Paper No. ____
` Filed: December 15, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`IBG LLC; INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC;
`TRADESTATION GROUP, INC.; TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC.;
`TRADESTATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;
`IBFX, INC.; CQG, INC.; and CQGT, LLC
`
`Petitioners
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner Trading Technologies
`
`International, Inc. hereby submits a current listing of Trading Technologies
`
`Exhibits to counsel for Petitioners IBG, LLC, Interactive Brokers LLC,
`
`TradeStation Group, Inc., TradeStation Securities, Inc., TradeStation
`
`Technologies, Inc., IBFX, Inc., CQG, INC., and CQGT, LLC.
`
`Exhibit 2002
`
`Exhibit 2004
`
`Exhibit 2005
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Exhibit 2007
`
`Exhibit 2008
`
`Exhibit 2009
`
`Filed Exhibits Description
`Exhibit 2001
`Transcript of Teleconference with the Board, dated
`November 23, 2015
`Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. and SAP
`AG, Case No. 2014-1194 (CAFC), Docket No. 61, Brief for the
`Intervenor - Director of the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office (May 1, 2014)
`Exhibit 2003 Meyers, Brad A. “A Brief History of Human-Computer
`Interaction Technology.” Interactions 5.2 (1998): 44-54
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Technical Areas
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Human Computer Interaction Group
`University of Washington Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Degree Option
`Rochester Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Masters
`in Human Computer Interaction
`Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Web Page Print out, M.S. in
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Tufts University Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Certificate Program
`Georgia Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Human-
`Computer Interaction Master’s Program
`DePaul University Web Page Print out, Master of Science
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Carnegie Mellon University Web Page Print out, Masters of
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Senate Congressional Record, S936-S953 (Feb. 28, 2011)
`
`Exhibit 2010
`
`Exhibit 2011
`
`Exhibit 2012
`
`Exhibit 2013
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Exhibit 2014
`
`Exhibit 2016
`
`Exhibit 2017
`
`Exhibit 2018
`
`Exhibit 2019
`
`Exhibit 2020
`
`Exhibit 2021
`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`Crossing the Finish Line on Patent Reform: What Can and
`Should Be Done, Hearing Before the Subcommittee on
`Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet of the
`Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives (Feb. 11,
`2011)
`Exhibit 2015 Markup of H.R. 1249, The America Invents Act, House of
`Representatives Committee on the Judiciary (Apr. 14, 2011)
`Study and Report on the Implementation of the Leahy-Smith
`America Invents Act, USPTO Report to Congress (Sept. 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 613, Supplemental Response of Certain
`Defendants to TT’s Emergency Motion (July 20, 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Transcript of Proceedings - Motion (September 10,
`2015)
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading
`Technologies International, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131,
`Declaration of Kendyl A. Román (May 17, 2014)
`TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al. v. Trading
`Technologies International, Inc., Case No. CBM2014-000131,
`Declaration of Harold Abilock (March 6, 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 176, Defendants’ Case Management Statement
`for May 5, 2011 Status Hearing (May 30, 2011)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 528, Position Statement of the TD Ameritrade
`Defendants on the Federal Circuit’s Decision in OEC and How
`this Case Should Proceed (Feb. 20, 2014)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 562, Reply
`Memorandum in Support of the IBG Defendants’ Motion to Stay
`Proceedings Pursuant to Section 18(b) of the America Invents
`Act (Jun. 18, 2014)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc, Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 558, TradeStation Defendants’ Joinder In and
`Motion for Stay (June 11, 2014)
`
`Exhibit 2022
`
`Exhibit 2023
`
`Exhibit 2024
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc, Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 546, Memorandum in Support of the TD
`Ameritrade Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pursuant to
`Section 18(b) of the America Invents Act (May 22, 2014)
`Trading Tech Int’l v BGC Partners, Inc., Case No. 10-C-715
`(N.D.Ill.), Dkt. 609, Response of Certain Defendants to Trading
`Technologies’ “Emergency” Motion (July 15, 2015)
`Trading Tech Int’l v TradeStation Securities, Inc. and
`TradeStation Group, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-884 (N.D.Ill.),
`TradeStation Securities, Inc.’s and TradeStation Group, Inc.’s
`Initial Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 2.3
`(October 12, 2010)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,993,572 B2
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., Ecco LLC and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No.
`1:04-CV-05312 (N.D. Ill.), Volume 11-A Trial Transcript of
`Proceedings (September 26, 2007)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Verdict Form (October 10, 2007)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Instruction Form (October 10, 2007)
`Trading Techs. Int’l. Inc., v. eSpeed, Inc. et al. , Case No. 04-cv-
`5312, Dkt. 1140, Notification of Docket Entry (January 3, 2008)
`79 Fed. Reg. 74618- 633, USPTO 2014 Interim Guidance on
`Patent Subject Matter Eligibility (December 16, 2014)
`July 2015 Update Appendix 1: Examples, USPTO Examination
`Guidelines
`The American Heritage College Dictionary Fourth Edition, 100
`(2002): Definition of “Axis”
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Rachel L. Emsley/
` Rachel L. Emsley, Back-up Counsel
`Reg. No. 63,558
`
`
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 2025
`
`Exhibit 2026
`
`Exhibit 2027
`
`Exhibit 2028
`Exhibit 2029
`
`Exhibit 2030
`
`Exhibit 2031
`
`Exhibit 2032
`
`Exhibit 2033
`
`Exhibit 2034
`
`Exhibit 2035
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 15, 2015
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`
`Case CBM2015-00179
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`
`
`Owner’s Updated Exhibit List and Exhibits 2002 - 2035 were served on
`
`December 15, 2015, via email directed to counsel of record for the Petitioner at the
`
`following:
`
`Robert Sokohl
`rsokohl-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Lori Gordon
`lgordon-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Jonathan Strang
`jstrang-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Richard M. Bemben
`rbemben-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`
`Date: December 15, 2015
`
`/Ashley F. Cheung/
`Ashley F. Cheung
`Case Manager
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
`& Dunner, LLP