throbber
.I. Fluid Me&. (1988), O O ~ . 187, pp. 507532
`Printed in Great Britain
`
`507
`
`The dynamics of towed flexible cylinders
`Part 1. Neutrally buoyant elements
`
`By A. P. D O W L I N G
`Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street,
`Cambridge C H 2 lPZ, UK
`
`(Received 20 March 1987)
`
`The transverse vibrations of a thin, flexible cylinder under nominally constant
`towing conditions are investigated. The cylinder is neutrally buoyant, of radius uA
`with a free end and very small bending stiffness. As the cylinder is towed with
`velocity U , the tangential drag causes the tension in the cylinder to increase from zero
`a t its free end to a maximum a t the towing point. Transverse vibrations of the
`cylinder are opposed by a normal viscous drag force. Both the normal and tangential
`viscous forces can be described conveniently in terms of drag coefficients C, and
`C,. The ratio C,/C,
`has a crucial effcct on the motion of the cylinder. The form of
`thc transverse displacement is found to be greatly influenced by the existence of a
`critical point a t which the effect of tension in the cylinder is cancelled by a fluid
`loading term. Matched asymptotic expansions are used to extend the solution across
`this critical point to apply the downstream boundary condition. Displacements well
`upstream of the critical point have a simple form, while nearer to the critical point
`the solution depends on whether the normal drag coefficient C, is greater or less than
`one-half C,.
`The typical acoustic streamer geometry considered is found to be stable to
`transverse displacements a t all towing speeds. Forced perturbations of frequency w
`are investigated. At low frequencies they propagate effectively along the cylinder
`with speed U . At higher frequencies they are attenuated.
`The effect of a rope drogue of length I,,
`radius aR, is investigated. Provided
`is very small, the drogue has the same effect as a small increase in the
`ol,a,/Ua,
`length of the cylinder. However a t higher frequencies and for small values of the ratio
`C,/C,
`attaching a drogue may be disadvantageous because it reduces the
`attenuation of high-frequency disturbances as they propagate down the cylinder.
`
`1. Introduction
`Towed instrumentation packages in the form of long flexible cylinders are used
`extensively to detect and analyse acoustic signals in the ocean. A typical geometry
`is illustrated in figure 1 . It consists of a heavier-than-water cable attached a t one end
`to a ship and a t the other to a neutrally buoyant slender cylinder containing a sonar
`array. This cylinder is sometimes referred to as an acoustic ‘ streamer ’ or ‘ array ’.
`There may possibly be a rope at the downstream end of the cylinder acting as a
`drogue. If such an arrangement is to give good resolution of the acoustic signals it
`detects, the instantaneous shape of the acoustic streamer must be known. When the
`ship maintains a constant velocity, the cylinder is straight and horizontal. However,
`changes in the ship’s path will make i t deform. In these two papers we analyse linear
`departures from the ideal case due, for example, to changes in ship speed or heading.
`
`17
`
`FLM 187
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 1
`
`

`

`508
`
`A . P. Dowling
`
`-
`
`Heavier-than-water cable
`
`Rope drogue 3 Neutrally' buoyant
`
`cylinder containing
`sonar array
`FIGURE 1 . Typical geometry for a ship towing an array
`
`The aim of this work is to provide a simple means by which the shape of the towed
`system can be predicted either from the ship's path or from an accelerometer a t the
`leading edge of the cylinder. Part 1 deals with the displacements of the neutrally
`buoyant elements, while Part 2 investigates the propagation of disturbances along
`the negatively buoyant cable. The results of Part 1 provide the downstream
`boundary conditions for the cable in Part 2.
`Computer programs have been developed to calculate the three-dimensional path
`of a towed system as a ship manoeuvres (see for example Ivers & Mudie 1973, 1975;
`Huston & Kamman 1981 ; Sanders 1982; Ablow & Schechter 1983). In general these
`packages require considerable computing resources and, if they are to run in real
`time, certain simplifying assumptions must be made. Since we are investigating
`small departures from constant velocity, we adopt a different approach, and linearize
`the transverse equations of motion. Pa'idoussis (1966, 1968) derived a linearized form
`of the transverse momentum equation for neutrally buoyant flexible cylinders with
`an axial flow. A term has been omitted from these early versions and Pa'idoussis
`(1973) gives the correct form of the equation of motion. Disturbances of frequency
`o satisfy a linear fourth-order differential equation. The coefficient of the fourth
`derivative depends on the bending stiffness of the cylinder. Perturbations of
`cylinders whose response depends on their bending stiffness have been extensively
`studied in the literature (see for example Hawthorne 1961 ; Pa'idoussis 1966, 1968,
`1973 ; Lee 1978 ; Prokhorovich, Prokhorovich & Smirnov 1982).
`However, acoustic streamers are very long in comparison with their radius a*, and,
`for motions with wavelengths comparable with the cylinder length, the restoring
`force due to bending stiffness is exceedingly small. It is therefore appropriate to
`recognize this and neglect the effect of the bending stiffness over most of the cylinder.
`This approximation has been made by Ortloff & Ives (1969), Kennedy (1980),
`Kennedy & Strahan (1981) and Lee & Kennedy (1985). The differential equation
`then reduces to second order, the coeficient of the highest derivative being
`T ( x ) -ponai U 2 , where T ( x ) is the tension in the cylinder and varies along its length.
`U is the mean flow velocity and pa the density of the surrounding fluid; pa nai U 2
`arises due to the effect of fluid loading.
`In $ 2 4 we consider a thin, neutrally buoyant, flexible cylinder with its
`downstream end unrestrained. T ( x ) then vanishes a t this free end, and increases
`along the cylinder due to tangential drag. It is well known that the transverse
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 2
`
`

`

`Dynamics of towed Jlexible cylinders. Part 1
`
`509
`
`displacements of a tensioned string in vacuo satisfy a hyperbolic differential
`equation. When fluid loading is included, the equation remains hyperbolic over most
`of its length, but is elliptic near the free end, having a regular singular point a t x,,
`a critical position a t which T(x,) = po 7cai U 2 . Ortloff & Ives and Kennedy & Strahan
`base their work on Pa’idoussis’ early erroneous equation of motion, and find one of
`the solutions of their linear, second-order equation to be unbounded a t x,. They
`therefore reject this solution and the downstream boundary condition and describe
`the response of the cylinder in terms of the other (finite) solution. However, when the
`correct form of Pa’idoussis’ equation is used, and for reasonable values of the drag
`coefficients, both solutions are finite at the critical position, although one solution
`has a branch point there. Hence, before the downstream boundary condition can be
`applied, further investigation is needed to see how this solution behaves as x crosses
`x,. In the region of x, the response is controlled by the bending stiffness of the
`cylinder. We therefore use the fourth-order equation in the region of x,, and the
`method of matched asymptotic expansions to join these ‘inner’ bending solutions to
`the ‘outer’ tension-dominated response. In this way, the general solution for the
`vibration of a fluid-loaded cylinder, in the limit of small bending stiffness, can be
`found. Application of the free-end boundary condition then leads to an analytical
`expression for transverse displacements of the towed cylinder at frequency w . The
`displacements are found to have a simple form well upstream of x,. Nearer to x, the
`expression is more complicated and depends on whether the normal drag coefficient
`C, is greater or less than half the tangential drag coefficient C,.
`In 93 we investigate the stability of a neutrally buoyant towed cylinder by seeing
`whether there are any free modes that grow in time. A practical streamer geometry
`is found to be stable a t all towing speeds.
`Since the towed cylinder is stable, it is appropriate to determine its response to
`forcing at its upstream end. A t low frequencies for which wl,/U
`is small the
`disturbances propagate along the cylinder, virtually unchanged in amplitude and
`with a phase speed U , while for higher frequencies the disturbances decay in
`amplitude along the streamer. The first form of motion is often described as ‘worm-
`in-a-hole’ because all points of the cylinder take the same track. This motion is
`compatible with observations of low-frequency oscillations of towed arrays.
`So far we have assumed the end of the cylinder to be free. However in many
`practical situations it is attached to a rope drogue. In 95 we investigate the effect of
`a rope drogue. We use the work in the earlier sections to describe the transverse
`motions of the rope which has a free end, and apply continuity of displacement and
`force a t the junction of the drogue and cylinder. Ifwl,a,/Ua,
`is very small, the main
`effect of the drogue is found to be the same as an increase in length of the cylinder
`by an amount lRaR/aA, where a, and I , are the radius and length of the rope drogue
`respectively. At higher frequencies a drogue can have an adverse effect if the ratio
`C,/C,
`is small. Then attaching a drogue reduces the attenuation of high-frequency
`transverse disturbances as they propagate down the cylinder.
`
`2. The transverse motion of a neutrally buoyant flexible cylinder
`Consider an acoustic streamer consisting of a long flexible cylinder of length I,,
`radius a,, towed in the negative x-direction a t a constant speed U . If the cylinder is
`neutrally buoyant its mean position is horizontal. We will investigate linear
`departures from this arrangement and choose a frame of reference in which the
`distant fluid has a velocity (U,O,O), with the origin a t the mean position of the
`
`17-2
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 3
`
`

`

`510
`
`A . P. Dowling
`
`FIGURE 2. Linear perturbations of the towed cylinder, viewed in a frame of reference in which
`the distant fluid has velocity (a, 0 , O ) .
`
`FIGURE 3. Forces acting on a small length, Sx, of the neutrally buoyant cylinder.
`
`upstream end of the cylinder as shown in figure 2. It follows from the neutral
`buoyancy of the cylinder, and the linearity of the disturbances, that perturbations
`in the (y = 0)- and ( z = 0)-planes satisfy identical uncoupled equations. It is
`thzrefore sufficient just to investigate the motion in one plane, (2 = 0) say.
`The equation of motion of the cylinder may be derived by considering the balance
`of forces on a small length as shown in figure 3. Let T(x) be the variable tension in
`the cylinder, FN and FT the viscous forces acting on the cylinder per unit length in
`the local normal and tangential directions respectively, and FA the inviscid force due
`to the acceleration of the virtual mass of the cylinder. Resolving in the x-direction
`gives, to zeroth order in the perturbations,
`aT
`FT+- = 0.
`ax
`The transverse momentum balance gives, to first order in the disturbances,
`
`a4y
`ay
`-FA-FN+FT--B--,
`ax
`ax4
`where m is the mass of the cylinder per unit length and B is its bending stiffness. This
`is Pa'idoussis' equation. The term FT aylax was omitted in Pa'idoussis' early work (see
`for example Pai'doussis 1966, 1968). This error was later corrected (Pai'doussis 1973
`and Pa'idoussis & Yu 1976) but unfortunately the earlier erroneous form has been
`adopted in much of the towed-array literature (Ortloff & Ives 1969; Kennedy 1980;
`Kennedy & Strahan 1981). As Pai'doussis (1973) points out, omitting the term
`FT aylax is equivalent to taking the tangential viscous force to act in the x-direction
`rather than in the instantaneous tangential direction.
`FA is the force required to accelerate the neighbouring fluid as the cylinder
`deforms. Provided the flow does not separate, the expression derived by Lighthill
`
`where po is the fluid density.
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 4
`
`

`

`Dynamics of towed Jlexible cylinders. Part 1
`
`51 1
`
`The viscous forces acting on a long, thin flexible cylinder are discussed by Taylor
`(1952). He proposes the form
`FN = $po V 2 {2aA C, sin2 i + 2naA CN sin i},
`F, = po V 2 na, C, cos i,
`where V is the magnitude of the relative velocity between the cylinder and the
`distant flow, and i is the angle between this relative velocity and the local tangent.
`For linear perturbations of a neutrally buoyant element, V is equal to U and i is
`small,
`sini x i x l3+%, cosi x I.
`ax
`ri at
`These expressions therefore reduce to
`
`(2.46)
`
`( 2 . 4 ~ )
`
`FT = po nu* u2 c,.
`With this form for the tangential drag the longitudinal momentum equation (2.1)
`may be integrated immediately to give
`
`(2.56)
`
`( 2 . 5 ~ )
`
`T ( x ) = T(1,) +ponaA U 2 CT(ZA-x),
`(2.6)
`T ( l A ) is the tension a t the downstream end of the array, and vanishes if the end is
`free. Then T(O), the tension at the upstream end, is directly proportional to the drag
`coefficient C,. Hence G, may be inferred from measurements of T ( 0 ) . Data from
`large-scale experiments suggest C, = 0.0025 (Andrew private communication 1984).
`Ni & Hansen (1978) obtained similar values of C, for a range of Reynolds numbers
`in their rig experiments. There is less evidence about the appropriate value of
`G,. Taylor discusses in some detail how the value of C, would vary in the range
`0 < C, < C, depending on the type of roughness on the cylinder. We will therefore
`investigate the effect of varying C, within this range.
`When the expressions for FA and FN in (2.3) and (2.5) are substituted into the
`transverse momentum equation (2.2) they lead to
`porn- a2y = ( T ( x ) - p o n a ~ U 2 ) - - p o n a ~ -+2U-
`a2y
`at2
`a x 2
`
`axat
`a2y
`
`(Z
`
`The coefficient of the second derivative of y vanishes a t a position x,, where T(x,) is
`equal to the fluid-loading term po nu; U 2 . Using (2.6) to rewrite T(x) shows that
`
`where
`
`T(x)-p0naiU2 = p o ~ ~ A U 2 C T ( ~ c - ~ ) ,
`T ( z A ) -5
`PO naA u2CT
`
`x, = 1,+
`
`cT ‘
`
`x, lies on the cylinder if
`
`1, 2 xc 2 0,
`
`i.e. if
`
`(2.8)
`
`(2.10)
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 5
`
`

`

`512
`
`A . P. Dowling
`
`Since we are considering linear disturbances we may investigate each Fourier
`component separately. For modes with time dependence eiwt, equation (2.7) reduces
`to
`
`This may be cast into non-dimensional form by scaling lengths on L (typically
`of order I*). When a new variable X = x / L is introduced, and with y(x,t) =
`Re (Y(X) eiWt ), the transverse momentum equation becomes
`
`d4 Y
`dY
`d2Y
`d x
`e 3 ~ - ( X c - X ) ~ + b - + i 1 2 b Y
`
`= 0,
`
`(2.12)
`
`e = (B/L3po ~a~ U2C,)%, is a small parameter because bending forces in the cylinder
`are very much less than the tension forces.
`
`(2.13)
`
`Q is the non-dimensional frequency, wL/U, and X , is the non-dimensional critical
`position, x,/L.
`Away from regions with intense gradients the contribution from the fourth-order
`derivative in (2.12) is negligible because e is small, and the equation reduces to
`
`= 0,
`
`(2.14)
`
`d2Y d Y
`(X,-X)--b--iiabY
`d x 2 dx
`a second-order ordinary differential equation with a regular singular point at
`X = X,. This only differs from the equation investigated by Ortloff & Ives (1969)
`and Kennedy & Strahan (1981) (derived from Pa'idoussis' erroneous version) in that in
`their equation the coefficient of the first derivative is, in this notation, - 1 - b rather
`than -b. We will see later that this apparently small difference has considerable
`consequences.
`The occurrence of a singularity a t X , is not an artefact of the linearization. Ablow
`& Schechter (1983) investigate finite-difference solutions of general cylinder motion.
`They find that the matrix to be inverted is singular a t the end of the cylinder where
`the tension vanishes. Since they have omitted a virtual mass term, which is the
`generalization of our linearized expression pa nai U 2 a2y/i3x2 to arbitrary motion,
`their singularity is entirely equivalent to our singularity at X,. Ablow & Scheehter
`get around this difficulty in an ad hoc way by applying the downstream boundary
`condition at' a point P, a short distance from the free end, and assuming the cylinder
`to be straight between P and the free end. However for the linear disturbances
`considered here the effect of the singularity on the form of the solution can be
`investigated analytically.
`Two solutions of (2.14) may be obtained by the standard method (Ince 1956) of
`trying a series solution of the form
`Y(X) = (X,-X)" c an(Xc-X)n.
`
`0
`
`n=O
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 6
`
`

`

`Dynamics of towed jlexible cylinders. Part 1
`The indicia1 equation shows CT to be equal either to 0 or t o 1 - b. The general solution
`of (2.14) is then found to be
`O0 (iQb(X, -X))%
`Y(X) = P x
`n ! ( n + b - l ) !
`P and Q are arbitrary constants. Y ( X ) is a linear combination of two independent
`series solutions. The first solution is analytic while the second has a branch point a t
`X,. Both series converge for all X. Equation (2.13) shows that
`
`+ Q ( X , -X)’-b z
`
`O0 (iQb(X, -X))%
`n-O n ! ( n + l - b ) ! ’
`
`(2.15)
`
`513
`
`and so for 0 < C, < C, both solutions are finite a t the critical position X,.
`In a typical problem, boundary conditions for the transverse motion are given at
`the two ends of the cylinder X = 0 and X = lA/L. If the inequalities expressed in
`(2.10) are satisfied these two points are on either side of the critical position X,. Let
`us now for definiteness consider a cylinder with a free downstream end at which
`T(1,) vanishes. Then the first inequality in (2.10) is automatically satisfied. Practical
`acoustic streamers are sufficiently long to ensure that C, 1, > aA, hence also meeting
`the second inequality. The critical point X, therefore lies somewhere between the two
`ends where the boundary conditions are specified. Before these boundary conditions
`can be applied, we need to determine how the solution expressed in (2.15) varies as
`X passes through X,. There is no difficulty with the first series solution because it is
`continuous a t X,, but the second has a branch point there and the relevant cut must
`be found. Since the second series solution has large gradients in the vicinity of X,,
`bending forces become important and the full fourth-order equation (2.12) is needed
`to determine the form of the deflections. The method of matched asymptotic
`expansions may be used to match these ‘inner’ bending solutions to the ‘outer’
`tension-dominated disturbances described in (2.15).
`It is worth noting that Ortloff & Ives (1969) and Kennedy & Strahan (1981) did
`not have these difficulties. The second independent solution to their equation is
`infinite a t the critical point. They therefore reject it and the downstream boundary
`condition, and use the other bounded solution to describe motion in X < X,. But we
`have seen that when the correct form of Pai’doussis’ equation is used, both
`independent solutions are finite at X, for reasonable values of the normal drag
`coefficient. The behaviour of the solutions as X varies across X , must therefore be
`investigated in detail so that the downstream boundary condition may be applied.
`The solutions of (2.12) are to be determined for small values of E and 0 < Re (b).
`Let us shift the origin by introducing a new variable r = X,-X. Then with
`Y(X) = $(r,e), $ satisfies
`
`d$
`d2$
`d4$
`E3--r--b-++Qb#
`dr2
`dr4
`dr
`For small e, it is appropriate to seek a series solution in powers of the small parameter
`e3 which appears in (2.16) ;
`$(r, e) = $,(r) + e3&(r) + . . . .
`
`.
`
`= 0.
`
`(2.16)
`
`The equation for #o(r) is
`
`r T + b A - i Q b # o d2$, d$
`
`
`dr,
`dr
`
`= 0.
`
`(2.17)
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 7
`
`

`

`C
`
`(iS2br)n
`n ! ( n + 1 - 6 ) !
`
`(2.18)
`
`The general solution of this second-order equation ha,s been given in (2.15) and is
`(iObr)"
`#o(r) = P c n=O n ! ( n + b - l ) !
`Gradients of #o(r) become large near r = 0. Away from this region $o(r) dcscribes
`deflections of the towed cylinder in which the response is determined by its mass,
`tension and fluid loading.
`In the region of r = 0, the surface response is controlled by bending stiffness, and
`# ( r , E ) varies rapidly. For this region then let us strctch the spatial coordinate and
`introduce R = r/t: with #(r, e ) = @(R, E ) . An inner expansion for the displacements
`can be obtained by expanding @ in ascending powers of E
`@(R, E ) = @,(R) + e@,(R) + . . ,
`
`514
`
`A . P. Dowling
`
`a;
`
`O0 satisfies
`
`(2.19)
`
`The four independent solutions of this linear fourth-order equation are determined
`in integral form in the Appendix where, in particular, their asymptotic forms for
`large IRI are evaluated. It is found that for large positive R
`
`A , B, C and D are arbitrary constants multiplying the four independent solutions
`and are to be determined by matching to the outer solution. When this inner solution
`is rewritten in terms of the outer variable r it becomes
`
`Hence for r p E we have
`(iQbr)"
`(iQ6r)n
`+ (Q, + &3 ) y l - b c n=o n ! (n+ 1 - 6) !
`#o(r) = p c 12=o n ! (n+b- i ) !
`with Q2 = -Betixb (1 -b) ! (6-2) ! cbP1 and Q3 = -Ce-iixb (1 -6) ! (6-2) ! &'.
`VC'hen r / e is large and negative with 1 9 Irl 9 E , the asymptotic form for O,,(R)
`evaluated in the Appendix (see equation (A 26)) shows that
`
`(2.23)
`
`O0
`
`- r)ib-?! 8-Eb
`ac.4 2
`+
`( 1 - b ) ! (6-2)!
`
`( Q2 e-is + Q3 eis ),
`
`(2.24)
`
`r 9 - 1 , with B = n ( & ~ ) + $ ( - r / e ) ~ .
`for - E +
`The first term on the right-hand side of (2.24) is just the series solution, describing
`the balance between tension and inertial forces, that is valid everywhere. The second
`and third terms describe motions downstream of the critical position with large
`gradients whose form is influenced by the bending stiffness of the cylinder.
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 8
`
`

`

`Dynamics of
`
`towed flexible cylinders. Part 1
`
`525
`
`Returning to the spatial variable X
`O0 (iQb(X, -X))n
`Y(X) = P c
`%=,, n ! ( n + b - l ) !
`
`and
`
`+ nu
`
`with
`
`(2.253)
`
`(X -x,
`ei-3
`(Q2e-is+Q3eio) for 1 $- X-X, + e,
`(1 - b ) ! (b - 2) !
`4 ) + $( (X -x,)/E)t
`0 = .($-a
`To summarize then, perturbations of the cylinder upstream of the critical point are
`described by two linearly independent series solutions. The displacement typically
`varies over a non-dimensional lengthscale of order unity and the bending stiffness of
`the cylinder, characterized by the small non-dimensional parameter E , is unimportant
`in this range. The first series solution is always slowly varying and so is valid for all
`X . The second has a branch cut at the critical position, X,, and large gradients near
`it. This second solution is extended across X = X, in the Appendix by using the full
`equation of cylinder motion including bending stiffness and is displayed in (2.25 6).
`Not only is the appropriate branch cut determined by equation ( 2 . 2 5 b ) , but it also
`shows the solution downstream of X,
`to contain wavelike disturbances with
`wavelengths of the order of e. Bending stiffness therefore has an important influence
`
`on the cylinder motion throughout this region. If either Q2 or Q3 is non-zero, the
`displacements of the cylinder vary over a long lengthscale well upstream of X , , but
`have very small wavelengths throughout the tail region downstream of X,. The
`coefficients P, Q2 and Q3 may be determined from the boundary conditions a t the two
`ends of the array, X = 0 and X = LA = 1JL.
`The two boundary conditions appropriate for a free end of a flexible cylinder have
`been derived by Hawthorne (1961). One condition is that there be no bending
`moment ;
`d2 Y
`- = 0
`d x 2
`The second condition arises from the transverse momentum balance for the tapered
`portion of the cylinder at its end. If this portion is very short its momentum is
`negligible, and the forces acting on it must cancel. The only significant forces on a
`short end a t which the tension vanishes are due to bending resistance and the virtual
`mass of the fluid near the end. This has been evaluated by Hawthorne (1961) and
`PaTdoussis (1966) and takes the form
`
`a t X = L , .
`
`(2.26)
`
`where f is a non-dimensional parameter less than unity introduced to account for
`departures of the flow from two-dimensionality. In view of the uncertainty in the
`value off, it is reassuring that our results will be found not to depend on the details
`of this boundary condition. For motions with time dependence eiwt (2.27) becomes
`
`(2.27)
`
`(2.28)
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 9
`
`

`

`516
`
`A . P. Dowling
`
`We now substitute for Y(X) from equation (2.25b) into the two boundary conditions
`(2.26) and (2.28). I n the limit of small bending stiffness, this gives
`
`(eiOE-inb - e-illE+ixb
`
`2i( 1
`z;E&+f&fb
`(b- 2) ! ( 1 -b) !
`
`)-
`
`flQ2E2 eieE
`( b + l ) ! '
`
`(2.29)
`
`(2.30)
`Q 3 = - Q 2 e-i28~ 1
`and
`E is the distance between the critical point and the free end. It is apparent from (2.9)
`that
`E = L,-X, = a,/LC,.
`(2.31)
`In deriving (2.29) the product SZE has been assumed to be small in comparison with
`unity. Acoustic streamers are sufficiently long in comparison with their radius for
`this to be a good approximation a t the low frequencies of interest here. 8, is defined
`8, = ~ ( i b - 2) + g ( E / ~ ) f .
`(2.32)
`by
`The solution of (2.29) and (2.30) has quite a different form according to whether
`Re@) is greater or less than one-half. For Re(b) greater than a half these two
`boundary conditions reduce to the very simple statement that
`
`Qz w Q3 - p&!.
`
`(2.33)
`I n the limit of small bending stiffness, E tends to zero and Q2 and Q3 are negligible in
`comparison with P. Then the motion upstream of the critical position is given by
`for E < X, - X, Re (b) > $.
`
`Y(X) = P z: (iQb(Xc
`
`%-,,
`
`n ! ( n + b - l ) !
`
`(2.34)
`
`(2.35)
`
`, (2.36)
`
`When Re@) is less than one-half, (2.29) and (2.30) become
`
`and the cylinder displacement is described by
`
`sin 8,
`b( -b) !
`(iSZb(X, -X))n
`n-,, n ! (n + b - 1) ! + sin (8, - r b ) (b + 1 ) !
`Q2El+b (X, -X)l-b
`(iQb(X, -X))']
`x c
`n-O n ! ( n + l - b ) !
`
`for G 4 X,-X and Re(b) < t.
`We have determined a general expression for the propagation of deflections of
`frequency w along a towed cylinder with a free end in the limit of small bending
`st'iffness. The method of solution involves extending the upstream expression for
`transverse displacements across a critical point, a t which the restoring force due to
`tension is cancelled by a fluid-loading effect, so that the downstream boundary
`condition may be applied. The general solution upstream of the critical point is given
`in (2.34) and (2.36), and is seen to have a different form according to whether Re(b)
`is greater or less than one-half. These can be combined into a statement that
`sin 8,
`+H(0.5-Re(b))
`sin (8, - zb)
`SZ2E1+b (X, - X ) l - b C
`
`n-,, n ! ( n + b - l ) !
`
`X-
`
`b(-b)!
`(b+ l ) !
`
`(iSZb(X, -"))I
`
`n=,, n ! ( n + l - b ) !
`
`, (2.37)
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 10
`
`

`

`Dynamics of towed JEexible cylinders. Part 1
`
`517
`
`for tz < X,-X
`and SZE small. An inspection of this expression shows that, when
`lengths are non-dimensionalized on the cylinder length l,,
`the displacement at
`position X = x/1, depends on the non-dimensional frequency 52 = ol,/U,
`the ratio
`and the value of the parameter aA/lACT. I n a particular example the constant
`C,/C,
`P will be determined by the upstream boundary.
`Well upstream of the critical position this form for Y ( X ) simplifies to
`a, (iSZb(X, - X ) ) n
`Y(X) = P c
`n=O n ! ( n + b - I ) ! *
`
`(2.38)
`
`For Re (b) greater than a half, this solution is valid throughout the region X , - X % E .
`But when Re (6) is less than one-half, it only holds in X,-X % E. Then, once X,-X
`is comparable in magnitude to E , the distance from the critical point to the free end,
`the second series in (2.37) is important and leads to large gradients of the
`displacement Y ( X ) . For real frequencies, Re (b) is equal to C,/C,. Hence, whenever
`the normal drag coefficient is less than half the tangential drag coefficient, the
`displacement of the cylinder has large gradients upstream of the critical position. It
`is interesting to note that (2.38) describes the motion that would be obtained by
`applying a boundary condition i 0 Y +dY/dX = 0 a t the critical point, i.e. a
`condition that the cylinder has no normal velocity there. The displacement
`downstream of the critical position X , has a more complicated form, and the full
`expression defined by (2.25b) and the boundary conditions (2.29) and (2.30) must be
`used. The slope of the cylinder is large, but there is little practical interest in the
`solution in this region.
`Ortloff & Ives (1969) expressed their solution to a similar equation in terms of
`Bessel functions of complex argument and order. Y ( X ) can be rewritten in a similar
`form. The series expansion for Jb-l shows that
`(iQb(X,-X))"
`r, npo n ! ( n + b - I ) !
`where a = (-4iSZb)i, the sign of the square root being chosen so that Re(a) is
`positive. Hence, (2.38) is equivalent to
`
`= ( ~ a ( X c - x ) ~ ) l - b J b - l (a(X, - X ) $ .
`
`(2.39)
`
`( a ( X , - X ) i ) ,
`Y ( X ) = P(;a(X,-X)i)l-bJ,-,
`(2.40)
`for 0.5 < Re (b) and X,-X 9 6 or for 0 < Re (b) < 0.5 and X, - X 9 E. This form for
`Y ( X ) will be found to be convenient when investigating high-frequency disturbances.
`
`3. The stability of a towed flexible cylinder
`The general solution for the deflections of a towed cylinder derived in $ 2 may be
`used to investigate its stability by seeing whether free modes for a fixed upstream end
`grow or decay in time.
`It follows from (2.38) that a condition of no transverse displacement a t X = 0 is
`equivalent to
`(i52bX,)n
`c ,=,n!(n+b-l)!
`The complex non-dimensional eigenfrequencies 52 may be determined from this
`equation. If one of the roots has negative imaginary 52, a free mode grows in time and
`the system is unstable. If, however, all the roots of (3.1) have positive imaginary 52
`
`= 0.
`
`PGS v. WESTERNGECO (IPR2014-00688)
`WESTERNGECO Exhibit 2045, pg. 11
`
`

`

`518
`
`A . P. Dowling
`
`the system is stable. It is interesting to note that (3.1) shows that the non-
`dimensional eigenfrequencies 52 are determined only by the values of the parameters
`and are independent of the free-stream velocity U . It therefore
`C,/C,
`and a,/l,C,
`implies that if the towed cylinder is unstable a t any flow speed, it is unstable for all
`speeds !
`We introduce a function f(52) defined by
`
`(iQbXJn
`f(52) = ( b - l ) ! 2
`nso n ! (n+b- l ) ! '
`
`OcI
`
`(3.2)
`
`f(i2) is analytic in the lower half Q-plane and its number of zeros, N , within a closed
`contour r in this region is given by Cauchy's theorem as
`
`(3.3)
`
`The derivative f ' ( Q ) may be evaluated by differentiating (3.2) term by term. The
`integral (3.3) was evaluated for C,/C, = 0.25 and 0.75, a,/l,C, = 0.033 and a
`contour r consisting of the real 52-axis from 52 = 30 to - 30 closed by a semicircle in
`the lower half 52-plane. In both cases N was found to be zero, showing that f(s2) has
`no zeros in Im(52) < 0 with 1521 E < 1. Hence we conclude that for this typical
`acoustic streamer geometry the towed cylinder is stable for all towing speeds.
`
`4. The forced vibration of a towed flexible cylinder
`Let us now determine how disturbances produced by vibration of the upstream
`end of a towed neutrally buoyant cylinder propagate along it. Without loss of
`generality we will take the amplitude of the transverse vibrations of the upstream
`end to be unity, and write
`
`y(0, t ) = coswt,
`Since y(x, t ) = Re( Y(X) eiot) the boundary condition for Y ( X ) is
`
`(4.1)
`
`Y ( 0 ) = 1.
`(4.2)
`The coefficient P in the solution (2.38) can be determined from the boundary
`condition (4.2) to give a form for the displacements of the cylinder:
`
`(iQbX,)"
`O0 (iQb(X,-X))"/
`Y(X) = c
`O0
`n=O n ! ( n + b - 1) ! m-O m ! (m+b-- l

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket