`
`ATTOR.N'Ei .. OCKET NO.: 3125-4002!.‘-S}
`
`48. (n
`
`) An information management and synchronous communications system
`
`comprising:
`
`
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`(I.
`
`e.
`
`a central database containing applications and data,
`
`first computing device associated with the central
`d tabase,
`
`a s ond computing device associated with a second
`stora e medium containing applications and data,
`
`an app] ations program interface, and
`
`21 Comm ‘cations control module;
`
`wherein applications or data are sync
`
`nized between the central database and the second
`
`storage medium and wherein the applic 'ons program interface and communications control
`
`module establish a seamless link between
`
`second storage medium.
`
`e data in the central database and the data on the
`
`fl
`
`49. (new) The information man ement and synchronous communications system
`
`of claim 48 wherein the communications contro module and the applications program interface
`
`enable the automatic generation of and updating of operator menus or screens on the second
`
`computing device based on data from the central d abase.
`
`50. (new) The information managem t and synchronous communications system
`
`of claim 1 wherein the second menu is generated
`
`manually selecting items from the first
`
`menu, adding items to the second menu or assigning p
`
`eters to items in the second menu.
`
`51. (new) The infonnation management
`
`d synchronous communications system
`
`of claim 1 wherein the data is synchronized by digita transmission between the data storage
`
`device connected to the central processing unit and at leas one other computing device.
`
`52. (new) The infonnation management and synchronous communications system
`
`of claim 12 wherein the modified menu is generated by man lly selecting items from the master
`
`menu.
`
`601142_l
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 201
`
`
`
`PATENT
`
`ATTOR.NE‘t
`
`.. JCKET NO.: 3125---10021 5'1
`
`53. ( w) The information management and synchronous communications system
`
`of claim 12 wherein the
`
`ata is synchronized by digital transmission between the data storage
`
`‘device and at least one other c
`puting dev° e.
`
`54. (new) The comp
`r sém ofclaim 31 wherein the data is synchronized by
`
`_d_i_g__i~t'al transmission between the storage
`vice and at least one other data storage medium.
`/ gffnew) The information management and synchronous communications system
`of claim ggavherein the applications and data are synchronized by digital data transmission
`
`between the central database, at least one wireless handheld computing device, at least one Web
`
`Oh
`
`server and at least one Web page.
`
`56. (n w) The information management and synchronous communications system
`
`of claim 44 wherein- th
`
`pplications or data are synchronized by digital data transmission
`
`between the central database
`
`at least one w‘
`
`less handheld computing device.
`
`
`
`57. (new) The inform ‘on m
`
`ement and synchronous communications system
`
`of claim 4‘? wherein the applications or
`
`ata are synchronized by digital data transmission
`
`between the central database, at least one wire
`
`computing device and at least one wireless
`
`paging or beeper device.
`
`
`
`z-——-...__.._.-.-.- ~
`
`-- -
`
`
`
`
`REMARKS
`
`By the present amendment, claims 1, 12 and 31 are amended. Claims 20-30 and
`
`40-43 were allowed. New claims 44-5‘? have been added. Claims 1-57 are now pending.
`
`\i-_-
`
`new matter has been added.
`
`Claims 1-19 and 31-39 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. l02(e) as anticipated b}
`
`Cupps et al. U.S. Patent No. 5,991,739. Claims l, 12 and 31 have been amended to further recite
`
`that the data comprising the second or modified menu is synchronized between the data storage
`
`device connected to the central processing unit and at least one other computing device. Cupps
`
`60ll42_l
`H-—--‘''''.—.-'----
`
`-6-
`
`.
`
`_j';
`‘'1'
`
`_
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 202
`
`
`
`PATENT
`
`ATTORNEH .. JCKET N0; 3125-4002USl
`
`describes the dynamic creation of menu web pages that are customized to a customer's request.
`
`(See, e.g., col. 9, lines 3-7). However, Cupps does not describe the synchronization of generated
`
`menus between different databases or computing devices. As a matter of fact, Cupps describes
`
`data transmission via phone or fax (e.g., col.10, lines 26-42) precisely because Cupps did not
`
`appreciate what Applicants describe and claim,
`
`i.e., real-time synchronization of data on
`
`different computers or databases. Claims 1, 12 and 31 as amended are thus believed to be
`
`patentably distinguishable over Cupps.
`
`Claims 2-11, 13-19 and 32-39 further contribute to the claiming of the invention
`
`because they are directed to further aspects of the claimed device. Claims 2-1 1, 13-19 and 32-39
`
`depend from claims 1, 12 or 31. With the amendments to claims 1, l2 and 31, it is respectfully
`
`submitted that claims 2-1 1, 13-19 and 32-39 are now allowable.
`
`New claims 44-57 recite further aspects of the invention which Applicants art‘
`
`entitled to claim. Claims 44-49 find support in the specification, e.g., at page 21, lines 8-10 and
`
`14-15; page 20, line 8 — page 21, line 3 and page 25, line 10 — page 26, line 8. Support for new
`
`claims 50 and 52 is found, e.g., at p. 12, line 3 - page 15, line 25. Support for new claims 51 and
`
`53-57 is found, e.g., at page I, line 1? and p. 2, lines 2-3. No new matter has been adtlczi
`
`Applicants respectfully submit that new claims 44-51‘ are distinguishable and patentable aw-:t' iht‘
`
`prior art of record.
`
`To avoid any negative inference, Applicants state for the record that Elm
`
`respectfiilly disagree with the Examiner’s statements with regard to claims 1-19 and 31-39 that
`
`Cupps discloses a synchronous communications system. Applicants fiirther disagree with the
`
`Examiner’s statements with respect to claims 8 and 16 that Cupps discloses creating the second
`
`menu in conformity with extensible markup language.
`
`In any event, claims 1-19 and 31 -1‘) :15
`
`amended are asserted to be patentable over the prior art of record as discussed above.
`
`601142_l
`
`-7.
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 203
`
`
`
`PATENT
`
`ATTORNEY _ JCKET N0.: 3125-4002USl
`
`It is therefore respectfully submitted that the invention as now claimed in rejected
`
`claims 1-19 and 31-39 and new claims 44-57 is patentable over the cited references and those
`
`claims are in condition for allowance. Accordingly, reconsideration and withdrawal of the
`
`rejection of claims 1-19 and 31-39 and allowance of the pending claims, being claims 1-57, is
`
`respectfully requested.
`
`Date: February 26, 2001
`
` :
`MORGAN & FINNEGAN, L.L.P.
`345 Park Avenue
`
`New York, NY 10154-0053
`TELEPHONE: 212-75 3-4300
`TELECOPIER: 212-751-6849
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Morgan & Finnegan, L.L.P.
`
`flu.
`011:: W. Osborne
`
`B
`
`Registration No. 36,231
`
`sm142_1
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 204
`
`
`
`
`
`rt‘!
`
`EAIENI
`
`Docket No.
`
`Q» 125-4002USl
`
`
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`Serial No.
`
`Filed
`
`For
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`McNally et al.
`
`09.-’400,4l 3
`
`Group An Unit: 2l73
`
`September 21, 1999
`
`Examiner: Cao Nguyen
`
`INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND SYNCHRONOUS
`COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WITH MENU GENERATION
`
`AM
`
`ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`
`Sir:
`
`"ll'ansnu‘tted herewith is an Amendment for the above—ident-ified application.
`
`[ ]
`[ X ]
`
`No additional fee is required
`
`
`M-4 R 0 8 30Theadditionalfeehasbeencalculatedas shownbelow:
`
`Claims
`Remaining
`After
`Amendment
`
`Highest No.
`Covered by
`Previous
`Payments
`
`Present
`Extra
`
`Rate
`
`00
`
`‘l'otal'
`Claims
`
`Independent
`Claims
`
`Multiple
`Dependent
`Clairn(s)
`
`57
`
`8
`
`-
`
`-
`
`43
`
`5
`
`= 14
`
`X $18.00
`
`$2§.2.l.El
`
`= 3
`
`it $80.00
`
`$2$_Q.£E!
`
`(If claims added by amendment include
`Multiple Dependent Claim(s) and there
`was not Multiple Dependent Clai.ms[s)
`in application before amendment add
`$270.00 to additional fee.)
`
`sum
`
`Total:
`
`$422,131
`
`[ X]
`
`Statement of “Small Entity” Status Under 37 CFR § 1.27 filed _Sgm§mh:L2_L_1222
`Reduced Fees Under 37 CFR § l.9(f} (50% of total) paid herewith.
`
`.
`
`$_Z1§.fl9.
`
`Includes all independent and single dependent claims and all claims referred to in multiple dependent
`claims. See 3'! C.F.R. § 1.750;).
`
`602l'l'6_l
`
`._..._...-.
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 205
`
`Tech
`
`0?
`‘V ceflfel-2!
`Additional
`Fee
`
`
`
`Docket No. 3125-4002US1
`
`Charge fee to Deposit Account No. 13-4500. Order No.
`A DUPLICATE COPY OF THIS SHEET IS ATTACHED.
`
`The Assistant Commissioner is hereby authorized to charge any additional fees which may be required for
`this amendment, including all fees pursuant to 37 CPR. § 1.17 for its timely consideration, or credit any
`overpayment to Deposit Account No. 13-4500. Order No. ,3 12§;_4.m21JSl
`. A DUPLICATE
`COPY OF THIS SHEET IS ATTACHED.
`
`Page(s) of substitute Sequence Listing
`
`Computer disk(s) containing substitute Sequence Listing
`
`Statement under 37 CPR. § l.825(b) that the computer and paper copies of the substitute Sequence Listing
`are the same.
`
`[
`
`]
`
`[X]
`
`[
`
`[
`
`[
`
`]
`
`]
`
`]
`
`[ X ]
`
`A check in the amount of S Efim to cover the filing fee is attached.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MORGAN & FINNEGAN, L.L.P.
`
`By:
`
`ét” . 0
`John W. Osborne
`Reg. No. 36,231
`
`Dated: February 26, 2001
`
`CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
`
`MORGAN & FINNEGAN, L.L.P.
`345 Park Avenue
`New York, New York l0lS4
`(212) 758-4800
`(212) 751-6349 Facsimile
`
`FORM: AMD-TRAN.NY
`Rev. l0.’01lO0
`
`eo2115_1
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 206
`
`
`
`
`
`G,!°rU
`,2I13
`..
`
`Docket No. 3125-4002USl
`
` fl£E
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`Serial No.
`
`Filed
`
`For
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`McNally et al.
`
`09;’-400,413
`
`Group Art Unit: 2173
`
`September 21, 1999
`
`Examiner: Cao Nguyen
`
`INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND SYNCHRONOUS
`COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WITH MENU GENERATION
`
` LEfl
`
`ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`
`Sir:
`
`I hereby certify that the attached Amendment Fee Transmittal; Amendment; Check for $188.00;
`
`Check for $58.00; and Postcard.
`
`along with any paper{s} referred to as being attached or enclosed and this Certificate of Mailing are being deposited
`
`with the United States Postal Service on date shown below with sufficient postage as first-class mail in an envelope
`
`addressed to the: Assistant Commissioner for Patents, Washington. D.C. 20231.
`
`Dated: February 26, 2001
`
`CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
`MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP
`
`345 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10154
`(212) 753-4800
`(212) 751-6849 Facsimile
`=
`..
`§?§“5‘s,§f9“3T “Y
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MORGAN & FINNEGAN, L.L.P.
`
`. 0/é”<-_
`
`W. Osborne
`
`Reg. No. 36,231
`
`I D
`M4
`R 0 8 2001
`Techno’
`°9rc
`%"3100
`
`6022543
`
`3_
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 207
`
`
`
` PATENT
`
`#07
`
`Attorney Docket No. 3125-4002USl
`
`
`
`Applicant
`
`Serial No.
`
`Filed
`
`For
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`McNally et :1.
`
`09{400,413
`
`September 2 l , 1999
`
`Group Art Unit:
`
`2173
`
`Examiner:
`
`Cao Nguyen
`
`HNIFORMATTON MANAGEMENT AND SYNCHRONOUS
`COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WITH MENU GENERATION
`
`
`
`Assistant Commissioner For Patents
`
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`Attn: OFFICIAL DRAFTSPERSON
`
`Sir:
`
`Enclosed for filing in the above-identified application are six (6) sheets of formal
`
`drawings containing Figures l—?, corrected as required by the Official Draftsperson in the Notice of
`
`Drafisperson‘s Patent Drawing Review dated February 7, 2000.
`
`Please substitute the enclosed drawings for those presently on file.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`John w. Osborn
`'3},
`:_«_=_
`; ,1
`Registration No. 36,231
`ii:
`1”)
`'
`-:3
`°°
`:3
`‘C5
`'
`
`..
`3;;
`3:
`23'
`(:3:
`
`""
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 208
`
`Dated: February 26. 2001
`
` :
`MORGAN & FINNEGAN, L.L.P.
`345 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10154-0053
`(212) 758-4800
`(H2) 751-6849 (FAX)
`
`6022T6_1
`
`
`
`.lE»:EH8mm.Hvoamamfio:93...0aHm.H.32e_a§._§5..oE333ma$9HHz_mm_~aO9.55OEo25.25280mtommmo0EumH___Hoom_m~_Ho&<0a
`:82:.H_E.2aaH_N5mH._:_n_o=masQm.Hm/oa§§E.ga__
`
`
`
`:=__H.__..9mmm_HE...3..eHHHMgs.aseHHHHum_asmn__.ES:sj.HHH@259o9HH_
`
`:32:5M9E8:méaI
`m_3_amo«Mnm_§._.8moaHma__H_._.§§asaEHHm,
`
`
`
`.we:5:m_o_.._lIII v.
`
`oase___A
`
`
`
`
`2/6
`
`Modifier
`
`
`
`I
`I
`l
`
`I
`
`Brice:
`
`_L_ong Name:
`§hort Name:
`Qode:
`
`
`L10
`
`
` Menu Cote
`
`Ii
`
`
`
`
`
`Long Nome:
`Short Name:
`
`
`‘
`I
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 210
`
`
`
`JNFORMATION MANAGEMEN . AN...
`SYNCHRNOUS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
`WITH MENU GENERATION
`
`Inventors: Keiih McNally
`Docket No.: 3125-4002US1
`
`Morgan & Finnegan, LLP
`Angus R. Gill. Reg. No. 51.133
`Formal Drawing Sheets 2 of 6 (Figs. 1-?)
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 211
`
`
`
`:5/6
`
`33
`
`
`
`Noamdam"853:52roam
`
`Sou
`
`
`
`Em9_%_<__%__a
`
`
`
`E3.:82
`
`
`
`
`
`.m8._m__§_o_._o.252B§__5E.€_§n_8__o:_«:5:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5:...Baum.858§=a__ogas»a£58&3
`
`
`._=__to=~Bom§.__8.__885E53»
`
`
`
`
`
`_..m9__o.__..,_.aa..o&2_case.%_._2__m....oam
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`¢.o_.._
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 212
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND
`SYNCHRNOUS COMMUNICATIONS
`SYSTEM WITH MENU GENERATION
`
`Inventors: Keith McNaIIy
`Docket No.: 3125—40D2US1
`
`Morgan & Finnegan, LLP
`Angus R. Gill, Reg. No. 51,133
`Fon'na| Drawing Sheets 3 of 6 (Figs. 1-7}
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 213
`
`
`
`am_.s_mm
`
`
`
`2.8E:
`2E=_8383
` %Em.333::§_....m
`
`
`
`
`m=E=_oo§Eo.._m._E=_8~8_om
`
`
`
`a__E=_8o_€___....s<
`
`3...:
`
`m.o_.._
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 214
`
`
`
`INFORMATION MANAGEMEH I‘ ANIJ
`SYNCHRNOUS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
`WITH MENU GENERATION
`
`Inventors: Keith McNaIIy
`Docket No.: 3125-4002US1
`
`Morgan 8: Finnegan. LLP
`Angus R. Gill, Reg. No. 51,133
`Formal Drawing Sheets 4 of 6 (Figs. 1-?)
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 215
`
`
`
`5/6
`
`%_.%weas.30.:as.5
`
`
`
`Jccoecu:m3_8_zu.=E=s8m
`
`3$88:
`
`0.0....
`
`
`
`09885.252.,
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 216
`
`
`
`INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND
`SYNCHRNOUS COMMUNICATIONS
`SYSTEM WITH MENU GENERATION
`
`Inventors: Keith McNaIIy
`Docket No.: 3125-4002US1
`
`Morgan & Finnegan, LLP
`Angus R. Giil, Reg. No. 51,133
`Formal Drawing Sheets 5 of 6 (Figs. 1-?)
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 217
`
`
`
`m,HUWHHEH
`52HUM
`
`
`
`2Nam5.:E.....§5
`
`EHEH
`
`mafia
`
`ao=8._5
`
`3:H
`
`MUHH
`
`8..sec3$25swam
`
`5,3.H._o_.8_om~8._
`
`E3magma
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 218
`
`
`
`An’
`INFORMATION MANAGEMEI
`SYNCHRNOUS COMMUNICATION::i SYSTEM
`WITH MENU GENERATION
`
`Inventors: Keith McNaIIy
`Docket No.: 3125~4DD2US1
`
`Morgan 8: Finnegan, LLP
`Angus R. Gill, Reg. No. 51,133
`Formal Drawing Sheets 6 of 6 (Figs. 1-?)
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 219
`
`
`
`’”/C4-mi19%?/,3?;’5'3
`4//7 /o r
`
`BAIEEI
`
`Docket No. 3125-4002USl
`
`
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`Serial No.
`
`Filed
`
`For
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`McNa1ly et a].
`
`09i400,4l3
`
`Group Art Unit: 2173
`
`September 21, 1999
`
`Examiner: Cao Nguyen
`
`INFORMATTON MANAGEMENT AND SYNCHRONOUS
`COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WITH MENU GENERATION
`
` 4m
`
`ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`
`Sir:
`
`I hereby certify that the attached
`
`Submission of Formal Drawings, Six (6) Sheets of Formal
`
`Drawings (Figs. 1-7); and Postcard.
`
`along with any paper(s) referred to as bei.ng attached or enclosed and this Certificate of Mailing are being deposited
`
`with the United States Postal Service on date shown below with sufficient postage as first-class mail in an envelope
`
`addressed to the: Assistant Commissioner for Patents, Washington, D.C. 2023 l .
`
`Dated: February 26, 2001
`
`CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
`MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP
`345 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10154
`(212) 753-4300
`(212)751-6849 Facsimile
`
`FORM: CERT. NY
`Rev. 05/27193
`
`6o2219_1
`
`Respectfully submitted.
`
`MORGAN &'. FINNEGAN, L.L.P.
`
`ml ' 0
`
`J
`. Osborne
`Reg. No. 36,231
`
`*3: I
`:3 ===
`'
`C’-3
`,.._.;
`
`f‘.'.
`7;,
`(D
`‘:3:
`
`‘:1
`I
`
`511
`C3
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 220
`
`
`
`
`
`*2./T213
`
`v_'/‘_ ’.'/1."; 5/
`;
`LJOCKCI NO. 3125-4-Ofll
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PA ENT AND TRADEM OFFICE
`
`Applicant(s)
`Serial No.
`Filed
`
`For
`
`: McNally er al.
`: o9:4oo,413
`: September 21, 1999
`
`Group An Unit: 2173
`Examiner: Cao Nguyen
`
`RECEIVED
`‘MR 2 U 200!
`Group 2100
`
`:
`
`INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND SYNCHRONOUS
`COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WITH MENU GENERATION
`
`Assistant Commissioner for Patents
`
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`
`LETTER CONCERNTNG NOTICE OF REFERENCES CITED IN OEEICE ACTION
`
`Sir:
`
`The previous communication dated November 29, 2000 (paper no. 5) rem-.-::d
`
`from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) indicates an incorrect patent number for item.
`
`(c) which is
`
`listed as document number 5,912,734.
`
`The correct number should read
`
`“5,912,‘743”.
`
`We enclosed a copy of the Notice of References Cited for your reference. To
`
`ensure that the application issues with the correct information, Applicant respectfully requests
`
`correction of said item.
`
`Date: _1\_/!_a_1'c_j;_8_._2_QQ_1_
`
`Mailing Address
`MORGAN & FINNEGAN
`345 Park Avenue
`
`New York, New York 10154
`(212) 758-4800
`
`60622l_l
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MORGAN & FINNEGAN
`
`\
`
`(Xx . 0/r6T'~<_
`
`W. Osborne, Reg. No. 36,231
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 221
`
`
`
`
` l.lN(I'ED STATES DEPARTMENTOFGOMM
`
`v
`Phuntuwdfiadenuntolnoe
`Ache DOINIBSIONOFPATEITSAINDTFIADEIMHKB
`‘
`
`uaumuoe-.o.c.aoaa«
`
`
`
`Ilflfimflll mnawma
`
`DATE MAILED:
`
`Please find below andfor attached an onion: communication concerning this application or
`proceeding.
`
`cornmnlsalonar of Patents and Trademarks
`
`neceweo
`
`(mm 2.11 2001
`
`2;:
`
`aeroup 2100
`3 '\':!
`
`
`
`
`
`930-DOC {FIN-. 2551
`‘U5 GPO ?0004r‘.)4J0om:~‘~'I
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 222
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Allnlauon Ho.
`001400.413
`.
`
`: -.
`
`Armando)
`
`can “Kevin” Nguyen
`
`U5. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`McNalIyetaL
`Gtup An Uri:
`-
`
`2173
`
`
`
`CUPPS et al,
`
`Kinebuchi et al,
`
`1
`
`DOCUMENT no.
`
`one
`
`oourmrr
`
`NAME
`
`. cuss f
`
`suscu.-:5
`
`FOREIGN PAYENT DOCUMENTS
`
`_ T -_—-
`
`5 °
`.
`:...;-...
`5
`r ;
`.. ————
`
`|
`
`I
`
`E
`
`5
`I
`
`1'
`
`'
`
`!
`-:
`-*‘:“‘% j
`-
`E
`I
`5.
`NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`T j—: j: T —: T i
`J
`
`
`
`J
`
`a
`
`1
`
`:
`
`I
`
`'
`
`I
`.
`j
`I
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT {Including Author. nun. some. and Porflnont no»)
`
`'
`
`one
`
`-
`
`-
`
`____._ _..
`
`_— j —.
`
`5
`2
`.:___——
`3
`5.
`
`i
`
`‘
`|
`
`3
`Ir.
`!v
`-4--
`!
`'
`:
`:W!
`:'
`:
`E
`.+-—E_
`!
`;
`-
`- x
`:
`'
`1.}
`
`-
`
`.
`
`- _-
`
`_
`
`_.____1_.__
`-I
`
`_
`
`_
`
`____,_
`
`___ __ __
`
`_ _________
`
`E5 Fale-nl and Trarlennark ijmce
`T0-892 (Rev 9-95)
`
`?!
`
`A
`--
`
`_
`Notice of References Clted
`
`\
`
`1/-."_)—
`
`'
`
`-;
`‘
`
`Dam of Paper No_ _
`
`5
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 223
`
`
`
`(_-/
`
`fwifwb
`' '
`35,
`9}’
`
`mm at
`
`EPAFITMENT OF commence
`unrreo suns:
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER OF PATENTSmo mnoemxmcs
`Washington. Dc 20231
`
`6,.)
`'
`
`
`
`{qf+¢/ad
`
`MENQLLY
`
`me
`
`:.n a1;
`
`I-
`
`TMn:zu522
`
`-'3‘--*3-"F-'*‘='.*F\'NE
`--TiI'H¥\=' Wu
`MORGAN a FINNEGAN, LLP
`34$ FARR HVENU:
`
`New yuan mv 13154
`
`mugnmfi;
`
`1.'|E~f'.'-;'3;‘;' |fI1
`
`Please find below anclfor attached an Office communication concerning this application or
`proceeding.
`
`Commissioner ol Patents and Trademarks
`
`no-soc[Hau.1tIOOI
`
`1,3,,¢,$W
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 224
`
`
`
`
`_
`
`_
`
`Application No.
`
`09!-100.413
`
`Mclilally et al.
`
`°”'°° “"9" 3""'"'‘'''3’
`
`i
`l
`:
`Art Unit
`mm
`| El
`2173
`cao "Kevin" Nguyen
`|
`i
`5 I.
`— The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address -
`
`If
`
`;;
`
`it
`I"
`!i
`
`ii'=
`
`i
`
`.
`
`i
`.i
`
`.
`_
`‘l
`
`Period for Reply
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE
`THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`. Extensions oi‘ time may be available under the provisions of 3? CFR 1.136 la).
`alter SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`. ltthe period for reply specified above is less than thirty (30) days. a reply within the statutory minimum of thirty {30} days will
`be considered timely.
`. jf No period for reply is specified above. the maximum statutory period will apply and wil expire Six (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this
`communication.
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will. by statute. cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`. Any reply received by the Office later than three months alter the mailing date of this oorninunicatipn. even it timely liled_ may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 3? CFR 1.?I2l4-(b).
`status
`
`3
`
`MONTH(Sj FROM
`
`in no event. however. may a reply be timely filed
`
`ijfi Responsive to cornrnunicationlsitlleo on Mart 2001
`
`2a}E This action is FINAL.
`
`2b]CE This action is non-final.
`
`3);? Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parre Qua_i1ie35 CD. 11; 453 O6. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`tljfi Clalmlsj
`
`‘l-19 31-39 44-54 56 and 57
`
`islare pending in the applica
`
`4a) Of the above, claims)
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`islare withdrawn from considers
`
`5355 clalmisl 2040 and
`
`-
`
`mi.-4L 5'!
`
`61X Claimisj 1-19 31-39 44-3, 56, and 57
`
`7]: Claimlsi
`
`8] 1': Claims
`
`Application Papers
`
`islare allowed.
`
`islare rejected.
`
`islare objected to.
`
`are subject to restriction andlor election require -
`
`9] : The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`10}: The clrawinglsj filed on
`
`islare objected to by the Examiner.
`
`11):; The proposed drawing correction filed onT is. afj
`
`approved bjfidisapproved
`
`12}: The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`13}; Acknowledgement is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-{d}.
`
`a}:_'. All bl
`
`Some‘ cl Dione of:
`
`1. 5; Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2. 1: Certified copies or the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`
`3.
`
`Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the international Bureau (PCT Rule ‘l?.2{a}j.
`‘See the attached detailed Ollice action tor a list or the certified copies not received
`
`14] ".2 Acknowledgement is made of a claim for domestic priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e).
`
`iltlachrrientlsj
`
`15:
`15i
`
`1?:
`
`Notice or References Cited (PTO-892)
`Notice of Draltsoerson's Patent Drawing Review [PTO-948]
`
`lei F": Interview summary {PTO-413} Paper lvoisi
`19)
`Notice l'.‘l|'1i'1l‘0|‘ll'|a|-Palel'tlADDlIcalICll'I{PTO-152!
`
`Information Disclosure $taternerlt(s}tPTO-14-19] Paper Nolsl
`
`20) D other
`
`I.‘ 5 93%| and Trademark DI!-ce
`PTO-326 (Rev 9-00]
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No. 9
`
`
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 225
`
`
`
`App1icationfControl Number: 091400.413
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 2] 73
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`I .
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the
`
`basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless --
`
`tej the invention was described in a patent granted on an application for patent by another filed in the United
`States before the intention thereof by the applicant for patent, or on an international application by another who
`has fulfilled the requirements of paragraphs (I), (2), and [4] of section 37113 ofthis title before the invention
`thereof by the applicant for patent.
`
`2.
`
`Claims 1-19, 31-39 and 50-S4)are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by
`
`Cupps et al. (5,991,739).
`
`Regarding claim 1, Cupps discloses an information management and synchronous
`
`communications system for generating menus comprising: a central processing unit, a data
`
`storage device connected to said central processing unit, an operating system including a graphical
`
`user interface (see figure 2), a first menu stored on said data storage device, application software
`
`for generating a second menu from said first menu, wherein the application software facilitates the
`
`generation of the second menu by allowing selection of items from the first menu. addition of
`
`items to the second menu and assignment of parameters to items in the second menu using the
`
`graphical user interface of said operating system (see col. 9, lines 42-67).
`
`Regarding claim 2, Cupps discloses an information management and synchronous
`
`communications system, wherein the second menu is a restaurant menu (see col. 5, lines 27-67).
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 226
`
`
`
`Applicationx'Control Number: 09;‘-400,413
`
`Page 3
`
`ArtUnit: 2173
`
`Regarding claim 3, Cupps discloses an information management and synchronous
`
`communications system, wherein the second menu is capable of being displayed on the display
`
`screen of a wireless computing device (see col. 4, lines I-S5).
`
`Regarding claims 4 and 5, Cupps discloses an information management and synchronous
`
`communications system, wherein selections from the second menu are capable of being
`
`transmitted to a receiving computer by wireless link,(see figures I-2).
`
`Regarding claims 6 and ‘I, Cupps discloses an information management and synchronous
`
`communications system in, wherein the computer network is the int ernet; and selections fi'om the
`
`second menu are capable of being transmitted to a receiving computer via the internet (see col. 9,
`
`lines 16-65 and figure 8-10).
`
`Regarding claims 8-1 1, Cupps discloses an information management and synchronous
`
`communications system, wherein the second menu is created in conformity with hypertext markup
`
`language or extensible markup language (see col. 10, lines 8-56 and figures 7-10).
`
`As claims 12-19, 31-39 and 50-54 are analyzed as previously discussed with respect to
`
`claims 1-] 1 above.
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 227
`
`
`
`
`
`ApplicationfControl Number: 0%-100,413
`
`Page 4
`
`ArtUnit:2l73
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(3) which forms the basis for all obviousness
`
`rejections set forth in this Ofiice action:
`
`(a) A patent rriay not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in
`section 102 of this title. if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are
`such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person
`having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the
`rnanner in which the invention was made.
`
`This application currently namesjoint inventors.
`
`In considering patentability of the claims
`
`under 35 USC. l03(a), the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was
`
`commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein were made absent any evidence to
`
`the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 3? CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor
`
`and invention dates of each claim that was not commonly owned at the time a later invention was
`
`made in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 103© and potential 35
`
`U.S.C. l02(t) or (g) prior art under 35 USC. l03(a).
`
`4.
`
`Claims 44-49 and 56-57 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. l03(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Cupps in view of Behr et al. (US Patent No. 6, l07,944).
`
`Regarding claim 44, Cupps fails to explicitly teach at least one wireless handheld
`
`computing device on which hospitality application.
`
`Behr teaches wireless handheld computing device on which hospitality application (see
`
`col. 14, lines 1-57).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of an ordinary skill in the art at the time
`
`the invention was made to provide wireless handheld computing device on which hospitality
`
`
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 228
`
`
`
`Applicationfcontrol Number: 09!400,4] 3
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 2173
`
`application as taught by Behr to the internet on-line ordering vendor of Cupps; in order to provide
`
`the customer with the hospitality over the wireless communication device.
`
`It would enhance user
`
`friendly and to remotely access into the hospitality ordering database.
`
`Regarding claim 45, Behr discloses wherein the communications control module and the
`
`application program interface enable automatic generation of and updating of operator menus or
`
`screen of the handheld (see figures 33-35).
`
`Regarding claim 46, Cupps discloses wherein Messaging format are used which are
`
`conformity with HTML or XML message format (see col. 9, lines 8-65).
`
`As claims 48-49 and 56-57 are analyzed as previously discussed with respect to claims 44-
`
`46 above.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`5.
`
`Applicant's arguments filed on 030 N01 have been fully considered but they are not
`
`persuasive.
`
`On page 7, Applicant argues that Cupps fails to explicitly teach or suggest “the second
`
`menu is synchronized between the data storage device connected to CPU “. However, the
`
`limitations set forth to reply upon “A customer accesses the online ordering machine through a
`
`client computer that is connected to the Intemet_ The customer enters the appropriate web
`
`address or universal resource locator (URL) for the online ordering machine. The online order
`
`procedure interacts with the client computer by providing access to a series of web pages that can
`
`
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 229
`
`
`
`Application.fControl Number: 09f400,4 1 3
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 2173
`
`be downloaded to the client computer for the customer's use. Initially, a home web page is
`
`provided to the client computer. The customer can register with the online ordering machine
`
`which is accomplished by filling out information requested through one or more web pages. The
`
`customer is then provided with a web page that prompts the customer for his location as shown in
`
`the exemplary web page. This web page can also obtain the current time at the customer’s
`
`location which is returned to the online order procedure. The current time is used to determine
`
`which restaurants meeting the customer's criteria are currently open.
`
`In addition, the web page
`
`obtains the type of service that the customer seeks, such as but not limited to take-out service
`
`or delivery service." See Cupps col. 9, lines 35-65 and figures 2-3F.
`
`On page 7, Applicant argues that the claims invention describe a real-time synchronization
`
`of data on different computers or database. However, the limitation as claimed was not clearly
`
`defined in the claim invention.
`
`Allowable Subject Matter
`
`6.
`
`Claims 20-30, 40-43 and 55 are allowed over the prior art of record.
`
`Applicant has claimed uniquely distinct features in the instant invention which are not
`
`found in the prior art either singularly or in combination. They are an information management
`
`and synchronous communications system for generating and transmitting menus at sub—modifier
`
`menu stored on data storage device and displayable in a window ofgraphical user interface, and
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 230
`
`
`
`
`ApplicationfControl Number: 09/400,41 3
`
`Page ?
`
`An Unit: ZI73
`
`application software for generating a second menu from first menu and transmitting second menu
`
`to a wireless handheld computing device or Web page. These features are not found or suggested
`
`in the prior art.
`
`The present invention is directed to an information management and synchronous
`
`communications system for generating and transmitting menus. Each independent claims 20 and
`
`40 are identified the uniquely distinct features “a smS—mod:' rer menu stored :1 data S! m e
`
`detrice and disgfagable in a window of flghfcal user interface, ¢_1_grd agglicgggori ggggrwgre [gr
`
`
`
`- ecndmerm I awfr! _
`
`comgutiirg device gr Web mge”. The closest prior art, Cupps (US Patent No. 5,991 J39) and
`
`Chen (US Patent No. 5,724,069) discloses convention of user interactive interface providing an
`
`on-line ordering distribution, either singularly or in combination, fail to anticipate or render the
`
`above underlined limitations obvious.
`
`Conclusion
`
`7.
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's
`
`disclosure and provided on the attached Form 892.
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 231
`
`
`
`AppiicationfControl Number: 09x‘400,4t 3
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 2173
`
`8.
`
`THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time
`
`policy as set forth in 3? CFR 1.l36(a).
`
`A shonened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action.
`
`In the event a first reply is filed within TWO
`
`MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until afier
`
`the end of the TI-[REE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period
`
`will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37
`
`CFR l.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action.
`
`In no event,
`
`however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date
`
`of this final action.
`
`Response
`
`9.
`
`Responses to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks,
`
`Washington, DC. 20231. If applicant desires to fax a response, (?03) 308-6306 may be used for
`
`formal communications.
`
`Please label “PROPOSED" or “DRAFT“ for informal facsimile communications. For after
`
`final responses, please label “AFTER FINAL” or “EXPEDITED PROCEDURE” on the
`
`document.
`
`Apple, Exhibit 1010, Page 232
`
`
`
`ApplicationfControl Number: 09f400,413
`
`Page 9
`
`An Unit: 2173
`
`I-land-delivered responses should be brought to Crystal Park Ii, 2121 Crystal Drive,
`
`Arlington, VA. Sixth Floor (Receptionist).
`
`Inquires
`
`10.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the eXaIll!I'It'!
`
`should be directed to Cao (Kevin) Nguyen whose telephone number is (703) 30 5-3 972. The
`
`examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8:30 am to 6:00 pm.
`
`if attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, John W.