`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Phone: 202-530-3980
`
`Fax: 202-530-0436
`jjarosz@analysisgroup.com
`
`
`
`JOHN C. JAROSZ
`Managing Principal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Analysis Group, Inc.
` 800 17th Street, NW
`
` Suite 400
` Washington, DC 20006
`
`John Jarosz, a Managing Principal of Analysis Group, Inc., specializes in applied microeconomics and
`industrial organization. He has performed research, given economic testimony and provided strategy
`consultation in intellectual property, licensing, commercial damages and antitrust matters, including:
`
` 
`
` Evaluation of damages in patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark and unfair competition cases. The
`types of damages have included lost profits, reasonable royalties, price erosion, unjust enrichment,
`accelerated market entry and prejudgment interest.
`
` 
`
` Strategy consultation regarding the nature and value of technology, methods to share technology and
`reasonable compensation terms.
`
` 
`
` Analysis and testimony regarding patent misuse and copyright misuse defenses, particularly
`concerning market definition and market power.
`
` 
`
` General commercial damages testimony in a variety of cases and across numerous industries.
`
`Mr. Jarosz received a J.D. from the University of Wisconsin. Mr. Jarosz holds an M.A. in Economics
`from Washington University in St. Louis, where he was a Ph.D. candidate and completed most of the
`program requirements. He also holds a B.A. in Economics and Organizational Communication from
`Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska.
`
`Prior to joining Analysis Group, Mr. Jarosz was a Director with Putnam, Hayes & Bartlett, Inc. Before
`that, he was a Senior Analyst with Richard J. Barber Associates, a Section Supervisor with Mutual of
`Omaha Insurance and a Research Analyst with the Center for the Study of American Business.
`
`
`EDUCATION
`
`
`
`
`J.D.
`M.A. & Ph.D. candidate
`B.A.
`
`
`
`
`University of Wisconsin
`Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
`Economics and Organizational Communication, Creighton University
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 1
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 2
`
`PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
`
` 
`
` American Economic Association
` American Law and Economics Association
` American Bar Association (Sections: Intellectual Property, Antitrust and Litigation)
` State Bar of Wisconsin (Section: Intellectual Property)
` American Intellectual Property Law Association (Sections: Federal Litigation, Licensing, Trade
`Secrets and Antitrust)
` Licensing Executives Society
`• Former Chair, Valuation and Taxation Committee
`• Former Member, Certified Licensing Professional Exam Writing Team
` Former Advisory Board - The IP Litigator
` Former Columnist (Damage Awards) - The IP Litigator
` Omicron Delta Epsilon (International Honor Society in Economics)
` Association of University Technology Managers
` Certified Licensing Professional
`Intellectual Property Owners Association
`
` 2011 Presidential Rank Review Board
` Referee, Journal of Forensic Economics
` The Sedona Conference (Sections: Best Practices in Patent Litigation, Patent Damages and Remedies)
`IAM Patent 1000 (2014): The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners - Economic Experts
`
`
`TESTIMONIAL EXPERIENCE
`
` 
`
` CertusView Technologies, LLC v. S &N Locating Services LLC and S & N Communications,
`Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division (Case No. 2:13 –cv-346
`(MSD/LRL))
`Expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving patents directed to creation of
`electronic sketches for utility location purposes.
`
`In the Matter of Certain 3G Mobile Handsets and Components Thereof (Nokia (Respondent))
`(International Trade Commission Inv. No. 337-TA-613)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: economic evaluation of whether proposed license terms for
`certain wireless devices are discriminatory under a FRAND obligation and economic evaluation of
`hold-up and reverse hold-up.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 2
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 3
`
` Ecolab USA Inc. and Kleancheck Systems, LLC v. Diversey, Inc.
`United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (Civil Action No. 12-cv-1984 (SRN/JJG))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty, and prejudgment interest
`involving products covering the monitoring of hospital cleaning.
`
`Intendis GmbH, Intraserv GmbH & Co. KG and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., v.
`Glenmark Generics Ltd. and Glenmark Generics Inc., USA.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 13-cv-421-SLR)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success involving a patent directed to the
`treatment of certain skin diseases.
`
`
`
` 
`
`
`
`Immunomedics Inc. v. Nycomed GmnH (n/k/a Takeda GmbH), Takeda Pharmaceutical
`Company Limited, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.
`International Center for Dispute Resolution
`Arbitration hearing and expert report: diminution of value associated with the delayed/failed
`development of a monoclonal antibody drug to treat various autoimmune diseases.
`
` 
`
`
`
`In the Matter of Certain Sulfentrazone, Sulfentrazone Compositions, and Processes for Making
`Sulfentrazone (FMC (Complainant))
`United States International Trade Commission (Investigation No. 337-TA-914)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: irreparable harm, balance of hardships, and public
`interest involving a patent directed to a crop herbicide.
`
` Bayer CropScience AG and Bayer CropScience NV v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, Mycogen Plant
`Science Inc., Agrigenetics, Inc. d/b/a Mycogen Seeds LLC, and Phytogen Seed Company, LLC
`International Chamber of Commerce (Case No. 18892/VRO /AGF)
`Arbitration testimony and expert report: damages associated with alleged breach of contract and
`patent infringement involving genetically modified seed.
`
` Antares Pharma, Inc. v. Medac Pharma, Inc., Medac GmbH, Becton Dickinson France S.A.S.,
`and Becton, Dickinson and Company
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (C.A. No. 14-270-SLR)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: irreparable harm, balance of hardships, and public interest
`involving patents directed to methotrexate autoinjector products.
`
` 
`
`
`
`In the Matter of Certain Opaque Polymers (Organik Kimya (Respondent))
`United States International Trade Commission (Investigation No.337-TA-883)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: injury, independent economic valuation, and bond involving
`trade secrets used in the production of opaque polymers.
`
` Katherine Dines v. Toys “R” Us-Delaware, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Colorado (Case No. 12-cv-2279-PAB-KMT)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: profits and prejudgment interest associated with trademark
`infringement involving a line of stuffed animal toys.
`
` Source Search Technologies, LLC v. Kayak.com, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No. 2:11-cv-03388-FSH-MAH)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to online exchanges.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 3
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 4
`
` Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.
`United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division (Case No.SACV12-
`329AG (JPRx))
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to universal remotes.
`
` Everlight Electronics Co. Ltd., and Emcore Corporation v. Nichia Corporation and Nichia
`America Corporation v. Everlight Americas, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division (Case No.4:12-cv-
`11758 GAD-MKM)
`Deposition testimony, expert report and declaration: commercial success, lost profits, reasonable
`royalty, and prejudgment interest involving patents directed to LEDs.
`
` Suomen Colorize Oy v. Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Online LLC, and Verizon Delaware
`LLC
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No.12-715-CJB)
`Expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a patent directed to interactive
`programming guides.
`
` 
`
` Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc. v. River’s Edge
`Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Teresina Holdings, LLC, Medical Products Laboratories, Inc. and
`Stayma Consulting Services, LLC
`United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division (Case No.11-cv-01634-
`RLV)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success involving a patent directed to the
`treatment of certain skin diseases.
`
` 
`
` MacDermid, Inc. v. Cookson Group, plc, Cookson Electronics, Enthone, Inc., and David North
`United States Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury (Case No.x10-cv-09-5014518-d)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: royalty and prejudgment interest involving the
`misappropriation of trade secrets directed to chemicals, materials, and technical services used in a
`possible corporate acquisition.
`
` 
`
`
`
` JDS Therapeutics, LLC and Nutrition 21, LLC v. Pfizer Inc., Wyeth LLC, Wyeth Consumer
`Healthcare Ltd., and Wyeth Consumer Healthcare LLC
`United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No.1:12-cv-09002-JSR)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success, reasonable royalty, and unjust
`enrichment involving patents and trade secrets directed to the use of chromium picolinate in multi-
`vitamins.
`
`In the Matter of Certain Wireless Devices with 3G and/or 4G Capabilities and Components
`Thereof (Nokia (Respondent))
`United States International Trade Commission (Investigation No.337-TA-868)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: economic evaluation of whether proposed license
`terms for certain wireless devices are discriminatory under a FRAND obligation, and economic
`evaluation of hold-up and reverse hold-up.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 4
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 5
`
`
`
`
`
` Prowess, Inc. v. RaySearch Laboratories AB, et al.
`United States District Court, District of Maryland (Case No. 11 CV 1357 (WDQ))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to treatment planning software for radiation therapy.
`
`comScore, Inc. v. Moat, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division (Case No. 2:12CV695-
`HCM/DEM, Lead Case 2:12CV351-HCM/DEM)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to online analytics.
`
` LendingTree, LLC v. Zillow, Inc., NexTag, Inc., and Adchemy, Inc.
`United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division (Case No. 3-:10-
`cv-439-FDW-DCK)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment
`interest involving patents directed to internet loan matching systems.
`
`Impulse Technology Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts, Inc., Ubisoft Holdings, Inc.,
`and Konami Digital Entertainment Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 11-586-RGA-CJB)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty involving patents directed to video game
`motion detection functionalities.
`
` Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.
`United States District Court, Northern District of California (Case No. 3:12-cv-01106-WHA)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving patents
`directed to network security systems.
`
` 
`
` Shurtape Technologies, LLC and Shurtech Brands, LLC v. 3M Company
`United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina (Case No.5:11-cv-00017)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to painter’s tape.
`
` 
`
` Ferring, B.V. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. – Florida, Apotex Inc., and Apotex Corp.
`United States District Court, District of Nevada (Case Nos.3:11-cv-00481-RCJ-VPC, 3:11-cv-00485-
`RCJ-VPC, 3:11-cv-00853-RCJ-VPC, 3:11-cv-00854-RCJ-VPC, 2:12-cv-01935-RCJ-VPC, and 2:12-
`cv-01941-RCJ-VPC)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success involving patents directed to the
`treatment of menorrhagia.
`
` Ewa-Marie Rundquist v. Vapiano SE, f/k/a Vapiano AG, Vapiano International LLC, and
`Vapiano Franchise USA, LLC, f/k/a Vapiano Franchising LLC
`United States District Court, District of Columbia (Case No.1:09-cv-02207 (EGS))
`Expert report: damages involving copyrighted photographs used in restaurants.
`
` Delavau, LLC v. J.M. Huber Corporation and J.M. Huber Micropowders Inc.
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No.12-05378 (ES)(SCM)))
`Deposition testimony and expert declaration: preliminary injunctive relief involving patents directed
`to dietary calcium supplements.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 5
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 6
`
` Carl B. Collins and Farzin Davanloo v. Nissan North America, Inc. and Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Case No.2:11-cv-00428-
`JRG)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving patents
`directed to automotive engines.
`
` Match.com LLC v. Fiesta Catering International, Inc. (Barbados), et al.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division (Case No.1:12cv363
`AJT (IDD))
`Expert report: profits and prejudgment interest associated with a trademark directed to on-line dating
`services.
`
` Abbott Biotechnology Ltd. and AbbVie, Inc. v. Centocor Ortho Biothech, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Massachusetts (Case No. 09-40089-FDS)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
`
` Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation; Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc.; and Alyzan, Inc. v.
`Actavis Mid Atlantic LLC
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 11-CV-409)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success involving a patent directed to delivery
`vehicles for treatment of dermatological disorders.
`
` TomTom, Inc. v. Michael Adolph
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia (Case No. 6:10-CV-521-LED)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to automotive navigation systems.
`
` Wi-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.; Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson; Ericsson Inc.; Sony
`Mobile Communications AB; Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.; HTC Corporation;
`HTC America, Inc.; Exedea Inc.; LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A.,
`Inc.; and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 6:10-CV-521-LED)
`Trial and deposition testimony, affidavit, and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment
`interest involving patents directed to wireless telecommunication systems.
`
` Epos Technologies Ltd.; Dane-Elec S.A.; Dane-Elec Memory S.A.; and Dane-Elec Corporation
`USA v. Pegasus Technologies Ltd. and Luidia, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Columbia (Case No. 07-cv-00416-WMN)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to digital pen products.
`
` Life Technologies Corporation; Applied Biosystems, LLC; Institute for Protein Research;
`Alexander Chetverin; Helena Chetverina; and William Hone v. Illumina, Inc. and Solexa, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of California (Case No. 3:11-cv-00703)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to DNA amplification and sequencing technology.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 6
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 7
`
`In the Matter of Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof
`(Nokia (Respondent))
`United States International Trade Commission (Investigation No.337-TA-800) (Nokia)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: economic evaluation of whether proposed license
`terms for certain wireless devices are discriminatory under a FRAND obligation.
`
`
`
` 
`
`
`
`
`
` Dyson Technology Limited and Dyson, Inc. v. Cornucopia Products, LLC
`United States District Court, District of Arizona (Case No. 2:12-cv-00924-ROS)
`Hearing testimony and expert declaration: irreparable harm involving patents directed to bladeless
`fans.
`
` Flycell, Inc. v. Schlossberg LLC; Michael T. O’Neil; Glispa LLC; and Glispa GmbH
`United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:11-CV-00915 (KBF)(THK))
`Expert report: damages and profits associated with marketing of mobile content.
`
`
`In the Matter of Certain Computing Devices with Associated Instruction Sets and Software
`(VIA Technologies, Inc., Centaur Technology, IP-First LLC (Complainants))
`United States International Trade Commission (Investigation No.337-TA-812)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: economic evaluation of domestic industry issues
`associated with importation of certain computing devices.
`
`I.E.E. International Electronics & Engineering, S.A. and IEE Sensing, Inc. v. TK Holdings, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan (Case No. 2:10-cv-13487)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to capacitive sensing used in automotive seats.
`
` Complex Systems, Inc. v. ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
`United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No. 08-cv-7497)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: revenues and profits involving copyrighted trade finance
`software.
`
` St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. v. Acer, Inc., et al.; Microsoft Corporation v. St.
`Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 09-354-JJF, 09-704-JJF and 10-282-
`LPS)
`Expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving patents directed to power
`management, bus configuration and card slot technology in laptops and desktops.
`
` CardioFocus, Inc. v. Xintec Corporation (d/b/a Convergent Laser Technologies); Trimedyne,
`Inc.; and Cardiogenesis Corporation
`United States District Court, District of Massachusetts (Case No. 1:08-cv-10285 NMG)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to laser devices used for the treatment of advanced coronary artery disease.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 7
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 8
`
` Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Raritan Americas, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No. 10-cv-6100 (PKC)(JLC))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, lost royalties, reasonable royalty and
`prejudgment interest involving a patent and contract directed to software and hardware products and
`technologies that provide connectivity and centralized management of IT infrastructure through KVM
`switches.
`
` TattleTale Portable Alarm Systems, Inc. v. Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, et al.
`United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division (Case No. 2:10-CV-226)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost royalties associated with a law firm’s negligence in
`handling a patent directed to portable alarm systems.
`
` General Assurance of America, Inc. v. Overby-Seawell Company
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division (Case No. 1:11CV483)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: damages and profits associated with obligations arising from
`a contract involving specialized insurance products.
`
` 
`
` Galderma Laboratories, L.P.; Galderma S.A.; and Galderma Research & Development, S.N.C.
`v. Tolmar Inc. and Actavia Mid Atlantic LLC
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 10-cv-45 (LPS))
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success involving a patent directed to
`treatment of dermatological disorders.
`
` Frontline Placement Technologies, Inc. v. CRS, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Case No. 2:07-CV-2457)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, lost royalties, reasonable royalty and
`prejudgment interest involving a patent and contract directed to automated substitute fulfillment
`software.
`
` Triangle Software, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.; Garmin USA, Inc.; TomTom, Inc.; and
`Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division (Case No. 1:10-CV-
`01457-CMH-TCB)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to providing personal navigation devise functionality.
`
`In the Matter of Certain Mobile Telephones and Wireless Communication Devices Featuring
`Digital Cameras, and Components Thereof (Research in Motion Ltd. (Respondent))
`United States International Trade Commission (Investigation No. 337-TA-703)
`Expert declaration: economic evaluation of public interest issues associated with importation of
`certain wireless devices.
`
`
`
` 
`
` Promote Innovation LLC v. Toshiba Corporation, et al.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division (Case No. 2:10-CV-100)
`Expert report: payment for false patent marketing directed to portable DVD players.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 8
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 9
`
` Elan Pharma International Ltd. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.; Alcon Manufacturing, Ltd.; and
`Alcon Research, Ltd.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 4:09-CV-32)
`Expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving patents directed to the treatment
`of glaucoma.
`
` Northeastern University and JARG Corporation v. Google, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division (Case No. 2:07-CV-
`486(CE))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to internet index and search technology.
`
` Pronova Biopharma Norge AS v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; Apotex Corp.; and Apotex
`Inc.; Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.; and Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case Nos. 09-286-SLR/09-304-SLR/09-305-SLR-
`MPT)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success covering patents directed to
`treatment of HDL cholesterol and hypertriglyceridemia.
`
` 
`
` Eli Lilly and Company v. Wockhardt Limited and Wockhardt USA, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (Case No. 1:08-cv-
`1547-TWP-TAB)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success covering a patent directed to treatment
`of depression, anxiety and pain treatment.
`
` Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc.
`International Chamber of Commerce, International Court of Arbitration (Case No.166531/VRO
`Hearing and deposition testimony and expert report: royalty payments due under a contract directed
`to semiconductor packaging technology.
`
` Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp.
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No. 2:07-cv-04937-JAG-MCA)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success covering a patent directed to
`treatment of spasticity.
`
` 
`
` Shepard Fairey and Obey Giant Art, Inc. v. The Associated Press v. Shepard Fairey; Obey
`Giant Art, Inc.; Obey Giant LLC; Studio Number One, Inc.; and One 3 Two, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of New York (Case No. 09-01123(AKH))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: fair use, damages and profits involving copyrighted
`photograph of President Obama.
`
` Toshiba Corporation v. Imation Corp.; Moser Baer India Ltd.; Glyphics Media, Inc.; Ritek
`Corp.; Advanced Media, Inc.; CMC Magnetics Corp.; Hotan Corp.; and Khypermedia Corp.
`United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin (Case No. 3:09-cv-00305-slc)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to DVDs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 9
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 10
`
` Bissell Homecare, Inc. v. Dyson, Inc.
`United States District Court, Western District of Michigan (Case No. 1:08-cv-724)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to vacuum cleaner collection and discharge.
`
` Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. v. Danisco A/S; Genecor International
`Wisconsin, Inc.; Danisco US Inc.; and Danisco USA Inc.
`United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin (Case No. 10-CV-251)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report and expert declaration: lost profits, reasonable
`royalty, prejudgment interest and irreparable harm involving a patent directed to alpha-amylases used
`for fuel ethanol.
`
` SAIC v. In-Q-Tel
`Expert report: reasonable royalty involving patents that enable service communications via a virtual
`private network.
`
` Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC. v. BMW North America, LLC, et al.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division (Case No. 9:08-CV-00164-
`RC)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to connecting a portable audio player to an automobile sound system.
`
` E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company v. Kolon Industries, Inc. and Kolon USA, Inc.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division (Case No. 3:09CV58)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: unjust enrichment involving misappropriation of
`trade secrets directed to aramid fiber production.
`
` MoonScoop SAS v. American Greetings Corp.
`United States District Court, Northeastern District of Ohio, Eastern Division (Case No. 1:09-cv-
`01885-SO)
`Expert report: damages and profits associated with a contract covering the ownership and use of the
`animated characters Strawberry Shortcake and Care Bears.
`
` Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften E. V.; Max-Planck-Innovation
`GmbH and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research;
`Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and the Board of Trustees of the University of
`Massachusetts
`United States District Court, District of Massachusetts (Case No. 2009-11116-PBS)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: damages and profits associated with contracts covering the
`transfer and sharing of RNAi technology.
`
` Regents of the University of Minnesota v. AGA Medical Corp.
`United States District Court, District of Minnesota (Case No. 0:07-cv-04732 (PJS/RLE))
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving
`patents directed to septal occlusion devices.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 10
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 11
`
` Personnel Department, Inc. v. CareerBuilder, LLC
`United States District Court, District of Vermont (Case No. 2:08-CV-59)
`Expert report: unjust enrichment and reasonable royalty involving breach of contract and
`misappropriation of trade secrets claims directed to online resume writing services.
`
` Timothy Robinson and Whorl, LLC v. Cohen Mohr, LLP; Dan Duval; Perkins Coie, LLP;
`Perkins Coie, I.P.C.; Perkins Coie, D.C., P.C.; and Perkins Coie, California, P.C.
`State of Virginia, Circuit Court of Fairfax County (Case No. CL-2009-080)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: lost value and prejudgment interest involving allegations of
`law firm’s negligence in securing an interest in intellectual property directed to biometric payment
`technology.
`
` Humanscale Corp. v. CompX International, Inc. and CompX Waterloo
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division (Case No. 3:09-CV-86-
`JRS)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest
`involving patents directed to keyboard support mechanisms.
`
` LifeWatch Services, Inc. and Card Guard Scientific Survival, LTD. v. Medicomp, Inc. and
`United Therapeutics Corp.
`United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division (Case No. 6:09-cv-1909-
`Orl-31DAB)
`Hearing and deposition testimony and expert declaration: preliminary injunctive relief involving
`patents directed to ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring solutions.
`
` Medeva Pharma Suisse A.G. and Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Roxane
`Laboratories, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of New Jersey (Case No. 3:07-CV-05165-FLW-TJB)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: commercial success involving a patent directed to treatment
`of ulcerative colitis.
`
` Carl Zeiss Vision GMBH and Carl Zeiss Vision International GMBH v. Signet Armorlite, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of California (Case No. 09-CV-0657-DMS (POR))
`Trial testimony and deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits, reasonable royalty, and lost
`licensing fees involving a patent directed to progressive eyeglass lenses.
`
` Fujinon Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware (Case No. 07-533(GMS))
`Expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving patents directed to lenses used
`in camera phones.
`
` Tredegar Film Products Corp. v. Aplix, Inc. and Aplix, S.A.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia (Case No. 2:08cv440-HCM-TEM)
`Expert report: lost profits and reasonable royalty involving a patent directed to plastic laminates used
`in infant diapers.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IMMUNOGEN 2132, pg. 11
`Phigenix v. Immunogen
`IPR2014-00676
`
`

`

`John C. Jarosz, page 12
`
` The Coryn Group II, LLC v. O.C. Seacrest, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Maryland, Northern Division (Case No. 08-cv-02764-WDQ)
`Trial testimony and expert report: profits and damages involving the use of “Secrets” trademark in the
`leisure resort business.
`
` Yellow Pages Photos, Inc. v. Yellow Book USA, Inc. and Pindar Set, Inc.
`United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division (Case No. 8:08-cv-930-
`T23EAJ)
`Expert report: profits and damages involving infringement of copyrighted photographs used in
`telephone directories.
`
` ShopNTown LLC v. Landmark Media Enterprises, LLC
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division (Case No. 2:08CV564)
`Deposition testimony and expert report: reasonable royalty and prejudgment interest involving a
`patent directed to rental matching systems over the internet.
`
` Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc.
`United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Western Division (Case No. 04-1033-CV-
`W-GAF)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits and reasonable royalty involving patents
`directed to electronic ICU monitoring systems.
`
` The Osage Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. The United States of America
`United States Court of Federal Claims (Case No. 99-550 L (into which is consolidated No. 00-169 L))
`Deposition testimony and expert declaration: present value interest from unpaid oil royalties.
`
` Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Hologic Inc. and Suros Surgical Systems, Inc.
`United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division (Case No. 07-cv-00834)
`Trial and deposition testimony and expert report: lost profits and reasonable royalty involving patents
`directed to biopsy equipment and methods, and the biopsy of soft tissue.
`
` YSL Beauté v. Oscar de la Renta, Ltd.
`American Arbitration Association (Case No. 13 133 01389 08)
`Arbitration testimony and expert report: damages associated with alleged breach of contrac