IPR2013-00246, No. 1037 Exhibit - Petitioners demonstratives for oral argument (P.T.A.B. Jul. 3, 2014)

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`Sipnet EU S.R.O.,
`Pe;;oner
`v.
`Straight Path IP Group, Inc.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2013-‐00246
`U.S. Patent No. 6,108,704
`
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`1
`
`

`Ex. 1001, ‘704 Patent, Fig. 1
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`2
`
`

`Ex. 1001, ‘704 Patent, Figs. 7,8
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`3
`
`

`Exhibit 1001, ‘704 patent, col. 5: 24-‐29
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘704 Patent, Col. 5: 31-‐34
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`4
`
`

`Exhibit 1001, ‘704 patent, col. 5: 39-‐44
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`5
`
`Ex. 1001, ‘704 Patent, Col. 5: 55-‐62
`
`

`Ex. 1001, ‘704 Patent, 6:17-‐25
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`6
`
`

`Oﬃce Patent Trial Prac;ce Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48764 (Aug. 14, 2012)
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`7
`
`

`Prac;ce Guide for Proposed Trial Rules, 77 Fed. Reg. 6868, 6870 (February 9, 2012) (ci;ng Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880,
`895 (2008)), See also, Oﬃce Patent Trial Prac;ce Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48759 (Aug. 14, 2012) (ﬁnalized version)
`
`Explana;on of Real Party in Interest Requirement provided by Chief Judge James Donald Smith, Board of Patent Appeals and
`Interferences (“BPAI”). Available at hep://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementa;on/smith-‐blog-‐extravaganza.jsp#heading-‐2
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`8
`
`

`In re Guan Inter Partes Reexamina;on Proceeding, Control No. 95/001,045, “Decision Vaca;ng File Date, “ (Aug. 25, 2008)
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`9
`
`

`In re Schlecht Inter Partes Reexamina;on Proceeding, Control No. 95/001,206 (June 10, 2010) at pp.4-‐5
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`10
`
`

`Exhibit 2026, p. 1
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`11
`
`

` 20 Q. Did you know him in Latvia?
`
`21 A. No, he was in Russia at this ;me, but we
`
`22 contacted at some conferences.
`
`
`23 Q. And have you had any discussions with
`
` 24 Mr. Antonov about the Exhibit 1004?
`
` 25 A. No.
`
`
`0036
`
` 1 MR. MORLOCK: Objec;on, scope.
`
` 2 MR. HOFFMAN:
` 3 Q. Have you had any discussions with
` 4 Mr. Antonov about the Microson Windows NT Server
`
` 5 box that you provided?
`
` 6 MR. MORLOCK: Objec;on, scope.
`
` 7 THE WITNESS: No.
` 8 MR. HOFFMAN:
` 9 Q. Are you aware of any ac;vi;es that
`
`
`10 Mr. Antonov has had in this maeer?
`
`
`11 MR. MORLOCK: Objec;on, scope.
`
`
`12 THE WITNESS: No.
`
` 13 MR. HOFFMAN:
`
` 14 Q. When is the last ;me you spoke with
`
`
`15 Mr. Antonov?
`
`
`16 A. About two weeks ago.
`
`
`17 Q. What did you talk about?
`
` 18 MR. MORLOCK: Objec;on, scope.
`
` 19 THE WITNESS: Snorkeling.
`
`
`20 MR. HOFFMAN: Snorkeling.
`
`
`21 Q. Have you had any -‐-‐ are you in regular
`
`
`22 contact with Mr. Antonov?
`
` 23 A. Yes.
`
` 24 MR. MORLOCK: Objec;on, scope.
`
`
`25 MR. HOFFMAN:
`
`
`0037
`
` 1 Q. Via e-‐mail?
` 2 A. Mostly personally.
` 3 Q. Just -‐-‐ is that by phone and in-‐person
`
` 4 mee;ngs?
`
` 5 A. That's correct.
`
`Exhibit 2043, Deposi;on of Yuri Kolesnikov, page 35, line 20 through page 37, line 5
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`12
`
`

`
` 12 Q. How do you know Mr. Butenko?
`
` 13 MR. MORLOCK: Objec;on, outside the scope
`
`
`14 of direct.
`
`
`15 THE WITNESS: We studied in the same
`
` 16 university on diﬀerent departments. And I was at
`
` 17 Department of Computer Science. He was at
`
` 18 Department of Physics. And we met because we were
`
`
`19 both ac;ve in systems programming community. And
`
`
`20 we kept in contact since then.
`21 MR. HOFFMAN:
`
`
`22 Q. So you're friends with him today?
`
`
`23 MR. MORLOCK: Objec;on, outside the scope
`
` 24 of direct.
`
` 25 THE WITNESS: You could say that we're
`
` 0174
`
` 1 friends. I would say acquaintances.
`
` 2 MR. HOFFMAN:
` 3 Q. So are you familiar with Stalker Sonware?
` 4 MR. MORLOCK: Objec;on, outside the scope
` 5 of direct.
`
` 6 THE WITNESS: I know that he founded that
`
` 7 company, and I know, roughly, what as a company is
` 8 doing. I didn't use Stalker Sonware products. I
` 9 do not know details of what's in them. And we
`
` 10 never discussed our -‐-‐ talked about current
`
`
`11 opera;ons of the company, and -‐-‐ and we never did
`
`
`12 any business together.
`
` 13 MR. HOFFMAN:
`
` 14 Q. Have you had any discussions with
`
` 15 Mr. Butenko about this maeer?
`
`
`16 MR. MORLOCK: Objec;on, outside the scope
`
`
`17 of direct.
`
` 18 THE WITNESS: No, we didn't. And I -‐-‐
`
` 19 I've heard that he's involved in some kind of
`
` 20 patent li;ga;on. I didn't know what this is
`
`
`21 about and why it was there. I only learned about
`
`
`22 involvement of Stalker Sonware when I was reading
`
` 23 the documents related to this case.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2045, Deposi;on of Vadim Antonov, Page 173, line 12, through, Page 174, line 23
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`13
`
`

`Exhibit 2045, AntonovDeposi;on, Page 13
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`14
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. [1]
`
`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. [3]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`15
`
`

`Exhibit 1017, Kolesnikov Declara;on, p.1[2]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`16
`
`

`Exhibit 2043, Kolesnikov Deposi;on, p.26
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`17
`
`

`Exhibit 2043, Kolesnikov Deposi;on, p.27
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`18
`
`

`Exhibit 1018, Ehrlich Declara;on, p.2
`
`Exhibit 1018, Ehrlich Declara;on, p.3
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`19
`
`

`7 Q. And when you say substan;ally iden;cal,
`
` 8 you didn't actually mean the two documents were
`
` 9 iden;cal, correct?
`
`10 A. No, then I would just say iden;cal.
`
`Exhibit 2044, Ehrlich Deposi;on, p.11
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`20
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. [4]
`
`Exhibit 1019, Yuri Guide, p. [2]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`21
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. [4]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`22
`
`Exhibit 1019, Yuri Guide, p. [3]
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. [4]
`
`Exhibit 1019, Yuri Guide, p. [4]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`23
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. [5]
`
`Exhibit 1019, Yuri Guide, p. [4]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`24
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. [6]
`
`Exhibit 1019, Yuri Guide, p. [5]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`25
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 1[18]
`
`Exhibit 1019, Yuri Guide, p. [17]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`Exhibit 1018, Ehrlich Declara;on, p.4
`26
`
`

`Exhibit 1019, Yuri Guide, p. [20]
`
`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 5[22]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`27
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 6[23]
`
`Exhibit 1019, Yuri Guide, p. [21]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`28
`
`

`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`29
`
`Exhibit 1018, Ehrlich Declara;on, p.7
`
`

`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`30
`
`Exhibit 1018, Ehrlich Declara;on, p.8
`
`

`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`31
`
`Exhibit 1018, Ehrlich Declara;on, p.9
`
`

`Exhibit 1020, pp.1, 15
`
`Exhibit 1021, pp.1-‐2
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`32
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 3[20]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`33
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 42[58]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`34
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 51[67]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`35
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 57[73]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`36
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 58[74]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`37
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 59[75]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`38
`
`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 90[106]
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 99[115]
`
`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 105[121]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`39
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 132[148]
`
`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 177[193]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`40
`
`

`Exhibit 1004, WINS, p. 134[150]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`41
`
`

`Exhibit 1023, Antonov Declara;on, p. 22[24]
`
`Exhibit 1023, Antonov Declara;on, p.31[33]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`42
`
`

`Exhibit 1023, Antonov Declara;on, p. 17[19]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`43
`
`

`Exhibit 1023, Antonov Declara;on, p.37[39]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`44
`
`

`Exhibit 1023, Antonov Declara;on, pp.44-‐45
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`45
`
`

`Exhibit 1023, Antonov Declara;on, p.36[38]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`46
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p.360[378]
`
`Exhibit 1022, Mayer-‐Patel Deposi;on, p.22
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`47
`
`

`Exhibit 1022, Mayer-‐Patel Deposi;on, p. 25
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`48
`
`

`Exhibit 1022, Mayer-‐Patel Deposi;on, p. 28
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`49
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 359[377]
`
`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 366[384]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`50
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 367[385]
`
`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 368[365]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`51
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 374[392]
`
`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 376[394]
`
`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 377[395]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`52
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 377[395]
`
`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 377[395]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`53
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 381[399]
`
`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 377[395]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`54
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 385[403]
`
`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 388[406]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`55
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 389[407]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`56
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 390[408]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`57
`
`

`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 389[407]
`
`Exhibit 1003, NetBIOS, p. 410[428]
`
`Sipnet v Straight Path/IPR2013-‐00246
`
`58
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.

Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

Up-to-date information for this case.
Email alerts whenever there is an update.
Full text search for other cases.
Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.

Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

Still Working On It

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

This document could not be displayed.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

One Moment Please

Your document is on its way!

Sealed Document

We are redirecting youto a mobile optimized page.

Document Unreadable or Corrupt

We are unable to display this document.

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases