IPR 2014-00452, Patent 6,323,853
`Presentation of Patent Owner Arendi
`April 21, 2015
`
`Robert M. Asher
`Bruce D. Sunstein
`Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP
`Boston, MA 02110 www.sunsteinlaw.com
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`1 of 20
`
`
`Presentation of Patent Owner Arendi
`April 21, 2015
`
`Robert M. Asher
`Bruce D. Sunstein
`Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP
`Boston, MA 02110 www.sunsteinlaw.com
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`1 of 20
`
`
`
`Presentation
`
`The Technology (slide 3)
`Goodhand (slide 8)
`Theory of the Petition (slide 12)
`Conclusion (slide 17)
`
`2
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`2 of 20
`
`
`
`The problem solved by the ‘853 patent
`Exemplary embodiment, specific example
`
`User works with a document created with anapplication
`program
`Needs an address associated with a name in the document,
`the address is in an information source accessed by a
`different program
`
`Upon a single execute command the system automatically
`determines if there is a namein the document (and in the
`process finds the name in the document), and
`uses it to search for the addressin the information source
`and
`perform an action
`§ e.g. insert the address in the document
`
`3
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`3 of 20
`
`
`
`The ‘853 patent system analyzes the
`document to identify contact
`information
`
`4
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`4 of 20
`
`
`
`Benefitsfrom the ’853 patent
`
`User can access the address (i.e. needed associated info)
`without leaving the document (or the application used to
`work on the document)
`Few user actions/keystrokes:
`§ Only «click» once
`§ User need not tell the system what 1st info to act on: i.e. no selection
`No need to start the database program
`No need to learn how it works
`System is intelligent: understands what the user wants,
`e.g.
`If there is no address in the database program, let the user save it in the
`§
`database
`If there is an name and an address in the document, check it, and/or save
`it in the database program
`If an incomplete address is found in the document, complete it
`If a mailing list name is found in the document, create merge letter
`
`§
`§
`
`§
`
`5
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`5 of 20
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘853 patent
`
`Upon a single entry of the execute
`command:
`analyzing the document to determine if the
`first information (e.g., a name) is contained
`therein
`If so, searching for second information (e.g.,
`an address) associated with the first information
`If second information is found do at least one
`of:
`§ Display the second information
`§ Insert the second information into document
`§ Complete the first information based on the
`second information
`
`6
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`6 of 20
`
`
`
`Levy declaration, paragraph 25
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`7 of 20
`
`
`
`(emphasis added). The word “upon” means “on’fl and is “used to say that someone
`
`or something is very close or has arrived”. (Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary,
`
`Patent Owner Response, page 17
`er Respon
`
`the execute command. Declaration of Dr. Levy. Exhibit 2008, paragraph 24.
`
`accessed on October 6. 2014 at hgpzllwww.merriam-
`
`webster.com/dictionary/upon.) In this context, the meaning of “upon” is clearly
`
`that the analyzing process occurs as a result of and proximate in time to entry of
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`8of20
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`8 of 20
`
`
`
`“analyzingthe document”
`
`is to determine “if the first
`information is contained therein”
`occurs “upon a single entry of the
`execute command”
`
`7
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`9 of 20
`
`
`
`GOODHAND
`
`Name resolution in an email To-field
`
`8
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`10 of 20
`
`
`
`Goodhand’sname resolution
`
`In an email
`program’s To:-field,
`look up what the
`user has typed into
`the To:-field and
`resolve these
`names
`The user must type
`the name in the
`To:field
`
`9
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`11 of 20
`
`
`
`Goodhand’sname resolution: the user
`identifies the recipient-1
`
`Col. 16, lines 40-46; Response, p. 20.
`
`10
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`12 of 20
`
`
`
`Goodhand’sname resolution: the user
`identifies the recipient-2
`
`Col. 17, lines 15-20; Response, p. 33.
`
`11
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`13 of 20
`
`
`
`Petition about Analysis in
`Goodhand - 1
`
`Petition p. 21
`
`12
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`14 of 20
`
`
`
`Petition about Analysis in Goodhand - 2
`
`Petitionp. 24
`
`13
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`15 of 20
`
`
`
`Checking ifTo-field is empty
`
`Petition p. 21:
`“Goodhand'ssystem must also analyze the text in
`the To: line to determine if there is anything
`there to process at all.”
`
`The claim requires:
`
`“analyzing the document to determine if the
`first information is contained therein”
`
`14
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`16 of 20
`
`
`
`User tells Goodhand
`that there is first information, and what it is
`
`Dr. Levy’s
`declaration,
`page11:
`
`15
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`17 of 20
`
`
`
`Goodhandfails to teach “analyzing the
`document to determine if the first
`information is contained therein”
`
`Dr. Levy, p. 13
`
`No analysis as required by the claim needed
`nor performed: any text and all text in the To-
`field is first information
`
`16
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`18 of 20
`
`
`
`Conclusion
`
`Goodhand, col. 16, lines 39-42:
`
`Determining merely whether the user has
`identified a recipient by entering text in the
`address field fails to meet the claim limitation:
`“upon a single entry of the execute
`command:
`analyzing the document to determine if the
`first information (e.g., a name) is contained
`therein”
`
`17
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`19 of 20
`
`
`
`Thank you.
`
`Robert M. Asher
`Bruce D. Sunstein
`
`Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP
`Boston, MA 02110 www.sunsteinlaw.com
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. - Exhibit 2009
`20 of 20
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
