Presentation of Petitioner Apple Inc.
`Joined by Petitioners Yelp Inc. and Twitter Inc.
`
`IPR2014-00086
`
`IPR2014-00812
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`1
`
`
`Joined by Petitioners Yelp Inc. and Twitter Inc.
`
`IPR2014-00086
`
`IPR2014-00812
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,010,536
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00086
`
`Grounds in This Trial
`
`• Whether Claims 2-12, 14, and 16 of the ’536
`patent are anticipated by U.S. Patent No.
`5,836,529 to Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`2
`
`
`
`The ’536 Patent, Claim 2
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`3
`
`536 Patent (Ex. 1001), Claim 2
`
`
`
`The ’536 Patent, Claim 16
`
`536 Patent (Ex. 1001), Claim 16
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`4
`
`
`
`Institution Decision
`Gibbs’ Overall Train Management System
`
`Institution Decision at 21
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`5
`
`
`
`The ’536 Patent, Claim 2
`“plurality of containers”
`
`536 Patent (Ex. 1001), Claim 2
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`6
`
`
`
`Institution Decision
`construction of “plurality of containers”
`
`Institution Decision at 9
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`7
`
`
`
`Institution Decision
`Gibbs’ “plurality of containers”
`
`. . .
`
`Institution Decision at 21-22
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`8
`
`
`
`The ’536 Patent
`
`536 Patent (Ex. 1001) at 8:63-9:12
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`9
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Gibbs (Ex. 1006) at Fig. 1; Ex. 1003 at ¶ 70;
`see Pet. at 12; Reply at 7-8.
`
`Gibbs (Ex. 1006) at 3:65-4:24;
`see Ex. 1003 at ¶¶ 69-70; Ex. 1009 at ¶ 10; Pet. at 12; Reply at 4-5.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`10
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Gibbs (Ex. 1006), at Fig 2;
`see Ex. 1003 at ¶¶ 70-72, 107; Pet. at 12, 20;
`Ex. 1009 at ¶ 48; Reply at 7, 8.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`11
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Gibbs (Ex. 1006) at Fig 8a;
`see Ex. 1003 at ¶ 94; Pet. at 15-16;
`Ex. 1009 at ¶ 35; Reply at 3.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`12
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Pet. at 18-19
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶ 90;
`see Pet. at 15-16, 18-19, 23-24; Reply at 11-13;
`see also Inst. Decision at 19.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`13
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶ 138; see Pet. at 18;
`Reply at 5-6, 14-15; see also Inst. Decision at 20.
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶¶ 141-42;
`see Pet. at 18-19; Reply at 1;
`see also Inst. Decision at 20-21.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`14
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Gibbs (Ex. 1006) at Fig 9a;
`see Ex. 1009 at ¶¶ 42-46;
`Reply at 11-12.
`
`Gibbs (Ex. 1006) at Fig 9b; see Ex. 1003 at
`¶102; Ex. 1009 at ¶¶ 42-46; Pet. at 16, 23-24;
`Reply at 3-4.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`15
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶¶ 108-09; see Pet. at
`12-13; see also Inst. Decision at 17-18.
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶ 122;
`see Pet. at 15-16; Reply at 1-2.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`16
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶¶ 159-61;
`see Pet. at 23-24, 30-31; Reply at 10, 11-12.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`Patent Owner Assertion
`
`UNlTED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK Ol’l’lCE
`
`discloses containers, it appears that Dr. Houh believes that it has to do with
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`“nesting.” See EX. 1008 (Houh Tr.) at 76:23—78: 10 (identifying objects referenced
`
`Although it is unclear exactly why Dr. Houh believes that Gibbs inherently
`
`APPI ,E, INC.
`Petitioner,
`V.
`
`EVOLUTIONARY lNTELLlG ENCE, LLC,
`Patent Owner,
`
`Case IPR 2014-00086
`Patent No. 7,010,536
`
`'l'Wl'l'TER, lNC. and YELP INC.
`Joining Petitioners,
`V.
`
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`Patent Owner,
`
`Case IPR 2014—00812 (Consolidated)
`Patent No. 7,010,536
`
`in Figs. 2-3 and 5:35 as disclosures of the “TMR subsystem” based on “infinitely
`
`nesting” containers) and 75:16—76: 16 (testifyng that “single container” he used
`
`when analyzing anticipation by Gibbs was composite of Figures 2 and 3).
`
`However, it appears that Dr. Houh has misunderstood the concept of
`
`“nesting,” as it is disclosed in the ’536 patent
`
`
`
`
`EX. 1001 at 9:4-9', 4:46-53 (“Containers are nestable and configurable
`
`as subset and superset .
`
`.
`
`. .”)', 4:54-57 (gateways are “nestable in a hierarchical or
`
`set and class network scheme”); 20:35-39 (describing scheme of “hierarchically
`
`
`
`nested containers i.e., element, document, file, database, warehouse, domain”);
`
`PATENT OWNER RESPONSE
`
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.120
`
`23:18-23 (referring to menu of possible gateways “within the subset and superset
`
`
`
`scheme of defined multiple hierarchically nested gateways”).
`
` Opposition at 39
`Opposition at 39
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp |nc., Twitter Inc. — EX. 1011
`
`18
`18
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`
`Ex. 2006 at ¶ 33-36; see Reply at 6.
`
`Ex. 2009 at 56:18-22; see Reply at 6.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`19
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`
`* * *
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 34:14-22
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 36:22-37:9; see Reply at 6.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`20
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 43:12-17; see Reply at 6.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`21
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1009 (Houh Suppl Dec.) at ¶ 20; see Reply at 6.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`22
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1009 (Houh Suppl Dec.) at ¶ 20; see Reply at 6.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`23
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Reply at 3-4
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`24
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1009 (Houh Suppl Dec.) at ¶¶ 43-44; see Reply at 4-5, 7;
`See also Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec) at ¶¶ 102-06.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`25
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1009 (Houh Suppl Dec.) at ¶¶ 45-46; see Reply at 4-5, 6-7;
`See also Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec) at ¶¶ 102-06.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`26
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1009 (Houh Suppl Dec.) at ¶22; see Reply at 6.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`27
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1009 (Houh Suppl Dec.) at ¶ 48; see Reply at 8.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`28
`
`
`
`The ’536 Patent, Claim 2
`“first register”
`
`536 Patent (Ex. 1001), Claim 2
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`29
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶ 81;
`see Pet. at 13-14; Reply at 10;
`see also Inst. Decision at 18.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`30
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶82-83;
`see Pet. at 13-14; Reply at 10;
`see also Inst. Decision at 18.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`31
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Reply at 10
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`32
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`
`Ex. 1009 (Houh Suppl Dec) at ¶¶ 61-62; see Reply at 10.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`33
`
`
`
`The ’536 Patent, Claims 8 and 16
`“acquire register”
`
`536 Patent (Ex. 1001), Claim 8
`
`. . .
`
`. . .
`
`536 Patent (Ex. 1001), Claim 16
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`34
`
`
`
`The ’536 Patent, Claim 2
`“active space, passive, and neutral space registers”
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`35
`
`
`
`Institution Decision
`construction of “active space, passive, and neutral space register”
`
`Institution Decision at 11
`
`Institution Decision at 12
`
`Institution Decision at 12
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`36
`
`Institution Decision at 12
`
`
`
`Institution Decision
`Gibbs discloses the “active space, passive, and neutral space register”
`
`Institution Decision at 19
`
`Institution Decision at 22
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`37
`
`Institution Decision at 23
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`“active space register”
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶103;
`see Pet. at 16; Reply at 4, 13;
`see also Inst. Decision at 19.
`
`Pet. at 16;
`See also Inst. Decision at 19; Reply at 12-13.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`38
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`“active space register”
`
`Gibbs (Ex. 1006) at 12:36-48;
`see Ex. 1003 at ¶106; Pet. at 16;
`Ex. 1009 at ¶52-53; Reply at 12-13.
`
`Gibbs (Ex. 1006) at 22:13-55; see Ex. 1003 at ¶¶102-
`06; Pet. at 16; Reply at 12-13.
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`39
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`“active space register”
`
`Gibbs (Ex. 1006) at 13:46-61;
`see Ex. 1009 at ¶52; Reply at 13.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`40
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`“active space register”
`
`Opposition at 43-44
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`41
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`“active space register”
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 191:4-9; see Reply at 13.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`42
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`“active space register”
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 202:8-16; see Reply at 13.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`43
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`“active space register”
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 260:15-261:18;
`see Houh Suppl Dec. (Ex. 1009) at ¶ 52.
`
`. . .
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`44
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`“passive register”
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶ 93;
`see Pet. at 17; Reply at 13-14;
`see also Inst. Decision at 19-20, 22.
`
`Pet. at 17; see Reply at 13-14; see
`also Inst. Decision at 19-20, 22.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`45
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`“passive register”
`
`Opposition at 48-49
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`46
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`“passive register”
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 208:2-11; see Reply at 14.
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 216:6-15; see Reply at 14.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`47
`
`
`
`Anticipation by Gibbs (Ex. 1006)
`“neutral space register”
`
`Pet. at 18; see Reply at 14-15; see also
`Inst. Decision at 20, 23.
`
`Ex. 1003 (Houh Dec.) at ¶ 98;
`see Pet. at 18; Reply at 14-15
`see also Inst. Decision at 20, 23.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`48
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`“neutral space register”
`
`Opposition at 50-51
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`49
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Assertion
`“neutral space register”
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 154:7-16; see Reply at 15.
`
`Green Dep. (Ex. 2009) at 156:15-157:6; see Reply at 15.
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`50
`
`
`
`The ’536 Patent, Claim 2
`“information element, second register, and gateway”
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`51
`
`
`
`Institution Decision
`“information element, second register, and gateway”
`
`Institution Decision at 22
`
`Institution Decision at 22
`
`Petitioners Apple Inc., Yelp Inc., Twitter Inc. – Ex. 1011
`
`52
`
`Institution Decision at 20-21
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
