IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Covered Business Method Patent Review
`
`United States Patent No. 8,061,598
`
`Attorney Docket No.:
`104677—5008—829
`
`Customer No. 28120
`
`Petitioner: Apple Inc.
`
`Inventor: Racz et al.
`
`United States Patent No: 8,061,598
`l*'onnerly Application No.: 13/ 012,541
`Issue Date: November 22, 2011
`
`Filing Date: January 24, 2011
`l“().E1’1’1(31‘ Group Art Unit: 2887
`Former Examiner: Thien M. Le
`
`E§‘.i<§}!5il&"‘|§§fi!f‘.~t5'J
`
`For: Data Storage and Access Systems
`
`MAIL STOP PATENT BOARD
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Post Office Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`DECLARATION OF MEGAN RAYMOND IN SUPPORT OF PETITION
`
`FOR COVERED BUSINESS METHOD PATENT REVIEW OF
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT N0. 8,061,598
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 321, 3'7 C.F.R. § 42.304
`
`I, Megan 1*‘. Raymond, make the following Declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`
`"1746:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of Ropes & Gray LLP.
`
`I provide this Declaration in connection with the above-identified
`
`( Iovered Business Method Patent Review proceeding that is being requested at the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office by Apple Inc. under 35 U.S.C.
`
`321, 37
`
`(I.l*'.R.
`
`42.304. Unless otherwise stated, the facts stated in this Declaration are based
`
`on 1113-‘ pe1‘:~‘o1'121l linowledge.
`
`Apple Exhibit 1022
`
`Page 00001
`
`
`Page 00001
`
`Apple Exhibit 1022
`
`
`
`Covered Business Method Patent Review
`
`United States Patent No. 8,061,598
`
`Attorney Docket No.:
`104677—5008—829
`
`Customer No. 28120
`
`Petitioner: Apple Inc.
`
`Inventor: Racz et al.
`
`United States Patent No: 8,061,598
`l*'onnerly Application No.: 13/ 012,541
`Issue Date: November 22, 2011
`
`Filing Date: January 24, 2011
`l“().E1’1’1(31‘ Group Art Unit: 2887
`Former Examiner: Thien M. Le
`
`E§‘.i<§}!5il&"‘|§§fi!f‘.~t5'J
`
`For: Data Storage and Access Systems
`
`MAIL STOP PATENT BOARD
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Post Office Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`DECLARATION OF MEGAN RAYMOND IN SUPPORT OF PETITION
`
`FOR COVERED BUSINESS METHOD PATENT REVIEW OF
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT N0. 8,061,598
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 321, 3'7 C.F.R. § 42.304
`
`I, Megan 1*‘. Raymond, make the following Declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`
`"1746:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of Ropes & Gray LLP.
`
`I provide this Declaration in connection with the above-identified
`
`( Iovered Business Method Patent Review proceeding that is being requested at the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office by Apple Inc. under 35 U.S.C.
`
`321, 37
`
`(I.l*'.R.
`
`42.304. Unless otherwise stated, the facts stated in this Declaration are based
`
`on 1113-‘ pe1‘:~‘o1'121l linowledge.
`
`Apple Exhibit 1022
`
`Page 00001
`
`
`Page 00001
`
`Apple Exhibit 1022
`
`
`
`Covered Business Method Patent Review
`
`United States Patent No. 8,061,598
`
`3.
`
`Exhibit 1003 hereto is a true and correct copy of United States Patent
`
`No. 5,925,127 to Arshad Ahmad, which was downloaded on October 27, 2014 from
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) Patent Application
`
`Information Retrieval (“PAIR”) website at my request and which is a record of the
`
`USPTO to which all parties have access. An exhibit label on the first page and pages
`
`numbers on all pages have been added to the bottom of this document but no other
`
`alterations have been made.
`
`4.
`
`Exhibit 1004 hereto is a true and correct copy of United States Patent
`
`No. 5,940,805 to Dieter Kopp, which was downloaded on October 26, 2014 from the
`
`'USPTO PAIR website at my request and which is a record of the USPTO to which all
`
`parties have access. An exhibit label on the first page and pages numbers on all pages
`
`have been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations have been
`
`made.
`
`5.
`
`lixhibit 1005 hereto is a true and correct copy of two emails in an email
`
`string dated August 26, 2014, titled “RE: Srnartflash: Meet and Confer Regarding
`
`Further Claim/ Prior Art limits”, which I received from H. I-lamid on August 26,
`
`2014.
`
`:\n exhibit label on the first page and pages numbers on all pages have been
`
`added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`6.
`
`lixhibir 101 8 hereto is a true and correct copy of an article by liberhard
`
`Von l*'aber, Robert
`
`l-lammel1'ath_, and l*'ranz—Peter
`
`lleider, entitled “’.l‘l1e Secure
`
`Page 00002
`
`
`Page 00002
`
`
`
`Covered Business Method Patent Review
`
`United States Patent No. 8,061,598
`
`Distribution of Digital Contents,” from the 13th Annual Computer Security
`
`Applications Conference held on December 8-12, 1997, published by The Institute of
`
`lilectrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., which was retrieved from the Linda Hall
`
`Library of Science, Engineering and Technology, Document Services at my request.
`
`Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to the bottom of this document
`
`but no other alterations have been made.
`
`7.
`
`Exhibit 1023 hereto is a true and correct copy of the Claim Construction
`
`Opinion (“Claim Construction Opinion”) from Srzzarflasb LLC, .92‘ czl
`
`22. /lppie Inc, at
`
`:11, Civil Action No. 6:13-CV-447, before the District Court of the Eastern District of
`
`Texas, which was downloaded on October 29, 2014 from the Public Access to Court
`
`Electronic Records (“PACER”) website at my request and is a record of the
`
`aforementioned District Court (Dkt. No. 229) to which all parties have access. The
`
`Claim Construction Opinion contains markings at the top of each page indicating the
`
`PACIER filing information. An exhibit label on the first page and pages numbers on
`
`all pages have been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations
`
`have been made.
`
`8.
`
`ltxhibit 1024 hereto is a true and correct copy of the tile history for
`
`United States Patent No. 8,061,598 to Patrick Racz and I-Iermen—ard l"lulst_, which was
`
`downloaded on October 29, 2014 at my request and which is a record of the USP'l'()
`
`to which all parties have access.
`
`..-\n exhibit label on the first page and pages numbers
`
`Page 00003
`
`
`Page 00003
`
`
`
`Covered Business Method Patent Review
`
`United States Patent No. 8,061,598
`
`on all pages have been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations
`
`have been made.
`
`9.
`
`Exhibit 1025 hereto is a true and correct copy of United States Patent
`
`No. 4,337,483 to Louis C. Guiliou, which was downloaded on October 29, 2014 from
`
`the USPTO PAIR website at my request and which is a record of the USPTO to
`
`which all parties have access. An exhibit label on the first page and pages numbers on
`
`all pages have been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations
`
`have been made.
`
`10.
`
`Exhibit 1026 hereto is a true and correct copy of United States Patent
`
`No. 7,725,375 to Ian Kenneth Shepherd, which was downloaded on October 29, 2014
`
`from the USPTO PAIR website at my request and which is a record of the USPTO to
`
`which all parties have access. An exhibit label on the first page and pages numbers on
`
`all pages have been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations
`
`have been made.
`
`11.
`
`Exhibit 1027 hereto is
`
`a true and correct copy of International
`
`Publication No. \‘{=”() 95/345357, filed on June 14, 1995 by Smith,james P. and Smith,
`
`lidward 1-\., and published on December 21, 1995, which was downloaded on
`
`()ctober 26, 2014 from the li.uropear1 Patent Office’s Iispacenet search page to which
`
`all parties have access at my request.
`
`1-"\n exhibit label on the first page and pages
`
`Page 00004
`
`
`Page 00004
`
`
`
`Covered Business Method Patent Review
`
`United States Patent No. 8,061,598
`
`numbers on all pages have been added to the bottom of this document but no other
`
`alterations have been made.
`
`12.
`
`Exhibit 1029 hereto is a true and correct copy of United States Patent
`
`No. 5,646,992 to Ronald Sublet, which was downloaded on November 16, 2014
`
`from the USPTO PAIR website at my request and which is a record of the USPTO to
`
`which all parties have access. An exhibit label on the first page and pages numbers on
`
`all pages have been added to the bottom of this document but no other alterations
`
`have been made.
`
`13.
`
`Exhibit 1034 hereto is a true and correct copy of the Japanese Patent
`
`Application Publication No.
`
`I-I10-269289 filed on March 26, 1997 by Sony
`
`Corporation, and published on October 9, 1998, which was downloaded on March
`
`11, 2014 at my request from the European Patent Office’s Espacenet search page to
`
`which all parties have access, and which is accompanied by a true and correct copy of
`
`a translation of the text of that document and a declaration of accuracy regarding that
`
`translation provided by MultiLing Corporation. An exhibit label on the first page and
`
`pages numbers on all pages have been added to the bottom of this document but no
`
`other 21ll’C1‘21T.l()1”1S have been made.
`
`'14.
`
`l have been informed that willfully false statements are punishable by
`
`fine or impnsonment, or both.
`
`I make this declaration of my own personal
`
`l<nowledge, and all start.-merits are true.
`
`If called to testify as to the truth of the
`
`matters stated l'1e1‘ein._ I could and would testify competently.
`
`5
`
`Page 00005
`
`
`Page 00005
`
`
`
`Covered Business Method Patent Review
`
`United States Patent No. 8,061,598
`
`15.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed this ___3 day of May, 2015, at Washington, D.C.
`
`&«~v4=«,«»\/Q
`
`Megan F. Raymond
`
`Page 00006
`
`
`Page 00006
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
