`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE CORPORATION AND ZTE (USA) INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`IPR LICENSING, INC.
`Patent Owner
`__________________
`
`Case IPR2014-00525
`U.S. Patent No.: 8,380,244
`__________________
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, MIRIAM L. QUINN, and
`BEVERLY M. BUNTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
`_______________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc. (“Petitioner”) and IPR Licensing, Inc.
`
`(“Patent Owner”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby
`
`stipulate as follows:
`
`1.
`
`On September 17, 2014, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a
`
`Scheduling Order in the Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,380,244 (IPR2014-00525) setting forth “due dates for the parties to
`
`take action after institution of the proceeding.” Paper No. 20.
`
`2.
`
`The Scheduling Order further states that the “parties may stipulate to
`
`different dates for DUE DATES 1 through 5.” Id.
`
`3.
`
`The parties previously agreed to stipulate to amended due dates in a
`
`Joint Stipulation amending DUE DATES 1 through 4 filed on
`
`September 17, 2014. Paper No. 21.
`
`4.
`
`The parties herby stipulate to newly amended DUE DATES 1 through
`
`4 listed below. These newly amended DUE DATES supersede all
`
`previously stipulated DUE DATES 1 through 4.
`
`5.
`
`This stipulation does not affect or otherwise modify the dates for DUE
`
`DATES 5, 6 and 7 listed in the Scheduling Order.
`
`Patent Owner and Petitioner hereby stipulate to the newly amended DUE
`
`DATES 1 through 4 as follows:
`
`2
`
`
`
`Stipulated Due Date
`January 6, 2015
`
`March 9, 2015
`
`April 6, 2015
`
`April 24, 2015
`
`Document
`DUE DATE 1
`(a) Patent Owner’s Response to
`Petition
`(b) Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend
`the Patent
`DUE DATE 2
`(a) Petitioner’s Reply to Patent
`Owner’s Response to Petition
`(b) Petitioner’s Opposition to Patent
`Owner’s Motion to Amend the
`Patent
`DUE DATE 3
`Patent Owner’s Reply to
`Petitioner’s Opposition to Patent
`Owner’s Motion to Amend the
`Patent
`DUE DATE 4
`(a) Motions for an Observation on
`Cross-Examination Testimony of a
`Reply Witness
`(b) Motions to Exclude Evidence and
`Request Oral Argument
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Dated: December 9, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/ Charles M. McMahon
`Charles M. McMahon
`Registration No. 44,926
`Attorney for Petitioners ZTE
`Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.
`Brinks Gilson & Lione
`NBC Tower, Suite 3600
`455 North Cityfront Plaza Drive
`Chicago, IL 60611-5599
`Telephone: (312) 321-4200
`Fax: (312) 321-4299
`
`4
`
`
`
`COS for Joint Stipulation to Modify the Scheduling Order
`Attorney Docket No. 14569.0009
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION
`
`TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER has been served in its entirety on
`
`December 9, 2014, by electronic mail on the following counsel of record for Patent
`
`Owner IPR Licensing, Inc.:
`
`Lead Counsel
`Jonathan D. Link
`Reg. No. 41,548
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`555 11th Street, NW
`Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
`Telephone: (202) 637-2200
`Facsimile: (202) 637-2201
`E-mail: jonathan.link@lw.com
`
`
`
`
`Backup Counsel
`Julie M. Holloway
`Reg. No. 44,769
`Latham & Watkins LLP
`505 Montgomery Street
`Suite 2000
`San Francisco, California 94111-6538
`Telephone: (415) 391-0600
`Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
`E-mail: julie.holloway@lw.com
`
`/s/ Charles M. McMahon
`Charles M. McMahon
`
`
`
`1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
