`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IBG LLC; INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.; TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.;
`TRADESTATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; and IBFX, INC.;
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Case CBM2015-00182
`Patent No. 6,772,132
`____________________
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ OBJECTIONS TO PATENT OWNER’S
`EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`IBG LLC, Interactive Brokers LLC, TradeStation Group, Inc., TradeStation
`
`Securities, Inc., TradeStation Technologies, Inc., and IBFX, Inc. (collectively,
`
`“Petitioners”) object under 37 C.F.R. § 42.64 to the admissibility of the following
`
`evidence Trading Technologies International, Inc. (“TT” or “Patent Owner”) filed
`
`and served on Monday, June 27, 2016:
`
`
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2121
`
`U.S. Patent Classification System – Classification Definitions –
`
`Class 705
`
`2124
`
`Class 345, Computer Graphics Processing and Selective Visual
`
`Display Systems, (January 2011): 1-8
`
`2125
`
`July 2015 Update Appendix 1: Examples, USPTO Examination
`
`Guidelines
`
`2126
`
`2133
`
`Senate Congressional Record, S5402-S5443 (Sept. 8, 2011)
`
`McGraw Hill "Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms,"
`
`Fifth Edition (1994): Definition of “Recording”
`
`2159
`
`TSE-filed opposition document to Japanese Patent Application
`
`No. 2001-564025 (TSE0000000982-995)
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2160
`
`Certified Translation of TSE-filed opposition document to
`
`Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-564025
`
`(TSE0000000982-995)
`
`2161
`
`Certification of Translation of TSE-filed opposition document to
`
`2162
`
`2163
`
`2164
`
`2165
`
`Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-564025
`
`(TSE0000000982-995)
`
`JP Patent Application 2001-564025
`
`Deposition Transcript of Atushi Kawashima, dated June 17,
`
`2016
`
`Deposition Transcript of David Rho, dated April 26, 2016
`
`Deposition Transcript of Kendyl A. Roman, dated May 3, 2016
`
`(Thomas Ex. J)
`
`2166
`
`Deposition Transcript of Kendyl A. Roman, dated May 5, 2016
`
`2168
`
`2169
`
`2170
`
`2171
`
`
`
`(Thomas Ex. YYYY)
`
`Declaration of Eric Gould-Bear
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Declaration of Christopher Thomas
`
`Declaration of Michael Burns (Thomas Ex. W)
`
`Declaration of Timothy Geannopulos (Thomas Ex. U)
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2172
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Declaration of Jay Knobloch (Thomas Ex.
`
`2173
`
`2174
`
`2175
`
`KK)
`
`Declaration of Robbie McDonnell (Thomas Ex. V)
`
`Declaration of Dan Olsen
`
`Exhibit TSE1 from Kawashima 2005 Deposition
`
`(TSE0000000996-1016)
`
`2176
`
`Certified Translation of Exhibit TSE1 from Kawashima 2005
`
`Deposition (TSE0000000996-1016)
`
`2177
`
`Certification of Translation of Exhibit TSE1 from Kawashima
`
`2178
`
`2179
`
`2180
`
`2005 Deposition (TSE0000000996-1016)
`
`Declaration of Harold Abilock
`
`E-mail from J. Goldberg to Board (May 10, 2016)
`
`Attachment E to Letter to Director Lee: Trading Tech Int’l v
`
`CQG, Inc. and CQGT, LLC, Case No. 05-cv-4811 (N.D.Ill.),
`
`Dkt. 1073, Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Motion
`
`for Summary Judgment (35 U.S.C. § 101)
`
`2201
`
`Thomas Ex. A - Christopher Thomas CV
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2202
`
`Thomas Ex. B - Reexam Certificate for U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,772,132
`
`2203
`
`Thomas Ex. C - Reexam Certificate for U.S. Patent No.
`
`2204
`
`2205
`
`2206
`
`6,766,304
`
`Thomas Ex. D - Microsoft DNA Case Study
`
`Thomas Ex. E - TT0103979-995
`
`Thomas Ex. F - Excerpts from Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
`
`Form 10-K Statement IBG_00000412-421
`
`2207
`
`Thomas Ex. G - Excerpts from TradeStation Group, Inc. Form
`
`10-K Statement TS0005177-88
`
`2208
`
`Thomas Ex. H - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc., Case
`
`No. 04-cv-5312, Expert Report of David Silverman
`
`2209
`
`Thomas Ex. I - Globex User Guide June 1995 (get excerpt -
`
`cover and p. 61)
`
`2210
`
`Thomas Ex. K - Declaration of Daniel Durkin TTX00020829-
`
`00020830 (05/28/2004)
`
`2211
`
`Thomas Ex. L - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc., Case
`
`No. 04-cv-5312, Trial Transcript - Brumfield Trial Testimony
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2212
`
`2213
`
`2214
`
`2215
`
`2216
`
`Thomas Ex. M animation
`
`Thomas Ex. N - Brumfield Sketch - eSpeed_PTX0321
`
`Thomas Ex. O animation
`
`Thomas Ex. P - Brumfield Trading Results - eSpeed_PTX0396
`
`Thomas Ex. Q - Declaration of David Martin TTX00061557-
`
`00061558 (08/13/2004)
`
`2217
`
`Thomas Ex. R - Brumfield Articles CQG014380172-177 and
`
`CQG014380206-209
`
`2218
`
`Thomas Ex. S - Declaration of James Zellinger TTX00061410-
`
`00061412 (08/31/2004)
`
`2219
`
`Thomas Ex. T - Declaration of Ray Cahnman TTX00061529-
`
`00061530 (07/23/2004)
`
`2220
`
`Thomas Ex. X - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc., Case
`
`No. 04-cv-5312, Trial Transcript - David Feltes Trial Testimony
`
`2221
`
`Thomas Ex. Y - Declaration of Charles McElveen
`
`TTX00061559-00061560 (05/18/2004)
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2222
`
`Thomas Ex. Z - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc., Case
`
`No. 04-cv-5312, Trial Transcript - Tim Geannopulos Trial
`
`2223
`
`2224
`
`Testimony
`
`Thomas Ex. AA - Trader Declarations
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Thomas Ex. BB - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc.,
`
`v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from David
`
`Martin Deposition (06/08/2006)
`
`2225
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Thomas Ex. CC - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc.,
`
`v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from Charles
`
`McElveen Deposition (01/17/2006)
`
`2226
`
`Thomas Ex. DD - Steidlmayer, J. Peter, Steidlmayer on Markets
`
`Trading with Market Profile, 2ed (2003) - PTX0814
`
`2227
`
`Thomas Ex. EE - Declaration of Scott Johnston TTX00061397-
`
`00061398 (09/24/2004)
`
`2228
`
`Thomas Ex. FF - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc., Case
`
`No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from Scott Johnston Deposition
`
`(06/27/2006)
`
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2229
`
`Thomas Ex. GG - Declaration of Tom Grisafi TTX00061542-
`
`00061543 (07/31/2004)
`
`2230
`
`Thomas Ex. HH - Collins, Daniel, What is Behind your Front-
`
`2231
`
`2232
`
`End?, Smart Trading 2001 - PTX0620
`
`Thomas Ex. II - eSpeed_PTX0782
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Thomas Ex. JJ - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v.
`
`eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from Elliot Lapan
`
`Deposition (06/04/2007)
`
`2233
`
`Thomas Ex. LL - U.S. Patent No. 7,676,411 Claim Chart - MD
`
`2234
`
`2235
`
`2236
`
`2237
`
`2238
`
`Trader with Exhibits 1-3 (06/23/2016)
`
`Thomas Ex. MM - Screenshot - Market Depth Trader Window
`
`Thomas Ex. NN - Screenshot - Placing Non-Automated Futures
`
`Trades
`
`Thomas Ex. OO - Screenshot - About the Matrix Window
`
`Thomas Ex. PP - TTX03586066-70
`
`Thomas Ex. QQ - Screenshot - TradeStation® Securities
`
`MATRIX
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2239
`
`Thomas Ex. RR - Declaration of Dieter Marlovics
`
`2240
`
`2241
`
`2242
`
`2243
`
`2244
`
`2245
`
`2246
`
`2247
`
`2248
`
`2249
`
`2250
`
`2251
`
`TTX00061553-00061554 (08/09/2004)
`
`Thomas Ex. SS - eSpeed_PTX0038
`
`Thomas Ex. TT - eSpeed_PTX0078
`
`Thomas Ex. UU - eSpeed_PTX0123
`
`Thomas Ex. VV - eSpeed_PTX0279
`
`Thomas Ex. WW - eSpeed_PTX0281
`
`Thomas Ex. XX - eSpeedPTX0286
`
`Thomas Ex. YY - eSpeed_PTX0294
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Thomas Ex. ZZ - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc.,
`
`v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from Raymond
`
`Deux Deposition (11/03/2006)
`
`Thomas Ex. AAA - eSpeed_PTX2064
`
`Thomas Ex. BBB - eSpeed_PTX2077
`
`Thomas Ex. CCC - eSpeed_PTX0438
`
`Thomas Ex. DDD - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc.,
`
`Case No. 04-cv-5312, Trial Transcript - Amanda Lewis Trial
`
`Testimony
`
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`2252
`
`2253
`
`2254
`
`2255
`
`2256
`
`2257
`
`2258
`
`2259
`
`2260
`
`2261
`
`2262
`
`2263
`
`2264
`
`2265
`
`2266
`
`2267
`
`2268
`
`2269
`
`
`
`Thomas Ex. EEE - eSpeed_PDX0215
`
`Thomas Ex. FFF - eSpeed_PTX1366
`
`Thomas Ex. GGG - eSpeed_PTX0080
`
`Thomas Ex. HHH - eSpeed_PTX1367
`
`Thomas Ex. III - eSpeed_PTX0081
`
`Thomas Ex. JJJ - eSpeed_PTX1356
`
`Thomas Ex. KKK - eSpeed_PTX0110
`
`Thomas Ex. LLL - eSpeed_PTX1360
`
`Thomas Ex. MMM - eSpeed_PTX0448
`
`Thomas Ex. NNN - eSpeedPTX1357
`
`Thomas Ex. OOO - eSpeed_PTX0079
`
`Thomas Ex. PPP - eSpeed_PTX1358
`
`Thomas Ex. QQQ - eSpeed_PTX1359
`
`Thomas Ex. RRR - eSpeed_PTX1361
`
`Thomas Ex. SSS - eSpeed_PTX1362
`
`Thomas Ex. TTT - eSpeed_PTX1363
`
`Thomas Ex. UUU - eSpeed_PTX1364
`
`Thomas Ex. VVV - eSpeed_PTX1365
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`2270
`
`2271
`
`2272
`
`2273
`
`2274
`
`2275
`
`2276
`
`2277
`
`2278
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Thomas Ex. WWW - eSpeed_PTX0036
`
`Thomas Ex. XXX - eSpeed_PTX0440
`
`Thomas Ex. YYY - eSpeed_PTX0441
`
`Thomas Ex. ZZZ - eSpeed_PTX1371
`
`Thomas Ex. AAAA - eSpeed_PTX1369
`
`Thomas Ex. BBBB - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc.,
`
`Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from David Feltes (01/24/ 2007)
`
`Thomas Ex. CCCC - eSpeed_PTX1370
`
`Thomas Ex. DDDD - CQG_PTX0600
`
`Thomas Ex. EEEE - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. CQG, Inc., et.
`
`al., Case No. 05-cv-4811, Jury Verdict (03/18/2015)
`
`2279
`
`Thomas Ex. FFFF - Directory of Software Solutions for LIFFE
`
`2280
`
`2281
`
`2282
`
`Connect (Oct. 1998) - PTX0355
`
`Thomas Ex. GGGG - eSpeed_PTX0356
`
`Thomas Ex. HHHH - eSpeed_PTX0357
`
`Thomas Ex. IIII - Directory of Access Solutions for LIFFE
`
`Connect (May 2001) - DDX0174
`
`2283
`
`Thomas Ex. JJJJ – Consent Judgments
`
`
`
`- 11 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2284
`
`2285
`
`2286
`
`Thomas Ex. KKKK - eSpeed_DTX0119
`
`Thomas Ex. LLLL - eSpeed_DTX0120
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Thomas Ex. MMMM - Trading Techs. Int’l.
`
`Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from
`
`Nicholas Garrow Deposition (05/26/2005)
`
`2287
`
`Thomas Ex. NNNN - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc.,
`
`Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from Robert McCausland
`
`Deposition (04/07/2005)
`
`2288
`
`Thomas Ex. OOOO - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc.,
`
`Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from Michael Burns Deposition
`
`(05/29/2007)
`
`2289
`
`Thomas Ex. PPPP - Petition for withdrawal of Application from
`
`Issue, 09/590,692 - ELLIS0000585-592
`
`2290
`
`Thomas Ex. QQQQ - Notice of Allowance - ELLIS0000948-
`
`951
`
`2291
`
`Thomas Ex. RRRR - Steps Taken to Improve Patent Quality -
`
`PTX0624
`
`
`
`- 12 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`TT Exhibit No. Description
`
`2292
`
`Thomas Ex. SSSS - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. CQG, Inc., et.
`
`al., Case No. 05-cv-4811, Excerpts from Steven Van Dusen
`
`Deposition (01/20/2015)
`
`2293
`
`Thomas Ex. TTTT - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc.,
`
`Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from David Silverman
`
`Deposition (08/24/2007)
`
`2294
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Thomas Ex. UUUU - Trading Techs. Int’l.
`
`Inc., v. CQG, Inc., et. al., Case No. 05-cv-4811, Excerpts from
`
`John Phillip Mellor Deposition (01/16/2015)
`
`2295
`
`CONFIDENTIAL Thomas Ex. VVVV - Trading Techs. Int’l.
`
`Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc., Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from
`
`Richard Ferraro Deposition Vol. 2 (08/09/2007)
`
`2296
`
`Thomas Ex. WWWW - Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed,
`
`Inc., Case No. 04-cv-5312, Excerpts from Robert Dezmelyk
`
`Deposition (08/17/2007)
`
`2297
`
`Thomas Ex. XXXX - National Aeronautics and Space
`
`Administration Web Page Print out, Human Computer
`
`Interaction Group
`
`
`
`
`
`- 13 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`Petitioners ask the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to deny the admission and
`
`consideration of the following documents on the following bases:
`
`FRE ARTICLE IV – RELEVANCE AND ITS LIMITS
`
`Petitioners object to Exhibit Nos. 2121, 2124, 2125, 2126, 2133, 2159, 2160,
`
`2161, 2162, 2165, 2175, 2176, 2177, 2179, 2180, 2204, 2205, 2206, 2207, 2208,
`
`2209, 2210, 2211, 2212, 2213, 2214, 2215, 2216, 2217, 2218, 2219, 2220, 2221,
`
`2222, 2223, 2224, 2225, 2226, 2227, 2228, 2229, 2230, 2231, 2232, 2233, 2234,
`
`2235, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2239, 2240, 2241, 2242, 2243, 2244, 2245, 2246, 2247,
`
`2248, 2249, 2250, 2251, 2252, 2253, 2254, 2255, 2256, 2257, 2258, 2259, 2260,
`
`2261, 2262, 2263, 2264, 2265, 2266, 2267, 2268, 2269, 2270, 2271, 2272, 2273,
`
`2274, 2275, 2276, 2277, 2278, 2279, 2280, 2281, 2282, 2283, 2284, 2285, 2286,
`
`2287, 2288, 2291, 2292, 2293, 2294, 2295, 2296, 2297, and 2298 as irrelevant
`
`under FRE 401 and thus inadmissible under FRE 402, or as confusing or a waste of
`
`time under FRE 403, because cited portions are not relevant to any issue remaining
`
`in this proceeding, such as patentability of the subject matter, broadest reasonable
`
`interpretation of the claims, anticipation of the claims in view of the prior art, or
`
`obviousness of the claims in view of the prior art.
`
`FRE ARTICLE VI – WITNESSES
`
`Petitioners object to Exhibit Nos. 2169, 2212, 2214, 2220, 2224, 2225, 2228,
`
`2232, 2247, 2251, 2275, 2286, 2287, 2288, 2292, 2293, 2295, and 2296 for lack of
`
`
`
`- 14 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`foundation. Patent Owner has not shown that the declarant has personal knowledge
`
`of the subject matter of the testimony as required by FRE 602.
`
`Petitioners object to Exhibit Nos. 2212, 2213, and 2214 as improper
`
`demonstratives. Patent Owner has not established a proper foundation for the
`
`evidence set forth in the exhibits.
`
`FRE ARTICLE VII – OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY
`
`Petitioners object to Exhibit Nos. 2169, 2208, 2210, 2212, 2214, 2216, 2218,
`
`2219, 2221, 2223, 2227, 2229, 2239, and 2295 to the extent they offer opinion
`
`under FRE 701 - 703. The declarant is not qualified to offer expert testimony, the
`
`testimony is not based on sufficient facts or data, and there is no indication that
`
`declarant has the expertise necessary to apply the law to the facts as would be
`
`necessary to opine under FRE 702. Further, there is no indication that the declarant
`
`based those opinions on facts or data upon which an expert in the relevant field
`
`would reasonably rely. FRE 703. Further, testimony at these paragraphs falls
`
`outside acceptable lay opinion testimony under FRE 701. A party may not evade
`
`the expert witness requirements of FRE 702 by simply designating the testimony
`
`as lay testimony under FRE 701.
`
`FRE ARTICLE VIII – HEARSAY
`
`To the extent Patent Owner relies on the contents of Exhibit No(s). 2121,
`
`2124, 2159, 2160, 2162, 2165, 2169, 2175, 2176, 2180, 2204, 2205, 2206, 2207,
`
`
`
`- 15 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`2208, 2209, 2210, 2211, 2212, 2213, 2214, 2215, 2216, 2217, 2218, 2219, 2220,
`
`2221, 2222, 2223, 2224, 2225, 2226, 2227, 2228, 2229, 2230, 2231, 2232, 2233,
`
`2234, 2235, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2239, 2240, 2241, 2242, 2243, 2244, 2245, 2246,
`
`2247, 2248, 2249, 2250, 2251, 2252, 2253, 2254, 2255, 2256, 2257, 2258, 2259,
`
`2260, 2261, 2262, 2263, 2264, 2265, 2266, 2267, 2268, 2269, 2270, 2271, 2272,
`
`2273, 2274, 2275, 2276, 2277, 2278, 2279, 2280, 2281, 2282, 2283, 2284, 2285,
`
`2286, 2287, 2288, 2291, 2292, 2293, 2294, 2295, 2296, and 2297 for the truth of
`
`the matter asserted, Petitioners object to such contents as inadmissible hearsay
`
`under FRE 801 and 802 that does not fall under any exceptions, including those of
`
`FRE 803, 804, 805 or 807.
`
`FRE ARTICLE IX – AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION
`
`Petitioners object to Exhibit Nos. 2124, 2133, 2159, 2175, 2176, 2204, 2205,
`
`2206, 2207, 2208, 2209, 2210, 2211, 2212, 2213, 2214, 2215, 2216, 2217, 2218,
`
`2219, 2220, 2221, 2222, 2223, 2224, 2225, 2226, 2227, 2228, 2229, 2230, 2231,
`
`2232, 2233, 2234, 2235, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2239, 2240, 2241, 2242, 2243, 2244,
`
`2245, 2246, 2247, 2248, 2249, 2250, 2251, 2252, 2253, 2254, 2255, 2256, 2257,
`
`2258, 2259, 2260, 2261, 2262, 2263, 2264, 2265, 2266, 2267, 2268, 2269, 2270,
`
`2271, 2272, 2273, 2274, 2275, 2276, 2277, 2278, 2279, 2280, 2281, 2282, 2283,
`
`2284, 2285, 2286, 2287, 2288, 2291, 2292, 2293, 2294, 2295, 2296, and 2297 as
`
`not properly authenticated under FRE 901 because Patent Owner has not presented
`
`
`
`- 16 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`any evidence that these documents are authentic nor that the documents are self-
`
`authenticating under FRE 902.
`
`FRE ARTICLE X – CONTENTS OF WRITINGS, RECORDINGS, AND
`PHOTOGRAPHS
`
`To the extent Patent Owner relies on the contents of Exhibit Nos. 2210,
`
`2212, 2213, 2214, 2216, 2218, 2219, 2221, 2223, 2227, 2229, 2239, 2284, and
`
`2285 to prove the content of the original document, Petitioners object to these
`
`documents as not being original documents under FRE 1002, authentic duplicates
`
`under FRE 1003, nor documents that fall under any exceptions to the original-
`
`document requirement, including those of FRE 1004.
`
`Petitioners object to Exhibit Nos. 2212 and 2214 under FRE 1006 as an
`
`improper summary because Patent Owner has not shown that the contents of the
`
`original cannot be conveniently examined in court nor made the original or
`
`duplicates available for examination or copying.
`
`CITING EXHBITS NOT SERVED
`
`Petitioners object to Exhibit Nos. 2169, 2208, 2212, and 2214 as citing
`
`exhibits not served with the documents as required by 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(1)(i).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 17 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`These objections are made within five business days from the June 27, 2016
`
`filing and service of TT’s exhibits.
`
`
`
`Date: 7/5/2016
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Richard M. Bemben #68658/
`
`
`Robert E. Sokohl, Reg. No. 36,013
`Lori A. Gordon, Reg. No. 50,633
`Richard M. Bemben, Reg. No. 68,658
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`- 18 -
`
`
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to TT’s Evidence
`CBM2015-00182
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on July 5, 2016, the attached
`
`Petitioners’ Objections to Patent Owner’s Evidence Pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.64(b)(1) were served electronically via e-mail upon the following counsel for
`
`Patent Owner, TT:
`
`erika.arner@finnegan.com
`Erika H. Arner, Reg. No. 57,540
`joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`Joshua L. Goldberg, Reg. No. 59,369
`kevin.rodkey@finnegan.com
`Kevin D. Rodkey, Reg. No. 65,506
`rachel.emsley@finnegan.com
`Rachel L. Emsley, Reg. No. 63,558
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Trading-Tech-CBM@finnegan.com
`
`Steven F. Borsand
`TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`tt-patent-cbm@tradingtechnologies.com
`
`
`gannon@mbhb.com
`Michael D. Gannon
`sigmond@mbhb.com
`Leif R. Sigmond, Jr.
`MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: 7/5/2016
`
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Richard M. Bemben #68658/
`
`
`Robert E. Sokohl, Reg. No. 36,013
`Lori A. Gordon, Reg. No. 50,633
`Richard M. Bemben, Reg. No. 68,658
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`
`
`- 19 -
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
