throbber
A CATV-Based High-Speed
`Packet-Switching Network Design
`
`David Charles Feldmeier
`
`© Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1986
`
`This research was supported in part by the Defense Advanced Research
`Projects Agency of the Department of Defense and monitored by the Office of
`Naval Research under contract number N00014-83-K-0125
`
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology
`
`Laboratory for Computer Science
`
`Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
`
`Petitioner ARRIS Group, Inc.’s
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001060
`
`

`
`A CATV-Based High-Speed
`Packet-Switching Network Design
`
`by
`David Charles Feldmeier
`
`Submitted to the
`Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
`on April 24, 1986 in partial fulfillment of the requirements
`for the Degree of Master of Science
`
`Abstract
`
`A high-speed packet-switching data network to the home can be built on an existing,
`unmodified,
`residential cable television (CATV) system.
`This thesis considers the
`theoretical and practical
`technical aspects of providing such a service and suggests a
`possible system design. All network data must pass through the CATV hub, so the
`network design is divided into three major parts: upstream transmission, downstream
`transmission, and access scheme.
`
`Upstream transmission is difficult because of the high noise level on the upstream channel
`caused by ingress of shortwave signals and impulse noise. The noise level is increased by
`the CATV system topology that funnels all system noise to the headend. Several noise-
`reduction techniques must be used simultaneously for robust upstream transmission. The
`downstream channel has low noise, but the data signal must be compatible with the
`CATV system, video signals and television receivers. Vestigial sideband data modulation
`“is suggested for total system compatibility. Existing access schemes, such as those for
`local area networks and satellite networks, are unsuitable for a high-speed CATV-based
`network. Modified versions of two satellite access schemes are suggested as possible
`solutions. The best techniques for upstream transmission, downstream transmission and
`access scheme are combined into a single proposed system.
`
`Key Words: cable television, metropolitan area networks, broadband networks, access
`control techniques
`
`Thesis supervisor.’ Jerome H. Saltzer.
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001061
`
`

`
`Acknowledgments
`
`I would like to thank my thesis advisor Jerry Saltzer for proposing a CATV-based
`
`computer network as a research project and for his thoughts on various aspects of
`
`communication via residential CATV systems.
`
`John Cafarella of Micrilor spent many hours with me, discussing aspects of modulation
`
`and error-correction coding for noisy channels, both of which are important for the design
`
`of the upstream transmission system. His help and expertise are greatly appreciated.
`
`George Papadopoulos of the University of Patras, Greece, spent a few weeks considering
`
`possible access schemes for CATV networks. He and I had several meetings discussing
`the pros and cons of various access schemes.
`
`Stanly Reible of Micrilor helped with measurement and interpretation of noise on some
`
`local CATV systems.
`
`My special thanks to Patrick Mock, Katy Isaacs, and Carine Bickley for their helpful
`
`comments on my thesis.
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001062
`
`

`
`Table of Contents
`
`Chapter One: Introduction
`
`1.1 Background
`1.2 Goals
`
`1.3 Communication Systems to the Home
`1.4 Previous Work
`
`Chapter Two: An Introduction to Cable Television
`
`2.1 Community Antenna Television
`2.2 Distribution Plant
`2.3 Residential versus Institutional Cable
`
`2.4 Constraints on Network Design
`2.4.1 Central Clock
`2.4.2 Economics
`
`2.4.3 CATV Topology
`2.4.4 Noise
`2.5 Problem Division
`
`2.6 Summary
`
`Chapter Three: Upstream Data. Transmission
`
`3.1 Power Measurements on CATV Systems
`3.2 Phase Distortion
`
`8.2.1 The Cause of Phase Distortion
`
`3.2.2 The Effects of Delay Distortion
`3.2.3 Overcoming Delay Distortion
`3.3 System Characteristics
`
`3.3.1 CATV Topology
`3.3.2 Digital Regenerators
`3.4 Upstream Noise
`3.4.1 White Noise
`3.4.2 Narrow Band Noise
`
`3.4.3 Impulse Noise
`3.5 Effective Channel Utilization
`
`3.5.1 Modulation Techniques
`3.5.1.1 Noise and Signal Power Considerations
`3.5.1.2 Delay and Interference Considerations
`3.5.2 Selective Spectrum Utilization
`3.5.3 Coding
`3.6 System Noise Budget
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001063
`
`

`
`3.7 Summary
`
`Chapter Four: Downstream Data Transmission
`
`4.1 CATV System Considerations
`4.2 Frequency Shift Keying
`4.3 Vestigial Sideband Modulation
`4.3.1 Transmitter Baseband Processing
`4.3.1.1 Number of Signal Levels
`4.3.1.2 Low-pass Filtering
`4.3.2 Amplitude Modulation
`4.3.3 Transmitter Bandwidth Restriction Filter
`4.3.4 Vestigial Sideband Filtering
`4.3.5 Signal Detection
`4.3.5.1 Coherent Detection
`
`4.3.5.2 Envelope Detection
`4.4 A Sony VSB Data Transmission System
`4.4.1 Transmitter
`
`4.4.1.1 Nyquist Filtering
`4.4.1.2 Modulation
`
`4.4.1.3 Transmitter Bandpass Filter
`4.4.2 Receiver
`
`4.5 Channel Capacity
`4.6 Master Clock Reception
`4.7 Summary
`
`Chapter Five: Network Access Schemes
`
`5.1 Introduction
`
`5.2 CATV Access Schemes Considerations
`
`5.2.1 Packet-Switching Broadcast Networks
`5.2.2 Preliminary Access Scheme Evaluation
`5.2.3 Monitoring of the Upstream Channel
`5.2.4 An Example CATV System
`5.2.5 Expected Traffic
`5.2.6 Traffic Modeling
`5.2.7 The Comparison Metric
`5.3 Deterministic Access Schemes
`
`5.3.1 Polling
`5.3.2 Token Passing
`5.3.3 Fixed Reservation
`5.4 Contention Access Schemes
`5.4.1 Aloha
`
`5.4.1.1 Collision Detection
`5.4.1.2 P-Persistent CSMA
`5.4.2 Contention Reservation
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001064
`
`

`
`5.5 Propagation Delay Determination
`5.6 Summary
`
`Chapter Six: System Design
`
`6.1 Downstream Transmission
`
`6.2 Upstream Transmission
`6.3 Proposed Access Scheme
`6.4 The Network Center
`6.5 The Network Interface
`
`6.6 Summary
`
`Chapter Seven: Conclusion
`
`7.1 Major Points
`7.2 The CATV System as a Metropolitan Area Network
`7.3 Future Research
`7.4 Conclusion
`
`Appendix A: Filter Power Loss
`
`1 Pre-Modulation Filter Loss
`
`2 Transmitter Bandpass Filter Loss
`3 Determination of VSB Filter Loss
`4 Calculation
`
`4.1 Transmitter Bandpass Filter
`4.2 VSB Calculations
`
`Appendix B: Bit Error Rate of an Envelope Detector
`
`Appendix C: Contention Reservation Slot Calculation
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001065
`
`

`
`Table of Figures
`
`Figure 3-1: CATV Network Delay Errors as a Function of Signal Frequency
`and Bandwidth (from [30])
`Figure 3-2: Measurement Method for Linear Delay Distortion (from [28])
`Figure 3-3: Maximum Signal Impairment as a Function of Delay for Phase and
`Frequency Modulation (from [28])
`Figure 3-4: Measured Upstream Noise Spectrum from 0 to 30 MHz with a 20
`dBmV Reference for an Example CATV System (from
`Figure 3-5: Probability of Bit Error as a Function of Eb/No for Several
`Modulation Systems (from
`I
`Figure 3-6: Error Rates for Several Modulation Systems (from [27])
`Figure 3-7: Bit Error Probability as a Function of C/N Ratio for BPSK (from
`l23ll
`Figure 4-1: Frequency Responses for the Receiver’s Vestigial Sideband Filter
`and the Transmitter’s Bandpass Filter (from [25])
`Figure 4-2: Bit Error Rate versus Eb/No for BPSK (from
`Figure 4-3: Frequency Characteristics of the Sony Pre-modulation Bandpass
`Filter (from [18])
`‘Figure 4-4: Bit Error Rate as a Function of C/N Ratio for the Sony Digital
`Transmission System (from [l8])
`Figure 1: Vestigial Sideband Filter Frequency Response (from [25])
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001066
`
`

`
`Table of Tables
`
`Table 3-1: Table of Concatenated Codes \Vith a Bit Error Rate Below
`10‘19(rrom 112})
`Table 4-1: Table of Error Rate versus Sony System Carrier Power
`Table 5-1: Table of k and Ew versus 3
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001067
`
`

`
`Chapter One
`
`Introduction
`
`The demand for high-speed communication to the home is increasing as the economy
`
`becomes information-oriented. Although no suitable system exists to meet this demand,
`
`a communication network to the home can be built quickly and inexpensively on an
`
`existing residential cable television system. The goal of this research is to propose the
`
`design of a system suitable for providing high-speed packet-switched communication to
`the home.
`
`1.1 Background
`
`As the United States shifts from a manufacturing economy to an information-oriented
`
`economy, data processing and computers play an increasingly important role in our work.
`
`For people who work with information, it is feasible to work one or more days a week at
`
`an office in the home. Working at home has several advantages, including reducing the
`
`time and cost of commuting. Work during non~business hours becomes convenient, so
`
`that personal schedules may easily be shifted. Work at home also allows one to work
`
`during the day without interruptions.
`
`The cost of duplicating office equipment, such as a personal computer, at the office in the
`
`home becomes economically competitive with commuting as the price of electronics
`
`declines. For work at home to be productive, a worker must have access to the resources
`
`available in the office; for example,
`
`the use of a mainframe computer or shared data-
`
`storage system. The worker at home must not become isolated from the office work
`
`environment.
`
`A modern office environment consists of computers and peripherals connected together
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001068
`
`

`
`with a local area network. A local area network, or LAN, provides inexpensive, high-
`speed communication over a limited area. Many LANs have a data rate of 10 megabits
`
`per second and reside within a building, although network diameters of over a kilometer
`
`are possible. Resources that are too expensive to provide to each user, such as high-
`quality printers or mass-storage devices, are shared using such a network. The network
`
`allows the user of a personal computer (PC) to access those services that are available on
`a mainframe.
`
`An example of an application that requires high—speed communication is remote disk
`
`access. The disk drives in a PC have a small capacity and a low throughput, and do not
`
`allow data to be accessed by more than a single computer. An alternative is to provide a
`
`computer with a large storage system on the network to act as a remote disk that can be
`
`accessed by other computers on the network. With a high—speed network, data can be
`
`retrieved from a remote disk as quickly as from the local hard disk drive.
`
`If data are
`
`stored on a remote disk, a worker at home can use the data that are available at work
`
`without having to keep an extra copy at home.
`
`Another application for high—speed networks is the transmission of pictures, such as
`
`circuit diagrams. Often, the ability to show something to a person rather than describe
`
`it saves time, but only if a picture can be transmitted reasonably quickly. To transmit
`
`the bitmap display of an engineering workstation] takes a tenth of a second at 10 Mbps.
`If the worker at home is restricted to a conventional 1200 bps modem on a phone line,
`
`the same transmission takes almost 14 minutes. With a high—speed network, screen
`
`displays can be transmitted to a workstation as quickly as turning the pages of a book.
`
`A new generation of computers with faster processors, graphic displays and larger
`
`memories increases the need for high-speed communications.
`
`High—speed,
`
`low-cost
`
`communications must be brought
`
`to the home to support the services provided at the
`
`office by a local area network.
`
`1A Symbolics 3600 workstation has an 1100x900 pixel bitmap display.
`
`10
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001069
`
`

`
`1.2 Goals
`
`The office in the home can be efficient
`
`if the home worker has access to the same
`
`computational resources that are available at work. Because distributed computing is
`
`becoming common and computer prices are decreasing, data communication from the
`
`home to the office increasingly will be among computers, rather than between a computer
`
`and a home terminal. Computer to computer communication is bursty, with a high
`
`peak-to—mean ratio of network use.
`
`Unlike computer
`
`to terminal communication,
`
`intercomputer communication traffic is symmetric, with comparable amounts of data in
`both directions.
`
`The goal of this thesis is to describe a system that provides computer communication to
`
`the home, with performance similar to that of a local area network. As with a LAN, the
`
`system transports packets on a single, hared broadcast channel, rather than using point-
`
`to-point links. This network provides high-speed service on demand to a single user at a
`
`time and any one user occupies the channel for a very short time, which allows many
`
`users to share the same channel. Although a high-speed network is needed to handle the
`
`expected traffic bursts, each individual station on the network uses this capacity only a
`
`small percentage of the time. This type of operation is compatible with computer
`
`communication, and data transmission and reception rates are identical because of the
`expected traffic symmetry.
`
`Computer communication requires high-speed bursts for short periods of time, but what
`
`is the minimum necessary speed for acceptable performance? A network to the home is a
`
`metropolitan area network because of the large area that it covers. The Institute of
`
`Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.6 committee is developing metropolitan
`
`area network standards and the committee is mainly interested in LAN interconnection,
`
`and high-speed voice, video and data service. The 802.6 committee charter stipulates
`
`that
`
`1 Mbps is the minimum speed for a proposed network standard. Because the
`
`network to the home connects computers to LANs, the traffic should be similar to that of
`
`LAN interconnection, so 1 Mbps to the home is the minimal acceptable data rate.
`
`Although the data rate for the entire network is at least 1 Mbps, another important
`
`11
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001070
`
`

`
`consideration is the minimum throughput for a single user.
`
`The bursty nature of
`
`computer communication demands a high throughput for a single user because at any
`
`given time, only a few stations have data to transmit. The hard disk drive on a personal
`
`computer has a raw bit rate of about 500 Kbps. Since remote virtual disk access is a
`
`desired application, and one of the most demanding, 500 Kbps should be the network
`
`throughput for a single user. Since the data rate is still 1 Mbps, the minimum network
`
`efficiency is 50%.
`
`Throughput and delay on a network are related,
`
`so although throughput may be
`
`increased at the expense of delay, delay must not be excessive.
`
`Interactive activities,
`
`such as remote login, have a maximum tolerable delay between the queueing of a packet
`
`and its transmission. A decent typist will have bursts of over 100 words per minute, and
`
`remote login requires two packets per character (one of which is an acknowledgment).
`
`This is about twenty packets per second, ten packets in each direction, which implies a
`
`maximum delay of 50 milliseconds between packet queueing and transmission.
`
`The computer in the home will be connected to a local area network at the office, and it
`is simplest if both networks use similar protocols. Specifically, LAN protocols correct
`
`data errors by retransmitting damaged packets, so the network error rate should be low
`
`enough for most packets to be delivered undamaged. Local area network research at
`
`MIT suggests that the correct error rate to control is the frequency of corrupted packets,
`rather
`than the bit error
`rate, because
`the system overhead of detecting and
`
`retransmitting damaged packets dominates the resulting performance. The performance
`
`of automatic repeat request error correction depends critically on the packet error rate of
`
`the channel.
`
`If the error rate is too high,
`
`the retransmission overhead dominates the
`
`system. Experience also suggests a network design target of less than one Corrupted
`
`packet per 1000 for acceptable performance.
`
`A communication network to the home must be affordable if it is to be used, so the
`
`system must be comparable in cost to systems that provide similar services. The two
`
`closest systems are local area networks and dial-up telephone modems, both of which cost
`
`$500 to $700 per interface in 1985 dollars.
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001071
`
`

`
`The parameters above define a system to provide high-speed communication to the home.
`
`There are several existing technologies that could be used to build this network, and
`these are discussed in the next section.
`
`1.3 Communication Systems to the Home
`
`To provide a communications network to the home at a reasonable cost, the system must
`
`use either free-space transmission (microwave or light) or previously installed cables.
`
`It is
`
`to install dedicated cables to each home because of cost and right-of-way
`impractical
`considerations.
`
`The telephone system is commonly used for data communication to the home. However,
`telephone technology limits the data rate to about 9600 bps, which is too slow to provide
`acceptable packet switching service to the home.
`Data. communication is also an
`
`inefficient use of telephone company resources. Telephone switching equipment expects
`many calls of short (3 minute) duration, but data communication holds a circuit for
`
`much longer. Also, the bursty nature of computer communication means that the circuit
`
`In addition, the long economic recovery
`will often be idle, so system capacity is wasted.
`time for telephone switching equipment precludes its replacement for many years.
`
`A new service to be offered soon by the telephone company is the Integrated Services
`
`Digital Network (ISDN). This service provides two 64 Kbps circuit-switched channels
`
`and a 16 Kbps packet-switched channel to the home for a total of 144 Kbps. Although
`
`this will be a great improvement over a conventional telephone line, it is still slower than
`
`desired and does not exist yet.
`
`Another method of data transmission to the home is the FM Subsidiary Communications
`
`Authority (SCA) channel. Commercial FM stations can broadcast data on an SCA
`
`channel simultaneously with normal broadcasts. The Boston Community Information
`
`System uses this type of broadcast channel to provide data to the home [13]. The system
`broadcasts data to homes in a metropolitan area and is directed toward residential users.
`
`The system is also distributed — all data is broadcast to all receivers and it is up to each
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001072
`
`

`
`station to selectively receive
`
`the information of
`
`interest,
`
`store and present
`
`the
`
`information to the user in a suitable manner. A disadvantage of this system is that the
`
`data rate is only 4800 bps, and therefore too slow for the applications that we are
`interested in.
`
`An alternative is a satellite-based network. Satellite equipment prices are falling and
`
`Direct Broadcast Systems (DBS) are designed to provide video entertainment to the home
`
`via satellite to small, inexpensive dish antennas with inexpensive electronics. The major
`
`problem with satellite systems is
`
`that
`
`if
`
`the satellite is
`
`in geosynchronous orbit,
`
`propagation delay to the satellite and back is a quarter of a second. This means at least
`
`half a second passes before a reply can arrive from any other computer on the network,
`
`which is too long. Propagation delay could be reduced by lowering the satellite orbit, but
`
`a low orbit requires more satellites so that one is always within line-of-sight, as each
`
`satellite would be in range only a short time.
`
`In addition, the dish antennas at each
`
`home would require a tracking mechanism, which increases the cost for each station.
`
`DBS also does not offer a simple return path from the home. Communication from the
`
`home requires a powerful transmitter operating in the Gigahertz range. The antenna
`
`beam-width must be narrow and directed well enough to avoid interference with other
`
`satellites. These requirements could make the return path quite expensive.
`
`The most straight-forward way of approaching the problem is to use an existing link to
`
`the home - the residential cable television system. A residential Community Antenna
`
`Television (CATV) system distributes television signals with a network of coaxial cables
`
`branching out from the cable headend to homes in a community. Modern CATV systems
`
`not only provide video channels to the home but also carry signals from the home back
`
`to the CATV headend. The coaxial cable is a high-bandwidth medium that is already
`
`installed to the home, meaning that a communication system could be added at a low
`
`marginal cost.
`
`In addition, CATV has the advantage of a small propagation delay
`
`relative to the area covered by the network and it does not require any of the already
`
`crowded radio spectrum as a microwave system would. Of the possibilities considered
`
`above, a CATV system provides the best basis for the desired data communication
`
`network to the home.
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001073
`
`

`
`1.4 Previous Work
`
`Several existing or proposed systems that are built on residential CATV system or use
`
`CATV equipment are mentioned below. Although none of
`
`them provide a high-
`
`performance channel to the home, they show the current state of the art.
`
`The prototypical residential CATV-based communications system is the Warner-Amex
`
`QUBE system [20]. This is the first system to take advantage of the two-way capability
`
`of a CATV system. The QUBE system runs a. single channel at a 256 Kbps rate and uses
`
`an adaptive polling access scheme. A polling system queries each user on the system
`
`from a central point one at a time for data traffic. Although polling is simple and
`
`inexpensive, it is an inefficient access scheme for a network the size of a CATV system
`
`because most of the time, the polling system is waiting for a poll response. Adaptive
`
`polling is a better system that polls active stations more often than inactive ones, but
`
`still the network utilization is low.
`
`A more recent system developed jointly by General Instruments and Sytek is MetroNet,
`
`which is designed to bring Videotex service to the home via existing residential CATV
`
`systems [15]. A MetroNet is frequency divided into 50 channels, each of which has a data
`
`rate of 128 Kbps and uses a Carrier-Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection
`
`(CSMA/CD) access scheme. This data rate is almost
`
`that provided by ISDN, and
`
`although it
`
`is adequate for computer to terminal communication,
`
`it
`
`is too slow for
`
`demanding tasks such as remote-virtual-disk access.
`
`Rather than a single high-speed channel, Metronet has many slower channels. Videotex
`
`and terminal traffic is less demanding than computer traffic and the narrower bandwidth
`
`of the slower channels allows the system to overcome noise on the cable more easily
`
`The relatively slow channel speed allows MetroNet to efficiently use CSMA/CD as an
`
`access scheme, but efficiency declines if the data rate is increased.
`
`Unlike the two systems described above, the following two systems are incompatible with
`
`a residential CATV system. The Ethernet system is suited to an industrial network
`
`within a building or a company. Homenet is a generalized version of an Ethernet that is
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001074
`
`

`
`designed to cover a large area efficiently.
`
`Digital Equipment Corporation developed
`
`an Ethernet
`
`system with broadband
`
`the system diameter is
`transceivers that operates on CATV equipment However,
`limited to a few kilometers because the system operates at 10 Mbps and uses a
`CSMA/CD access scheme, which is efficient only over a limited area at high data rates.
`The system also requires 18 MHz of bandwidth in each direction, which would be difficult
`
`to fit onto the upstream channel of a residential CATV system because of noise
`considerations.
`
`Homenet is a system proposed by Bell Labs designed to be built with CATV components
`[16]. The system consists of cells of transmitters that contend for the channel using a
`CSMA/CD system. All transmitters within a cell use the same frequency and receivers
`shift to the frequency of the transmitter’s cell. This system allows the total system to be
`very large, but since all contention is within a cell of a kilometer in diameter, the access
`scheme remains efficient.
`
`Without modification, the structure of a residential CATV system could accommodate
`only one cell, because each cell needs a frequency translator and only the headend could
`have a translator. As a consequence, the access scheme would be inefficient and Homenet
`would not work well on a residential CATV system.
`
`Little research has been done concerning high-speed communications to the home on a.
`
`residential CATV system. Some sytems are low speed for providing videotex services;
`some are high-speed systems that require extensive modification to the CATV system.
`The thesis of D. L. Estrin discusses the technical and regulatory issues surrounding the
`use of a residential cable television system for data communications
`
`This thesis is a study of the technical and system issues of providing high-speed, packet-
`switched computer communication to the home on an existing residential CATV system.
`The purpose of this thesis is to review the type of communications necessary for work at
`home and to describe a system that provides this communication. This thesis outlines a.
`
`system that provides LAN-like communications to the home, and is specifically designed
`
`16
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001075
`
`

`
`for peer communication among computers on an unmodified residential CATV system.
`
`Chapter 2 contains a tutorial on residential cable television.
`
`It describes the design of a
`
`CATV system and points how it might be used for communication to the home. An
`
`analysis of the system leads to the problem being broken into three parts: access scheme,
`
`upstream transmission, and downstream transmission.
`
`Chapter 3 discusses transmission from the home to the CATV headend. The tree-shaped
`
`CATV system acts as a noise funnel that channels the amplified sum of the noise over
`
`the entire system to the headend. A system is proposed for high-speed transmission in
`
`this adverse environment that includes a robust modulation scheme, selective spectrum
`
`utilization, and error-correction coding.
`
`Chapter 4 covers communication from the CATV headend to the home. Because the
`
`CATV system is designed for communication in this direction,
`
`the design is relatively
`
`simple. The main considerations are compatibility with the current CATV system and
`
`equipment including commercial television receivers, and subscriber receiver cost.
`
`Chapter 5 discusses access schemes for a CATV-based data network.
`
`It begins with the
`
`CATV system constraints and the network expectations, and explores possible access
`
`schemes. Suggestions for improved access protocols include a modification of a satellite
`
`reservation scheme to accept variable instead of fixed slot
`
`lengths and a method of
`
`increasing network efficiency by reducing contention on the system.
`
`Chapter 6 proposes the design of a complete system for providing high-speed packet-
`
`switched communication to the home. The results of chapters 3, 4 and 5 are used to
`
`provide the pieces of the system. The chapter also describes network controller design
`
`and subscriber interface design.
`
`Chapter 7 concludes the thesis by considering the strengths and shortcomings of the
`
`presented analysis.
`
`It also suggests directions for the continuation of this research.
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001076
`
`

`
`Chapter Two
`
`An Introduction to Cable Television
`
`Since the high-speed data network to the home is to be built on a CATV system, the
`design of a CATV system must be understood. The technical characteristics of a CATV
`
`system will determine how a high—speed data network can be built on the system.
`
`2.1 Community Antenna Television
`
`A Community Antenna Television system is a tree-shaped structure of coaxial cables and
`
`amplifiers designed to distribute television signals to homes in a region. At the base of
`this tree is the system headend, from which the video signals originate. Although
`distribution of video entertainment signals from the system headend to the subscriber is
`the predominant design consideration, most modern CATV systems are two-way systems
`that carry signals both from the headend to the subscriber (downstream), and from the
`subscriber to the headend (upstream). This two-way capability of the cable system
`allows it to be the basis of a data communication network to the home.
`
`A CATV system is frequency-divided into adjacent 6 MHz channels. The most common,
`single-cable design used for
`residential areas divides frequencies into three bands:
`
`downstream channels, upstream channels and the guard band. Downstream channels
`
`carry signals, typically entertainment video, from the cable system headend to the home.
`
`Downstream (or forward path) channels begin at 54 Ml-Iz and continue up to the highest
`frequencies carried by the system - as high as 450 Ml-Iz, depending on the system design
`and technology employed. The upstream (or return path) channels occupy 5.75 to 29.75
`
`Ml-Iz and carry signals from the home to the cable headend. The frequencies from 29.75
`
`to 54 MHz form a guard band between the upstream and downstream channels and no
`
`signals are transmitted at
`
`these frequencies. The cable spectrum below 54 MHz is
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001077
`
`

`
`referred to as the subband, and a cable system that allocates that spectrum to upstream
`
`channels is referred to as a. subsplit system; residential cable systems are typical subsplit
`systems.
`
`Each downstream channel normally carries a single vestigial sideband (VSB) video signal.
`VSB is the standard modulation for broadcast video signals in the United States, and it is
`
`an amplitude modulation system followed by a. vestigial sideband filter that eliminates
`
`most of the lower sideband. The audio carrier is processed separately and combined with
`
`the video signal before transmission. Video carriers on modern cable systems are phase-
`locked to a master oscillator so that intermodulation distortion products of the carriers
`
`are phase-coherent with the carriers themselves. These coherent products are removed
`
`along with the carriers during demodulation at
`
`the television receiver, but sideband
`
`intermodulation products limit the subjective picture improvement to 4 - 6 dB [30].
`
`2.2 Distribution Plant
`
`The distribution plant of a CATV system is an array of coaxial cables and amplifiers
`
`that carry signals from the headend to the home. The amplifiers on such a system are
`
`adjusted for unity gain across a cable segment, which means that the gain of an amplifier
`
`is exactly enough to overcome the loss in the previous cable segment. Amplifiers
`
`maintain unity gain with Automatic Gain Control (AGC)2, which allows the amplifier to
`
`adjust its gain automatically so that the signals leaving the amplifier are at the correct
`
`signal level. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to operate correctly as the loss
`
`characteristics of the cable change with time and temperature, but AGC alone is
`
`insufficient because signal
`
`loss is also a function of frequency. Signal loss is roughly
`
`proportional to the square-root of frequency, a characteristic called slope. Amplifiers
`
`have Automatic Slope Control (ASC)
`
`to correct for system slope by increasing the
`
`amplifier gain at higher frequencies. The control voltages for both of these amplitude
`
`controls are derived from either two special pilot tones or two designated video carriers.
`
`With two signals at different
`
`frequencies,
`
`the amplifier has enough information to
`
`2Referred to in some literature as Automatic Level Control
`
`19
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001078
`
`

`
`determine the proper gain and slope.
`
`CATV amplifiers are unidirectional, but two-way systems need amplification in both
`
`directions. Two-way amplifiers are really two amplifiers in a single box, one for each
`
`direction. Since both upstream and downstream signals travel on the same cable,
`
`the
`
`upstream and downstream channels are separated at each amplifier by duplezing filters3.
`
`The CATV headend feeds into the trunk cable of the distribution plant, and the
`
`amplifiers along the trunk cable maintain the proper signal level throughout the system.
`
`Trunk cables span a city but cannot go everywhere - the trunk cable is too expensive and
`
`the cable system itself allows only a limited number of amplifiers in cascade. Feeder
`
`cables branch out from the trunk cable and serve a limited area, such as a neighborhood.
`
`A bridging amplifier amplifies signals from the trunk and drives the feeder cable.
`
`If a
`
`feeder cable is long or serves many homes, additional amplifiers called line extenders are
`
`used. Branching from the feeder cable to the individual home is done with directional
`
`splitters called taps. Taps are directional and couple power predominantly from signals
`
`traveling away from the trunk cable. This is so that mismatch reflections from taps
`
`farther down the cable are attenuated and do not cause interference at the television
`
`receiver. As distance from the trunk increas

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket