`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper No. 53
`Date Entered: March 24, 2015
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`
` FORD MOTOR COMPANY, JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA,
`LLC, VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH
`AMERICA, INC., and SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CRUISE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00281
`Patent 6,324,463
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, HYUN J. JUNG, and GEORGE R. HOSKINS,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00281
`Patent 6,324,463
`
`As authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to the Petition (Paper
`
`10), Co-Petitioner Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (“JLR“) has submitted
`a “Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Chi Cheung Under 37 C.F.R. §
`41.10(c)” (Paper 47)1. The motion indicates that it is not opposed by Patent
`Owner, Cruise Control Technologies LLC. Paper 47, 2. The Motion is granted.
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c); see also IPR2013-00639, Paper 72 (setting forth
`requirements for pro hac vice admission).
`
`It is
`ORDERED that JLR’s Motion for pro hac vice admission is granted, and
`
`Mr. Cheung is authorized to represent JLR as back-up counsel in IPR2014-00281;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that JLR is to continue to have a registered
`practitioner as lead counsel in this inter partes review proceeding; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Cheung is to comply with the Office Patent
`Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in
`Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and that Mr. Cheung is
`subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 JLR also has filed a declaration in support of the motion (Paper 48).
`2 Available at http://www.uspto.gov/ip/boards/bpai/ptab_trials.jsp, “Representative
`Orders, Decisions, and Notices,” “Other Representative Orders and Decisions”).
`Supersedes IPR2013-00010, “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission,” Paper 8.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00281
`Patent 6,324,463
`
`PETITONER:
`
`Eric A. Buresh
`Jason R. Mudd
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`Jason.mudd@eriseip.com
`
`Matthew J. Moore
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`matthew.moore@lw.com
`
`Matthew D. Satchwell
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`matthew.satchwell@dlapiper.com
`
`William H. Mandir
`SUGHRUE MION PLLC
`wmandir@sughrue.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`
`John R. Kasha
`KASHA LAW LLC
`john.kasha@kashalaw.com
`
`Kelly L. Kasha
`KASHA LAW LLC
`kelly.kasha@kashalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`