throbber
USOO7923311B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`(10) Patent No.:
`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`Zhang et al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`*Apr. 12, 2011
`
`(54) ELECTRO-OPTICAL DEVICE AND THIN
`FILM TRANSISTOR AND METHOD FOR
`FORMING THE SAME
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Hongyong Zhang;Yamato (JP); Naoto
`Kusumoto; Atsugi (JP)
`
`(73) Assignee: Semiconductor Energy Laboratory
`Co., Ltd.; Atsugi-shi; Kanagawa-ken
`(JP)
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer; the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 541 days.
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`(21) Appl.No.: 11/898,833
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Sep. 17, 2007
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2008/0044962 A1
`
`Feb. 21; 2008
`
`Related US. Application Data
`
`(60) Division of application No. 10/925,984, filed on Aug.
`26; 2004; now Pat. No. 7,507,991; which is a division
`of application No. 10/140,176, filed on May 8; 2002;
`now Pat. No. 6,847,064; which is a division of
`application No. 10/011,708, filed on Dec. 11; 2001;
`now Pat. No. 6,797,548; which is a division of
`application No. 09/291,279; filed on Apr. 14; 1999;
`now Pat. No. 6,335,213; which is a division of
`application No. 09/045,696; filed on Mar. 23; 1998;
`now Pat. No. 6,124,155; which is a division of
`application No. 08/455,067; filed on May 31; 1995;
`now Pat. No. 5,811,328; which is a division of
`application No. 08/260,751; filed on Jun. 15; 1994;
`now Pat. No. 5,648,662; which is a continuation of
`application No. 07/895,029; filed on Jun. 8; 1992; now
`abandoned.
`
`(30)
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`H01L 21/02
`(52) US. Cl.
`........ 438/151; 438/152; 438/156; 438/166;
`257/E21.133; 257/E21.413; 257/E21.414;
`257/E29.151; 257/E29.294
`(58) Field of Classification Search .......... 438/1507166;
`257/E21.133; 413; 414; E27.111; E29.151;
`257/278; 294
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,484,662 A
`
`12/1969 Hagon
`(Continued)
`
`EP
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0 341003
`11/1989
`
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co, Ltd’s Motion for Summary
`Judgment on its Claim of Infringement 0f the ‘480 Patent and on
`Defendants’ Inequitable Conduct, Laches, License, and Patent Mis-
`use Affirmative Defenses dated Mar. 19, 2007.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner 7 Michael S Lebentritt
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm 7 Eric J. Robinson; Robinson
`Intellectual Property Law Ofiice; PC.
`
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`A semiconductor device having a pair of impurity doped
`second semiconductor layers; formed on a first semiconduc-
`tor layer having a channel formation region therein; an outer
`edge of the first semiconductor film being at least partly
`coextensive with an outer edge of the impurity doped second
`semiconductor layers. The semiconductor device further
`includes source and drain electrodes formed on the pair of
`impurity doped second semiconductor layers; wherein the
`pair of impurity doped second semiconductor layers extend
`beyond inner sides edges ofthe source and drain electrodes so
`that a stepped portion is formed from an upper surface of the
`source and drain electrodes to a surface of the first semicon-
`ductor film.
`
`Jun. 19; 1991
`
`(JP) ....................................... 3-174541
`
`54 Claims, 8 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 1
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 1
`
`

`

`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`Page2
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,368,523 A
`149% Kawate
`4,376,672 A
`“983 Wang “A
`4,472,240 A
`9/1984 Kameyama
`4,514,253 A
`“985 Mmezakl
`2522:1232 A
`13813:; fiflderetfl
`4,601,097 A
`7/1986 813$;ng
`4,619,034 A
`10/1986 Janning
`4,624,737 A
`11/1986 Shimbo
`4,651,408 A
`3/1987 MacElwee et 31.
`4,654,295 A
`3/1987 Yangetal.
`4,663,494 A
`5/1987 Kishietal.
`4,693,960 A
`9/1987 Babichetal.
`4,746,628 A
`5/1988 Takafujietal.
`4,778,773 A
`10/1988 Sukegawa
`4788157 A
`11/1988 Nakamura
`4,797,108 A
`“1989 mether
`4803536 A
`2/1989 Tuan
`4,838,654 A
`6/1989 Hamaguchietal.
`4,851,363 A
`7/1989 Troxe“ et 31'
`4,857,907 A
`8/1989 Koden
`4,862,234 A
`8/1989 KOden
`4,864,376 A
`9/1989 Aoki etal.
`4,902,638 A
`“990 Mum
`4,930,874 A
`6/1990 Mitsumune et al.
`4,933,296 A
`6/1990 Parksetal.
`4,938,565 A
`7/1990 IChikawa
`4,948,231 A
`8/1990 Aoki etal.
`2’323’%5§ A
`31338 8211:2353“ 31'
`4,960,719 A
`10/1990 Tanaka etal.
`/1990 Aoki
`1333123:
`12/1991 Bate et 31
`5003356 A
`3/1991 WakZi et a1
`,
`,
`.
`~
`28%;? A
`$331 P13313133
`5,032,883 A
`7/1991 Wakaietal.
`5040 875 A
`8/1991 Noguchi
`5,041,888 A
`8/1991 Possin etal
`5,051,800 A
`9,1991 Shojietal.
`5,055,899 A
`10/1991 Walmi et a1.
`5,062,690 A
`“/1991 Whefien
`5,063,378 A
`11/1991 Roach
`5,070,379 A
`12/1991 Nomoto et al.
`5,071,779 A
`12/1991 Tanakaetal.
`5,091,337 A
`2/1992 Watanabe etal.
`5,124,769 A
`6/1992 Tanakaetal.
`5,132,820 A
`7/1992 Someyaetal.
`5,141,885 A
`8/1992 Yoshidaetal.
`5,147,826 A
`9/1992 Liu etal.
`5,153,702 A
`10/1992 Aoyama etal.
`5,153,754 A
`10/1992 Whetten
`5,157,470 A
`10/1992 Matsuzaki etal.
`5,165,075 A
`11/1992 Hirokietal.
`5,166,085 A
`11/1992 Wakaietal.
`5,166,757 A
`11/1992 Kitamura etal.
`5,170,244 A
`12/1992 Dohjo etal.
`5,173,753 A
`12/1992 Wu
`5,191,451 A
`3/1993 Katayamaetal.
`5,198,379 A
`3/1993 Adan
`5,198,694 A
`3/1993 Kwasnick etal.
`5,200,846 A
`4/1993 Hirokietal.
`5,200,847 A
`4/1993 Mawatarietal.
`5,208,476 A
`5/1993 Inoue
`5,229,644 A
`7/1993 Wakaietal.
`5,270,567 A
`12/1993 Morietal.
`5,275,851 A
`1/1994 Fonash etal.
`5,294,811 A
`3/1994 Aoyama
`5,306,651 A
`4/1994 Masumo
`5,311,041 A
`5/1994 Tominagaetal.
`5,313,077 A
`5/1994 Yamazaki
`5,315,132 A
`5/1994 Yamazaki
`5,327,001 A
`7/1994 Wakaietal.
`5,359,206 A
`10/1994 Yamamoto etal.
`5,366,912 A
`11/1994 Kobayashi
`5,366,926 A
`11/1994 Mei et 31.
`5,403,762 A
`4/1995 Takemura
`5,403,772 A
`4/1995 Zhang etal.
`
`,1
`
`5,420,048 A
`2’3§§’?2§§
`5,474,945 A
`5,485,019 A
`5,493,129 A
`5,501,989 A
`5,530,265 A
`5,532,850 A
`3328838 A
`5,572,046 A
`5’595’923 A
`5’610’737 A
`5’648’662 A
`5’656’511 A
`5’705’829 A
`’
`’
`5,712,495 A
`5,767,930 A
`3’311333 A
`5:821:565 A
`5,834,071 A
`5 834 345 A
`5’849’611 A
`5,859,443 A
`5888839 A
`5’889’290 A
`5,943,593 A
`6’020’223 A
`6,077,731 A *
`8188888 A
`’
`’
`6,226,060 B1*
`6’335’213 B1
`6,346,730 131*
`6,509,217 131*
`333833,; E:
`’
`’
`6’847’064 BZ
`6,979,840 B1
`2002/0042171 A1
`2002/0127785 A1
`
`'
`
`5/ 1995 KOHdO
`13/1332 VKVEWA 6111
`12/1995 Yamazaki etal.
`1/1996 Yamazaki etal.
`2/1996 Matsuzaki etal.
`3/1996 Takayamaetal.
`6/1996 Takemura
`7/1996 Someyagtal.
`188888 3311;221:131
`11/1996 Takemura '
`1/1997 Zhan 6131
`3,1997 Akiyinaef 31
`7,1997 Zhanget 31
`8,1997 Shindo
`'
`1/1998 M-
`131
`
`'
`Wang“
`1/1998 Suzawa.._. ..................... 257/49
`6/1998 Kobayashletal.
`88883 38:28:23;
`10/1998 Matsuzaki ettal.
`11,1998 Lin
`11/1998 Shimizu
`1
`12,1998 Y
`316 t
`1/1999 Yflzaki 2121
`3/1999 Ino et a1
`'
`'
`3,1999 Kim
`chi etal
`8/1999 N0
`'
`2,2000 Mefital
`6/2000 Yamazaki etal.
`138888 éfiflg 6:3
`- ge
`'
`................ 349/43
`5/2001 On1sawaetal.
`“2002 21mg etal.
`2/2002 K1takad0 etal. .............. 257/350
`1/2003 Reddy ........................... 438/153
`8888: xmefi'
`“’3 et
`'
`“2005 Zhang etal.
`12/2005 Yamazak1etal.
`4/2002 Zhang etal.
`9/2002 Zhang etal.
`
`............ 438/150
`
`EP
`EP
`EP
`EP
`GB
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0347178
`12/1989
`0416 798 A2
`3/1991
`0419160
`3/1991
`0456199
`11/1991
`2185622
`7/1987
`58-002073
`1/1983
`58-222533
`12/1983
`59-163871
`9/1984
`60-224270
`11/1985
`60-245124
`12/1985
`60245172
`12/1985
`61-093488
`5/1986
`61-139069
`6/1986
`61263273
`11/1986
`62-030379
`2/1987
`62-104171
`5/1987
`62-148928
`7/1987
`62-171160
`7/1987
`62-299081
`12/1987
`63-000164
`1/1988
`63-046776
`2/1988
`61-232483
`4/1988
`63-086573
`4/1988
`63168052
`7/1988
`63-224258
`9/1988
`63-237577
`10/1988
`63-289965
`11/1988
`64045162
`2/1989
`64-068726
`3/1989
`64-068967
`3/1989
`01-091467
`4/1989
`64-091120
`4/1989
`01-114080
`5/1989
`01-117067
`5/1989
`
`Exhlblt 1001, page 2
`
`.............. 257/66
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 2
`
`

`

`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`Page 3
`
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`
`01-144682
`01-157520
`01-180523
`01-155025
`02-001824
`02-001947
`02-008369
`02-027320
`02-033934
`02-152251
`02-157824
`02-177443
`02-203567
`02-208635
`02-210420
`02-222545
`02-223912
`02-224221
`02-234124
`02-234125
`02-250037
`02-260460
`02-268468
`02-272774
`02-281238
`02-310932
`03-091932
`03-116778
`03-138980
`03-201538
`04-360580
`06-267978
`06-267979
`06-267988
`06-275806
`06-275807
`
`6/1989
`6/1989
`7/1989
`10/1989
`1/1990
`1/1990
`1/1990
`1/1990
`2/1990
`6/1990
`6/1990
`7/1990
`8/1990
`8/1990
`8/1990
`9/1990
`9/1990
`9/1990
`9/1990
`9/1990
`10/1990
`10/1990
`11/1990
`11/1990
`11/1990
`12/1990
`4/1991
`5/1991
`6/1991
`9/1991
`12/1992
`9/1994
`9/1994
`9/1994
`9/1994
`9/1994
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Declaration of Stanley A. Schlitter in Support of Semiconductor
`Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd’s Motion for Summary Judgment
`(Exhibit 1, 5-21) dated Mar. 19, 2007.
`Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of (A) Non-Infringe-
`ment and Invalidity of the ’258 Patent; (B) Non-Infringement and
`Invalidity of the ’995 Patent; and (C) No Liability for Foreign Sales
`and/or Sales to Authorized Licensees dated Mar. 19, 2007.
`Declaration of Robert W. Unikel in Support of Defendants’ Motion
`for Summary Judgment of (A) Non-Infringement and Invalidity of
`the ’258 Patent; (B) Non-Infringement and Invalidity of the ’995
`Patent; and (C) No Liability for Foreign Sales and/or Sales to Autho-
`rized Licensees (Exhibit 2-17) dated Mar. 19, 2007.
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd’s Memorandum of
`Points andAuthorities in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Sum-
`mary Judgment dated Apr. 16, 2007.
`Declaration of Stanley A. Schlitter in Support of Semiconductor
`Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for
`Summary Judgment (Exhibit 2, 3, 6, 9, 10, 13, 77) dated Apr. 16,
`2007.
`Defendants’ Opposition to Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co.,
`Ltd’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its Claim of Infringement
`of the ’480 Patent and on Defendants’ Inequitable Conduct, Laches,
`License, and Patent Misuse Affirmative Defenses dated Apr. 16,
`2007.
`Declaration of Robert W. Unikel in Support of Defendants’ Opposi-
`tion to Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd’s Motion for
`Summary Judgment on its Claim of Infringement of the ’480 Patent
`and on Defendants’ Inequitable Conduct, Laches, License, and
`Patent Misuse Affirmative Defenses (Exhibit 2, 8-14) dated Apr. 16,
`2007.
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. ’s Reply in Support of its
`Motion for Summary Judgement on its Claim of Infringement of the
`’480 Patent and on Defendants’
`Inequitable Conduct, Laches,
`License, and Patent Misuse Affirmative Defenses dated Apr. 30,
`2007.
`Declaration of Stanley A. Schlitter in Support of Semiconductor
`Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd’s Reply in Support of its Motion for
`Summary Judgment (Exhibit 1-3) dated Apr. 30, 2007.
`
`Defendants’ Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Sum-
`mary Judgment of (A) Non-Infringement and Invalidity of the ’258
`Patent; (B) Non-Infringement and Invalidity of the ’995 Patent; and
`(C) No Liability for Foreign Sales and/or Sales to Authorized Lic-
`ensees dated Apr. 30, 2007.
`Declaration of Ryan E. Lindsey in Support of Defendants’ Reply
`Memorandum in Support ofits Motion for Summary Judgment of(A)
`Non-Infringement and Invalidity of the ’258 Patent; (B) Non-In-
`fringement and Invalidity ofthe ’995 Patent; and (C) No Liability for
`Foreign Sales and/or Sales to Authorized Licensees (Exhibit A-G)
`dated Apr. 30, 2007.
`Joint Motion Requesting Court to Vacate Order on Summary Judg-
`ment of (I) Invalidity ofU.S. Patent No. 6,756,258 as to Obviousness
`and (II) Infringement of US. Patetnt No. 6,404,480 dated Jul. 5,
`2007.
`Rule 41 Stipulation of Dismissal dated Jul. 6, 2007.
`Order Granting Joint Motion Requesting Court to Vacate Order on
`Summary Judgment of(I) Invalidity ofU.S. Patent No. 6,756,258 as
`to Obviousness and (II) Infringement of US. Patent No. 6,404,480
`dated Jul. 6, 2007.
`Defendant Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.’s Notice of Motion and
`Motion for Clarification of the Court’s Claim Construction Order
`Regarding US. Patent Nos. 6,404,480 and 6,756,258; Memorandum
`of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof dated Jun. 9, 2006,
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
`v. Chi Mei
`Optoelectronics Corp., et al., No. C 04-04675 MHP, 9 pages.
`Plaintiff Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd.’ s Memorandum
`of Points and Authorities in Support of Its Opposition to CMO’s
`Motion for Clarification of the Court’s Claim Construction Order
`dated Jun. 26, 2006, Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. v.
`Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp., et al.
`, No. C 04-04675 MHP, 10
`pages.
`Defendant Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.’s Reply Memorandum in
`Support of Its Motion for Clarification dated Jun. 29, 2006, Semicon—
`ductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics
`Corp., et al., No. C 04-04675 MHP, 8 pages.
`Memorandum & Order Re: Motion for Clarification dated Jul. 28,
`2006, Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. v. Chi Mei
`Optoelectronics Corp., et al., No. C 04-04675 MHP, 3 pages.
`Memorandum & Order, Claim Construction, Mar. 24, 2006, US.
`District Court, Northern District of California, Semiconductor
`Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp., et al.,
`No. C 04-04675 MHP.
`Stipulation of Dismissal of SEL’s Claims Against Proview and
`Proview’s Claims Against SEL dated Feb. 2, 2007.
`Order (Proview Dismissal) dated Feb. 7, 2007.
`Stipulation ofDismissal of SEL’ s Claims Against all Defendents, and
`Defendants’ Claims Against SEL dated Apr. 27, 2007.
`[Proposed] Order (All Defendants Dismissal) dated Apr. 27, 2007.
`Order (All Defendants Dismissal) dated Apr. 30, 2007.
`Plaintiff’ s Original Complaint, Filed May 5, 2006, US. District
`Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Semiconductor
`Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd, v. HannStar Display Corp. et al., Case
`No. 2-06CV—190.
`Defendant’s Final Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying Docu-
`ment Production dated Aug. 28, 2006.
`Miyata et al., “Two-Mask Step-Inverted Staggered ot-Si TFT-Ad-
`dressed LCD’s,” SID International Symposium Digest of Technical
`Papers, pp. 155-158, May 1989.
`Yo shida et al ., “A 9-in. Multicolor LCD Addressed by ot-Si TFTs with
`High-Field-Effect Mobilities,” SID International Symposium Digest
`of Technical Papers, pp. 242-246, May 1988.
`Castleberry et al., “A 1 Mega-Pixel Color ot-Si TFT Liquid-Crystal
`Display,” SID International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers,
`pp. 232-234, May 1988.
`Peter Van Zant, “Microchip Fabrication: A Practical Guide to Semi-
`conductor Processing” (McGraW-Hill, 2"d ed. 1990).
`Kern & Decked, “Thin Film Processes” (Academic Press 1978).
`Brian Chapman, “Glow Discharge Processes,” (John Wiley & Sons
`1980), p. 299.
`Maissel & Glang, “Handbook of Thin Film Technology,” pp. 7-44
`(McGraW-Hill 1983).
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 3
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 3
`
`

`

`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`Page 4
`
`C. Adams and A. Capio, “Edge Profiles in the Plasma Etching of
`Polycrystalline Silicon,” J. Electrochem. Soc.: Solid-State Science
`and Tech., Feb. 1981, pp. 366-370.
`Y. Asai et al., “A 6.7-in. Square High-Resolution Full-Color TFT-
`LCD,” Japan Display 1989, pp. 514-517.
`A. Bell and D. Hess, “Fundamentals and Applications of Plasma
`Chemistry for IC Fabrication,” The Electrochemical Society, May 12,
`1985.
`D. Castleberry et al., “a-Si Addressed Liquid Crystal Aircraft Dis-
`play,” American Inst. ofAeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 1984, pp.
`296-300.
`T. Chikamura et al., “The Characteristics ofAmorphous Silicon TFT
`and Its Application in Liquid Crystal Display,” Mat. Res. Coc. Symp.
`Proc., vol. 95, 1987, pp. 421-430.
`J. Coburn and H. Winters, “Plasma etchingiA Discussion of
`Mechanisms,” J. Vac. Sci. Tech., 16(2), Mar/Apr. 1979, pp. 391-403.
`M. Dohjo et al., “Low Resistance Mo-Ta Gate-Line Material for
`Large-Area a-Si TFT-LCDs,” Proceedings of the SID, vol. 29/4,
`1988, pp. 330-332.
`I. Haller et al., “Selective Wet and Dry Etching of Hydrogenated
`Amorphous Silicon and Related Materials,” J. Electrochem. Soc.:
`Solid-State Science and Tech., Aug. 1988, pp. 2042-2045.
`H. Hayama and M. Matsumura, “Amorphous-Silicon Thin-Film
`Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 36(9),
`May 1, 1980, pp. 754-755.
`W. Howard, “Active-Matrix Techniques for Displays,” Proceedings
`ofthe SID, vol. 27/4, 1986, pp. 313-326.
`N. Ibaraki, “Active Matrix Crystal Manufacturing Process,” Nikkei
`Business Publications, Inc., pp. 146-155.
`K. Ichiawa, “14.3-in-Diagonal 16-Color TFT-LCD Panel Using
`(x-SizH TFTs,” SID Digest 1989, pp. 226-229.
`M. Ikeda et al., “Low Resistance Copper Address Line for TFT
`LCD,” Japan Display, 1989, pp. 498-501.
`Y. Kaneko et al., “Analysis and Design of ot-Si TFT/LCD Panels with
`a Pixel Model,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 36, No.
`12, Dec. 1989, pp. 2953-2958.
`Y. Lee, “Reactive Ion Etching,” Mar. 10, 1983.
`H. Lehmann & R. Widmer, “Dry Etching for Pattern Transfer,” J. Vac.
`Sci. Tech., 17(5), Sep./Oct. 1980, pp. 1177-1183.
`J.
`R. Light,
`“Reactive
`Ion Etching of Aluminum/Silicon,”
`Electrochem. Soc.: Solid-State Science and Tech., Nov. 1983, pp.
`2225-2230.
`M. Matsumura, Amorphous Silicon Transistors and Integrated Cir-
`cuits,: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Solid State Devices,
`Tokyo, 1982, pp. 487-491.
`H. Mattausch et al., “Reactive Ion Etching ofTa-Silicide/Polysilicon
`Double Layers for the Fabrication of Integrated Circuits,” J. Vac. Sci.
`Tech, B1(1), Jan-Mar. 1983, pp. 15-22.
`M. Mieth andA. Barker, “Anisotropic Plasma Etching of Polysilicon
`Using SF6 and CFC13,” J. Vac. Sci. Tech., A1(2), Apr.-Jun. 1983, pp.
`629-635.
`H. Moriyama et al., “A 12-in. Full-Color Ot-SIZH TFT-LCD With
`Pixel Electrode Buried in Gate Insulator,” Proceedings of the SID,
`vol. 31/1, 1990, pp. 13-17.
`Y. Nara and M. Matsumura, “Experimental Study of Amorphous
`Silicon Integrated Circuit,” Proceedings of the 13th Conference on
`Solid State Devices, Tokyo, 1982, pp. 257-261.
`T. Nomoto et al., “A 9-in. Diagonal Full Color LCD Using T2-Gate
`Electrode ot-Si TFT,” Japan Display 1989, pp. 502-505.
`Y Oana et al. “A 9.5-inch Diagonal Multicolor Amorphous Silicon
`TFT-LCD Panel,” 1985 Int’l Display Research Conference.
`Y Oana, “Technical Developments and Trends in ot-Si TFT-LCDs, ”
`Journal ofNon-Crystalline Solids 115, 1989, pp. 27-32.
`P. Parrens, “Anisotropic and Selective Reactive Ion Etching of
`Polysilicon Using SF6,” J.Vac. Sci. Tech., 19(4), Nov/Dec. 1981, pp.
`1403-1407.
`M. Powell and J. Orton, “Characteristics ofAmorphous Silicon Stag-
`gered-Electrode Thin-Film Transistors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 45(2), Jul.
`15, 1984, pp. 171-173.
`J. Pankove, “Semiconductors and Semimetals,” Academic Press
`1984, vol. 21, Part D, pp. 89-114.
`
`A. Snell et al., “Application ofAmorphous Silicon Field Effect Tran-
`sistors in Addressable Liquid Crystal Display Panels,” App. Phys. 24,
`1981, pp. 357-362.
`V. Dorfman, “The Use of Selective-Etching and Masking Principles
`in Integrated-Circuit Manufacture,” Soviet Microelectronics, vol. 5,
`No. 2, Mar/Apr. 1976, pp. 81-101.
`E. Takeda, “An Amorphous Si TFT Array with Tan/SiNx Double
`Layered Insulator for Liquid Crystal Displays,” 1988 Int’l Display
`Research Conf., pp. 155-158.
`M. Takeda, “12.5-in. LCD Addressed by ot-Si TFTs Employing
`Redundancy Technology,” Japan Display 1986, pp. 204-207.
`M. Thompson, “A Comparison of Amorphous and Poly Crystalline
`TFTs for LC Displays,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 137 and
`138, 1991, pp. 1209-1214.
`S. Uchikoga et al., Soda Lime Glass as a Substrate for TFT-LCDs,
`Japan Display, 1989.
`J. Vossen et al., “Processes for Multilevel Metallization,” J. Vac. Sci.
`Tech., vol. 11, No. 1, Jan/Feb. 1974, pp. 60-70.
`M. Yamano and H. Takesada, Full Color Liquid Crystal Television
`Addressed by Amorphous Silicon TFTs, Journal of Non-Crystalline
`Solids 77 and 78, 1985, pp. 1383-1388.
`M. Yuki et al., A Full Color LCD Addressed by Poly Si TFTs Fabri-
`cated at Low Temperature Below 450° C, 1988 Int’l Display
`Research Conference, pp. 220-221.
`C. Zarowin and R. Horwath, “Control of Plasma Etch Profiles with
`Plasma Sheath Electric Field and RF Power Density,” J. Electrochem.
`Soc.: Solid-State Science and Tech., Nov. 1982, pp. 2241-2247.
`M. Zhang et al., “Reactive Ion Etching for Submicron Structures of
`Refractory Metal Silicides and Polysilicides,” J. Vac. Sci. Tech.,
`B1(4), Oct-Dec. 1983, pp. 1037-1042.
`Complaint for Patent Infringement, and Demand for Jury Trial, Semi-
`conductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd., Plaintiff vs. Chi Mei
`Optoelectronics Corp., International Display Technology Co., Ltd.,
`International Display Technology USA, Inc., Westinghouse Digital
`Electronics, LLC and CTX Technology Corp., Defendants dated
`Nov. 3, 2004.
`Defendant Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.’ s Answer to Compliant for
`Patent Infringement, Demand for Jury Trial, and Counterclaim dated
`Feb. 28, 2005.
`Defendant Westinghouse Digital Electronics, LLC’s Answer to
`Complaint for Patent Infringement dated Feb. 28, 2005.
`Defendant International Display Technology Co., Ltd’s Answer to
`Complaint for Patent Infringement dated Feb. 28, 2005.
`Defendant International Display Technology USA, Inc.’s Answer to
`Complaint for Patent Infringement dated Feb. 28, 2005.
`Defendant Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.’s Responses to Plaintiff
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd’s First Set of Interroga-
`tories dated Apr. 4, 2005.
`Expert Report of Dr. Jerzy Kanicki and accompanying documents
`dated Oct. 15, 2006.
`Expert Report of the Honorable Gerald J. Mossinghoff and accom-
`panying documents dated Oct. 16, 2006.
`Expert Report of Professor Martin Adelman and accompanying
`documents dated Nov. 14, 2006.
`Rebuttal Expert Witness Report of Michael Thomas, Ph. D. and
`accompanying documents dated Nov. 14, 2006.
`Defendant Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.’s Notice of Motion and
`Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity
`ofClaims 3-6, 10-13 and 18-21 ofU.S. Patent No. 6,756,258 dated
`Nov. 14, 2006.
`Defendant Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.’s First Amended Answer
`to Complaint for Patent Infringement, Demand for Jury Trial, Coun-
`terclaim, and Certification of Interested Parties dated Nov. 9, 2006.
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd’s Opposition to CMO’s
`Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity
`ofClaims 3-6, 10-13, 18-21 ofU.S. Patent No. 6,756,258 dated Jan.
`9, 2007.
`Declaration of Stanley A. Schlitter in Support of Semiconductor
`Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd’s Opposition to CMO’s Motion for
`Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of Claims
`3-6, 10-13, 18-21 ofU.S. Patent No. 6,756,258 dated Jan. 9, 2007.
`Declaration of Michael Thomas, Ph. D. in support of Semiconductor
`Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd’s Opposition to CMO’s Motion for
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 4
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 4
`
`

`

`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`Page 5
`
`Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of Claims
`3-6, 10-13, 18-21 ofU.S. Patent No. 6,756,258 dated Jan. 9, 2007.
`Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.’s Reply in Support of its Motion for
`Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of Claims
`3-6, 10-13 and 18-21 of US. Patent No. 6,756,258 dated Jan. 18,
`2007.
`Declaration of Frank P. Cote in Support of CMO’s Reply in Support
`ofits Motion for Summary Judgment of US. Patent No. 6,756,258
`dated Jan. 18, 2007.
`Memorandum & Order Re: Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judg-
`ment dated Apr. 17, 2007.
`Memorandum & Order Re: Motions for Summary Judgment dated
`Jun. 19, 2007.
`Inoue et al., “Low Temperature CMOS Self-Aligning Poly-Si TFTs
`and Circuit Scheme Utilizing New Ion Doping and Masking Tech-
`nique,” Seiko Epson Corporation, TFT Research Laboratory, Aug.
`12, 1991, pp. 555-558.
`Kawachi et al., “Large-Area Doping Process for Fabrication of Poly-
`Si Thin Film Transistors Using Bucket Ion Source and XeCl Excimer
`Laser Annealing,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 29, No.
`12, Dec. 1990, pp. L2370-2372.
`Hayzelden et al., “In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy Studies
`of Silicide-Mediated Crystallization of Amorphous Silicon,” Appl.
`Phys. Lett., vol. 60, No. 2, Jan. 13, 1992, pp. 225-227.
`Hempel et al., “Needle-Like Crystallization ofNi DopedAmorphous
`Silicon Thin Films,” Solid State Communications, vol. 85, No. 11,
`Mar. 1993, pp. 921-924.
`Dvurechenskii et al., “Transport Phenomena in Amorphous Silicon
`Doped by Ion Implantation of 3d Metals,” Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), vol. 95,
`(1986), pp. 635-640.
`Wolf et al., “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era vol. 1: Process
`Technology,” © 1986, pp. 179.
`Wolf et al., “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era vol. 2: Process
`Integration,” © 1990, pp. 260-273.
`Defendant’ s Preliminary Proposed Claim Constructions and Prelimi-
`nary Identification of Extrinsic Evidence Pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2
`dated Jul. 22, 2005, including Exhibits A-L attached thereto.
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd’s Proposed Preliminary
`Claim Construction and Extrinsic Evidence dated Jul. 22, 2005.
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd’s Patent L.R. 4-2(b)
`Disclosure dated Jul. 22, 2005 including documents bates numbered
`as SEL-CMO 89041-89049.
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement dated Aug. 5,
`2005.
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd’s Opening Brief on
`Claim Construction and Supporting Evidence dated Sep. 20, 2005.
`Declaration of Donald R. Harris in Support of Semiconductor Energy
`Laboratory Co., Ltd’s Opening Brief on Claim Construction dated
`Sep. 20, 2005 including Exhibits 1-12.
`Defendants’ Claim Construction Response Brief dated Oct. 4, 2005.
`Declaration of Scott R. Mosko in Support of Defendants’ Claim
`Construction Response Brief dated Oct. 4, 2005 including Exhibits
`A-X.
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd’s Reply Brief on Claim
`Construction and Supporting Evidence dated Oct. 11, 2005.
`
`Declaration ofDonald R. Harris in Support of Semiconductor Energy
`Laboratory Co., Ltd. ’s Reply Brief on Claim Construction dated Oct.
`11, 2005 including Exhibits 14-18.
`Inter Partes Reexamination Communication dated Aug. 13, 2007 in
`Control No. 95/000,246 filed Mar. 22,2007 (Patent in Reexamination
`of 6,756,258).
`Defendant’ s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying
`Document Production dated Jun. 6, 2005.
`Revised Exhibits D-2, D-3, D-4, D-9 and D-15 to Defendant’s Pre-
`liminary Invalidity Contentions dated Jun. 14, 2005.
`Miyata et al., “Two-Mask Step-Inverted Staggered a-Si TFT-Ad-
`dressed LCDs,” SID International Symposium Digest of Technical
`Papers, pp. 155-158, May 1989.
`Yoshida et al., “A 9-in. Multicolor LCD Addressed by a-Si TFTs with
`High-Field-Effect Mobilities,” SID International Symposium Digest
`of Technical Papers, pp. 242-246, May 1988.
`Castleberry et al., “A 1 Mega-Pixel Color a-Si TFT Liquid-Crystal
`Display,” SID International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers,
`pp. 232-234, May 1988.
`A. Bell and D. Hess, “Fundamentals and Applications of Plasma
`Chemistry for IC Fabrication,” Journal of the Electrochemical Soci-
`ety, May 12, 1985.
`Inoue et al., “Low Temperature CMOS Self-Aligning Poly-Si TFTs
`and Circuit Scheme Utilizing New Ion Doping and Masking Tech-
`nique,” Seiko Epson Corporation, TFT Research Laboratory, Dec. 8,
`1991, pp. 555-558.
`Transcript of Michael Thomas, Ph.D., Dec. 14, 2006, Semiconductor
`Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd, v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. et al.,
`Case No. C 04 4675 MHP (N.D.CAL.), at 122:20-123:23.
`Appendix B to Rebuttal Expert Witness Report of Michael Thomas,
`Ph.D. (“Thomas Report”), Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co.,
`Ltd v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp. et al., Case No. C 04 4675
`MHP (N.D.Cal), Nov. 14, 2006.
`Transcript of Deposition of Shumpei Yamazaki, Aug. 24-26; 2006,
`Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
`v. Chi Mei
`Optoelectronics Corp. et al., Case No. C 04 4675 MHP (N.D.CAL.),
`at 404: 10-406:7.
`SEL’s Patent L.R. 4-2(b) Disclosure, Including Excerpt of Silicon
`VLSI Technology, Fundamentals, Practice and Modeling, James D.
`Plummer et al., p. 614, Prentice Hall, 2000, and Excerpt of Semicon-
`ductor Manufacturing Technology, Michael Quirk et al., p. 400,
`Prentice Hall, 2001.
`Peter Van Zant, “Microchip Fabrication: A Practical Guide to Semi-
`conductor Processing” (McGraw-Hill, 2nd ed. 1990), pp. 26-27.
`Peter Van Zant, “Microchip Fabrication: A Practical Guide to Semi-
`conductor Processing” (McGraw-Hill, 2nd ed. 1990), pp. 221-257.
`Order Granting Joint Motion Requesting Court to Vacate Order on
`Summary Judgment of(I) Invalidity ofU.S. Patent No. 6,756,258 as
`to Obviousness and (II) Infringement of US. Patent No. 6,404,480
`dated Jul. 6, 2007 (As titled, but in fact the Motion is Denied).
`C. Zarowin and R. Horwath, “Control of Plasma Etch Profiles with
`Plasma Sheath Electric Field and RF Power Density,” J. Electrochem.
`Soc.: Solid-State Science and Tech., Nov. 1982, pp. 2541-2547.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 5
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 5
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 2011
`
`Sheet 1 of8
`
`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`FIG.I(0)
`
`LASER RADIATION
`
`12
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`9n“ 7/// 1o
`
`hw/J/l—I—fil__h
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`FIG.I(b)
`
`LASER RADIATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MMé/I==
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 6
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 6
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 2011
`
`Sheet 2 of8
`
`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`FIG . 1(0)
`
`1.
`
`3
`
`
`
`—_‘— 2
`
`.«JM'-
`9
`%/%113
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LASER RADIATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LASER
`
`RADIATION
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 7
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 7
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 2011
`
`Sheet 3 of8
`
`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`FIG.2
`
`a gA E
`
`”II/[IIIIIIIIIIA
`
`xhibit 1001, page 8
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 8
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 2011
`
`Sheet 4 of8
`
`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`3 2 1
`
`FIG.3(A)
`
`FIG.3(B)
`
`P1
`
`%
`
`FIG.3(C)
`
`f—fi 6fl
`
`Villa
`2
`
`
`FIG.3(E) WI,
`
`
`
`
`
`VIII/[Illfl'IIIIIA
`’IIIIIIIIA
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 9
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 9
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 2011
`
`Sheet 5 of8
`
`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`FIG.3(F)
`
`
`
`FIG.3(G)
`
`[/4
`7/;
`”Alf-5,222,.
`
`.r-
`'14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG.3(H)
`
`13
`
`
`
`z;- {a
`”11min”
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 10
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 10
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 2011
`
`Sheet 6 of8
`
`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`FIG.4
`
`POINT B
`
`WWWWWWWfl/Wmflm
`lllllllllllllllllIIIIIIIIIIlllllllIllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllllllllllllllllllllllllIllllll
`
`l.7/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////,’////////l/A
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 11
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 11
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 2011
`
`Sheet 7 of8
`
`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`FIG.5
`
`[29\
`23 a II
`
`24 #51
`Jfi
`
`POINTA '
`
`Kw]
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 12
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 12
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Apr. 12, 2011
`
`Sheet 8 of8
`
`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`LDI'H-
`NNm
`OJ..—
`
`8
`
`*—
`
`:55;
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 13
`
`LO
`
`0
`
`(D
`
`— L
`
`1.
`
`Exhibit 1001, page 13
`
`

`

`US 7,923,311 B2
`
`1
`ELECTRO-OPTICAL DEVICE AND THIN
`FILM TRANSISTOR AND METHOD FOR
`FORMING THE SAME
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to an electro-optical device
`and a thin film transistor and a method for forming the same,
`in particular, to a method of fabricating polycrystalline, or
`microcrystalline, silicon thin film transistors.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`One method of obtaining a polycrystalline, or microcrys-
`talline, silicon film is to irradiate a completed amorphous
`silicon film with laser radiation, for crystallizing the amor-
`phous silicon. This method is generally well known. Laser-
`crystallized thin-film transistors fabricated by making use of
`this technique are superior to amorphous silicon thin-film
`transistors in electrical characteristics including field effect
`mobility and,
`therefore,
`these laser-crystallized thin-film
`transistors are used inperipheral circuit-activating circuits for
`active liquid-crystal displays, image sensors, and so forth.
`The typical method of fabricating a laser-crystallized thin-
`film transistor is initiated by preparing an amorphous silicon
`film as a starting film. This starting film is irradiated with laser
`radiation to crystallize it. Subsequently, the film undergoes a
`series of manufacturing steps to process the device structure.
`The most striking feature of the conventional manufacturing
`process is to carry out the crystallization step as the initial or
`an intermediate step of the series of manufacturing steps
`described above.
`
`Where thin-film transistors are fabricated by this manufac-
`turing method, the following problems take place:
`(1) Since the laser crystallization operation is performed as
`one step of the manufacturing process, the electrical charac-
`teristics of the thin-film transistor (TFT) cannot be evaluated
`until the device is completed. Also, it is difficult to control the
`characteristics.
`
`(2) Since the laser crystallization operation is effected at
`the beginning of, or during, the fabrication of the TFT, it is
`impossible to modify various electrical characteristics after
`the device structure is completed. Hence, the production yield
`of the whole circuit system is low.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is an object of the present invention to provide a novel
`method of fabricating polycrystalline, or microcrystalline,
`thin film transistors without incurring the foregoing prob-
`lems.
`
`In accordance with the present invention, in order to make
`it possible to crystallize a channel formation region and to
`activate the Ohmic contact region of the source and drain by
`la

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket