`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`'
`ROY-G-BIV CORP.
`'
`
`'
`v.
`'
`
`'
`ABB, Ltd., ABB INC., MEADWESTVACO
`TEXAS, LP, and MEADWESTVACO CORP. '
`
`
`ROY-G-BIV Corp.
`
`v.
`
`HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`and MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, LLC
`
`
`ROY-G-BIV CORP.
`
`v.
`
`SIEMENS CORP., et al.
`
`
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`
`NO. 6:11-CV-622 (Lead Case)
`
`NO. 6:11-CV-623
`
`NO. 6:11-CV-624
`
`ODER ADOPTING ORDER OF
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`The above entitled and numbered civil actions were referred to the United States
`
`
`
`Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Memorandum Opinion and
`
`Order of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 196) (“Opinion”), which contains his construction of
`
`disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,513,058; 6,516,236; 6,941,543; and 8,073,557 has been
`
`presented for consideration. The Defendants move for reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion
`
`(Doc. Nos. 201, 202). The matter has been fully briefed (Doc. Nos. 208, 209, 213, 215, 219).
`
`Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s
`
`constructions of the disputed terms are correct. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Opinion of the
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:11-cv-00622-LED-ZJH Document 220 Filed 10/16/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9407
`
`United States Magistrate Judge as the opinion of this court. All objections are overruled and the
`
`Motions for Reconsideration (Doc. Nos. 201, 202) are DENIED.
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
`__________________________________
`LEONARD DAVIS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 16th day of October, 2013.
`
`