`
`USOO6896775B2
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`(10) Patent 196.;
`(12) United States Patent
`Chistyakov
`(45) Date of Patent:
`May 24, 2005
`
`
`(54) HIGH-POWER PULSED MAGNETICALLY
`ENHANCED PLASMA PROCESSING
`
`W0
`W0
`
`W0 98/411532
`W0 01/98353 A1
`
`9/1998
`12/2001
`
`(75)
`
`Inventor: Roman Chistyakov, Andover, MA
`(US)
`
`)
`
`(
`
`‘
`,
`(73) Asmgnee. Zond, Inc., Mansfield, MA (US)
`.
`~
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`*
`Notice.
`Sub ect to an disclaimer, the term 01 this
`patcjnt is extznded or adjusted under 35
`U S C 154(b) by 386 davs
`‘
`'
`'
`’
`'
`'
`.
`5 55
`.
`2
`..
`1
`( 1) Appl NO 10/06 ’
`(22)
`Filed:
`Oct. 29, 2002
`1‘
`,
`‘
`(65)
`Prio Publication Data
`us 2004/0082187 A1 Apr. 29. 2004
`
`Int. Cl? ............................ czsc 14/34; C23F 1/00
`(5.1)
`‘
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`.
`204/1923; 204/2983];
`
`
`204/2 83 , ‘ £98.34; 204/298.37; 216/67;
`216/71; 156/345.43; 156/345.44; 156/345.46
`(58) Field of Search ....................... 204/19232, 298.31,
`204/29833, 29834, 29837; 216/6171;
`15634543, 345,44, 345.46
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`315,011.31
`
`.............. 204/298
`
`5/1986 Cuomo ct al.
`4,588,490 A
`1/1991 Vvolfe et al.
`4,983,253 A
`1/1992 Koshttshi et at.
`5,083,061 A
`3/1998 Wolfe et al.
`5,728,261 A
`...... 204/298.11
`3/1998 Okamui-a et a1.
`5,728,278 A
`@1998 KiHOShita 3‘ 3L ----- 204098-37
`5.7951452 A
`3/2000 Hausmann 6‘ “1' """"" 438/706
`65037244 A
`9/2002 Denda et al,
`................. 216/61
`6,447,691 B1
`9/2002 liu el al.
`.................... 438/710
`6.451.703 Bl
`10/2002 Kumar et al.
`.......... 204092.37
`6,471,833 132
`Z/ZUU‘Z Zhang et at.
`............. 438/714
`2111210019159 A1
`
`...... 427/560
`8/2002 Sumiya et al.
`2002/0114897 A1
`,,,,,,,, 156,345,416
`1/2003 Horioka et al.
`2(‘103/1xx16tjins A1
`FOREIGN PA'l‘liN'l‘ DOCUMENTS
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`US 5,863,392, 1/1.999, Drummond et a1. (Withdrawn)
`Encyclopedia Of Low Temperature Plasma, p. 119, vol. 3.
`Encyclopedia Of Low Temperature Plasma, p. 123, vol. 3.
`Chistyakov, High—Power Pulsed Magnetron Sputtering,
`.
`_
`.
`US. App]. No.: 10/005,27/, Filed: Sep. 30, 2002.
`Chistyakov, Roman, High—Power Pulsed Magnetron Sput—
`tcring, us. Appl. No: 10/065,277, Filed: Sep. 30, 2002.
`Booth, et 211., The Transition From Symmetric To Asymmet-
`_
`.
`-
`.
`tic Discharges ln Pulsed 13.56 MHZ (,Iapacuy Coupled
`Plasmas, J. Appl, Phys, Jul. 15, 1997, pp. 552—560. vol. 82
`(2), American Institute of Physics.
`(CC’I‘U‘IUW)
`
`I’m/mo"Examiner~ Rodney G-Mchnald
`(74) Attorney. Agent,
`or Firm—Kurt Rauschcnbaeh;
`Rauschcnbach Patent Law Group, LLC
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`
`Magnetically enhanced plasma processing methods and
`apparatus are described. A magnetically enhanced plasma
`processing apparatus according to the present
`invention
`includes an anode and a cathode that is positioned adjacent
`to the anode. An ionization source generates a weakly-
`ionized plasma proximate to the cathode, A magnet
`is
`positioned to generate a magnetic field proximate to the
`.
`weakly—iomzed plasma. The magnetic field substantially
`traps electrons in the weakly-ionized plasma proximate to
`the cathode. A power supply produces an electric field in a
`gap between the anode and the cathode. The electric field
`generates excited atoms in the weakly-ionized plaSma and
`generates secondary electrons from the cathode. The sec-
`~
`-,
`-
`.
`ondary “Wm.“ “mm the fixated atoms’ thereby creating
`“ Strong-"“0”“ Plasma A, ”“3329 WWI-V applies a bias
`voltage to a substrate that
`is posuioned proximate to the
`cathode that causes 10118 in the plurality of ions to impact a
`surface of the substrate in a manner that causes etching of
`the surface of the substrate.
`
`EP
`
`0428 161 A2
`
`5/1991
`
`37 Claims, 18 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|PR2014-00803
`
`Gillette v. Zond
`
`Gillette 1129
`
`IPR2014-00803
`Gillette v. Zond
`Gillette 1129
`
`
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`WP??? 3.,
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Bunshah, et al., Deposition 'I‘echnologies For Films And
`Coatings, Materials Science Series, pp. 176—183, Noyes
`Publications, Park Ridge, New Jersey.
`Daugherty, et a1., Attachment—Dominated Electron—Bea-
`m—[onized Discharges, Applied Science Letters, May 15,
`1976, vol. 28, N0. 10, American Institute of Physics.
`Goto, et al., Dual Excitation Reactive Ion Etcher for Low
`Energy Plasma Processing, J . Vac. Sci. 'I‘echnol. A, Sop/Oct.
`1992, pp. 3048—3054, vol. 10, No. 5, American Vacuum
`Society.
`Kouznetsov, et al., A Novel Pulsed Magnetron Sputter
`Technique Utilizing Very High Target Power Densities,
`Surface & Coatings Technology, pp. 290—293, Elsevier
`Sciences S.A.
`
`Lindquist, e1 211., High Selectivity Plasma Etching Of Silicon
`Dioxide With A Dual Frequency 27/2 MHZ Capacitive RF
`Discharge.
`Macak, Reactive Splitter Deposition Process ol'Al 203 and
`Characterization Of A Novel IIigh Plasma Density Pulsed
`Magnetron Discharge, Linkoping Studies In Science And
`Technology, 1999, pp. 1—2, Sweden.
`
`Ionized Sputter Deposition Using An
`Macak, el al,
`Extremely High Plasma Density Pulsed Magnetron Dis—
`charge,
`]. Vac Sci. Technol. A., Jul/Aug. 2000, pp.
`1533—1537, vol. 18, No. 4, American Vacuum Society.
`
`Mozgrin, et a1., High—Current Low—Pressure Quasi ~Sta-
`tionary Discharge In A Magnetic Field: Experimental
`Research, Plasma Physics Reports, 1995, pp. 400—409, vol.
`21, No. 5, Mozgrin, Feitsov, Khodachenko.
`
`Rossnagel, et al., Induced Drift Currents In Circular Planar
`Magnetrons, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A., Jan/Feb. 1987, pp.
`88—91, vol. 5, No. 1, American Vacuum Society.
`
`Sheridan, et 211., Electron Velocity Distribution Functions In
`ASputtering Magnetron Discharge For The EXB Direction,
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A.,Ju1./Aug. 1998, pp. 2173-22176), vol,
`16, No, 4, American Vacuum Society.
`
`Stcinhruchcl, A Simple Formula For Low—Energy Sputter—
`ing Yields, Applied Physics A., 1985, pp. 37412, vol. 36,
`Springer—Verlag.
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 1 0f 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`100
`
`
`
`FIG. 1
`PRIOR ART
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 2 0f 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`209
`L
`
`”/2
`
`[WW
`
`____________,;_______
`
`245m- --
`
`\
`l
`W Wr711Ill[III/Ill”Ill/I/f/Il/I/I/J/I/I/{I/I/‘W/Ilt
`
`211 &\\\\\\\\\\\\\‘\\\\\\\\
`
`248
`
`212 \§
`
`g-
`I
`fi 7/112 2W
`fl
`...
`
`3I
`
`W\
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 3 0f 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`/////J’///////////////
`11%\
`\
`44/ g5
`'
`”1/ afig..gIE'a! 244
`'iiii
`_hk\\
`
`
`V.4.
`
`238
`
`u.
`
`<§Q.533
`
`l§fii
`5’3"?.lI1;;\\\\{\\\:§
`2
`' /
`W/l/I/Illllll/WA216\
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 4 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 BZ
`
`mom
`
`vow
`
`
`
`.av............nnnl
`
`......................................>222-ET
`
`05
`
`mom
`
`com
`
`Ema/On—
`
`
`
`a4tntuIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL
`
`--_..---
`
`m5:3
`
`JP
`
`u:
`.4
`
`_-*----.-._
`
`N8
`
`-vro-
`
`
`
`
`
`..............-2208-55.?
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 5 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`~200V—30kV
`
`320
`
`~100V—5kV
`
`~10A—5000A
`
`~0.1A—1 DOA
`
`~1kW'10MW
`
`-0.01 KW-1 OOKW
`
`llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`tzta t4
`
`t5
`
`FIG. 5
`
`TEME
`
`llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`TIME
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 6 0f 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`
`_
`
`)4
`
`
`,7.,
`
`O.—‘3;z.’,...._
`
`\S,
`
`..:an‘Q..
`
`r wSN1@.
` 59.3%.!nil
`
`
`
` $9.91\A
`
`,*—
`
`
`z:
`
`,._._:J.5:_.W.
`ag.»“mi...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 7 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`SNF
`
`11‘
`
`,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`”h
`
`
`J‘r“.“‘l
`
`L1,,
`
`,
`
`—/.'xflf‘fl
`ffl.._.rl..(..lu‘\.llill.|.l|all7;.:7:III.‘.II.I!.._.
`
`
`z‘ljl
`a?..\\\\\\:
`.fifl‘éfi.:3
`\\ufl%25§mmb
`an."I...
`2%\\\.§@
`wéfi‘fi
`
`e,
`My.
`
`= :
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`m¥.3é...“,éy\EL:_//SEmFEW“
`
`..4‘mrlekinda}:PMiii-[Iii
`m..»\w)nu_§i_.\I.r.},\./wl)w
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 9 of 18
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`{Tili..x!.u.|l|“ua..|lllu‘lu«Mgr/UFO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1W»:H-{Ukkrm
`
`I!@Na?l'.kgsil
`‘illlf
`
`Infill!!!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 10 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`m
`
`\\V
`
`I”
`
`ggW
`Bl
`
`216
`
`S
`
`‘1
`1111/,
`
`.-
`
`\\
`
`\\\\\' .\\\
`’.;\
`
`212 §
`
`III/IWWW/4
`
`II
`
`ll/)3
`
`I:
`.1
`
`”E“;
`
`S
`
`
`
`I\k(\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`1m
`‘\\\\\\\Va\\‘\\\\\\\\\&\\\7§\\\\\\
`W‘al
`_\‘-i'-.
`g0
`254 233”":“fii\\
`111W
`mum
`(III/(III1mm’7III!11:111.”II/JIIIIIIJII/l/t/III
`
`211 W\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 11 0f 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`m.0E
`
`35N.
`
`MuWuJD“.
`
`arm
`
`mom
`
`vow
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`...........................>222-$2..
`
`com
`
`Mm>>0l
`
`NOW
`
`>>xooro>>V:‘O.OI
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 12 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`216“
`
`528
`
`530
`
`ca
`03
`
`92
`u.
`
`FIG.9C
`
`238
`
`518
`
`
`
`wk452520
`
`238
`
`FIG.9A,
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 13 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`450
`
`MATCHI
`UNU
`
`Sam
`
`456
`
`n.F,H
`
`x...
`\\\\\\\m-m\\\\ \figgwxx.“Ill/WVmMWI/frflllllllliv“Wml..\WWWWIWWWW\WWWW\\\\\
`
`WWW/VWWWfmleWy”Wr.WwmaW5..A
`
`
`m\\\\\x\\\\\\\\”wM\
`
`\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\W\m2m\\\\\.
`
`I,2W.W”mzzrr./AMW,W?All/47.15%Mw/Ia???
`
`
`.\\\\\\\\§§W§W
`
`
`FIG. 10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 14 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`472
`
`464
`
`8
`
`64
`
`5a 8
`
`rz.
`
`4
`
`.fiv.4n.Ala-a.
`A’1’.
`
`’II.MyI’l‘"""“'r
`
`’
`
`7/
`
`§§§
`
`VVmm\\\\\\§“§\Li
`
`I/
`
`m4
`
`//w.”
`
`
`\\\
`
`I NANA?“w\\\/g,
`
`
`M'n'r
`
`«“IV/nr\.\\
`
`\\.r
`
`Ill/l0Ill/Illl/I/I/Il/I/I/I/I/fll/l/Il/I/lIII/III).
`
`FIG. 11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 15 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`600
`
`START
`
`502
`
`604
`
`PUMP DOWN CHAMBER
`
`
`
`
` CHAMBER
`PRESSURE
`
`CORRECT?
`
`
`Y
`
`
`
`PASS FEED GAS INTO CHAMBER
`PROXIMATE TO CATHODE
`
`608
`
`
`GAS
`
`CHAMBER
`
`
`PRESSURE
`FRESSURE
`
`
`
`CORRECT?
`
`
`CORRECT?
`
`
`Y
`
`APPLY APPROPRIATE MAGNETIC
`FIELD PROXIMATE TO FEED GAS
`
`514
`
`
`
`HELD
`PROPER?
`
`Y
`
`618
`
`IONlZE FEED GAS TO GENERATE
`WEAKLY-IONIZED PLASMA
`
`
`
`
`GAS
`WEAKLY-
`KONIZED?
`
`
`
`my
`FIG. 12A
`
`FIG. 12A
`
`FIG- 128
`
`FIG. 12
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24,2005
`
`Sheet 16 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLY NEGATIVE BiAS TO SUBSTRATE
`
`62"!
`
`
`
`GENERATE STRONGLY-IONIZED
`PLASMA FROM WEAKLYJONIZED PLASMA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLASMA
`STRONGLY-
`iONlZED?
`
`MONITOR PLASMA ETCH
`
`PLASMA
`ETCH
`
`COMPLETE
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 17 of 18
`
`Us 6,896,775 B2
`
`650
`
`602
`
`604
`
`PUMP DOWN CHAMBER
`
`
` CHAMBER
`
`PRESSURE
`
`CORRECT?
`
`
`Y
`
`
`
`PASS FEED GAS INTO CHAMBER
`PROXIMATE TO CATHODE
`
`608
`
`
`
`
`GAS
`
`CHAMBER
`
`
`PRESSURE
`PRESSURE
`
`
`
`CORRECT?
`CORRECT?
`
`
`
`
`Y
`
`614
`
`APPLY APPROPRIATE MAGNETIC
`FIELD PROXIMATE TO FEED GAS
`
`
`
`F RELD
`PROPER?
`
`FIG. 13A
`
`618
`
`Y
`
`IONIZE FEED GAS TO GENERATE
`WEAKLY-IONIZED PLASMA
`
`FIG. 138
`
`FIG. 13
`
`
`
`
`
`GAS
`WEAKLY-
`IONIZED?
`
`5
`
`FIG. 13A
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 24, 2005
`
`Sheet 18 of 18
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`0
`
`APPLY NEGATIVE BIAS TO SUBSTRATE
`
`621
`
`622
`
`GENERATE STRONGLY—IONIZED
`PLASMA FROM WEAKLY-lONIZED PLASMA
`
`
`
`PLASMA
`
`STRONGLY-
`
`IONIZED?
`
`
`Y
`
`MONITOR ETCH RATE
`
`652
`
`658
`
`INCREASE
`HIGH-POWER PULSE
`TO CATHODE TO
`INCREASE ETCH RATE
`
`
`
`Y
`
`658
`
`CONTINUE
`ETCHING
`
`660
`
` PLASMA
`?
`
`ETCH
`COMPLETE
`
`m
`
`FIG. 133
`
`
`
`US 6,896,775 BZ
`
`1
`HIGH-POWER PULSED MAGNETICALLY
`ENHANCED PLASMA PROCESSING
`
`BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
`
`Plasma processes are widely used in many industries,
`such as the semiconductor manufacturing industry. For
`example, plasma etching is widely used in the semiconduc—
`tor manufacturing industry. There are four basic types of
`plasma etching processes that are used to remove material
`from surfaces: sputter etching, pure chemical etching, ion
`energy driven etching, and ion inhibitor etching.
`Sputter etching is the ejection of atoms from the surface
`of a substrate due to energetic ion bombardment. Pure
`chemical etching uses a plasma discharge to supply gas—
`phase etchant atoms or molecules that chemically react with
`the surface of a substrate to form gas-phase products.
`Ion-enhanced energy driven etching uses a plasma discharge
`to supply both etchant and energetic ions to a surface of a
`substrate. Ion inhibitor etching uses a discharge to provide
`etchant, energetic ions, and inhibitor precursor molecules
`that deposit on the substrate to form a protective layer film.
`It is desirably to increase the uniformity and etch rate of
`known sputter etching systems.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
`
`This invention is described with particularity in the
`detailed description. The above and further advantages of
`this invention may be better understood by referring to the
`following description in conjunction with the accompanying
`drawings,
`in which like numerals indicate like structural
`elements and features in various figures. The drawings are
`not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon
`illustrating the principles of the invention.
`FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a known
`magnetically enhanced etching apparatus having a having a
`radio-frequency (RF) power supply.
`FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional View of an embodiment
`of a magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`according to the present invention.
`FIG. 3 illustrates a cross—sectional View of the anode and
`the cathode of the magnetically enhanced plasma processing
`apparatus of FIG. 2.
`FIG. 4 illustrates a graphical representation of the applied
`power of a pulse as a function of time [or periodic pulses
`applied to the plasma in the magnetically enhanced plasma
`processing apparatus of FIG. 2.
`FIG. 5 illustrates graphical representations of the applied
`voltage, current, and power as a function of time for periodic
`pulses applied to the plasma in the magnetically enhanced
`plasma processing apparatus of FIG. 2.
`FIG. 6A through FIG. 6D illustrate various simulated
`magnetic field distributions proximate to the cathode for
`various electron EXB drift currents according to the present
`invention.
`FIG. 7 illustrates a cross-sectional View of another
`embodiment of a magnetically enhanced plasma processing
`apparatus according to the present invention.
`FIG. 8 illustrates a graphical
`representation of pulse
`power as a function of time for periodic pulses applied to the
`plasma in the magnetically enhanced plasma processing
`apparatus of FIG. 7.
`FIG. 9A through FIG. 9C are cross-sectional views of
`various embodiments of cathodes according to the present
`invention.
`
`2
`FIG. 10 illustrates a cross-sectional view of another
`illustrative embodiment of a magnetically enhanced plasma
`processing apparatus according to the present invention.
`FIG. 11 is a cross—sectional View of another illustrative
`embodiment of a magnetically enhanced plasma processing
`apparatus according to the present invention.
`FIG. 12 is a flowchart of an illustrative process for
`magnetically enhanced plasma etching according to the
`present invention.
`flowchart of an illustrative process for
`FIG. 13 is a
`controlling etch rate according to the present invention.
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`illustrates a cross—sectional view of a known
`1
`FIG.
`magnetically enhanced etching apparatus 100 having a
`radio—frequency (RF) power supply 102. The known mag-
`netically enhanced etching apparatus 100 includes a vacuum
`chamber 104 for confining a plasma 105. A vacuum pump
`106 is coupled in fluid communication with the vacuum
`chamber 104 via a conduit 108. The vacuum pump 106 is
`adapted to evacuate the vacuum chamber 104 to high
`vacuum and to maintain the chamber at a pressure that is
`suitable for plasma processing. A gas source 109, such as an
`argon gas source, introduces gas into the vacuum chamber
`104 through a gas inlet 110. A valve 112 controls the gas
`flow to the chamber 104.
`
`The magnetically enhanced etching apparatus 100 also
`includes a cathode 114.
`The cathode 114 is an electrode that is generally in the
`shape of a circular disk. The cathode 114 is electrically
`connected to a first terminal 118 of a blocking capacitor 120
`with an electrical transmission line 122. A second terminal
`124 of the blocking capacitor 120 is coupled to a first output
`126 of the RF power supply 102. The cathode 114 is isolated
`from the vacuum chamber 104 by an insulator 128 that is
`used to pass the electrical transmission line 122 through a
`wall of the vacuum chamber 104.
`
`II)
`
`15
`
`to'Ji
`
`2.:U}
`
`40
`
`An anode 130 is positioned in the vacuum chamber 104
`opposite the cathode 114. The anode 130 is electrically
`coupled to ground by an electrical transmission line 132. A
`second output 134 of the R14 power supply 102 is also
`electrically coupled to ground. An insulator 136 is used to
`. pass the electrical transmission line 132 through a wall of the
`vacuum chamber 104 in order to isolate the anode 130 from
`the vacuum chamber 104. The vacuum chamber 104 can
`also be electrically coupled to ground.
`A pair of magnets 140 is positioned outside the chamber
`104 to generate a magnetic field 142 in a direction that is
`substantially parallel to the top surface of the cathode 114.
`A substrate 144 is disposed on the cathode 114.
`In operation, the substrate 144 to be etched is positioned
`on the cathode 114. The chamber 104 is sufficiently evacu-
`ated to high vacuum by the vacuum pump 106. The etching
`gas from the gas source 109 is introduced into the chamber
`104 through the gas inlet 110. The RF power supply 102
`applies high—frequency radiation at 13.56 MHz through a
`blocking capacitor 120 to the cathode 114.
`The high—frequency radiation applied to the cathode 114
`creates a high-frequency electric field 146 in a direction that
`is perpendicular to the top surface of the cathode 114. The
`magnetic field 142 and the high-frequency electric field 146
`intersect each other in a region .148 above the substrate 144.
`Electrons are trapped in the region 148 and collide with
`neutral atoms from the etching gas. These collisions gener-
`ate a high—density plasma 105. The negatively biased cath—
`
`‘J\ 'JI
`
`60
`
`
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`3
`ode 114 attracts positively charged ions in the plasma 105
`with sufficient acceleration so that the ions etch a surface of
`the substrate 144.
`
`The RF power applied between the cathode 114 and the
`anode 130 has suflicient amplitude to ionize the etching gas
`and create the plasma 105 in the vacuum chamber 104. The
`plasma consists of positive ions and negative electrons. A
`typical RF driving voltage is between 500 V and 5000 V, and
`the distance 138 between the, cathode 1'14 and the anode 130
`is about 70 mm. Typical pressures are in the range 10 m Torr
`and 100 m Torr. Typical power densities are in the range of
`0.1 W/cm2 to 1 W/cm3. Typical plasma densities are 109
`cot—3’40ll cut—3, and the electron temperature is on the
`order of 3 (N.
`
`10
`
`The ionization process that generates the plasma 105 for
`sputter etching is sometimes referred to as direct ionization
`or atomic ionization by electron impact and can be described
`as follows:
`
`A r+e"—>A r*+26'
`
`where Ar represents a neutral argon atom in the etching gas
`and e"represents an ionizing electron generated in response
`to the voltage applied between the cathode 114 and the
`anode 130. The collision between the neutral argon atom and
`the ionizing electron results in an argon ion (AH) and two
`electrons.
`
`The plasma discharge is maintained by secondary electron
`emission from the cathode 114. However, typical operating
`pressures must be relatively high so that
`the secondary
`electrons are not lost to the anode 130 or the walls of the
`chamber 104. These pressures are not optimal
`for most
`plasma processes including plasma etching.
`The electrons, which cause the ionization, are generally
`confined by the magnetic fields produced by the magnets
`140. The magnetic confinement is strongest in a confinement
`region 148 Where the magnetic field lines are parallel to the
`surface of the electrode. Generally, a higher concentration of
`positively charged ions in the plasma is present
`in the
`confinement region 148 than elsewhere in the chamber 104.
`Consequently, the substrate 144 is etched more rapidly in
`areas directly adjacent to the higher concentration of posi-
`tively charged ions. The rapid etching in these areas results
`in undesirable non-uniform etching of the substrate 144.
`Dramatically increasing the RF power applied to the
`plasma alone will not result in the formation of a more
`uniform and denser plasma that improves the etching uni—
`formity. Improved etching will not occur because the mag-
`netic field will be non—uniform across the electrode and the
`magnetic field distribution around the electrode will be
`insufficient
`to confine the electrons. Furthermore.
`the
`amount of applied power that
`is necessary to achieve a
`significant increase in uniformity can increase the probabil-
`ity of generating an electrical breakdown condition leading
`to an undesirable electrical discharge (an electrical are) in
`the chamber 104.
`
`Pulsing the direct current (DC) power applied to the
`plasma can be advantageous since the average discharge
`power can remain low while relatively large power pulses
`are periodically applied. In addition,
`the duration of the
`voltage pulses can be chosen so as to reduce the probability
`ol‘ establishing an electrical breakdown condition. However,
`very large power pulses can still result
`in an electrical
`breakdown condition regardless of their duration. An unde-
`sirable electrical discharge will corrupt the etching process,
`cause contamination in the vacuum chamber 104, and can
`damage the substrate and/or any process layers already
`
`5-:Ui
`
`40
`
`m C
`
`'J. “J!
`
`60
`
`4
`fabricated. In addition, using a magnetron—type plasma gen-
`erator results in a magnetic field that significantly improves
`confinement. The electrons generated in a magnetron-type
`plasma generator will have a closed-loop path that generates
`an ExB drift current that significantly improves confine-
`ment.
`FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an embodiment
`of a magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`200 according to the present invention. In one embodiment,
`the magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus 200
`can be configured for magnetically enhanced reactive ion
`etching. In another embodiment, the magnetically enhanced
`plasma processing apparatus 200 can be configured for
`sputter etching.
`'I'he magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`200 includes a chamber 202, such as a vacuum chamber. The
`chamber 202 is coupled in lluid communication to a vacuum
`pump 204 through a vacuum valve 206. In one embodiment,
`the chamber 202 is electrically coupled to ground potential.
`The chamber 202 is coupled to a feed gas source 208 by
`one or more gas lines 207. In one embodiment, the gas lines
`207 are isolated from the chamber and other components by
`insulators 209. In addition, the gas lines 207 can be isolated
`from the feed gas source 208 using invline insulating cou-
`plers (not shown). A gas flow control system 210 controls
`the gas [low to the chamber 202. The gas source 208 can
`contain any type of feed gas, such as argon.
`In sortie
`embodiments, the feed gas is a mixture of diiferent gases.
`The dilTerent gases can include reactive and non—reactive
`gases. In one embodiment, the feed gas is a noble gas or a
`mixture of noble gases.
`A substrate 211 to be processed is supported in the
`chamber 202 by a substrate support 212. The substrate 211
`can be any type of work piece such as a semiconductor
`water. In one embodiment,
`the substrate support 2.12 is
`electrically coupled to an output 213 of a bias voltage source
`214. An insulator 215 isolates the bias voltage source 214
`from the chamber 202. In one embodiment, the bias voltage
`source 214 is an alternating current (AC) power source, such
`as a radio frequency (RF) power source. In other embodi-
`ments (not shown), the substrate support 212 is coupled to
`ground potential or is electrically floating.
`The magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`200 also includes a cathode 216. In one embodiment, the
`cathode 216 is formed of a metal. In one embodiment, the
`cathode 216 is formed of a chemically inert material, such
`as stainless steel. The distance from the cathode 216 to the
`substrate 211 can vary from a few centimeters to about one
`hundred centimeters.
`The cathode 216 is coupled to an output 222 of a matching
`unit 224. An insulator 226 isolates the cathode 216 from a
`grounded wall of the chamber 202. An input 230 of the
`matching unit 224 is coupled to a first output 232 ofa pulsed
`power supply 234. A second output 236 of the pulsed power
`supply 234 is coupled to an anode 238. An insulator 240
`isolates the anode 238 from a grounded wall of the chamber
`202. Another insulator 242 isolates the anode 238 from the
`cathode 216.
`In one embodiment (not shown), the first output 232 of the
`pulsed power supply 234 is directly coupled to the cathode
`216. In one embodiment (not shown), the second output 236
`of the pulsed power supply 234 and the anode 238 are both
`coupled to ground. In one embodiment (not shown), the first
`output 232 of the pulsed power supply 234 couples a
`negative voltage impulse to the cathode 216.
`In another
`embodiment (not shown),
`the second output 236 of the
`pulsed power supply 234 couples a positive voltage impulse
`to the anode 238.
`
`
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`5
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 gener-
`ates peak voltage levels that are on the order of 5~10 kV. In
`one embodiment, operating voltages are between about 50 V
`and 1000 V. In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply
`234 sustains a discharge current level that is between about
`IA and about 5,000A depending on the volume of the
`plasma. Typical operating currents varying from less than
`about one hundred amperes to more than about a
`few
`thousand amperes depending on the volume of the plasma.
`In one embodiment,
`the pulses generated by the pulsed
`power supply 234 have a repetition rate that is below 1 kHz.
`In one embodiment, the pulse width of the pulses generated
`by the pulsed power supply 234 is substantially between
`about one microsecond and several seconds.
`"lhe anode 238 is positioned so as to form a gap 244
`between the anode 238 and the cathode 216 that is sufficient
`to allow current to flow through a region 245 between the
`anode 238 and the cathode 216. In one embodiment, the
`width of the gap 244 is between approximately 0.3 cm and
`10 cm. The surface area of the cathode 216 and the dimen-
`sions of the gap determine the volume of the region 245. The
`dimensions of the gap 244 and the total volume ofthe region
`245 are parameters in the ionization process as described
`herein.
`An anode shield 248 is positioned adjacent to the anode
`238 and functions as an electric shield to electrically isolate
`the anode 238 from the plasma. In one embodiment, the
`anode shield 248 is coupled to ground potential. An insulator
`250 is positioned to isolate the anode shield 248 from the
`anode 238.
`The magnetically enhanced plasma processing apparatus
`200 also includes a magnet assembly 252.
`In one
`embodiment, the magnet assembly 252 is adapted to create
`a magnetic field 254 proximate to the cathode 2'16. The
`magnet assembly 252 can include permanent magnets 256,
`or alternatively, electromagnets (not shown). The configu-
`ration of the magnet assembly 252 can be varied depending
`on the desired shape and strength of the magnetic field 254.
`The magnet assembly 252 can have either a balanced or
`unbalanced configuration.
`In one embodiment, the magnet assembly 252 includes
`switching electro—magnets, which generate a pulsed mag-
`netic field proximate to the cathode 216.
`In some
`embodiments, additional magnet assemblies (not shown) are
`placed at various locations around and throughout the cham—
`ber 202 depending on the plasma process.
`In one embodiment, the magnetically enhanced plasma
`processing apparatus 200 is operated by generating the
`magnetic field 254 proximate to the cathode 216. In the,
`embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the permanent magnets 256
`continuously generate the magnetic field 254.
`In other
`embodiments, electro-magnets (not shown) generate the
`magnetic field 254 by energizing a current source that is
`coupled to the electro—magnets.
`In one embodiment,
`the
`strength of the magnetic field 254 is between about 50 and
`2000 gauss. After the magnetic field 254 is generated, the
`feed gas from the gas source 208 is supplied to the chamber
`202 by the gas flow control system 210.
`In one embodiment,
`the feed gas is supplied to the
`chamber 202 directly between the cathode 216 and the
`anode 238. Directly injecting the Iced gas between the
`cathode 216 and the anode 238 can increase the [low rate ol‘
`the gas between the cathode 2'16 and the anode 238. Increas-
`ing the flow rate of the gas allows longer duration impulses
`and thus, can result in the formation higher density plasmas.
`The flow of the feed gas is discussed further in connection
`with FIG. 3.
`
`6
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 is a
`component of an ionization source that generates a weakly-
`ionized plasma. The pulsed power supply 234 applies a
`voltage pulse between the cathode 216 and the anode 238.
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 applies a
`negative voltage pulse to the cathode 216. The amplitude
`and shape of the voltage pulse are chosen such that a
`weakly-ionized plasma is generated in the region 246
`between the anode 238 and the cathode 216.
`The weakly-ionized plasma is also referred to as a pre—
`ionized plasma. In one embodiment, the peak plasma density
`of the pro-ionized plasma is between about 106 and 10*12
`cm'3 for argon feed gas. In one embodiment, the pressure in
`the chamber varies from about 10‘3 to 10 Torr. The peak
`plasma density of the pre—ionized plasma depends on the
`properties of the specific plasma processing system.
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 gener-
`ates a low power pulse having an initial voltage of between
`about 100 V and 5 kV with a discharge current of between
`about (HA and lOOAin order to generate the weakly-ionized
`plasma. In some embodiments the width of the pulse can be
`in on the order of about 0.1. microseconds to about one
`hundred seconds. Specific parameters of the pulse are dis-
`cussed herein in more detail.
`In one embodiment, the pulsed power supply 234 applies
`a voltage between the cathode 216 and the anode 238 before
`the feed gas is supplied between the cathode 216 and the
`anode 238. In another embodiment, the pulsed power supply
`234 applies a voltage between the cathode 216 and the anode
`238 after the feed gas is supplied between the cathode 216
`and the anode 238.
`In one embodiment, a direct current (DC) power supply
`(not shown) is used to generate and maintain the weakly—
`ionized or pre-ionized plasma. In this embodiment, the DC
`power supply is adapted to generate a voltage that is large
`enough to ignite the pre-ionized plasma. In one embodiment,
`the DC power supply generates an initial voltage of several
`kilovolts between the cathode 216 and the anode 238 in
`order to generate and maintain the pre-ionized plasma. The
`initial voltage between the cathode 216 and the anode 238
`creates a plasma discharge voltage that
`is on the order of
`100—1000 V with a discharge current that is on the order of
`0,1 A—lttt) A.
`
`Lil
`
`10
`
`IS
`
`30
`
`wLn
`.
`
`40
`
`an0
`
`'lhe direct current required to generate and maintain the
`" pre—ionized plasma is a
`function of the volume of the
`plasma.
`In addition,
`the current required to generate and
`maintain the pro-ionized plasma is a function of the strength
`of the magnetic field in the region 245. For example, in one
`embodiment, the DC power supply generates a current that
`is between about 1 mA and 100 A depending on the volume
`of the plasma and the strength of the magnetic field in the
`region 245. The DC power supply can be adapted to generate
`and maintain an initial peak voltage between the cathode
`216 and the anode 238 before the introduction of the feed
`gas.
`(AC)
`In another embodiment, an alternating current
`power supply (not shown) is used to generate and maintain
`the weakly—ionized or pre-ionized plasma. For example, the
`weakly—ionized or pre~ioni7ed plasma can be generated and
`maintained using electron cyclotron resonance (ECR),
`capacitively coupled plasma discharge (CCP), or inductively
`coupled plasma (ICP) discharge. An AC power supply can
`require less power to generate and maintain a weakly-
`ionized plasma than a DC power supply. In addition, the
`pre-ionizcd or weakly-ionized plasma can be generated by
`numerous other
`techniques, such as UV radiation
`techniques, X—ray techniques, electron beam techniques, ion
`
`’J1U!
`
`60
`
`
`
`US 6,896,775 B2
`
`7
`beam techniques, or ionizing filament techniques. In some
`embodiments, the weakly~ionized plasma is formed outside
`of the region 245 and then dilfuses into the region, 245.
`Forming a wealdy—ionized or pro-ionized plasma substan~
`tially eliminates the probability of establishing a breakdown
`condition in the chamber 202 when high—power pulses are
`applied between the cathode 216 and the anode 238. Uni-
`formly distributing the weakly-ionized or pre~ionized
`plasma over the cathode area results in a more uniform
`strongly ionized plasma when a high power pulse is applied.
`The probability of establishing a breakdown condition is
`substantially eliminated because the weakly-ionized plasma
`has a lo