400 G provided the
`initial plasma density in the 109-10“ cm'3 range.”).
`
`Mozgrin at 407, left col, 1] 3 (“The action of the magnetic field
`serves only to limit the electron thermal conductivity and to
`provide collisions sufficient for efficient energy transfer fiom
`electrons to heavy particles.”).
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 1
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(b)
`shaped-electrode configuration.
`(1) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`[le.] a ower su l
`
`The combination of Mozrin with Ku avtsev discloses a ower
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`supply generating a Voltage pulse that produces an electric field
`between the cathode assembly and the anode, the power supply
`being configured to generate the Voltage pulse with an amplitude
`and a rise time that increases an excitation rate of ground state
`atoms that are present in the weakly-ionized plasma to create a
`multi-step ionization process that generates a strongly-ionized
`plasma, which comprises ions that sputter target material, fiom the
`weakly-ionized plasma, the multi-step ionization process
`comprising exciting the ground state atoms to generate excited
`atoms, and then ionizing the excited atoms within the weakly-
`ionized plasma without forming an arc discharge.
`
`‘759 Patent, claim 33 (“wherein the peak plasma density
`strongly-ionized plasma is greater than about 1012 cm'3”)
`
`of the
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 1
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(b)
`shaped-electrode configuration.
`(1) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 2
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`generating a Voltage
`pulse that produces an
`electric field between the
`
`cathode assembly and the
`anode, the power supply
`being configured to
`generate the Voltage
`pulse with an amplitude
`and a rise time that
`
`increases an excitation
`
`rate of ground state
`atoms that are present in
`the weakly-ionized
`plasma to create a multi-
`step ionization process
`that generates a strongly-
`ionized plasma, which
`comprises ions that
`sputter target material,
`from the weakly-ionized
`plasma, the multi-step
`ionization process
`comprising exciting the
`ground state atoms to
`generate excited atoms,
`and then ionizing the
`excited atoms within the
`
`weakly-ionized plasma
`without forming an arc
`discharge.
`
`ActiVeUS l22249422V.l
`
`

`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`High-vollag
`supply unit
`
`C
`
`supply unit
`
`Fig. 2. Discharge supply unit.
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 3
`
`(a)
`
`1
`
`2a 2b
`
`3
`
`Fig. 3. Oscillograms of (a) current and (b) voltage of the
`quasi-stalionary discharge (50 ps pcr div.. 180 A per div.,
`180 V per div.).
`
`Mozgrin at 402, right col, 1] 2 (“Part 1 in the Voltage oscillogram
`represents the Voltage of the stationary discharge (pre-ionization
`Stage)-”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, 1] 1 (“Thus, the supply unit was made
`providing square Voltage and current pulses with [rise] times
`(leading edge) of 5 — 60 us. . .”).
`
`Mozgrin 403, right col, 1]4 (“Regime 2 was characterized by
`intense cathode sputtering. . .”) (emphasis added).
`
`Mozgrin at 409, left col, 1]5 (“The high-current diffuse discharge
`(regime 3) is useful for producing large-Volume uniform dense
`plasmas n,-2 1.5x1015cm'3. . .”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, 1] sparming left and right columns (“Designing the
`[pulsed supply] unit, we took into account the dependences which
`had been obtained in [Ku avtsev] of ionization relaxation on
`
`ActiVeUS l22249422V.l
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`pre-ionization parameters, pressure, and pulse voltage
`amplitude.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 400, left col, 1] 3 (“Some experiments on magnetron
`systems of various geometry showed that discharge regimes which
`do not transit to arcs can be obtained even at high currents.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 400, right col, 1] 1 (“A fiirther increase in the discharge
`currents caused the discharges to transit to the arc regimes. . .”).
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, 112 (“For pre-ionization
`plasma density in the 109 — 10” cm'3 range.”)
`
`the initial
`
`Mozgrin at 404, left col, 1] 3 (“The parameters of the shaped-
`electrode discharge. . .transit to arc regime 4, could be well
`determined... The point of the planar-magnetron discharge transit
`to the arc regime was determined by discharge voltage and
`structure changes...”).
`
`Mozgrin at 404, left col, 1] 4 (“If the current was raised above 1.8
`kA or the pulse duration was increase to 2 — 10 ms, an instability
`development and discharge contraction was observed.”).
`
`Mozgrin at 409, left col, 1] 4 (“The implementation of the high-
`current magnetron discharge (regime 2) in sputtering
`plasma
`density (exceeding 2x1013 cm'3).”).
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 4
`
`U, V
`500
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`0
`
`0.1
`
`10
`
`LA
`
`100
`
`1000
`
`Fig. 4. Current-voltage characteristic of the quasi-stationary
`discharge with shaped electrodes in argon, p = 0.1 ton; B =
`0.4 kG.
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 7
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`U, V
`500- 1000
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`15 - 225
`
`1000 -1800 1,?
`
`Fig. 7. Generalized ampere-voltaic characteristic CVC of
`quasi-stationary discharge.
`
`Kudryavtsev at 34, right col, 1] 4 (“Since the effects studied in this
`work are characteristic of ionization whenever a field is suddenly
`applied to a weakly ionized gas, they must be allowed for when
`studying emission mechanisms in pulsed gas lasers, gas
`breakdown, laser sparks, etc.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Fig. 1
`
`CI):
`vr,
`
`FIG. 1. Dlngrmn showing the rclatlvc sizes nf I:
`fluxes In terms of the atomic energy level: for
`and fast 0:) stages. The width of the armwl ind
`magnitude nfthu clcclmu flux. T11: lmrlmntal
`the diffusion fluxes nf electrons and excited arc
`the walls of the discharge tube.
`
`
`
`Kudryavtsev at Fig. 6
`
`ActiVeUS l22249422V.l
`
`10
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`.9
`
`75
`
`27
`
`27
`
`.13’
`
`.79
`
`1/5
`
`E/n, , Td
`1) neg/111 =
`FIG. 6. The behavior of us in the bulk of an argon discharge.
`10'”: 2) 10‘1. Stepwise ionization predominates in region 1, direct ioniza-
`tion processes predominate in region I1, and nc does not increase in region
`11!.
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, 1] 7 (“The behavior of the increase in
`n, with time thus enables us to arbitrarily divide the ionization
`process into two stages, which we will call the slow and fast
`growth stages. Fig. 1 illustrates the relationships between the
`main electron currents in terms of the atomic energy levels during
`the slow and fast stages.”).
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, 1] 6 (“For nearly stationary n2 [excited
`atom density] values
`there is an explosive increase in ne
`[plasma density]. The subsequent increase in ne then reaches its
`maximum value, equal to the rate of excitation [equation omitted],
`which is several orders of magnitude greater than the ionization
`rate during the initial stage.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Abstract (“[I]n a pulsed inert-gas discharge plasma
`at moderate pressures... [i]t is shown that the electron density
`increases explosively in time due to accumulation of atoms in the
`lowest excited states.”)
`
`One of ordinary skill would have been motivated to use
`Kudryavtsev’s fast stage of ionization in Mozgrin so as to increase
`plasma density and thereby increase the sputtering rate. Further,
`use of Kudryavtsev’s fast stage in Mozgrin would have been a
`combination of old elements that in which each element performed
`as expected to yield predictable results of increasing plasma
`density and multi-step ionization.
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`ll
`
`

`
`Claims 1_3, 5_10, 13_16,
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`2. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`power supply generates a
`constant power.
`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the
`power supply generates a constant power.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 5
`
`’759 Patent, 11:48-50 (“Between time t1 and time t2, the Voltage
`326, the current 328, and the power 326 remain constant. . .”).
`
`Mozgrin Fig. 3 shows constant power in region 3
`
`Fig. 3. Oscillogmmu of (21) cunenl and (h) voltage of the
`quasi-sumonnry discharge (50 '1.» per diva IR!) A per dI‘v,.
`l8U V per dIV J,
`
`3. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`power supply generates a
`constant Voltage.
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the
`power supply generates a constant Voltage.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 3
`
`__ L._l___4: mm.
`1
`2:: 2h
`3
`
`Fig. 3. Oscillugmms of (a) current and (h) voltage of Ill:
`quasi-smlionnry dischnrgc (50 w; pcr div/., I80 A pct dim.
`I80 V per dw.),
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`12
`
`

`
`Claims 1_3, 5_10, 13_16,
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`5. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`electric field comprises a
`.
`pulsed electnc field‘
`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the
`electric field comprises a pulsed electric field.
`
`'
`'
`'
`1
`'
`See evidence cited in c a1m
`Mozgrin at Fig. l
`
`1.
`
`(a)
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(b)
`shaped—clectrode configuration.
`(1) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`Mozgrin, at 403 -404, right col, last paragraph of 403, left col, first
`paragraph of 404 (“. . .The current pulse
`repetition frequency
`was 10 Hz...”).
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 3
`
`_l_4j_tj4m_m—.
`2:: 2b
`3
`
`I
`
`Fig. 3. Oscillugrums of (a) current and (b) voltage of the
`quasi-stationary discharge (50 use per div., 180 A per div..
`I80 V pct div.],
`
`6. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`rise time of the Voltage
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the rise
`time of the Voltage pulse is chosen to increase the ionization rate
`of the excited atoms in the weakly-ionized plasma.
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`13
`
`

`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`pulse is chosen to
`increase the ionization
`
`rate of the excited atoms
`
`in the weakly-ionized
`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, 1] l (“[t]he power supply was able to
`deliver square voltage and current pulses with [rise] times (leading
`edge) of5 — 60 us ....”).
`
`Kudryavtsev at Fig. 1
`
`plasma.
`
`n
`
`]]n.
`
`]:> ‘I
`
`V”
`
`I’?-I-‘h““
`
`2-
`
`r
`
`K4
`,7
`— —;\
`rff)
`vc
`
`1r
`\
`v];
`r
`/ \
`I‘?!
`\~..
`/
`
`EC>
`
`]
`
`]7t:1[jr.1nI shuwlng lhc rclatlvs: sizes: of
`I“l(?. 1.
`(I! n-rm: of the atomic unurgy lcwl: In
`l1m<r~.:
`and fan (hi stages. The width of the arrow: (1
`rnngnlnurle of the uluctron flux.
`‘l'I1u lmrlmm
`[hr dlffustnn fluxus of ulucxrons and uxcltud n
`the walls nf (hr dlsclmrgc nibc.
`
`rm
`
`of claim 1 wherein the
`
`weakly-ionized plasma
`reduces the probability of
`developing an electrical
`breakdown condition
`
`between the anode and
`
`the cathode assembly.
`
`8. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`
`ions in the strongly-
`ionized plasma impact
`the surface of the
`
`sputtering target in a
`manner that causes
`
`substantially uniform
`erosion of the sputtering
`target.
`
` 7. The sputtering source
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the
`weakly-ionized plasma reduces the probability of developing an
`electrical breakdown condition between the anode and the cathode
`
`assembly.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`Mozgrin at 406, right col, 1]3 (“pre-ionization was not necessary;
`however, in this case, the probability of discharge transferring to
`arc mode increased.”)
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the ions
`in the strongly-ionized plasma impact the surface of the sputtering
`target in a manner that causes substantially uniform erosion of the
`sputtering target.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. l
`
`Mozgrin, at 403, left col, last 1] (“. . .being transferred to the high-
`current regime, the discharge expands over a considerably larger
`area of the cathode surface than it occupied in the stationary pre-
`ionization regime.”).
`
`Mozgrin at 404, left col, 1] 4 (“. . .the discharge plasma and current
`area were seen to expand and cover the whole cathode surface
`(Fig 6)-”)
`
`One of ordinary skill would understand that expanding the plasma
`increases its uniformity. One of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand that the n lasma dischar e coverin; a lar er area of the
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`14
`
`

`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`9. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`
`strongly-ionized plasma
`is substantially uniform
`proximate to the
`sputtering target.
`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`cathode surface during sputtering would impact the surface of the
`sputtering target in a substantially uniform manner and lead to a
`substantially more uniform erosion of the sputtering target
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. l
`
`Mozgrin, at 403, left col, last 1] (“. . .being transferred to the high-
`current regime, the discharge expands over a considerably larger
`area of the cathode surface than it occupied in the stationary pre-
`ionization regime.”).
`
`Mozgrin at 404, left col, 1] 4 (“. . .the discharge plasma and current
`area were seen to expand and cover the whole cathode surface
`(Fig 6)-”)
`
`One of ordinary skill would understand that expanding the plasma
`increases its uniformity. One of ordinary skill in the art would
`understand that the plasma discharge covering a larger area of the
`cathode surface during sputtering would impact the surface of the
`sputtering target in a substantially uniform manner and lead to a
`substantially more uniform erosion of the sputtering target
`
`10. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 further
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses a
`substrate support that is positioned in a path of the sputtering flux.
`
`comprising a substrate
`support that is positioned
`in a path of the sputtering
`flux.
`
`13. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein a
`
`volume between the
`
`anode and the cathode
`
`assembly is chosen to
`increase the ionization
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`‘759 Patent at 3: 10-12 (“FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a
`known magnetron sputtering apparatus 100. . .”)
`
`‘759 Patent at 3:44-46 (“substrate 134 is positioned in the vacuum
`chamber 104 on a substrate support 135 to receive the sputtered
`target material 1 16.”)
`
`Mozgrin, at 403, right col, 1] 4 (“To study sputtering, we used a
`probecollector placed 120 mm fiom the cathode. The pulsed
`deposition rate of cathode material (copper was used) turned out to
`be about 80 um/min. . .”).
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses a volume
`between the anode and the cathode assembly is chosen to increase
`the ionization rate of the excited atoms in the weakly-ionized
`plasma.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`rate of the excited atoms
`
`See evidence cited in claim 6.
`
`in the weakly-ionized
`
`Moz rin’s exeriments were conducted in actual ma netrons with
`
`ActiVeUS l22249422V.l
`
`15
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`an actual volume between the anode and the cathode. Mozgrin’s
`ionization rate of excited atoms increased within that volume.
`
`Moreover, if one of ordinary skill building a system according to
`Mozgrin did not experience Kudryavtsev’s “explosive increase” in
`plasma density, it would have been obvious to incorporate
`Kudryavtsev’s fast stage into Mozgrin so as to increase plasma
`density and thereby increase the sputtering rate. Further, use of
`Kudryavtsev’s fast stage in Mozgrin would have been a
`combination of old elements that yielded predictable results to
`increase plasma density and multi-step ionization.
`
`14. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the
`ionization source comprises an electrode.
`
`ionization source
`
`comprises an electrode.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. l
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(b)
`shaped-electrode configuration.
`(1) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`15. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`
`ionization source
`
`comrises a DC
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the
`ionization source comprises a DC power supply that generates an
`electric field proximate to the anode and the cathode assembly.
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`16
`
`

`
`Claims 1_3, 5_10, 13_16,
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`supply that generates an
`electric field proximate
`to the anode and the
`
`cathode assembly.
`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 2
`
`High-vollag
`supply unit
`
`C
`
`-3‘
`
`'3
`
`ary
`supply mm
`
`Fig. 2. Discharge supply unit.
`
`Mozgrin at 401, left col, 1] 5 (“. . .The pre-ionization system
`provided direct current up to O.3A and Voltage up to 3 kV.”)
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. l
`
`s\"
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(h)
`shaped-electrode configuration.
`(I) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 3
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`17
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
` __mm__
`I
`241
`2!:
`3
`
`Fig. 3. Oscillograms of (a) current and (b) voltage of the
`quasi-stationary discharge (50 us per div., 180 A per div.,
`
`I80 V pcr div.].
`
`
`
`
`
`16. The sputtering source The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the
`of claim 1 wherein the
`ionization source comprises an AC power supply that generates an
`
`ionization source
`electric field proximate to the anode and the cathode assembly.
`
`comprises an AC power
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`supply that generates an
`electric field ptexjmate
`to the anede and the
`eathede assembly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mozgrin at 401, left col, 1] 4 (“The pre-ionization could be
`provided by RF discharge. . .”).
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. l
`
`
`‘759 Patent at 4:52-54 (“In one embodiment, the bias Voltage
`source 214 is an alternating current (AC) power source, such as a
`radio frequency (RF) power source.”)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`1 8
`
`
`
`VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(b)
`shaped-electrode configuration.
`(I) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`18. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the
`magnet comprises an electro-magnet.
`
`magnet comprises an
`electro-magnet.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`Mozgrin at 401, left col, 1] 2 (“The system with shaped electrodes
`involved two axisymmetrical electrodes 120 mm in diameter
`separated by about 10 mm, and immersed in a cusp-shaped
`magnetic field produced by oppositely directed multilayer coils.
`The values of Bmax were controlled by coil current variation to
`range from 0 to 1000 G.”).
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. l
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`19
`
`

`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`19. The sputtering source
`of claim 1 wherein the
`
`sputtering target is
`formed of a material
`
`chosen from the group
`comprising a metallic
`material, a polymer
`material, a
`superconductive material,
`a magnetic material, a
`non-magnetic material, a
`conductive material, a
`non-conductive material,
`a composite material, a
`reactive material, and a
`refractory material.
`
`[20pre.] A method of
`generating sputtering
`flux, the method
`comprising:
`
`[20a.] ionizing a feed gas
`to generate a weakly-
`ionized plasma proximate
`to a sputtering target;
`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`Fig. 1. Discharge device configurations: (a) planar magne-
`tron;
`(b)
`shaped-electrode configuration.
`(1) Cathode;
`(2) anode; (3) magnetic system.
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses the
`sputtering target is formed of a material chosen from the group
`comprising a metallic material, a polymer material, a
`superconductive material, a magnetic material, a non-magnetic
`material, a conductive material, a non-conductive material, a
`composite material, a reactive material, and a refractory material.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 1.
`
`Mozgrin at 401, left col, 1] 1, (“The cathodes we used were made
`of Cu, Mo, Ti, Al, or stainless steel.”).
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses a method
`of generating sputtering flux.
`
`See evidence cited in limitation [1 pre] of claim 1.
`
`Mozgrin at 403, right col, 1] 4 (“Regime 2 was characterized by
`intense cathode sputtering. . .”).
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses ionizing
`a feed gas to generate a weakly-ionized plasma proximate to a
`sputtering target.
`
`See evidence cited in limitation [lc] of claim 1.
`
`‘759 Patent at 6:30-32 (“The weakly-ionized plasma is also
`referred to as a pre-ionized plasma.”)
`
`‘759 Patent at claim 32 (“wherein the peak plasma density of the
`weakly-ionized plasma is less than about 1012 cm‘3”)
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 2
`
`ActiveUS l22249422v.l
`
`20
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`current oscillograms.. .. Part I in the voltage oscillogram
`represents the voltage of the stationary discharge (pre-ionization
`stage).”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, 112 (“[t]or pre-ionization, we used a
`stationary magnetron discharge; ... provided the initial plasma
`density in the 109 — 10“ cm‘3 range.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 400, right col, 1] 3 (“We investigated the discharge
`regimes in various gas mixtures at 10'3 — 10 torr. . .”)
`
`Mozgrin at 402, 1] sparming left and right cols (“We studied the
`high-current discharge in wide ranges of discharge current. . .and
`operating pressure. . .using various gases (Ar, N2, SF6, and H2) or
`their mixtures of various composition. . .”)
`
`Mozgrin at 403, right col, 1] 4 (“Regime 2 was characterized by
`intense cathode sputtering. . .”).
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses
`generating a magnetic field proximate to the weakly-ionized
`plasma, the magnetic field substantially trapping electrons in the
`weakly-ionized plasma proximate to the sputtering target.
`
`‘759 Patent at 3: 10-12 (“Fig. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a
`known magnetron sputtering apparatus 100. . .”)
`
`‘759 Patent at 4:4-10 (“The electrons, which cause ionization, are
`generally confined by the magnetic fields produced by the magnet
`126. The magnetic confinement is strongest in a confinement
`region 142...”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, left col, 1] 1 (“The electrodes were immersed in a
`magnetic field of annular permanent magnets.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, 112 (“We found out that only the regimes
`with magnetic field strength not lower than 400 G provided the
`initial plasma density in the 109-10“ cm'3 range.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 407, left col, 1] 3 (“The action of the magnetic field
`serves only to limit the electron thermal conductivity and to
`provide collisions sufficient for efficient energy transfer fiom
`electrons to heavy particles.”)
`
`[20b.] generating a
`magnetic field proximate
`to the weakly-ionized
`plasma, the magnetic
`field substantially
`trapping electrons in the
`weakly-ionized plasma
`proximate to the
`sputtering target; and
`
`[20c.] applying a voltage
`pulse to the weakly-
`ionized plasma, an
`am litude and a rise time
`
`The combination of Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev discloses applying
`a voltage pulse to the weakly-ionized plasma, an amplitude and a
`rise time of the voltage pulse being chosen to increase an
`excitation rate of round state atoms that are resent in the
`
`ActiVeUS l22249422V.l
`
`21
`
`

`
`Claims 1-3, 5-10, 13-16,
`
`18-20, 22-34, 37, 40-43
`
`and 45-46, 48, 50
`
`of the Voltage pulse being
`chosen to increase an
`
`excitation rate of ground
`state atoms that are
`
`present in the weakly-
`ionized plasma to create
`a multi-step ionization
`process that generates a
`strongly-ionized plasma,
`which comprises ions
`that sputter target
`material, from the
`weakly-ionized plasma,
`the multi-step ionization
`process comprising
`exciting the ground state
`atoms to generate excited
`atoms, and then ionizing
`the excited atoms within
`
`the weakly-ionized
`plasma without forming
`an arc discharge.
`
`EXHIBIT A.01
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev
`
`weakly-ionized plasma to create a multi-step ionization process
`that generates a strongly-ionized plasma, which comprises ions
`that sputter target material, from the weakly-ionized plasma, the
`multi-step ionization process comprising exciting the ground state
`atoms to generate excited atoms, and then ionizing the excited
`atoms within the weakly-ionized plasma without forming an arc
`discharge.
`
`‘759 Patent, claim 33 (“wherein the peak plasma density of the
`strongly-ionized plasma is greater than about 1012 cm'3”)
`
`Mozgrin at Figs. 1, 2, 3
`
`Mozgrin at 402, right col, 1] 2 (“Part 1 in the Voltage oscillogram
`represents the Voltage of the stationary discharge (pre-ionization
`stage).”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, 1] 1 (‘‘Thus, the supply unit was made
`providing square Voltage and current pulses with [rise] times
`(leading edge) of 5 — 60 us. . .”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, 1]2 (“For pre-ionization
`plasma density in the 109 — 10“ cm'3 range.”)
`
`the initial
`
`Mozgrin at 409, left col, 1] 4 (“The implementation of the high-
`current magnetron discharge (regime 2) in sputtering
`plasma
`density (exceeding 2xl013 cm‘3).”)
`
`Mozgrin at 403, right col, 1]4 (“Regime 2 was characterized by
`intense cathode sputtering. . .”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, 1] sparming left and right columns (“Designing the
`[pulsed supply] unit, we took into account the dependences which
`had been obtained in [Kudryavtsev] of ionization relaxation on
`pre-ionization parameters, pressure, and pulse Voltage
`amplitude.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 400, left col, 1] 3 (“Some experiments on magnetron
`systems of Various geometry showed that discharge regimes which
`do not transit to arcs can be obtained even at high currents.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 404, left col, 1] 3 (“The parameters of the shaped-
`electrode discharge. . .transit to arc regime 4, could be well
`determined... The point of the planar-magnetron discharge transit

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket