throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Paper No. 17
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013-00472
`
`Patent 7,518,879
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`
`JONATHAN SHORT UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`E—FiZed Via PRPS
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`P. O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`To the Honorable Patent Judge Turner:
`
`PNY Technologies, Inc. (“Petitioner”) respectfully requests the pro hac vice
`
`admission of Jonathan Short into the present proceeding (IPR2013—00472).
`
`MEI 1749014lv.2
`
`

`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`This motion is filed further to the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition
`
`and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response, Paper No. 4 (the
`
`“Notice”), which authorizes motions for pro hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.10. Further to the Notice, this motion is filed in accordance with the “Order —
`
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR 2013-00010 (the
`
`“Order”) and no sooner than tw_enty—one (21) days after service of the petition.
`
`In
`
`accordance with the Order, this motion includes the following Statement of Facts,
`
`as well as a Declaration of Jonathan Short in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission, attached hereto and made a part hereof (the “Short Declaration”).
`
`II.
`
`Statement of the Facts
`
`Lead counsel for Petitioner, Mark Nikolsky, is a patent attorney registered to
`
`practice before the USPTO. Mr. Nikolsky will remain as lead counsel. Mr. Short
`
`will become back—up counsel.
`
`Mr. Short is an experienced patent litigator with an extensive background in
`
`the fields of intellectual property and information technology law.
`
`Mr. Short has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in
`
`this proceeding, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 7,518,879 (the “’879 Patent”), at least by
`
`virtue of Mr. Short’s active role as co—counsel in the co—pending patent litigation of
`
`the ‘879 Patent and another related patent before the United States District Court
`
`MEl l7490l4lv.2
`
`

`
`for the District of Delaware, Civil Action No.
`
`l:l2—cv—01478—GMS. Mr. Short has
`
`been substantially involved with this litigation and is familiar with all facets of the
`
`dispute, including but not limited to, the subject matter of the ‘879 Patent and its
`
`relationship with the prior art.
`
`Mr. Short works closely with the undersigned lead and back~up counsel in
`
`this matter. Mr. Short has reviewed, and is familiar with, the Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of the ‘879 Patent (Paper No. 1), the prior art cited by this petition,
`
`the arguments and factual assertions made by this petition, and the file history of
`
`the ‘879 Patent.
`
`III. Argument
`
`Upon a showing of good cause, the Board may admit counsel who are not
`
`register practitioners to appear pro hac vice in IPR and other Board proceedings.
`
`The applicable rule provides as follows:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding
`
`upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead
`
`counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the
`
`Board may impose.
`
`For example, where the lead counsel
`
`is a
`
`registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that
`
`MEI l7490l4lv.2
`
`

`
`counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`
`familiarity with the subj ect matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.l0(c).
`
`As
`
`seen in the Statement of Facts above and in the accompanying
`
`declaration, the conditions for admission pro hac vice have been satisfied.
`
`In
`
`particular, Mr. Short is an experienced litigator and has ample familiarity with the
`
`subject matter at issue in this IPR proceeding. Mr. Short has never been censured,
`
`disciplined, suspended, nor denied admission by any court or administrative body.
`
`Further, Mr. Short agrees to comply with or be subject to all relevant procedural
`
`and ethical rules. Finally, a registered practitioner, the undersigned Mr. Nikolsky,
`
`will remain as lead counsel.
`
`MEl l749()l4lv.2
`
`

`
`IV. Conclusion
`
`In View of the foregoing and the attached Short Declaration, Petitioner most
`
`respectfully submits that there is good cause for the Board to recognize Mr. Short
`
`pro hac vice as additional back-up counsel in this IPR.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`A ril 25 2014
`
`Dated
`
`
`
`. Chokshi
`Byi Sanjiv
`Reg. No. 44,080
`
`(Back—Up Counsel)
`
`Attorneys for PNY Technologies, Inc.
`McCarter & English, LLP
`Four Gateway Center
`100 Mulberry Street
`Newark, New Jersey 07102
`973.639.6987 (Mr. Nikolsky)
`973.848.5368 (Mr. Chokshi)
`
`April 25, 2014
`Dated
`
`MEI 1749014lv.2
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013—00472
`
`Patent 7,518,879
`
`DECLARATION OF JONATHAN SHORT
`
`IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`E—Fz'led Via PRPS
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`P. O. Box 1450
`
`’
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`1, Jonathan Short, hereby attest and declare the following:
`
`i.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New Jersey
`
`and the Bar of the State of Massachusetts.
`
`I am admitted to practice before the
`
`U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, the U.S. District Court for the
`
`District of Massachusetts, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,
`
`the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the U.S. Court of
`
`MEI 17490141V.2
`
`

`
`Appeals Federal Circuit, the U.S. Court of Appeals Second Circuit, and the U.S.
`
`Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
`
`ii.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`iii.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied.
`
`iv.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`v.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct and
`vi.
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § ll.l9(a).
`I
`
`vii.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice before the Office in any
`
`other proceeding within the last three (3) years.
`
`viii.
`
`I am an experienced litigator in the fields of intellectual property and
`
`information technology law, and have over ten (10) years of litigation experience
`
`in the federal and state courts.
`
`I have an established familiarity with the subject-
`
`matter at issue in this proceeding, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 7,518,879 (the “’879
`
`Patent”), at least by virtue of my active role as co—counsel in the co-pending patent
`
`litigation of the ‘879 Patent and another related patent before the United States
`
`MEI l749014lv.2
`
`

`
`District Court for the District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 1:12-cV—O1478-GMS.
`
`I have been involved with this litigation since near its inception and am familiar
`
`with all facets of the dispute, including but not limited to, the subject—matter of the
`
`‘879 Patent and its relationship with the prior art.
`
`I have also worked closely with
`
`lead and back—up counsel in this matter (Messrs. Nikolsky and Chokshi).
`
`I am
`
`familiar with the Petition for Inter Partes Review of the ‘879 Patent (Paper No. 1),
`
`the prior art cited by this petition, the arguments and factual assertions made by
`
`this petition, and the file history of the ‘879 Patent.
`
`I hereby certifiz that all statements made herein ofmy own knowledge are true, and
`
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and
`
`further certify that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful
`
`false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under 18 US. C. 59 1001, and may jeopardize the validity of the application or any
`
` Jonathan Short
`
`
`
`
`
`patent issuing thereon.
`
`Dated:
`
`April 15 , 2014
`
`MEI l7490l4lv.2
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`PNY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2013~00472
`Patent 7,518,879
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`E—Fz’led Via PRPS
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`P. O. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`To the Honorable Patent Judge Turner:
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this MOTION FOR PRO
`
`HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`
`JONATHAN SHORT,
`
`including
`
`the
`
`DECLARATION OF JONATHAN SHORT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
`
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION attached thereto and made a part thereof and
`
`further including this Certificate of Service, has been served in its entirety on April
`
`MEI 17490l41V.2
`
`Cert. 1
`
`

`
`25, 2014, Via electronic mail
`
`to Griswold@fr.coin, Hoffman@fr.com, and
`
`IPR23490—0008IPl@fr.corn.
`
`April 25, 2014
`Dated
`
`By:
`
`
`
`Mar E. Nikolsky (Lead ounsel)
`Reg. No. 48,319
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney for PNY Technologies, Inc.
`McCarter & English, LLP
`Four Gateway Center
`100 Mulberry Street
`Newark, New Jersey 07102
`973.639.6987 (Mr. Nikolsky)
`
`ME] l7490l4lV.2
`
`Cert. 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket