`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`Eastman Kodak Company, AGFA Corporation,
`Esko Software BVBA, and Heidelberg, USA,
`Petitioners,
`
`V.
`
`CTP Innovations, LLC
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00790
`
`Patent 6,611,349
`
`
`CTP INNOVATIONS, LLC’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Filed on behalf of CTP Innovations, LLC
`
`By:
`
`L. Clint Crosby (Back—up Counsel)
`W. Edward Ramage (Lead Counsel)
`Reg. No. 47,508
`Reg. No. 50,810
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, RC.
`CALDWELL 85 BERKOWITZ, PC.
`Baker Doneison Center
`Monarch Piaza, Suite 1603
`2:1 Commerce Siree‘i, Suite 800
`3314 Peachtree Ave” NE.
`Nashviile, Tennessee 37201
`Adamo, Georgia 30326
`Tei: (615) 726-577}
`Te}: ($8) 466~87i32
`Fax: (615) 744-5771
`Fax: (678) 406~8802
`Emaii: eramage@bakerdonelsoneom
`Email: eerosby@bakerdonelson.com
`
`
`
`Case lPR2014—00790
`
`Patent 6§611,349
`
`Pursuant to 37 CPR. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order, Patent
`
`Owner CTP Innovations, LLC (“Patent Owner”)
`
`respectfully requests oral
`
`argument. Specifically! Patent Owner requests oral argument on the following:
`
`1.
`
`Each ground of unpatentability on which trial was instituted.
`
`a. Whether the Jebens reference in combination with other prior art
`
`renders some or all of the subject claims obvious.
`
`b. Whether the Dorfrnan reference in combination with other prior art
`
`renders some or all of the subject claims obvious.
`
`c. Whether the Apogee reference in combination with other prior art
`
`renders some or all of the subject claims obvious.
`
`Whether Patent Owner’s motions to exclude evidence should be
`
`granted.
`
`a. Whether the Apogee reference (Ex. 1008) should be excluded.
`
`b. Whether the Suetens Declaration (Ex. 1023) should be excluded.
`
`c. Whether the Jahns Declaration (Ex. 1024) should be excluded.
`
`d. Whether the Supplemental Suetens Declaration (Ex. 1025) should
`
`be excluded,
`
`er Whether the Jahns Declaration or the Sepplernental Seetens
`
`Declaration comprise supplemental evidence or supplemental
`
`information.
`
`
`
`Case 1PR2014-OO790
`
`Patent 6,611,349
`
`3.
`
`Any arguments made by Petitioners in support of any motion to
`
`exclude evidence, or set forth in Petitioner’s Request for Oral
`
`Argument.
`
`Patent Owner further requests the ability to use audio-Visual projection
`
`equipment to display demonstrative exhibits Via a PowerPoint presentation.
`
`Dated: June 11, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC.
`
`/W. Edward Ramage/
`W. Edward Ramage, Reg. No. 50,810
`(Lead Counsel)
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC.
`
`211 Commerce Street, Suite 800
`
`Nashville, Tennessee 37201
`Tel: (615) 726-5771
`Fax: (615) 744—5771
`Email: eramage@bakerdonelson.com
`
`L. Clint Crosby, Reg. No. 47,508
`(Back—up Counsel)
`BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
`CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, RC.
`Monarch Plaza, Suite 1600
`
`3414 Peaehtree Ave, NE.
`Atienta, Geergia 30326
`Tet:
`(6’78) 406~S7’{}2
`Fax: (678) 406«8802
`Emaii: eerosby@bakerdoneison.eom
`
`Counsel for Parent Owner CTP
`Innovations, LLC
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014~0079O
`
`Patent 6,61 L349
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that, on June 11, 2015,
`
`the foregoing
`
`Request for Oral Argument was served in its entirety via US. Express Mail,
`
`postage prepaid, and electronic mail upon the following:
`
`Scott A. McKeown
`
`Michael L. Kiklis
`
`OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND,
`
`MAIER & NEUSTADT, LLP
`1940 Duke Street
`
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`/W. Edward Ramage/
`W. Edward Ramage, Reg. No. 50,810
`
`