throbber
SEL EXHIBIT NO. 2019
`INNOLUX CORP. v. PATENT OF SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY
`LABORATORY CO., LTD.
`
`IPR2013-00064
`
`

`

`Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 37 (1998) pp. 4704-4710
`Part 1, No. 9A, September 1998
`©1998 Publication Board, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
`
`Electrical Instability of Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon Thin-Film Transistors
`for Active-Matrix Liquid-Crystal Displays
`Chun-sung CHIANG 1 , Jerzy KANICKI1· * and Kazushige TAKECHI2
`1 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, CenTer for Display Technology and Manufacturing,
`University of Michigan, Ann Arb01; Michigan, USA
`2 Functional Devices Research Laboratories, NEC Corp, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
`
`(Received May 14, 1998; accepted for publication July 1, 1998)
`
`We investigated the threshold voltage shifts (11. VT) of inverted-staggered hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) thin(cid:173)
`film transistors (TFTs) induced by steady-state (de) and pulsed (ac) gate bias-temperature-stress (BTS) conditions. Our
`study showed that, for an equivalent effective-stress-time, 11. VT has an apparent pulse-width dependence under negative BTS
`conditions-the narrower the pulse width, the smaller the 11. VT. This gate-bias pulse-width dependence is explained by an
`effective-carrier-concentration model, which relates 11. VT for negative pulsed gate-bias stress to the concentration of mobile
`carriers accumulated in the conduction channel along the a-Si:Hjgate insulator interface. In addition, our investigation of the
`methodology of a-Si:H TFT electrical reliability evaluation indicates that, instead of steady-state BTS, pulsed BTS should be
`used to build the database needed to extrapolate 11. VT induced by a long-term display operation. Using these experimental
`results, we have shown that a-Si:H TFTs have a satisfactory electrical reliability for a long-term active-matrix liquid-crystal
`display (AMLCD) operation.
`KEYWORDS: amorphous silicon thin film transistor, threshold voltage, electrical instability, active-matrix liquid-crystal display
`
`1.
`
`Introduction
`There have been many studies of hydrogenated amorphous
`silicon (a-Si:H) thin-film transistors (TFTs) that concluded
`that two main mechanisms can explain the electrical insta(cid:173)
`bilities. I-B) One is the carrier trapping in the gate insulator.
`In most cases, the gate insulator of a-Si:H TFTs is made of
`amorphous silicon nitride (a-SiNx :H) deposited by plasma(cid:173)
`enhanced chemical-vapor-deposition (PECVD) technique. It
`is known that this type of a-SiNx :H can have a high density of
`defects, 1•2) which could trap charges during a gate bias-stress
`of a-Si:H TFTs. This trapping will induce a threshold voltage
`(VT) shift. The other mechanism is point defect creation at or
`near the a-Si:Hj a-SiNx :H interface that will increase the den(cid:173)
`sity of deep-gap states, causing the electron threshold voltage
`to shift in a more positive direction.4•5•8) A decrease in defect
`density has the opposite effect on VT.
`Until recently, most studies of a-Si:H TFT electrical in(cid:173)
`stability have employed a steady-state (de) bias-temperature(cid:173)
`stress (BTS) conditions in which a constant gate bias is ap(cid:173)
`plied to the gate electrode and a-Si:H TFT characteristics
`are measured during and/ or after a certain bias-stress pe(cid:173)
`riod. A satisfactory description of the stress-voltage, stress(cid:173)
`temperature, and stress-time dependence of the threshold
`voltage shift (.6. VT) has been reported for such experiments. 1)
`However, in active-matrix liquid-crystal displays (AMLCDs),
`a-Si:H TFTs are bias-stressed under a pulsed (ac) gate(cid:173)
`bias addressing (line-at-a-time) with a typical addressing fre(cid:173)
`quency of 60 Hz.9) It has been pointed out that certain differ(cid:173)
`ences exist in .6. VT between the steady-state and pulsed-bias
`stresses. 10· 11) Therefore, from a practical point of view, to ob(cid:173)
`tain a good estimation of the long-term reliability of a-Si:H
`TFTs in AMLCDs, it is necessary to understand the details
`of the electrical instability of a-Si:H TFTs under pulsed gate(cid:173)
`bias stress conditions that are similar to a typical AMLCD
`addressing conditions.
`In this paper, we investigate the .6. VT of bottom-gate back-
`
`*E-mail address: kanichi@eecs.umich.edu
`
`channel-etched a-Si:H TFTs induced by pulsed BTS. First,
`we examine the mechanism responsible for .6. VT in our a(cid:173)
`Si:H TFTs. Then, we propose a model to explain the ob(cid:173)
`served difference between steady-state and pulsed BTS in(cid:173)
`duced .6. VT, especially in the case of the negative gate-bias
`stress. We also examine methods of estimating .6. VT of a-Si:H
`TFTs under pulsed bias-stress having both positive and nega(cid:173)
`tive gate-voltage cycles. Using the proposed pulsed gate-bias
`instability model, an example of the reliability estimation of
`AMLCDs is given at the end of this paper.
`
`2. Experiment
`Figure 1(a) shows the cross-section of the inverted(cid:173)
`staggered bottom-gate a-Si:H TFT used in this study. Both
`a-Si:H and a-SiNx :H layers are about 3000 A thick. This TFT
`is a back-channel-etched type with a phosphorus (P) doped
`(n+) a-Si:H layer 500 A thick that is used to form an ohmic
`contact to chromium sourcejdrain electrodes. An over-etch
`process was used to assure complete removal of then+ a-Si:H
`in the back-channel region. At room temperature ("'-'25°C),
`the regular a-Si:H TFT with channel width(W)jlength(L)
`of 80 11m! 12 f,Lm has a field-effect mobility (tlFE) of about
`0.9cm2/V·s and a threshold voltage (VT) of 1 V. These val(cid:173)
`ues indicate a good electrical performance of a-Si:H TFTs
`used in this study. Together with the regular TFTs, ambipolar
`a-Si:H TFTs were also fabricated for studying the electrical
`instability mechanism as shown in Fig. l(b). The fabrication
`process for the ambipolar TFT is the same as for the regu(cid:173)
`lar TFT except that then+ a-Si:H layer was omitted and alu(cid:173)
`minum was used as the sourcejdrain contact metal. To have
`a similar process sequence for both types of a-Si:H TFTs, an
`etching process of the back-channel was used for the ambipo(cid:173)
`lar a-Si:H TFTs with an etching time approximately equal to
`the over-etching time used for the regular TFT. In addition,
`the ambipolar a-Si:H TFT has a channel length of 480 11m; a
`long channel length is selected in this case to reduce the effect
`of series resistance of the source/ drain contacts.
`A series of bias-temperature-stress experiments were con(cid:173)
`ducted for both steady-state and pulsed bias-stress conditions
`
`4704
`
`

`

`Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 37 (1998) Pt. 1, No. 9A
`
`C. CHIANG eta[.
`
`4705
`
`a-SiNx:H (3000 A)
`
`H P 4156
`Semiconductor
`Analyzer
`1-----t
`
`1
`
`2
`
`HP41501
`Pulse
`Generator
`
`Fig. 2. Schematic of experimental setup used for steady-state and pulsed
`bate bias-temperature-stress experiments.
`
`a-SiNx:H (3000 A)
`
`dark condition.
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`a-Si:H (3000 A)
`
`Fig. 1. Cross-sections of (a) regular and (b) ambipolar back-channel-etch
`a-Si:H TFTs used in this study.
`
`using an HP4156A semiconductor parameter analyzer and a
`pulse generator (Fig. 2). Pulses with different waveforms
`were applied to the gate electrode. To assure a uniform elec(cid:173)
`trical field distribution along the a-Si:H/ a-SiNx :H interface,
`the drain-to-source voltage (Vn) of the TFr was set to 0 V
`during the BTS. At the preselected stress time, the bias-stress
`was interrupted and the current-voltage Un-Vo) character(cid:173)
`istics were immediately measured in the saturation region
`(Vn > Va - VT) at the temperature used for BTS. For the
`ambipolar a-Si:H TFTs, a drain voltage of 15 V and a larger
`gate voltage (sweeping from -30V to +30V) were used to
`obtain both electron and hole conduction characteristics. A
`delay time of 2 s was used for each measurement point to re(cid:173)
`duce the transient effect, This delay time was a trade-off be(cid:173)
`tween getting a significant hole current and reducing the mea(cid:173)
`surement voltage .stress effect. Because of the longer mea(cid:173)
`surement time needed for the ambipolar TFrs, a lower stress
`temperature (40°C) was used to reduce the stress effect dur(cid:173)
`ing the In-Va sweeping. On the other hand, a higher stress
`temperature (TsT = 70°C) was chosen for the regular a-Si:H
`TFTs during the steady-state and pulsed BTS to accelerate
`the electrical instability that can be produced within a reason(cid:173)
`able experimental period. The threshold voltage (VT) at stress
`time (tsT) during the stress of a-Si:H TFr was extracted from
`the In-Va characteristics by using the conventional current(cid:173)
`voltage equations derived from the gr;:tdual channel approxi(cid:173)
`mation (GCA) theory,
`w
`1
`ln(tsT) = lJLFECiL[Va- VT(fsT)]:-
`
`?
`
`with Vn > (Va- VT)
`
`(1)
`
`where In· <tsT) is the measured drain current at tsT and Ci is
`the gate insulator capacitance per unit area. We used regular
`a-Si:H TFrs with L = 10 J.Lm and W = 60 J.Lm, that is sim(cid:173)
`ilar to the TFrs used in AMLCDs. It should be noted that
`all BTS and current-voltage measurements were conducted in
`
`3. Results and Discussion
`3.1 Steady-state BTS of a-Si:H TFTs
`It has been previously indicated that the mechanism re(cid:173)
`sponsible for 1:::. VT of a-Si:H TFTs can be determined by using
`ambipolar a-Si:H TFrs.4l The ambipolar a-Si:H TFTs pro(cid:173)
`vide the capability of measuring electron and hole conduc(cid:173)
`tions simultaneously because no n+ a-Si:H layer is used at
`source/drain contacts to block the hole current. If charges
`are trapped in a-SiNx:H during BTS, both electron and hole
`conduction characteristics will have rigid shift in the same di(cid:173)
`rection. On the other hand, they will shift in the opposite di(cid:173)
`rections if defect density is changed by BTS. Figure 3 shows
`the evolution of In-Va characteristics for our ambipolar a(cid:173)
`Si:H TFrs under +20V and -20V steady-state BTS. As
`can be seen in this figure, the electrons have a higher con(cid:173)
`duction current than holes, indicating that electrons have a
`higher mobility in a-Si:H TFrs. For the +20 V BTS condi(cid:173)
`tion, an apparent right shift was obtained for electron conduc(cid:173)
`tion characteristics. The hole conduction characteristics, on
`the other hand, shifted slightly to the right at the beginning of
`the positive gate-bias stress and then started to shift to the left.
`These results indicate that there is an increase of the density of
`deep-gap states in a-Si:H near the a-Si:Hja-SiNx:H interface,
`which causes the electron and hole conduction characteristics
`to shift in opposite directions. However, there are also charge
`trapping which induces the initial right shift of the hole con(cid:173)
`duction characteristics. The combination of charge trapping
`and defect creation causes an additive and complimentary ef(cid:173)
`fects in the shifts of electron and hole conduction characteris(cid:173)
`tics, respectively. For -20 V BTS, an apparent left shift was
`obtained for electron conduction characteristics, and a steeper
`characteristics was obtained for hole conduction. This result
`corresponds to a decrease of deep-gap states in the band-gap
`region. Similarly to the positive BTS, charge trapping is also
`present and the resulting effects is large electron conductimi
`shifts and much smaller hole conduction shift.
`It was reported previously that, empirically, a stretched(cid:173)
`exponential function can well describe the stress-time and
`stress-voltage dependence of 1:::. VT in a-Si:H TFrs;1, 12l
`
`1:::. VT(tsT) = 1:::. VTo 11- exp [- c~T Y])'
`
`(2)
`
`

`

`4706
`
`Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 37 (1998) Pt. 1, No. 9A
`
`C. CHIANG eta!.
`
`--initial
`-------- 5-102 s = t
`ST
`············ 1·103 s
`---5-103s
`--1·104s
`
`-20
`
`-10
`
`0
`
`.. -
`~7
`.. ,~:f'
`,r .~.~
`l'tJ'
`"
`I
`!! II
`'I
`•:
`
`Ik
`
`.: I
`U I
`l
`J.l
`Stress: T ~ 40 oc
`V8T=+20V
`20
`30
`
`10
`
`Gate voltage (V)
`
`(a)
`
`--initial
`2
`-------- 5·10 S = 1gT
`............ 1-103 s
`---5·103s
`---l-104s
`
`~~
`~~·
`VD = 15 v
`,._~-;::;•
`~~=<·;~'
`'I ...
`{, f/
`i I ::
`II f!
`...
`~---fL.·
`,, :•
`·'
`'
`I .,
`/' ::
`} .. ,
`j:
`I
`/.·~'
`
`Stress: T8T = 40 oc
`V8T=-20V
`
`-Original
`---- tST=200s
`······tST=500s
`-~1000s
`- t5T=2000s
`
`10-5
`
`10-6
`
`10·7
`
`10-8
`
`10-9
`
`< '-"
`....f
`
`10-11
`-10
`
`-5
`
`8
`
`6
`
`TST=70°C
`
`5
`
`10
`
`0
`VG(V)
`
`(a)
`
`4
`
`-> ._,
`;.:
`~ 0
`
`2
`
`-2
`
`-4
`
`10-5
`
`10-6
`<
`......, 10-7
`=
`~
`10-8
`=
`·ta
`Q 10-9
`
`(.)
`
`10.10
`
`10-11
`-30
`
`10-5
`
`10-6
`
`10-7
`
`s
`=
`~ 10-8
`=
`·ta
`Q 10-9
`
`(.)
`
`10.10
`
`10-11
`-30
`
`-20
`
`20
`
`30
`
`102
`
`-10
`10
`0
`Gate voltage (V)
`
`(b)
`
`103
`Stress time (sec)
`
`104
`
`(b)
`
`Fig. 3. Evolution of Io-Va characteristics of the ambipolar a-Si:H
`lFTs induced by (a) positive and (b) negative steady-state gate
`bias-temperature-stress. The stress and measurement temperatures are
`40°C.
`
`(a) Evolution of Io-VG characteristics and (b) extracted !1 VT ver(cid:173)
`Fig. 4.
`sus stress time for the regular a-Si:H lFTs induced by steady-state pos(cid:173)
`itive and negative gate bias-temperature-stress. The 1FT chamtel width
`and length are 80 and 12 Jlm, respectively. The stress and measurement
`temperatures are 70°C.
`
`with
`
`where 11 VTo is the shift at infinite time, r is a characteris(cid:173)
`tics time constant, and {3 is the stretched-exponential expo(cid:173)
`nent which is temperature-dependent. For a short effective
`stress time (tsT « r), eq. (2) can be simplified as
`
`(4)
`Figure 4(a) shows the evolution of Io-Va characteristics
`of our ordinary a-Si:H TFTs under +20 V and -20 V steady(cid:173)
`state BTS at 70°C. Because of the presence of P-doped a(cid:173)
`Si:H layer at the sourcejdrain contacts, only the electron con(cid:173)
`duction characteristics are observed. The characteristics have
`right and left shifts under +20V and -20V BTS, respec(cid:173)
`tively. The evolution of the threshold voltage shift extracted
`from these curves, using eq. (1), is shown in Fig. 4(b). Fit-
`
`ting of the experimental data with eq. (4) is also shown; we
`obtained the stretched-exponential exponents {3 of 0.50 and
`0.32 for positive and negative BTS, respectively; and these {3
`values are similar to those reported previously. 1• 3l
`Figure 5 shows 11 VT as the functions of effective gate-bias
`stress voltages at various stress times. The effective stress
`voltage is defined as the difference between the applied gate(cid:173)
`bias stress voltage CVsT) and the initial threshold voltage (VTi)·
`It can be seen that there is a power-law dependence between
`11 VT and the effective stress voltage that can be described by,
`
`(5)
`
`This power law dependence on stress voltage indicates that
`the characteristics time constant r in eq. (2) must be stress(cid:173)
`voltage dependent. We can further simplify the stretched(cid:173)
`exponential equation to
`
`

`

`Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 37 (1998) Pt. 1, No. 9A
`
`C. CHIANG eta/.
`
`4707
`
`10-5
`
`10-7
`
`Pulse-width = 10ms
`10-6 Duty-cycle = 50%
`--Original
`-------- t8T=200s
`············ t8T=500s
`-·-·-·-·-·-· t8T=2000s
`-··-··········· t5T=5000s
`
`,.-.. 10-8
`$
`.....P
`
`10-9
`
`Slope= 1.7
`
`T =70 oc
`ST
`tsT= 1000 sec
`
`0.1 '---------'-------~~-----'------'
`20
`40
`
`1'1 VT as a function of effective stress voltage I VsT- V" I induced by
`Fig. 5.
`positive and negative BTS.
`
`10-11~...:--~--'=--~---J.--~--':--~-_j
`-10
`-5
`0
`5
`10
`VG(V)
`
`Fig. 6. Evolution of ID-VG characteristics of the regular a-Si:H TFTs in(cid:173)
`duced by pulsed positive and negative gate bias-temperature-stress. The
`TFT channel width and length are 80 and 12 j..l.m, respectively. The stress
`and measurement temperatures are 70° C.
`
`(6)
`
`where A is a constant. Equation (6) was often used for the
`estimation of 1'. VT in AMLCDs, 13l and will be used in this
`study. Table I lists the parameters extracted from the experi(cid:173)
`mental data obtained for the a-Si:H TFTs under positive and
`negative steady-state gate-bias stress. This data is consistent
`with the previously repmted results. 13l
`
`4
`
`V8T= + 20V
`3 -o-d.c.
`-~>.- PW=lOOms
`2 -v-PW=lms
`--o-- PW=20f.I.S
`
`T8T= 70 °C
`50% duty-cycle
`
`3.2 Pulsed BTS of a-Si:H TFTs
`Figure 6 show the evolution of In-Vo characteristics of a(cid:173)
`Si:H TFTs during a positive and negative pulsed BTS with a
`duty-cycle of 50% and gate-bias pulse width of 50 f.LS at 70°C.
`A qualitative comparison between Fig. 6 and Fig. 4(a) shows
`that, under positive BTS, pulsed and steady-state bias-stress
`induce a similar evolution of In-V0 characteristics. However,
`1'. VT induced by the negative pulsed gate-bias stress is signif(cid:173)
`icantly smaller in comparison with 1'. VT induced by negative
`steady-state gate-bias stress. Figure 7 shows the threshold
`voltage shift versus effective stress time under both positive
`and negative bias-stress for different pulse conditions. The ef(cid:173)
`fective stress time is the accumulated time when the gate volt(cid:173)
`age is high (ON). For positive pulsed gate-bias stress, 1'. VT
`is slightly smaller than that for steady-state gate-bias stress
`and does not depend apparently on gate-bias pulse width. For
`negative pulsed gate-bias stress, 1'. VT has strong pulse-width
`(PW) dependence-the wider the pulse-width, the greater the
`magnitude of 1'. VT.
`It was reported previously that detrapping during pulsed
`operation can explain the smaller 1'. VT induced by steady(cid:173)
`state BTS. 10l The detrapping mechanism can be applied to
`a-Si:H TFTs if the electrical instability mechanism is mainly
`
`Table I. Extracted parameters from 1'1 VT induced by positive and negative
`steady-state bias-stress for inverted-staggered a-Si:H TFTs used in this
`study.
`
`Positive(+ )BTS
`Negative(+)BTS
`
`A
`
`1.5 X 10-4
`-1.4 X 10-4
`
`Cl
`
`1.9
`2.4
`
`fJ
`0.5
`0.32
`
`'-'
`
`ll(
`
`ll(
`
`)j(
`
`ll(
`
`)j(
`
`1 - VsT=-20V
`> 0 -•-d.c.
`-e-PW=ls ~ > <I -1 - • - PW=200ms
`""
`-T - PW=lOOms ~
`
`-2
`
`-3
`
`-+-PW=50ms
`-+-PW=lOms
`-x-PW=lms
`--*- PW=l00f.I.S
`
`-4
`101
`
`103
`102
`Effective stress time (sec)
`
`1'1 VT versus effective stress time induced by positive and negative
`Fig. 7.
`gate-bias stress with different gate pulse width. The effective stress time is
`the accumulated time when the gate voltage is high (ON).
`
`associated with the charge-trapping in the gate insulator. Dur(cid:173)
`ing the OFF-cycle of the pulse bias-stress, some of the trapped
`charge which is not deeply trapped could be relaxed from the
`trap centers. However, for our a-Si:H TFTs, defect creation
`also contributes to the shift of VT. Therefore, this smaller
`1'. VT for positive pulsed BTS can also be partially attributed
`to relaxation of created deep-gap defects during OFF-periods
`in the pulsed operation. It should be noted that there is a very
`small pulse-width dependence observed for positive pulsed
`BTS. As will be discussed below, this can be explained by the
`fast channel electron accumulation during positive pulse bias,
`that is about or less than 1 f.LS for a 10-f.LID channel-length
`TFT.
`
`

`

`4708
`
`Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 37 (1998) Pt. 1, No. 9A
`
`C. CHIANG et al.
`
`For negative pulsed BTS, the pulse-width dependence of
`.6. VT was previously attributed to the different effective(cid:173)
`voltages across the gate insulator under different pulsed bias(cid:173)
`stress conditions_lll This explanation is also based on a
`charge-trapping mechanism indicating that .6. VT is related
`to the trapped charge in gate insulators, and the amount of
`trapped charge is related to the electrical field across the gate
`insulator. As shown earlier, for our a-Si:H TFTs, in addition
`to positive charge trapping, there is also defect removal which
`contributes to the negative .6. VT. To characterize the apparent
`pulse-width dependent .6. VT for negative BTS condition, we
`used an simple RC circuit to simulate the operation of a-Si:H
`TFTs under negative pulsed BTS. This RC circuit consists
`of the gate insulator capacitance Ci, a-Si:H capacitance Cs,
`and a effective a-Si:H resistance Rs for hole conduction, as
`shown in Fig. 8. When a negative pulse is applied to the gate
`electrode, the total gate voltage is initially distributed across
`the insulator and a-Si:H because the a-Si:H layer acts as a
`semi-insulator under negative bias at high frequency. After
`the negative pulse is turned-on, carriers (holes) would start to
`accumulate near the interface due to thermal generation and
`the voltage drop across the gate insulator that increases grad(cid:173)
`ually. The voltage drops across the insulator and a-Si:H at
`timet* after applying a gate pulse with amplitude VsT can be
`expressed as
`
`*
`[
`V;,(t ) = VsT 1-
`
`ci
`Ci + Cs
`
`(
`t* )]
`exp - -
`TRe
`
`(7)
`
`with
`
`TRe = RsCs
`TRe represents the effective time constant of hole accumula(cid:173)
`tion along the a-Si:Hja-SiNx :H interface. The accumulation
`of hole could be due to thermal electron-hole pair generation
`near the a-Si:Hja-SiNx:H interface, in which the generated
`electrons are repelled by the applied negative gate-bias. The
`initial voltage (t* = 0) across the gate insulator is about
`Cs
`VsT
`Ci +Cs
`which is about 60% of the stress gate voltage level. There(cid:173)
`fore, the effective-voltage model could not explain the very
`small .6. VT (less than 10% of .6. VT for steady-state condition)
`
`(8)
`
`(9)
`
`V;, (0) =
`
`Fig. 8. The equivalent circuit of a-Si:H TFT during negative pulsed gate
`bias-temperature-stress.
`
`1 1PW
`NAe = --
`PW o
`( PW)]
`TRe
`TRe
`=Nne 1 - - - + --exp - - -
`[
`TRe
`PW PW
`where Nne = -C1 VsT I q is the accumulated carrier under
`steady-state gate bias condition.
`Assuming that .6. VT during the negative bias-stress is pro(cid:173)
`portional to the effective carrier concentration, we have the
`following relationship between steady-state and pulsed stress
`bias induced .6. VT with the same effective stress time,
`.6. V.f'e = 1 _ TRe + TRe exp (- PW)
`.6. v.pe
`TRe
`
`N(t*) dt*
`
`PW PW
`
`observed for narrow pulse-width ( < 1 ms) in our BTS exper(cid:173)
`iment, since the voltage across the gate insulator dming the
`pulse operation is always greater than [Cs/(C + Cs)]VsT·
`In this paper, we propose an alternative effective carrier
`model which correlates the threshold voltage shift to the ef(cid:173)
`fective hole concentration accumulated near the a-Si:Hja(cid:173)
`SiNx :H interface during negative pulse operation. As shown
`in the RC circuit of Fig. 8, after applying a negative· gate
`pulse, the accumulated carrier concentration Naccum at the a(cid:173)
`Si:Hja-SiNx:H intelface can be expressed as
`
`(10)
`Naccum = -Ni + Ns
`where Ni = Ci V,jq, Ns = Cs V5 jq, and q is the electron
`charge. From eq. (7) and using VsT = v; + Vs, we then have
`the accumulated carrier concentration N at timet* given by
`J
`- 1 .
`
`C VsT [
`*
`N (t ) = -q- exp
`
`(
`
`t* )
`- rRe
`
`(11)
`
`The average accumulated carrier concentration, NAe, under
`pulsed gate-bias with pulse-width of PW can then be ex(cid:173)
`pressed as
`
`(12)
`
`(1 3)
`
`where .6. v.fe and .6. v.pe are threshold voltage shifts induced
`by pulsed and stead-state BTS, respectively. Figure 9 shows
`the experimental .6. VT at a fixed effective stress time of 1000 s
`as a function of pulse-width. A fitting curve using eq. (13)
`is also shown in this figure with fitting parameters, rRe ~
`0.032 s which corresponds to Rs ~ 99 kQ-cm2 per unit area
`for 3000 A thick a-Si:H. The equivalent resistivity at the
`stressing temperature (70aC) is then about 3.3 x 10100-cm.
`This high resistivity could be due to a low conductivity of
`holes andjor a high contact resistance between then+ a-Si:H
`and intrinsic a-Si:H layers for hole conduction under negative
`bias-stress.
`
`3.3 Estimation of .6. VT during AMLCD operation
`A method for AMLCD long-term lifetime estimation based
`on addition of .6. VT's induced by positive and negative steady(cid:173)
`state BTS was reported in the literature. 13l However, as shown
`above, steady-state BTS results can not truly reflect the elec(cid:173)
`trical instability of a-Si:H TFT induced by pulsed BTS. We
`have conducted several BTS experiments to test the superpo(cid:173)
`sition method of positive and negative BTS under both steady(cid:173)
`state and pulsed BTS conditions. Figure 10(a) shows positive
`(+20 V) and negative ( -20 V) steady-state BTS induced .6. VT
`together with .6. VT induced by an alternatively pulsed BTS of
`+20V and -20V with a 50% duty-cycle. It can be clearly
`seen that, for the 50% duty-cycle condition, the real threshold
`
`

`

`Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 37 (1998) Pt. 1, No. 9A
`
`C. CHIANG et al.
`
`4709
`
`1.0
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`I
`
`I
`
`T5T= 70 °C
`e V5T=-20V
`.A. V5y=+20V
`-- - - - - Fitting curve
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I ,_
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`0.2 -
`
`0.0 1-
`
`...
`10-5
`
`=f-,
`,
`-t-___ .:e-'
`.......
`......
`....
`10-3
`10-2
`10-4
`
`.......
`10-1
`
`.. ...
`10°
`
`LWU
`
`101
`
`Gate-bias pulse width (sec)
`
`threshold voltage shift versus gate-bias stress
`Fig. 9. Normalized
`pulse-width. The measurements and bias stress were done at 70°C.
`
`voltage shift under alternatively pulsed BTS is (especially at
`longer stress time) greater than the values obtained by simply
`adding up the !l VT's induced by the corresponding positive
`and negative steady-state BTS. This difference is due to an
`overestimation of !l VT induced by negative steady-state BTS
`in comparison to negative pulsed BTS induced !l VT, which
`has apparent pulse-width gate-bias dependence as discussed
`above.
`On the other hand, Figure lO(b) shows the results for
`both the superposition of pulsed positive and negative BTS,
`and the corresponding alternative positive/negative pulsed
`BTS. From these experimental results, we can conclude
`that !l VT induced by pulsed bias-stress with alternative
`positive/negative amplitudes is approximately equal to the
`!l VT-values obtained by simply adding up !l VT's for solely
`positive and solely negative pulsed gate-bias stresses. This
`result pulsed indicates that, if !l VT of a-Si:H TFTs induced
`by positive pulsed and negative pulsed gate-bias stresses is
`obtained, respectively, a good estimation of a-Si:H TFT !l VT
`corresponding to AMLCD operation can be obtained. There(cid:173)
`fore, it is clear that only !l VT's induced by pulsed bias-stress
`with positive and negative amplitudes can be used to estimate
`AMLCD long-term electrical reliability. The total !l VT can
`be described by
`!l V/'CtsT) = !l vT+CtsT) + !l vT-CtsT).
`For our a-Si:H TFTs, positive pulsed gate-bias stress induced
`threshold voltage can be expressed as
`
`(14)
`
`!l vT+CtsT) =A+. (VaH- VT!)"'+ . UsT. De)f>+
`
`(15)
`
`and threshold voltage shift induced by negative pulsed gate(cid:173)
`bias stress, combining with the above mentioned pulse-width
`dependence, can be given by
`!l Vi CtsT) = A_ · CVT1 - VaL)"'- · [tsT · (1 - De) ]fi- · Fpw
`(16)
`
`with
`
`,....._
`G
`~
`-<J
`
`8
`
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`0
`
`-2
`
`-4
`
`-•-+20V,DC
`-'f'--20V,DC
`-o- +20V/-20V 50% 50Hz
`-+-Sum of-•- &-'f'-
`
`/
`
`.)' /
`
`/L -+
`/,a+-+'+
`............. ~+/
`~~
`o-¢::_..,._..,. -.........,......,.
`---...........,
`.......... .....,
`
`TsT=70°C
`
`...................
`
`102
`
`103
`
`104
`Effective stress time (sec)
`
`105
`
`(a)
`
`- • - +20V,50%,PW=50us
`6 - • - -20V,50%,PW=50us
`-o- +20V/-20V,50%,PW=50us
`-+-Sum of - • - and - • -
`
`4
`
`TsT=70°C
`
`....
`L-~
`li1
`J!f
`Q
`rq)
`~q('
`~:$
`-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-···-....-·-·
`
`> '-'
`~
`-<J
`
`2
`
`0
`
`-2 1d
`
`Effective stress time (sec)
`
`(b)
`
`t,. VT versus effective stress time for steady-state and pulsed BTS.
`Fig. 10.
`Sum of steady-state and pulsed positive and negative BTS induced t,. VT's
`is also shown.
`
`(17)
`
`De= ToN
`Tframe
`where VaL and VaH are the high and low gate-bias pulse lev(cid:173)
`els, respectively; De is the duty-cycle used to address the
`liquid-crystal pixels. Using the parameters given in Table I,
`we can estimate the evolution of !l VT induced by pulsed gate(cid:173)
`bias-stresses. Figure 11 shows the experimental results of
`!l VT induced by different pulsed gate-bias stress conditions,
`together with the calculated !l VT based on eqs. (13)-(16). It
`can be seen that a satisfactory fit between the calculated and
`experimental data can be obtained.
`Based on the methodology described above, we can esti(cid:173)
`mate the long-term evolution of !l VT induced by a typical
`AMLCD addressing conditions. For example, for a typical
`SXGA (1280 x 1024) display addressed by a 60Hz scanning
`signal, the gate pulse width is about 20 p.,s. If the gate sig(cid:173)
`nal has a positive (ON) and negative (OFF) voltage levels of
`18 and -8 V, respectively, and a common electrode voltage
`
`

`

`4710
`
`Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 37 (1998) Pt. I, No. 9A
`
`C. CHIANG eta/.
`
`V8T=+20V/-20V
`T8T= 70 °C
`
`,.--._ >
`'--' > <l
`
`10-1
`
`10-2
`
`10-3
`
`..,
`
`10
`
`10
`
`) Period=l00!ls,DC=50
`
`• ) Period=20ms,DC=50%
`..,
`
`&
`
`) Period=20ms,DC=20%
`) Period=20ms,DC=l0%
`10
`
`Stress time (sec)
`
`11 VT versus stress time for negative and positive pulsed BTS with
`Fig. I I.
`frequency of 10KHz. The calculated 11 VT (-) is also shown for different
`pulsed gate-bias conditions.
`
`8.-----------------------~-,
`
`6
`
`4
`
`Threshold voltage shift margin
`
`Stress time (sec)
`
`Fig. I2. Projection of 11 VT for a-Si:H TFTs induced by a typical SXGA
`display addressing conditions.
`
`level of + 5 V, we then have an effective positive and nega(cid:173)
`tive gate-bias stresses of+ 13 and -13 V, respectively, during
`the TFT ON- and OFF-period. Figure 12 shows the predicted
`evolution of /1 VT for our a-Si:H TFTs under the suggested
`display addressing conditions. It can be seen that at the early
`stage of the display operation, /1 VT has a negative shift. This
`is due to the longer negative bias period during a display ad(cid:173)
`dressing in comparison to positive bias period. As stress time
`increases, /1 VT starts to increases exponentially because the
`positive bias has larger ,8-value, which starts to dominate at
`longer stress times. Assuming the maximum allowable 11 VT
`of 3 V for normal display operation, our estimation of there(cid:173)
`liability period for our a-Si:H TFTs is about 10 years at 70°C,
`which is quite satisfactory for the display industry standard.
`
`4. Conclusion
`In this paper, we investigated the electrical instabilities of
`our bottom-gate a-Si:H TFTs under different BTS conditions.
`Our BTS experiments clearly indicated that there is a funda(cid:173)
`mental difference between steady-state and pulsed gate-bias
`stress induced !1 VT. We demonstrated that the reliability es(cid:173)
`timation of a-Si:H TFTs used in AMLCDs can be obtained
`from a series of short-term steady-state and pulsed BTS ex(cid:173)
`periments. Our results suggest that the a-Si:H TFTs long-term
`reliability is quite satisfactory for AMLCD.
`
`Acknowledgments
`The authors C.-S. Chiang and J. Kanicki would like to
`thank the Center for Display Technology and Manufactur(cid:173)
`ing at University of Michigan for the financial support of this
`work and the NEC Functional Devices. Research Laboratories
`for its technical assistance.
`
`I) F. R. Libsch and J. Kauicki: Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 (1989) 1286.
`2) M. J. Powell: Appl. Phys. Lett. 43 (I983) 597.
`3) Y. Kaneko, A. Sasano and T. Tsukada: J. Appl. Phys. 69 (1991) 7301.
`4) C. vau Berkel aud M. J. Powell: Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 (I987) 1094.
`5) M. J. Powell, C. vau Berkel, I. D. French aud D. H. Nicholls: Appl.
`Phys. Lett. 51 (I987) I242.
`6) M. J. Powell, C. van Berkel and J. R. Hughes: Appl. Phys. Lett. 54
`(1989) I323.
`7) R. E. I. Schropp and J. F. Verwey: Appl. Phys. Lett. 50 (1987) I85.
`8) M. J.Powell, C. van Berkel, A. R.Franklin, S.C. Deane and WI. Milne:
`Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 4160.
`9) W. E. Howard: J. SID 3 (I995) 127.
`10) F. R. Libsch aud J. Kanicki: SID Dig. (1993) 455.
`11) R. Oritsuki, T. Horii, A. Sasano, K. Tsutsui, T. Koizumi, Y. Kaneko aud
`T. Tsukada: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30 (1991) 3719.
`12) W. B. Jackson aud M.D. Moyer: Phys. Rev. B 36 (1987) 6217.
`13) N. lbaraki, M. Kigoshi, K. Fukuda aud J. Kobayashi: J. Non-Cryst.
`Solids 115 (1989) 138.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket