throbber
llllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllLllllJglllll/Ellllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`United States Patent [19]
`Thompson et al.
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,594,726
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`[54] FREQUENCY AGILE BROADBAND
`COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
`
`['75] Inventors: Leo J- Thompson’ Lilbum; Gregory T-
`Dubberly, Atlanta; John A. Ritchie,
`Jr., Duluth, allof Ga.
`
`[73] Assignee: Scienti?c-Atlanta, Inc., Atlanta, Ga.
`
`3/1990 Allison, III et al. ................... .. 358/84
`4,912,552
`5/1990 Von Kohorn ...... ..
`.. 358/84
`4,926,255
`8/1990 Iwamura et a1. .
`. 379/53
`4,955,048
`4,961,109 10/1990 Tanaka .................................... .. 358/84
`(List continued on next page)
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`Wow/13956 11,1990 WIPO.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 219,848
`-
`_
`[22] Wed‘
`
`Mar‘ 30’ 1994
`Related US. Application Data
`
`[63] Continuation-in-part of Ser.No. 123,363, Sepv 17, 1993, Pat.
`No‘ 5’499’241‘
`[51] Int. Cl.6 ...................................................... .. H041 1/00
`[52] US. Cl. ......................... .. 370/485; 370/524; 455/51;
`455/6-1; 348/12
`[58] Field of Search ................................ .. 348/12, 11, 14,
`348/15; 370/691, 71, 73, 110.1, 112; 375/219,
`222, 202; 455/5.1, 6.10, 4.1, 6.3, 6.2, 3.1
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`U‘S- PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,1941 Goldsmith
`272367501
`9/1966 Beltmmi,
`3,275,746
`9/1970 Hauer ...................................... .. 370/76
`3,529,088
`3,992,589 11/1976 Kuegler ....... ..
`370/120
`4,099,202 7/1978 Cavanaugh - - - - - - - -
`- - - -- 358/35
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`A Passive Optical/Coax Hybrid Network Architecture for
`Delivery of CATV, Telephony and Data Services; 1993. by
`M‘ Meslya’ pp‘ 358-364‘
`Primary Examiner_—-Benedict V. Safourek
`Assistant Examiner_AJ-it Patel
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Jones & Askew
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`A broadband communications system for coupling tele
`phony or other digital networks to a CATV network. The
`system transmits a multiplex of telephony signals in the
`forward band of the CATV network. Each forward channel
`is QPR modulated on a carrier and contains multiple sub
`scriber telephony signals. The forward telephony channels
`are demodulated and demultiplexed by a plurality of sub
`scriber terminals into the individual telephony signals
`directed to an addressed subscriber. Audio
`control
`signals returning from the subscnber are digltized into
`standard telephony signals and QPSK modulated on a carrier
`onto the reverse band of the CATV network. The multiplic
`ity of reverse band telephony channels are demodulated and
`multiplexed into a standard telephony signal which is
`guegtly igterfaced to ;he telephonylnetwgrk. Eh? reverlse
`an I“? ‘1 ators are requ‘incy .ag‘ e a“ m0 “ ate te 6'
`hon signals from a subscnber 1n a selected one or more
`P
`y
`_
`_
`_
`frequency subbands Hi the reverse
`Of thC SUbSCI'lptlCH
`network, so as to provide selectably changeable frequencies
`and selectably variable bandwidth in the reverse band com
`mensurate with a selected subscriber communication fea
`ture. e.g. a single voice line, multiple voice lines, ISDN
`service, data communications services, security monitoring
`Services etc
`
`-
`
`-
`
`.
`
`370/951
`455/612
`
`370/1041
`370/941
`_ _ _ __ 358/34
`370/581
`358/133
`358/143
`- ' - -- 358/84
`379/53
`
`,
`
`,
`
`eme son e
`
`.
`
`5996119111 ‘1231
`1%;
`4,633,462 12/1986 Shine et all‘ n
`4709 418 11/1987 Fox etal. ........ ..
`’
`’
`-
`4,742,512
`5/1988 Akashi et al.
`4,748,618
`5/1988 Brown et a1. .
`4,761,634
`g/lggg Clark et a1_ _ _ ' _ _ _ _
`4,763,317
`8/1988 Lehman et al.
`4,849,811
`7/1989 Kleinerman .... ..
`4,887,158 12/1989 Guichard et al- -
`4,888,638 12/1939 Bob" - - - - - - - - - ~ - - -
`4,888,795 12/1989 Ando et al.
`
`4,891,694
`
`l/1990 Way . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`. . . .. 358/86
`
`’
`
`-
`
`4,905,080
`4,907,079
`
`358/84
`2/1990 Watanabe et al.
`3/1990 Turner et a1. ........................... .. 358/84
`
`113 Claims, 15 Drawing Sheets
`
`TELEPHONY
`TELEPHO
`NETWOR i’ NETWORK L?
`
`Flask
`NEDE
`
`crv
`,zz NETWORK !~'
`
`1
`
`INPUI ,
`INYEHFACE!
`'- 1;
`
`:
`
`HONY
`‘IE
`NE 7058 '9
`
`EMISE
`SERVKNG
`
`SUESCNEEH
`PREMISES
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001020
`
`

`
`5,594,726
`Page 2
`
`us. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4,974,252 11/1990 Osborne .................................. .. 379/92
`4,975,902 12/1990 Damany
`.370/62
`4995 071
`2/1991 Weber et al
`379/53
`5003384 3,1991 Burden ml
`358,84
`
`5,008,926
`5,014,125
`5,029,333
`
`. . . .. 379/54
`4/1991 Misholi . . . . . . . . . .
`_
`5/1991 Pocock et a1, __
`358/86
`7/1991 Graves et a1. ....................... ..m370/58.1
`
`5,063,587 11/1991 Semasa et a1. .......................... .. 379/53
`75,77
`1 H h‘
`.............................. ._
`4
`5’0
`1 12/199
`as mm
`358/8
`5,084,903
`1/1992 McNamara m1. .................... .. 375/18
`5,088,111
`2/1992 McNamara e181.
`375/18
`5,124,980
`6/1992 Maki ....... ..
`370/77
`370/50
`9/1994 Beierle er a1
`5,351,234
`8/1995 Beveridge ............................... .. 348/13
`5,440,335
`5,469,495 11/1995 Beveridge ............................... ._ 379/56
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001021
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 1 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`TELEPHONY1 0 TELEPHONY
`NETWORK N NETWORK l9
`
`1
`
`FIBER
`
`CW
`22 NETWORK L?
`
`22
`
`INTERFACE
`
`TELEPHONY
`NETWORK 1;?
`
`32
`
`::
`TELEPHONY
`NETWORK l9
`FIG. 1
`
`26 \24
`
`28
`
`SERVING
`AREA 29
`
`41
`
`39
`CLASSS
`T SWITCH
`
`_
`
`245,55]
`LOCAL
`"
`T—-->RUNK
`sw
`.\
`"-1
`LELNEIWOHK 24: D_S?
`IJEMux
`14'
`< iis?‘?ii R <1
`E24£@(—~;} O
`POT
`<—i
`,
`(V
`
`FOR
`
`FIG. 2
`
`32
`(-45
`(-43
`, \ Q DST g E
`I
`:
`INPUT
`. FOT
`.
`INTERFACE
`I
`,
`
`DSI
`<.
`1
`\
`
`OUTPUT
`INTERFACE
`f
`
`A
`CW ,2
`NETWORK ~
`In
`_°
`A
`_°
`H
`_°
`_° SUBSCRIBER
`_,
`PREMISES
`_°
`53
`—@
`3
`Ed
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001022
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 2 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`/—REVERSE BAND
`/
`DIPLEx CROSSOvER REGION
`
`CATv
`AELE8CJ§II8N
`
`1
`
`FORWARD
`/ BAND
`
`I
`
`5 so so
`
`/
`
`I
`i
`PRESENTLY
`UNUSIED
`I
`I
`
`550
`
`800 MHz
`
`480 DSQ'
`RF TELEPHONY A“ 5OMHZ
`FREQUENCY
`/
`ALLOCATION ~>| I<—50kHz
`I
`—>I
`
`I
`I
`l
`l
`I
`l
`I
`I
`l
`l
`I
`l
`I
`l
`IN!
`
`I V
`
`BOMI-Iz
`5MH2
`REVERSE
`BAND
`
`15MHz
`480 089'
`
`I<—SMHz
`
`I
`
`2
`
`5
`4
`3
`‘5W2
`FORWARD
`BAND
`
`)
`
`550 MHz
`
`II
`
`5248 TELEPHONY
`5.12
`MHz MHZ UPSTREAM
`/
`388 DS¢
`
`TELEPHONY
`29.824 MHz DOWNSTREAM
`/
`480 DS¢
`
`\mH I<-128kHz
`/
`I
`\ W
`
`UP1 UP2 UPS "-UP194 SOMHz
`
`H I<~3MHz
`'I_III_I H H III
`
`<- 15.84 MHz ->\
`
`UPSTREAM
`CHANNELS
`UP194
`UP1,UP2
`DSO-I .DSO-2
`BSD-388
`OPSK
`
`DOWNSTREAM CHANNELS
`DN1,DN2
`DN48O
`(EACH 3 MHz BAND TO
`CARRY D52 (96 B808)
`lN OPR - INCLUDING DIRECTORY
`CHANNEL AND SIGNALING CHANNEL
`
`FIG. 3C
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001023
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 3 0f 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`41g D
`
`
`
`"rim ............................ 1 2 mm
`
`G |
`m m x
`
`4
`
`D now D E
`
`
`
`......... 1. OR lL
`r CW IL
`TILE 0 PE 4
`
`D E C A ‘I, 3 TA
`Q.u UF D PR
`LR 5 IT
`AE 4 M
`
`
`
`$Wm / W \ 2
`
`HAN E 3*
`
`mm 2 .
`
`QM
`
`n P .
`
`. R1 _ D u
`
`n O m
`
`m N1 + 2 1+ 3 \ 5
`m 1X X X . X m EU U U U
`.MM M M M
`
`NE
`
`FIG. 4
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001024
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 4 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`II
`DEMOD1ULATOR
`- _..____.I
`I
`DS¢
`03-0 Ii
`TUNER/
`DEMODéJLATOR
`MUX 1
`6-----
`Ir
`TUNEFI/
`DEMODULATOR
`3
`
`, ................................... ..
`
`TUNER/
`
`n -
`
`RF TELEPHONY
`
`OUTPUT
`INTERFACE 35
`
`_U_-_______--___ ‘P 12’
`
`TUNER/
`DEMODULATOR
`480
`
`f 66
`ADDRESSING
`AND
`CONTROL
`
`68
`
`70:
`I
`IDS-3 OPTICAL
`TRANSMITTER :
`
`--______________-_.6"-- (P
`
`.................................... .
`
`TELEPHONY TERMINAL (CIU) /— 82
`
`,
`
`L89
`
`ADDRESSING /“ 90
`AND
`
`CONTROL
`
`TUNER/
`DEMODULATOR
`
`DS2/DSD 08¢
`DEMUX --> LINE
`
`RF DRoP /
`
`MODULATOR
`
`r84
`
`CATV
`TERMINAL
`
`SUBSCRIBER 30
`PREMISES w
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001025
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 5 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`51
`
`D31
`
`CH1
`
`W
`V
`
`52 ’\‘
`V
`D51
`
`CR
`
`*\-v
`46
`
`DATA .
`'
`
`V
`CLK EBuffer
`
`‘1
`54/-X
`T
`EN
`DATA
`V
`STUFF REQ 5
`
`12.524
`OSC L/
`MHz
`
`56
`,
`
`'
`
`D
`
`55
`
`=
`3
`
`BUFFER .
`
`DATA
`
`DATA
`
`D51
`
`Egg‘
`
`D 1
`
`D31
`
`CH2
`C333]
`D31
`CH4
`
`DATA
`CLK Buffer
`DATA
`CLK Buffer
`EN
`DATA
`STUFF HEQ
`CLK Buffer.
`DATA
`"
`DS2 CLK
`
`EN
`I STUFF REQ
`
`STUFF REQ Mux
`—
`
`1
`
`;
`
`FIG. 7A
`
`COM DATA
`ALARM
`
`SCRAMBLER
`1/ 2 8-1
`T
`
`DATA,/5
`FRAM
`DATA 12 To 1
`MUX
`
`M1
`
`;
`~
`
`DS2
`RE DATA
`YNC
`
`CR BIT L
`
`DS2 CLK —
`
`I
`4 TO
`DECO E
`
`EN1
`EN2
`EN3
`EN4
`
`C
`CH3 STUF LOC
`CH2 STUF LOC
`CH1 STUF LOC
`
`CH BIT LOC
`
`I
`
`'
`
`CH1 SR
`CH2 SR
`CH3 SR
`CH4 SR
`CH EXT necooen
`V
`
`0 3”
`
`CH4 STUF LOC
`CH3 STUF LOC
`CH2 STUF LOC
`CH1 STUF LOC
`
`%49
`
`%6
`
`i
`
`7 4
`'
`
`DS2 CLK
`
`CR BIT LOC
`
`CR BIT TYPE
`
`SUBFRAME
`FIG. 7B
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001026
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 6 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`e
`
`EwmEDZ
`
`
`
`|EZZ<IO ....................................... -.
`
`
`
`w n | | | | I | | 1 | 1 | | | I I | | | v L
`
`
`
`m2 1 . 1
`
`
`
`X mwoOozm wBx mm wmmm
`
`n2 m v2
`
`
`
`mmEm>zO0 1 mob/D3002
`
`
`
` ll . \l mi! - o:
`
`
`
`wm3._.<mo<3O mmSI _
`
`N: 1 ESE O
`

`
`
`
`wzz<zwa Q2
`
`
`
`55% Q2 mm 5&8 Q2 g
`
`N2 50 z_
`2m
`NE 8 _ _. .INE 8
`
`1 m8.
`
`Eaoozw
`SE28
`5&3 lw9|v
`
`
`5o
`
`
`— NIE 3%.?
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001027
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 7 0f 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`.
`
`Multiframe definition
`
`16 data bytes
`1
`O 1
`1
`subframeO C1 0 0 1
`16 data bytes
`subframe1
`0 1 DL DL AL A B C
`16 data bytes
`subframe2 C2 0 O 1
`1
`0 1
`1
`subframe3
`0 1 DL DL AL A B C 16 data bytes
`subframe4 C3 0 0 1
`1
`O 1
`1
`16 data bytes
`subframeS
`1
`1 DL DL AL A B C 16 data bytes
`subframe6 C4 0 0 1
`1
`0 1
`1
`16 data bytes
`subframe7
`0 1 DL DL AL A B C 16 data bytes
`
`I --------------- -- total of 17 bytes per subframe --------------- --|
`2 ms subframe period
`68 kb/s data rate
`
`SUBFRAME
`1
`I__I_=__B | aDsD DATA BYTES | DL [Rose DATA BYTESI DL | sDsD DATA BYTESW
`FRAMING R'ié' ________________________________________________________________________________ "
`(7 bits SYNC
`,.IIII13:::3:._I=:;;;::::IIIII:
`DATABYTES
`1BitCBC) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- __
`4 |
`4 SUBFRAMES = 1 SUPERFRAME
`
`|
`
`FIG. 9B
`
`DIRECTORY SIGNALING
`CHANNEL CHANNEL
`
`
`
`1 8 [FB | |.__F.B I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DIR I SIG i DIR | SIG l
`
`
`
`
`
`96 0808 '11:::::;;:;;;;;:h...e?1111;111:111?‘ 96 DSO'S
`
`“i
`
`8 SUBFRAMES = 1 SUPERFRAME
`
`FIG. 9C
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001028
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`J
`
`14, 1997
`
`,m8tM...hS
`
`51
`
`
`
`m<H<o._<.Em
`
`5,594,726
`
`
`
`oz_s_:._om_2>m
`
`
`
`oz__2:.:m
`
`m_n_O._m_>zm
`
`mobmmo
`
`
`
`
`
`..._n_._E”_u_:m_._.._3_>_
`
`A~I_2~_o5._mzz<:o
`
`$9232
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001029
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 9 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`_2oE§
`
`mzo:5_z=_228m
`
`az<mn_<omm"
`
`E952"
`
`xwdao
`
`m.u.:..__u_
`
`ma.5.wz:s§m
`
`maSea2..3;M
`
`W§.5_oz:sa_m
`
`
`
`¢m:._oEzoomm<mE<o
`
`mamE55
`
`
`
`.Ma.-&mn_-wmwa
`
`mama§_
`
`mmtzam
`
`F_.GE
`
`m£%o.§§N>zo_$E
`9&8«No._.
`
`osaoamz
`
`.o.__mo
`
`
`
`
`
`SE.:2:m_o<U_E=__Sea:
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001030
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 10 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`
`
`
`
`:2:m_oEEE_E2925
`
`SE282:mm_Eos
`
`om<§ou_
`
`oosma
`
`$15mo
`
`8s_§z_<55
`
`mega5.as
`
`
`
`E2..0
`
`_.920m2:UE;oz:
`
`
`
`o_._m0:00
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001031
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 11 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`1:;
`
`~12moTmm
`
`
`
`~I_2...mm.m~DC.“.ON~.mNI_2¢NOw
`
`w._m<z3mu8.-0
`
`2.45
`
`405200
`
`mm:.__".
`
`5592
`an:Ez_5,3can:Ez_53_
`
`mum.om_E:oEzoo_
`
`
`
`
`
`Em.cm_E:oEzooxz:_xabmoNV<Eo.205H.39.MEo<m_#m>o
`
`
`mm._._Om._.ZOOJOEHZOO8Q53
`89.Wmz:
`
`32dzz<:ov
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001032
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 12 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`
`
`
`
`NT_—>_Ommw.VNU~I$_omnmm~:2m..&..8._._n_m.__®<E52.HE.NT=2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mmm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2m,_%,HJ/2,22¢?owm
`
`
`
`mmEm>zoo22,00mm_.mm>ZOOn5
`
`NIE82:N15.83
`
`z_“E
`
`3...n.¥l
`
`~12o3.m_-Q8"83
`
`N12332”o_J22N128mom.
`
`
`
`SE30:SE28
`
`Ex3:uama-mmouzME:omm.9.-om_.m
`
`mn_m._.w~Ix8.
`
`M_mmmH
`
`~Ix89.
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001033
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 13 0f 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`128 kHz
`CHANNEL
`SUBSCRIBER
`(CARRIER
`IDENTIFICATION SERVICE
`CENTER
`(SID)
`LEVEL
`FREQUENCY)
`UP1 (5.120 MHz) 81
`DEFAULT
`(1 LINE)
`UNUSED
`
`NOISY
`CHANNEL
`FLAG
`ERROR
`0:8
`COUNT &
`SIGNAUJNG
`1=NOISY
`THRESHOLD
`STATUS
`ON HOOK N/A 256 0
`
`TELCO
`DSOII
`USO-6
`
`UP2 (5.248 MHz) S2
`
`1 LINE
`
`080-?
`
`OFF HOOK 6
`
`256 0
`
`S2
`
`1 LINE
`
`DSO-204
`
`ON HOOK N/A 256
`
`UP3 (5.376 MHz) S3
`
`ISDN (1 B)
`
`USO-12
`
`RING
`
`12
`
`256 0
`
`s3
`
`ISDN (1 B)
`
`080-13
`
`35
`
`256 o
`
`UP4 (5.504 MHz) s3
`
`ISDN (0)
`
`use-144
`
`(1/4 D80)
`
`20
`
`25s
`
`UNUSED
`
`UP20 (7.552 MHZ) S4
`
`T1
`
`USO-155
`
`OFF HOOK 260 256
`
`1
`
`0
`
`I
`UP32 (9.088 MHz)
`
`DSO'S)
`
`a
`
`Z
`
`S4
`
`T1
`
`080-179
`
`RING
`
`15
`
`256
`
`;
`
`UNUSED
`
`UP130 (21.632 MHz) 85 SECURITY
`MONITOR
`S6 SECURITY
`MONITOR
`
`N/A
`
`NORMAL
`
`USO-191
`
`ALARM
`
`UP194 (29.824 MHz)
`
`SIGNALLING
`
`N/A
`
`(EACH 128 kHz CHANNEL CARRIES TWO 64 kbps DSO'S, ONE 16 kbps DIGITAL
`OVERHEAD CHANNEL, QPSK MODULATED, IN ONE 108 kHz BAND WITH 20 kHz
`GUARD BAND)
`
`FIG. 15
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001034
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 14 of 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`f CALLING SUBSCRIBER
`60’
`INITIATES TELEPHONE /
`CALL
`
`V<
`LINE CARD 9s
`A/DCONvERSION _/
`
`605
`
`/
`ADDOVERHEAD
`FRAMING BITS
`
`608
`‘J
`
`CHCCODEGENERATOH
`
`’
`, ORC COMPUTATION
`
`612
`J
`
`up“
`CAHNERFREOUENCY
`9
`
`FREQUENCY
`
`HIU 301
`(ADDRESSING AND
`CONTROL UNIT 90) CHANGE ’
`A
`.
`
`I
`
`:
`E
`
`V
`
`QPSK MODU LATE
`
`615
`/
`
`,l/
`
`up"
`
`620
`, TUNER/CONVERTER J
`
`E
`f
`5
`:
`E
`
`I
`l
`
`640
`(
`TELEPHONY
`DATA TO TELCO
`CHCGENERATOH
`
`EXCEEDS PREDETERMINED THRESHOLD
`
`OPSK DEMODULATE
`
`625
`/
`
`630
`
`632
`
`INCREMENT ERROR
`COUNT FOR
`DESIGNATED CARRIER
`
`FIG. 16
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001035
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Jan. 14, 1997
`
`Sheet 15 0f 15
`
`5,594,726
`
`CALLING
`SUBSCRIBER
`INITIATES
`CALL
`
`701
`
`I
`‘I
`II
`I
`
`INCOMING
`CALL RECEIVED
`FOR SUBSCRIBER
`(ON PARTICULAR
`INCOMING DSO
`LINE)
`
`702
`
`DETERMINE
`IDENTITY OF
`/_\ CUSTOMER
`705
`
`\
`ASCERTAIN REQUESTED
`70m & AUTHORIZED SERVICE
`I
`LEVEL
`
`E.G. INCOMING ISDN
`E.G. INCOMING SINGLE
`VOICE
`
`I
`
`V
`
`ISDN=2 DSO
`REG VOICE: 1 DSO
`
`~ SECURITY: POLL CIU
`
`,
`DETERMINE # D80 3
`714“ REQUIIRERRLETD
`I
`388 AVAILABLE
`/,\ DETERMINE'AVAILABLE
`713
`UNUSED D80 8 8‘ REVERSE IN REvERsE CI-IANNEL
`CHANNELS uPn
`
`V
`ASSIGN SELECTED
`DSO'S TO REvERsE
`CIIANNELLIPn
`
`I
`I
`
`775
`
`(UPDATE SERVICE
`LEVEL TABLE)
`
`\
`TRANSMIT SELECTED REVERSE
`CHANNEL FREQUENCY TO SUBSCRIBER
`AND
`IDENTITY OF FORWARD CHANNEL
`DSO FOR INCOMING SIGNALS
`IN FORWARD DIRECTORY CHANNEL
`
`I
`IL
`
`720
`
`Tim )
`
`FIG. 17
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001036
`
`

`
`5,594,726
`
`1
`FREQUENCY AGILE BROADBAND
`COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
`
`CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATION
`
`This application is a continuation-in-part of application
`Ser. No. 08/123,363, ?led Sep. 17, 1993, now US. Pat. No.
`5,499,241, entitled “Broadband Communications System”.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The system pertains generally to broadband communica
`tions systems, such as cable or community antenna televi
`sion (CATV) networks, and is more particularly directed to
`communicating telephony signals, and other or similar sig
`nals, over CATV and equivalent networks.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`2
`trunk system typically comprises of a combination of
`coaxial cable and optical ?bers with trunk ampli?ers peri
`odically spaced to compensate for attenuation of the signals
`along the line. Such modern trunk systems utilizing ?ber
`optics and coaxial cable are often referred to as “?ber/coax”
`systems.
`The “distribution systems” utilize a combination of opti
`cal ?bers and coaxial cable to deliver signals from the trunk
`system into individual neighborhoods for distribution to
`subscribers. In order to compensate for various losses and
`distortions inherent in the transmission of signals along the
`cable network, line-extender ampli?ers are placed at certain
`intervals along the length of the cable. Each ampli?er is
`given just enough gain to overcome the attenuation loss of
`the section of the cable that precedes it. A distribution
`network is also called the “feeder”.
`There is a strong desire in the CATV and telecommuni
`cations industry to push optical ?ber as deeply as possible
`into communities, since optical ?ber communications can
`carry more signals than conventional networks. Due to
`technological and economic limitations, it has not yet
`proved feasible to provide ?ber to the subscriber’s home.
`Present day “?ber deep” CATV distribution systems includ
`ing optical ?bers and coaxial cable are often called “?ber
`To-the-Serving-Area” or “FFSA” systems.
`“Subscriber drops” are taps in the distribution system that
`feed individual 75 .Q coaxial cable lines into subscribers’
`television sets or subscriber terminals, often referred to as
`“subscriber premises equipment” or “customer premises
`equipment” (“CPE”). Since the tap is the ?nal service point
`immediately prior to the subscriber premises, channel autho
`rization circuitry is often placed in the tap to control access
`to scrambled or premium programming.
`Cable distribution systems were originally designed to
`distribute television and radio signals in the “downstream”
`direction only (i.e., from a central headend location to
`multiple subscriber locations, also referred to as the “for
`ward” path). Therefore, the component equipment of many
`older cable systems, which includes ampli?ers and compen
`sation networks, is typically adapted to deliver signals in the
`forward direction only. For downstream transmissions, typi
`cal CATV systems provide a series of video channels, each
`6 MHz in bandwidth, which are frequency division multi
`plexed across the forward band, in the 50 MHz to 550 MHZ
`region of the frequency spectrum. As ?ber is moved more
`deeply into the serving areas in ?ber/coax and Fl‘SA con
`?gurations, the bandwidth of the coax portion is expected to
`increase to over 1 GHz.
`The advent of pay-per-view services and other interactive
`television applications has fueled the development of bidi
`rectional or “two-way” cable systems that also provide for
`the transmission of signals from the subscriber locations
`back to the headend. This is often referred to as the
`“upstream” direction or the “reverse” path. This technology
`has allowed cable operators to provide many new interactive
`subscriber services on the network, such as impulse-pay
`per-view (IPPV). In many CATV systems, the band of
`signals from 5 MHz to 30 MHz is used for reverse path
`signals.
`However, the topology of a typical CATV system, which
`looks like a “tree and branch” with the headend at the base
`and branching outwardly to the subscriber’s, creates tech
`nical di?iculties in transmitting signals in the upstream
`direction back to the headend. In the traditional tree and
`branch cable network, a common set of downstream signals
`are distributed to every subscriber home in the network.
`Upstream signals ?owing from a single subscriber toward
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`In order to introduce the present invention and the prob
`lems that it solves, it is useful to overview a conventional
`CATV broadband communication system, and then examine
`certain prior approaches to problems encountered when
`attempting to introduce telephony signals into the broadband
`environment.
`Conventional Cable Television Systems (CATV)
`Cable television systems, sometimes referred to as com
`munity-antenna television (CATV) systems, are broadband
`communications networks of coaxial cable and optical ?ber
`that distribute television, audio, and data signals to sub
`scriber homes or businesses. In a typical CATV system, a
`single advantageously located antenna array feeding a cable
`network supplies each individual subscriber with a usable
`television signal.
`'
`Since the pioneer days, cable networks have experienced
`enormous growth and expansion in the United States, par
`ticularly in urban networks. It is estimated that CATV
`networks currently pass approximately 90% of the popula
`tion in the United States, with approximately 60—65% of all
`households actually being connected. While cable systems
`originally had very simple architectures and provided a
`limited number of different television signals, the increase in
`the number of television broadcasters and television owners
`over the last several decades has resulted in much more
`complex and costly modern cable distribution systems.
`A typical CATV system comprises four main elements: a
`headend, a trunk system, a distribution system, and sub
`scriber drops.
`The “headend” is a signal reception and processing center
`that collects, organizes and distributes signals. The headend
`receives satellite-delivered video and audio programming,
`over-the-air broadcast TV station signals, and network feeds
`delivered by terrestrial microwave and other communication
`systems. In addition, headends may inject local broadcasting
`into the package of signals sent to subscribers such as
`commercials and live programming created in a studio.
`The headend contains signal-processing equipment that
`controls the output level of the signals, regulates the signal
`to-noise ratio, and suppresses undesired out-of-band signals.
`Typical signal-processing equipment includes a heterodyne
`processor or a demodulator-modulator pair. The headend
`then modulates received signals onto separate radio fre
`quency (RF) carriers and combines them for transmission
`over the cable system.
`The “trunk system” is the main artery of the CATV
`65
`network that canies the signals from the headend to a
`number of distribution points in the community. A modem
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001037
`
`

`
`3
`the headend pass by all the other upstream subscriber homes
`on the segment of distribution cable that serves the neigh
`borhood.
`The standard tree and branch topology has not proven to
`be well suited for sending signals from each subscriber
`location back to the headend, as is required for bidirectional
`communication services. Tree and branch cable distribution
`systems are the most ef?cient in terms of cable and distri
`bution usage when signals have to be distributed in only the
`downstream direction. A cable distribution system is gener
`ally a very noisy environment, especially in the reverse path.
`Interfering signals may originate from a number of common
`sources, such as airplanes passing overhead or from Citizens
`Band (CB) radios that operate at a common frequency of 27
`MHz, which is within the typical reverse channel bandwidth
`of CATV networks. Since the reverse direction of a tree and
`branch con?guration appears as an inverted tree, noise is
`propagated from multiple distribution points to a single
`point, the headend. Therefore, all of the individual noise
`contributions collectively add together to produce a very
`noisy environment and a communications problem at the
`headend.
`Present day FFSA systems facilitate the communication
`of signals in the reverse direction by dividing the subscriber
`base of a cable network into manageable serving areas of
`approximately 400-2500 subscribers. This allows for the
`reuse of limited reverse band frequency ranges for smaller
`groups of subscribers. The headend serves as the central hub
`of a star con?guration to which each serving area is coupled
`by an optical communications path ending in a ?ber node.
`The ?ber node is connected to the serving area subscribers
`over a coaxial cable distribution sub-network of feeders and
`drops in each serving area. In the FTSA con?guration, some
`of the signals in the forward direction (e.g., television
`program signals) are identical for each serving area so that
`the same subscriber service is provided to all subscribers. In
`the reverse direction, the con?guration provides an indepen
`dent spectrum of frequencies con?ned to the particular
`serving area. The FTSA architecture thus provides the
`advantage of multiplying the bandwidth of the reverse
`portions of the frequency spectrum times the number of
`serving areas.
`The Desire for Telephony Service
`The ever-expanding deployment of ?ber optic technology
`in CATV systems across the country has cable operators
`looking to provide a whole new range of interactive services
`on the cable network. One area that is of particular interest
`is telephony service. Because of recent advances in tech
`nology as well as the loosening of regulations, the once
`distinct lines between the cable television network and the
`telephone network have blurred considerably. Currently
`there is a great demand for a broadband communication
`system that can e?iciently provide telephone service over
`the existing cable distribution network.
`Moreover, there is substantial interest expressed by tele
`phone system operating companies in the idea of increased
`bandwidth for provision of new services to telephone sub
`scribers, such as television; interactive computing, shop
`ping, and entertainment; videoconferencing, etc. Present day
`“copper” based telephony service (so called because of the
`use of copper wires for telephone lines) is very bandwidth
`limited—about 3 kHz-—and cannot provide for such
`enhanced services by the telephone companies without
`massive changes to the telephone networks infrastructure.
`Existing communications systems, however, have not
`proven to be well suited for the transmission of telephony
`signals on the cable network. A system for transmitting
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,594,726
`
`15
`
`20
`
`4
`telephony signals must be con?gured to allow single point to
`single point distribution (i.e., from a single subscriber to a
`single subscriber). However, unlike the telephone compa
`nies with their well-established national two-way networks,
`the cable industry is fragmented into thousands of individual
`systems that are generally incapable of communicating with
`one another. The cable network is instead ideally con?gured
`for single point to multiple point signal transmission (i.e.,
`from a single headend downstream to multiple subscriber
`locations).
`Moreover, CATV systems do not have the switching
`capabilities necessary to provide point to point communi
`cations. A communications system for the transmission of
`telephone signals must therefore be compatible with the
`public switched telephone networks (“PSTN”) operated by
`the telephone operating companies. To be useful in the
`carriage of telephony signals, a CATV network must be able
`to seamlessly interface to a telephony network at a point
`where it is commercially viable to carry telephony signals.
`It must also provide signals that can pass to other parts of the
`interconnected telephone systems without extensive modu
`lation or protocol changes to thereby become part of the
`international telephone system.
`Telephony on Data Communications Network
`One approach taken to provide a bidirectional broadband
`communications system is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,084,903
`of McNamara et al., assigned to First Paci?c Networks
`(hereinafter referred to as “FPN”). This patent describes an
`approach to the communication of telephony signals that
`appears primarily designed to operate in an o?ice-type data
`communications network environment (e.g., Ethernet). Data
`communications networks are typically bandwidth sym
`metrical, that is, the forward and reverse signal paths con
`sume equal amounts of bandwidth, and the topology is star
`or serial, not tree and branch. In contrast, CATV networks
`are bandwidth asymmetrical, with heavy allocation of band
`width for use in the downstream direction and limited
`upstream bandwidth. As the present inventors have discov
`ered, the noise problem in the upstream direction is di?icult
`in a broadband bandwidth-asymmetrical, tree and branch
`topology, as contrasted with a symmetrical of?ce-type data
`communications network.
`The system described in the FPN patent employs two
`different modulation schemes for communicating informa
`tion between a central headend and a plurality of subscriber
`nodes. For downstream communications, the FPN system
`transmits signals continuously in a plurality of 6 MHZ
`bandwidth charmels. In a preferred embodiment, an AM
`PSK modulator is used in the downstream path. For
`upstream communications, the FPN system transmits pack
`ets of information in bursts to a headend using an offset
`quadrature phase shift keyed (OQPSK) modulator.
`While the FPN communications system may be suitable
`for communicating telephony signals on a data communi
`cations network such as Ethernet, it does not solve certain
`problems that occur in the carriage of telephony signals on
`a broadband cable network. Due to the single point to
`multiple point con?guration (tree and branch) of the CATV
`network, upstream transmissions of telephony signals have
`to contend with multiple noise sources as the branch signals
`from each subscriber are merged together toward the head
`end. It is believed, however, that the burst mode approach
`used in the reverse path of the FPN system is particularly
`susceptible to these noise issues. Speci?cally, it is believed
`that the framing bits and sequencing of the data streams are
`susceptible to interruption when an interference signal is
`sustained for any signi?cant length of time (i.e., for longer
`
`ARRIS883IPRI0001038
`
`

`
`5
`than the length of a data frame) anywhere within one of the
`6 MHz bandwidth channels used to carry telephony signals.
`It is further believed that the interruption of the framing
`bits may result in the loss of content in all telephone
`conversations represented within the data frame interrupted.
`In a data communications environment, this signal interrup
`tion may only be noticeable as a slowdown on the network,
`and, though inconvenient, may be considered acceptable.
`However, such degradation of signal quality in a cable and
`telephony environment is undesirable and may be unaccept
`able.
`There is no discussion in the FPN patent of any means for
`insertion or removal of telephony signals from and to the
`public switched telephone network (PSTN). The FPN sys
`tem appears to provide only a local area telephone network
`designed primarily for inter-office communications (such as
`o?ice to o?ice intercom), as only limited access to the PSTN
`is suggested. There are a number of diiferent locations in the
`FPN equipment where telephony signal insertion and
`removal could occur, but the patent does not describe any
`means for signal insertion or removal, or discuss any of the
`issues associated with signal insertion and removal. At best,
`it appears that telephony signals would be inserted and
`removed at nodes directly connected to the broadband media
`(e.g., the coaxial cable), as suggested at col. 3, line 30. The
`patent does not indicate how such insertion and removal
`directly from the broadband medium should best be effected,
`and is silent on issues involving multiple telephony chan
`nels.
`Therefore, there is a need for a broadband communica
`tions system that is compatible with the existing public
`switched telephone networks and that is not sensitive to
`noise or other interference issues, particularly in the reverse
`path. There is also a need for a broadband communications
`system that is bandwidth ef?cient and provides a higher
`spectral e?iciency than present systems, thereby increasing
`the number of subscribers that may be served by each
`broadband network with telephony and enhanced services
`offered by CATV system operators, telephone company
`operating companies, and others.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention includes methods and apparatus for pro
`viding broadband communications, including bidirectional
`telephony communications, over a cable distribution net
`work. In particular, the present invention provides an inte
`grated CATV/telephony system that is compatible with
`today’s public switched telephone networks and can also
`deliver video, data, security monitoring, and other services
`without affecting current in-home wiring or equipment.
`In one embodiment, the method includes communicating
`telephony signals from a telephony network to the CATV
`subscribers in the forward band of the cable network and
`communicating telephony signals from the CATV subscrib
`ers to the telephony network in the reverse band of the cable
`network.
`In another preferred embodiment, the method includes the
`digitizing of individual subscriber telephony signals into a
`multiplexed signal that is carried on a frequency division
`multiplexed (FDM) carrier in the forward band of the cable
`network. The digital multiplexed signal is quadrature partial
`response (QPR) modulated on a carrier which is positioned
`in an otherwise unused portion of the CATV network
`forward band. In the illustrated embodiment, the QPR signal
`is preferably approximately 3 MHz in bandwidth and easily
`?ts in a standard 6 MHz video channel. In another preferred
`
`45
`
`SO
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`5,594,726
`
`6
`embodiment, a pair of the QPR signals can be placed in an
`otherwise unused channel in the cable line to utilize approxi
`mately 6 MHZ of bandwidth. By making a system which
`uses a robust digital signal, the b

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket