Feb 17 200i 6;24PM
`
`Tredin~ Technoloties
`
`'
`
`. 24?G11G9
`
`JACDDN WALlER lJ.P
`
`p.S
`
`l'lJtOS
`
`Appltcl.fttt•l
`KEMPET N...
`Art Unit
`
`362.4
`
`1 UL J
`
`v
`
`-The MAILING DA'IE oftiW ~ .,_,.lllllllfeOIIWI"'"*wMIIhe ~GINIM" ...,...._
`AI claimS ltelng .-ow.blt, PROSECUTION ON THE MERITS IS (oR REMIIINSl Cl..O$EO ln ltlfa applcalilm. If not h:luded
`htr.wllt (or p~ mailed) a HatiH af NkM'Incl (PTOL-tS) or other 1lflpn!plllla communloatlon wt be tnlllled In due coii'M. Ttlll
`NOncE OF AllOWA8l.ITY li NOT AGIRAJIT Of PAtENT RIIGtml. Tills lflllbtion ls Sllllject to wlltl4lrawa.l 'hm !Due at the lnlltatiYe
`of tit• Oflict or upon pellion by tht apploalt. See 31 CFR 1.313 atiCl MPEP 1308.
`1. 18 Thb C0/11IIMII...tlon is respons~ to ,.mad. ftcm!otl dlsclttn•r: kl!flV!ew IUI'M!JO'.
`2. 18 Tile aa-d ~s)lslaro 41-§f ,., SHf.
`a 181 The d!W4np tied an~ art ICOij)Md by 1h• &.mlnu.
`4. 0 ~n~ec~Q~~Mnt!. madaofa c::IIJmforfartlgn prioflt)' undtr35 U.S.C. § 119(a}(il)or(f).
`••D All
`b)QGome• c)0 N1Jn1
`oftht:
`1. C Celtlled cople~ of tile priori)' doo.tiMfttl have bean !MINd.
`2. 0 Cettllied ccplll!l at 1!\e priority documwnea hiMJ been recelwd In Application No. _ .
`3. [] eapw of till clf1lled ct~pl• CJf lila plloritJt documtlltl MW been recel¥eclln tiQ nallonel atage applioCkln from til•
`lntemalloMI8urMCA tpCT Ru• 17.2(a)l.
`• ~td caplls not received:_.
`5.181 Ackn~Mtedgmllllt Is made of • cla1m for dom•tlc priority undr 35 U.S. C. t1 tU(•) (to 1 provtstahl!.l application).
`{a) 0 The trarwldon oflhe forelen Janguag. ~•lanai apploaOm hat IIIMII received.
`a. 181 Aeblowledgment 1s mada of a claim ror domestic priority under 35 us. c. H 120 ancllor 121.
`
`Appl cvi hu THREE MONTH$ FROM lHE "WA.N; DATE" of tllfll cornmunlcahllG file al'lfliY COI'IIpiJing with t\e requirements nattd
`llelow: Fallunt to timely Domplywll reaUitin ASANOONMENT ofthlt appllcalon.. THIS THREE..MONTH PERIOD IS NOT EXTfNOA8LE.
`7. 0 A SIJ8$1JTUTE OATH OR OECLAAATtON mu&t be submlbfl. No\e tie lilttch«< EXAMINER'S .M.I:NOMfNT or NOTICE OF
`INFORMI\1. P.t.TENT APPL.ICA110N {PT0-152)WbCh Gives reaeon(t) wby the oall ordld..clon IS clellclent.
`8. 0 CORRECTED DRAWINGS m111t be submlltel.
`(a) 0 lnck.ld'.,g th•ng• required "Y tt\41 Mallet of Dnlbpersot(s Piltent DrlwtriQ R~.w ( PTO.II48)IIItaclled
`1) CJ hor-lo or2) 0 to Psper Na. _ .
`(b) 0 lnetudlr'Q clltngas required by th1t propose4 drawlntt c:llft"tctian filed ___, mlch has been apprwtd byttt. El!wminel'.
`( o} 0 Including cha.rlG•• r.q11l11d by 1he tttllchlld Elc.mlnll's Nnclclment J Commlfrt or In the Ollc• Mtion Df P.ptr No. _ .
`
`lUll(~ llllllclll Nch u the..,plcllloniiii!Mer ( ... IT CFR U4(C}) slteuld .._ .......... on lila cfrrllflnp IMllll WlpiMqfn (a~ liM P.akt
`
`.t Nch sla.et TIM dnw!Rgeltlotlld lie thd II I .... , ... Pill If. e tr.4;mllflflltt4lr ..nued to the Ollcial Dn1111p . . 011.
`
`I. 0 DEPOSIT OF alldlor lf'IFORMATION CloC4t the deposit of BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL must be submitted. Note lit
`.U.Ched Exarnlnlll'• COIM'IItit reiJGfdlng REQUIREMENT FOR TtiE DEPOSIT OF BIOLOGICAl. MATERIAL
`
`~•I
`10 t.latio. oi'R.CII'er\CIQ Cited (PTO..a&2)
`3() HertA of1Jr11111111110n'• Fatfi Ola1win• Ra\iew(PT!).MIJ
`5Gillrl1a!T11etb\ Clados1fe St.t"etllanfla (PT0-1-4-49~ Paper No._.
`7(] Elcamlnel"s ComrrMnt Ragarclng Reqt!IIW11ent ,._.Deposit
`ol Elaloglclll Met..-t.l
`
`20 Notic-e or lr4ol'lmll Petel\1 Aflplieatll)n (P10·152)
`40 tniMew Sumtn•rv (PT0-413). Paper No._.
`eo Elcan111•r'• AmenllcM~ent
`8[] Elcarriws stcement of Renons !Dr Allowance
`B[Jother
`
`ZBtl9l.. .. Zt€
`
`11
`
`ELLIS 00948
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2290
`IBG et al. v. TRADING TECH. - CBM2016-00054
`
`

`
`Feb 17 2004<--S.:2'\Pt1
`
`Tradinc; Technolocies
`
`~. 2'1761169
`
`JACKSON WALiiR LLP
`
`Application/Control Number: 091894,637
`Art UOit: 3624
`
`ANowable Subject lllatNr
`
`p. G
`
`(lJooe
`
`Page2
`
`1.
`
`The following Is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: The follow\ng
`
`Is an exsminer's statement of reasons 1or allowance: This statement of raasOilS for
`
`altowance include& tl'ie major differences in the claims not found in the prior art of record
`
`and reasons why that differences are considered to define patentably over the prior art
`
`The statement is not Intended to necessarily state all the reuons for allowance or all
`
`the details why claims are allowed and should not be relied upon for lhls pf.I'Pose.
`
`Rather, this statement reflects what the examiner considers important and thef'efore the
`
`primary reason5 for the allowance of the claims.
`
`The primary reason for allowance is the Imitation directed to the vdynamic
`
`diapJaY' of a pturality of the quantity of bids and asks aligned with a "static display" of
`
`COIT8$p0ncllng prices. Here, unlike the prior c.i, the "static• display of prices Is just that,
`
`static, and does not move In response to a change In the insid& mark&l With this
`
`display of market depth, daimed in each or the independent claims, a trader places a
`
`trade order with the pointer in the area of the order entry region of the dynamic marl<et
`
`depth region. through a single computer implemented action, see Figwes 3 and 4. For
`
`example, in figure 3, a Click on Bid Q 16 will send an ader to the market to aell17 Iota
`
`of the commodity al a price of 69.
`
`The closest prior art inc\uding US Patent 6,408,282, PCT WO 01/16852 and
`commonly owned non-patent literature •x Trader" ($ee, applicant's retponsa to
`
`USPTO's request for information) all lack this feature. The PTO also inquired as to the
`
`sub}ect matter of alleged infringement referenced In applicant's petition to make special
`
`~B119l.t>r~1E
`
`J.J.
`
`ELLIS 00949
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2290
`IBG et al. v. TRADING TECH. - CBM2016-00054
`
`

`
`Feb 1? 2004 6:24PH Tradin' Technclo;les
`02/1712004 11:~4 PAX IT27~4~.Q9
`JACKSON IALIBR LLP
`
`ApplicatlonfControl NIJI'1\l)er: 091894,637
`Ari \Jnlt: 3624
`
`.,..~47SHG9 '
`
`. P•? -
`
`llJ 007
`
`Page3
`
`in related case SN 091590,692. The USPTO found no evidence of publtc use or any
`
`printed publlcati<:ln of the system known as J Trader, the subject rna~ of potential
`
`infringement and the applicants basis for his petition ta make apeclaJ, earlier than
`
`November 6, 2000. Therefore, the USPTO has c:oncluded that the system known as J
`
`trader is not prior art to the ins1ant applicatiOn, which has a filing date of Jul\e 06, 2000.
`
`2.
`
`Any comments considered necessary by apf)llcant must be submitted no Jater
`
`than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably
`
`accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be cteal1y \abated •comments on
`
`Statement of Reasons for Allowance."
`
`Respectfully
`
`By, _____ _
`
`Richard Weisberger
`
`t..•d
`
`2B119l..fr21E
`
`11 Wdtrtr:E tr002 Bl qa~
`
`ELLIS 00950
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2290
`IBG et al. v. TRADING TECH. - CBM2016-00054
`
`

`
`F'eb 1 '1 20.04 6:-24PM
`
`, . 24761169
`
`p.S
`
`02/lf/2001 1f:l4 p~ 1?171~409
`
`JACKSON JAUBR I.LP
`
`QIJOO&
`
`ApplicatlOfl/Controt Number: 091894,637
`Art Unit: 3524
`
`Page -4
`
`GBll9l.vatE
`
`.l.l
`
`ELLIS 00951
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`TRADING TECH EXHIBIT 2290
`IBG et al. v. TRADING TECH. - CBM2016-00054