`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`INNOLUX CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PATENT OF SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY LABORATORY CO., LTD.
`Patent Owner
`
`CASE IPR2013-00066
`
`PATENT 7,876,413
`
`NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE
`
`IN RESPONSE TO OBJECTION OF PETITIONER
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Previously Filed
`
`Exhibit 2001 — Complaint, Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
`Chimei Innolux Corp, et al., Case No. SACV 12-0021—JST (CD. Cal).
`
`v.
`
`Exhibit 2002 — Defendants” Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Outcome of Inter
`
`Partes Review, Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. v. Chimei Innolux
`
`Corp, et al.
`
`Exhibit 2003 — Supplemental Declaration of Gregory S. Cordrey in Support of
`Defendants' Motion for Stay, Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. v.
`Chimei Innolux Corp, et al.
`
`Exhibit 2004 — Defendants’ Reply in Support of their Motion to Stay,
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd v. Chimei Innolux Corp, et al.
`
`of
`Exhibit 2005 — Defendant Westinghouse Digital's Notice
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd v. Chimei Innolux Corp, et a].
`
`Joinder,
`
`Exhibit 2006 — Prosecution File History of US application serial no. 12/252,793
`(US Patent No. 7,876,413) Excerpt ~ Prior Art considered by the Office
`
`Exhibit 2007 — Sasuga, US Patent No. 5,432,626
`
`Exhibit 2008 — Display search Laboratory website material
`
`Exhibit 2009 — Sukegawa FIG. 1B marked by Dr. Hatalis at deposition to show
`vertical and horizontal limits of the opening in insulation film 9
`
`Exhibit 2010 — Sukegawa FIG. 2C marked by Dr. Hatalis at deposition to show
`hypothetical placement of a sealant
`
`Exhibit 201 1 — Dr. Hatalis deposition transcript, July 1, 2013
`
`i
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2012 — Declaration of Michael Escuti, PhD
`
`Exhibit 2013 — materials from LG website <TFT process>
`
`Exhibit 2014 ~ materials from CPT website <TFT process>
`
`Exhibit 2015 — materials from ShinMaywa website <evaporator>
`
`Exhibit 2016 —- materials from Pascal website <laser deposition>
`
`Exhibit 2017 — materials from MicroTec website <screen printing>
`
`Exhibit 2018 — materials from ULVAC website <laser ablation>
`
`Exhibit 2019 — materials from MicroFab website <ion beam etch technology>
`
`Exhibit 2020 — materials from SIJ website <inkjet>
`
`Exhibit 2021 — Henley_SID DIGEST OF TECHNICAL PAPERS 1994
`
`Exhibit 2022 — Shiba, US Patent No. 5,684,555, IPR2013—00068, EX. 1003.
`
`Exhibit 2023 — Dr. Hatalis deposition transcript, July 2, 2013, for No. IPR2013-
`00068
`
`Exhibit 2024 — Watanabe US Patent No. 5,504,601
`
`Currently Filed
`
`Exhibit 2025 — Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Michael J. Escuti
`
`Exhibit 2026 - Deposition transcript of Michael J. Escuti, dated September 6, 2013,
`for No. IPR 2013-00068
`
`Exhibit 2027 - Deposition transcript of Michael J. Escuti, dated September 5, 2013,
`for No, IPR 2013—00066
`
`’ii
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2028 — G.P. Crawford and M.J. Escuti, Liquid Crystal Display Technology,
`in Encyclopedia of Imaging Science and Technology, ed. J.P. Hornak, (John Wiley
`& Sons, Inc., 2002)
`
`Exhibit 2029 - Syllabus: 492/592-003 — Soft Electronics: Organic Devices &
`Liquid Crystal Displays
`
`Exhibit 2030 - Lab Module 4 of 4: OTFT: Fabrication and Characterization of an
`
`Organic Thin Film Transistor
`
`Exhibit 2031 - 2006-2473: A New Introductory Course on Signals, Circuits and
`Systems
`
`Exhibit 2032 - Syllabus for ECE 303 - Electromagnetic Fields.
`
`Exhibit 2033 — Syllabus for E 304 — Intro to Nano Science & Technology.
`
`Exhibit 2034 - Walter F. Goede, Seminar M—l: Status of Electronic Displays,
`Society For Information Display, 1996.
`
`Exhibit 2035 - Colin Prince, Seminar M—3: Active—Matrix LCDs, Society For
`Information Display, 1997.
`
`Exhibit 2036 — Terence J. Nelson, Seminar M—l: Electronic Information Display
`Perspective, Society For Information Display, 1998.
`
`Exhibit 2037 ~ Interactive Information Display Tutorial
`
`Exhibit 2038 - Komanduri et al., Late-News Paper: Polarization Independent
`Liquid Crystal Microdisplays, IPR2013-00068, Ex. 1008.
`
`iii
`
`
`
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. (“Patent Owner”) provides this
`
`Notice of Supplemental Evidence in Response to Objection of Innolux Corporation
`
`(“Petitioner”) dated September 12, 2013 and respectfully submits that Dr. Michael
`
`J. Escuti does qualify as a person of ordinary skill in the art at the relevant time. In
`
`response to Petitioner’s objection, Patent Owner submits Exhibits 2025—2038 as
`
`supplemental evidence pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2).
`
`Section 42.64(b)(l) requires that evidentiary objections “must identify the
`
`grounds for the objection with sufficient particularity to allow correction in the
`
`form of supplemental evidence.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(l); 77 Fed. Reg. 48676
`
`(Aug. 14, 2012). Petitioner objected on the grounds that Dr. Escuti’s “expertise is
`
`in photonics and liquid crystals rather than the TFT technology at issue in ‘413
`
`patent.” See paper No. 28, page 2. Dr. Escuti, however, provided testimony
`
`explicitly demonstrating his TFT design and fabrication experience and expertise,
`
`which is the TFT technology at issue in US. Patent No. 7,876,413 (the “’413
`
`patent” (Ex. 1001). See Exhibit 2025, Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Michael J.
`
`Escuti. Moreover, Dr. Escuti’s declaration, curriculum vitae, and deposition
`
`testimony together demonstrate that he is knowledgeable as to the level of skill of
`
`persons of ordinary skill in the art at the time when the patent application to which
`
`the ’413 patent claim priority was filed. Thus, Petitioner’s objection is not well
`
`grounded considering the record as a whole.
`
`It
`
`is unclear what experience
`
`
`
`Petitioner alleges Dr. Escuti is lacking. Therefore, Petitioner also does not provide
`
`the required particularity. Patent Owner thus reserves all rights to respond to any
`
`further explanations Petitioner is allowed to provide regarding its objections to Dr.
`
`Escuti’ s qualifications.
`
`Additionally, Petitioner’s assertion that Dr. Escuti failed to review the state
`
`of the art in 1997 takes Dr. Escuti’s testimony out of context and misinterprets it.
`
`As set forth in Exhibit 2025, Dr. Escuti was familiar with the state of the art in
`
`1997.
`
` It/éwfé/” £23.: ”/3 Respectfully submitted,
`Dated: {r
`
`Mark f:QV’MffprijReg. 3QZF§22~§K
`Edward D. Manzo, Reg. 28,139i\.__$
`HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
`
`a»
`
`,. 9/
`
`
`
`120 So. Riverside Plaza, #2200
`Chicago, IL 60606
`312-655-1500
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that the foregoing NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IN
`
`RESPONSE TO OBJECTION OF PETITIONER and each of Exhibits 2025 to
`
`2038 were served on the Petitioner by electronic mail on the following on
`
`September 25, 2013.
`
`Scott A. McKeown
`
`Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.
`
`1940 Duke Street
`
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`Gregory S. Cordrey
`
`Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
`
`3 Park Plaza, Suite 1100
`
`Irvine, CA 92614-2592
`
`Stanley Gibson
`
`Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
`
`3 Park Plaza, Suite 1100
`
`Irvine, CA 92614—2592
`
`
`
`