Filed on behalf of Microsoft Corporation
`
`By: John D. Vandenberg (Reg. No. 31,312)
`
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`Stephen J. Joncus (Reg. No. 44,809)
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00026 (TLG)
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717 B1
`____________
`
`FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AND LIST
`OF EXHIBITS TO PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`By: John D. Vandenberg (Reg. No. 31,312)
`
`john.vandenberg@klarquist.com
`Stephen J. Joncus (Reg. No. 44,809)
`stephen.joncus@klarquist.com
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PROXYCONN, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2012-00026 (TLG)
`Case IPR2013-00109 (TLG)
`Patent 6,757,717 B1
`____________
`
`FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX AND LIST
`OF EXHIBITS TO PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`
`
`Petitioner Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) serves this List of Exhibits
`
`with the exhibit number, a brief description of each exhibit, and a notation of
`
`which exhibits were served and which were filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e).
`
`IPR2012-00026
`
`Exhibits 1001-1018: Filed September 18, 2012 with Microsoft’s Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717;
`
`Exhibits 1019-1020: Served January 18, 2013, concurrently with the First
`
`Supplemental List of Exhibits and with Microsoft’s Notice of Supplemental
`
`Evidence in Response to Proxyconn’s Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1001-
`
`1018;
`
`Exhibit 1021: Filed March 21, 2013, concurrently with Microsoft’s Motion for
`
`Pro Hac Vice Admission Under4 7 C.F.R. § 42.10;
`
`Exhibit 1022: Served May 29, 2013, concurrently with Microsoft’s Objections To
`
`Patent Holder Proxyconn, Inc.’s Exhibits 2002, 2004; and filed August 20, 2013,
`
`concurrently with the Fourth Supplemental List of Exhibits, Microsoft’s Reply to
`
`Patent Owner’s Corrected Response to Petition, and with Microsoft’s Response to
`
`Patent Owner’s Corrected Motion to Amend.
`
`Exhibits 1023-1026: Filed August 21, 2013, concurrently with the Fourth
`
`Supplemental List of Exhibits, Microsoft’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Corrected
`
`Fourth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`Response to Petition, and with Microsoft’s Response to Patent Owner’s Corrected
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Motion to Amend.
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1001 Appendix A, Chart mapping ’717 claims to
`
`No.
`
`
`
`prior art references Perlman, Yohe and Santos.
`
`(Part of Petition.)
`
`1002 Leonid Goldstein, U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717,
`
`Yes, but only
`
`
`
`“System and Method for Data Access,” issued
`
`for
`
`Jun. 29, 2004, with Certificate of Correction,
`
`admissions of
`
`issued Aug. 14, 2012. (Long Dep. Ex. 1021;
`
`prior art and
`
`Konchitsky Dep. Exhibit.)
`
`knowledge of
`
`PHOSITA.
`
`1003 Radia J. Perlman et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`5,742,820, “Mechanism for Efficiently
`
`Synchronizing Information Over a Network,”
`
`issued Apr. 21, 1998. (Long Dep. Ex. 1024;
`
`Konchitsky Dep. Exhibit.)
`
`1004 Jonathan Santos et al., “USENIX, Increasing
`
`No.
`
`
`
`
`
`Effective Link Bandwidth by Suppressing
`
`Replicated Date,” Proceedings of the USENIX
`
`Annual Technical Conference (NO 98) New
`
`Orleans, Louisiana, June 1998. (Long Dep.
`
`Ex. 1026.)
`
`Fourth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1005 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`5,835,943, “Apparatus and Method for
`
`Increased Data Access in a Network File
`
`Oriented Caching System,” issued Nov. 10,
`
`1998. (Long Dep. Ex. 1022; Konchitsky Dep.
`
`Exhibit.)
`
`1006 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent
`
`No.
`
`Application No. 08/888,311, filed July 3,
`
`1997, issued as U.S. Patent No. 5,835,943.
`
`1007 Expert declaration of Professor Darrell D. E.
`
`Yes.
`
`Long in Support of Microsoft’s Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review. (Long Dep. Ex. 1020.)
`
`1008 Microsoft Corporation, “[MS-RDC] –
`
`No.
`
`v20120705, Remote Differential Compression
`
`Algorithm Specification,” July 5, 2012.
`
`1009 Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Response
`
`No.
`
`to Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s First Set of
`
`Interrogatories with supporting Exhibits A-B
`
`and E, dated July 25, 2012. (Exhibits C-D
`
`omitted.)
`
`1010 [Microsoft’s] Supplemental Ex. E to
`
`No.
`
`Defendants’ Supplemental Interrogatory
`
`Response, dated Aug. 15, 2012.
`
`1011 Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Objections and
`
`No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fourth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`Responses to Defendant Microsoft
`
`Corporation’s First Set Of Interrogatories,
`
`dated Sept. 9, 2012.
`
`1012 Plaintiff Proxyconn Inc.’s Second Amended
`
`No.
`
`Consolidated Complaint for Patent
`
`Infringement and supporting Ex. B, dated July
`
`16, 2012. (Exhibit A omitted.)
`
`1013 Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion for
`
`No.
`
`Summary Judgment of Invalidity, dated July 3,
`
`2012.
`
`1014 Declaration of Darrell D. E. Long in Support
`
`No.
`
`of Defendants’ Motion for Summary
`
`Judgment and supporting Exhibits A-C, dated
`
`July 3, 2012.
`
`1015 Peter Mattis et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,128,623,
`
`No.
`
`“High Performance Object Cache,” filed Apr.
`
`15, 1998, issued Oct. 3, 2000.
`
`1016 Reasons for Allowance of U.S. Application
`
`No.
`
`No. 09/398,007, dated Dec. 12, 2003.
`
`1017 Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`6,279,041, “Methods, Systems and Computer
`
`Program Products for Differencing Data
`
`Communications Using a Message Queue,”
`
`issued Aug. 21, 2001.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fourth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`1018 Stephen B. Baber et al., U.S. Patent
`
`No.
`
`
`
`Application No. 09/192,128, filed Nov. 13,
`
`1998, issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,279,041.
`
`1019 Verification of Microsoft’s Interrogatory
`
`Yes.
`
`Not filed,
`
`Responses, signed by David M. Howard, dated
`
`August 13, 2012.
`
`only
`
`served
`
`1020 Declaration of Mung Tam as Supplemental
`
`Yes.
`
`Not filed,
`
`Evidence in Response to Proxyconn’s
`
`Objections to Petitioner’s Exhibits 1001-1018.
`
`only
`
`served
`
`1021 Declaration Of Salumeh R. Loesch in Support
`
`Yes.
`
`of Microsoft Corporation’s Motion for Pro
`
`Hac Vice Admission Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10.
`
`1022 Dr. Alon Konchitsky’s Publicly-Available CV
`
`Yes.
`
`(6 pages). (Konchitsky Dep. Exhibit.)
`
`1023 Declaration of Mung Conway in Support of
`
`Yes.
`
`Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s
`
`Response to Petition.
`
`1024 Excerpts of Deposition Transcript of Alon
`
`Yes.
`
`Konchitsky, recorded July 2, 2013.
`
`1025 Third Expert Declaration of Professor
`
`Yes
`
`Darrell D. E. Long in Support of
`
`Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s
`
`Response to Petition.
`
`1026 Deposition Transcript of Darrell D. E.
`
`Yes.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fourth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Long, Ph.D., recorded May 6, 2013.
`
`
`
`Offered for
`
`Exhibits
`
`Truth?
`
`Not Filed
`
`IPR2013-00109
`
`Exhibits 1001-1014: Filed January 11, 2013 with Microsoft’s 2nd Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717, which was consolidated with
`
`IPR2012-00026.
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Offered for
`
`
`
`Truth?
`
`1001 Appendix A, Chart mapping ’717 claims to
`
`No.
`
`
`
`prior art references HTTP DRP, Mattis and
`
`Yohe. (Part of Petition.)
`
`1002 Leonid Goldstein, U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717,
`
`Yes, but only
`
`
`
`“System and Method for Data Access,” issued
`
`for
`
`Jun. 29, 2004, with Certificate of Correction,
`
`admissions of
`
`issued Aug. 14, 2012.
`
`prior art and
`
`knowledge of
`
`PHOSITA.
`
`Fourth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`
`
`Truth?
`
`1003 Arthur van Hoff, John Giannandrea, Mark
`
`No, except
`
`
`
`Hapner, Steve Carter, and Milo Medin, “The
`
`for its date of
`
`HTTP Distribution and Replication Protocol,”
`
`submission to
`
`W3C Note, http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-
`
`the W3C.
`
`drp-19970825.html, August 1997. (Long Dep.
`
`Ex. 1025; Konchitsky Dep. Exhibit.)
`
`1004 Peter Mattis et al., U.S. Patent No. 6,292,880,
`
`No.
`
`“Alias-Free Content-Indexed Object Cache,”
`
`issued Sept. 18, 2001 on application filed Apr.
`
`15, 1998. (Long Dep. Ex. 1023.)
`
`1005 Peter Mattis et al., U.S. Patent Application
`
`No.
`
`Ser. No. 09/060,886 , filed April 15, 1998.
`
`1006 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent No.
`
`No.
`
`5,835,943, “Apparatus and Method for
`
`Increased Data Access in a Network File
`
`Oriented Caching System,” issued Nov. 10,
`
`1998.
`
`1007 Thomas Patrick Yohe et al., U.S. Patent
`
`Yes.
`
`Application Ser. No. 08/888,311, filed July 3,
`
`1997 (Yohe Patent Application)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fourth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 7
`
`
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Offered for
`
`
`
`Truth?
`
`1008 Tim Berners-Lee, “W3C Staff Note on HTTP
`
`No.
`
`Distribution and Replication Protocol
`
`Submission,”
`
`http://www.w3.org/Submission/1997/10/Com
`
`ment.html, Aug. 28, 1997
`
`1009 Tim Berners-Lee, “Acknowledged
`
`No.
`
`Submissions to W3C,”
`
`http://web.archive.org/web/19980213220701/h
`
`ttp:/www13.w3.org/Submission/, Feb. 12,
`
`1998.
`
`1010 Michael A. Goulde, “Network Caching Guide
`
`No.
`
`Optimizing Web Content Delivery”, Patricia
`
`Seybold Group for Inktomi Corp., Mar. 1999.
`
`1011 Simon Spero, “HTTP-NG Architectural
`
`No.
`
`Overview,”
`
`http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP-NG/http-
`
`ng-arch.html, 1995.
`
`1012 Joint Stipulation Requesting Stay of Case
`
`No.
`
`Pending Inter Partes Review, dated Nov. 2,
`
`2012.
`
`1013 Expert declaration of Professor Darrell D. E.
`
`Yes.
`
`Long in Support of Microsoft’s Petition for
`
`Inter Partes Review. (Long Dep. Ex. 1027.)
`
`1014 Supporting declaration of Sean-Michael Riley Yes.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fourth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 8
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Ex.
`
`Description
`
`in Support of Microsoft’s Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review.
`
`
`
`Offered for
`
`
`
`Truth?
`
`Dated: August 21, 2013
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/John D. Vandenberg/
`John D. Vandenberg
`Registration No. 31,312
`Stephen J. Joncus
`Registration No. 44,809
`Klarquist Sparkman LLP
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`Fourth Supplemental Appendix and List of Exhibits
`to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,757,717
`
`Page 9
`
`
`
`Case IPR2012-00026; IPR2013-00109
`Patent 6,757,717
`
`Certificate of Service in Compliance With 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4)
`
`The undersigned certifies that a complete copy of this Fourth Supplemental
`
`Appendix and List of Exhibits to Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,757,717 was served along with Microsoft’s Exhibit Nos. 1022-1026 on the
`
`attorneys of record for Patent Owner in this proceeding:
`
`
`
`MATTHEW L. CUTLER
`BRYAN K. WHEELOCK
`DOUGLAS A. ROBINSON
`HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC
`7700 BONHOMME, SUITE 400
`ST. LOUIS, MO 63105
`
`
`via EXPRESS MAIL, on August 21, 2013.
`
`
`
`
`By: /John D. Vandenberg/
`
`John D. Vandenberg, Reg. No. 31,312
`One World Trade Center, Suite 1600
`121 S.W. Salmon Street
`Portland, Oregon 97204
`Telephone: (503) 595-5300
`Facsimile: (503) 595-5301
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
