`Patent 6,105,013
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-002USCBM
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
`AND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case CBM2014-00178
`Patent 6,105,013
`____________
`PATENT OWNER MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.’S
`MANDATORY NOTICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00178
`Patent 6,105,013
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-002USCBM
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8, in response to the Petition for Post-Grant
`
`Review on U.S. Patent No. 6,105,013 (“the ’013 Patent”), Patent Owner Maxim
`
`Integrated Products, Inc. submits the following Mandatory Notices.
`
`1. Real Party-In-Interest
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), Patent Owner identifies the real
`
`party-in-interest as Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
`
`2. Related Matters
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2), Patent Owner identifies the
`
`following related proceedings. As noted in connection with the individual
`
`proceedings, several of the identified proceedings have been dismissed.
`
`I. Proceedings Involving The ’013 Patent.
`
`a. PNC Bank N.A. et al. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00040, of US 6,105,013
`(petition for institution of review denied June 3, 2014, paper 19);
`b. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., No. 2013-
`1495 (Fed. Cir.) (judgment affirmed March 10, 2014, Dkt. 51);
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00178
`Patent 6,105,013
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-002USCBM
`
`c. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 4:12-cv-
`00369-RAS (E.D. Tex) (judgment affirmed March 10, 2014, Dkt. 33);
`d. In re Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., MDL No. 2354, No. 2:12-mc-
`00244;
`e. As transferred for MDL purposes:
`
` PNC Fin. Servs. Grp., Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-
`cv-00089-JFC (dismissed May 29, 2014, Dkt. 844)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 2:12-
`cv- 01641-JFC
` KeyCorp v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00860-JFC
`(dismissed August 20, 2013, Dkt. 648)
` Vanguard Grp., Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-
`00862-JFC (dismissed February 19, 2014, Dkt. 773)
` Jack Henry & Assocs., Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-00863-JFC (dismissed February 20, 2014, Dkt. 775)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Comerica Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00869-
`JFC (dismissed August 20, 2014, Dkt. 887)
` Fidelity Brokerage Servs. LLC v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-00871-JFC (dismissed May 16, 2014, Dkt. 840)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. First United Bank & Trust Co., No.
`2:12-cv-00876-JFC (dismissed February 19, 2014, Dkt. 774)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Starbucks Corp., No. 2:12-cv-00877-
`JFC (dismissed April 7, 2014, Dkt. 798)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Expedia, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00878-
`JFC (dismissed July 10, 2014, Dkt. 873)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Capital One Fin. Corp., No. 2:12-cv-
`00879-JFC (dismissed December 12, 2013, Dkt. 738)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Bank of the West, No. 2:12-cv-
`00880-JFC (motion to dismiss filed August 20, 2014, Dkt. 893)
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00178
`Patent 6,105,013
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-002USCBM
`
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Groupon, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00881-
`JFC (dismissed without prejudice August 20, 2014, Dkt. 886)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Union Bank, N.A., No. 2:12-cv-
`00882-JFC (dismissed February 6, 2014, Dkt. 763)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Southwest Airlines, Co., No. 2:12-
`cv-00883-JFC (dismissed May 5, 2014, Dkt. 836)
` Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-00887-JFC (dismissed August 5, 2014, Dkt. 882)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. QVC, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00891-JFC
`(dismissed March 14, 2014, Dkt. 789)
` Clairmail Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00923-
`NBF (dismissed August 31, 2012, Dkt. 146)
` Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-00945-JFC
` BMO Harris Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No.
`2:12-cv-01538-JFC
` Deutsche Bank AG v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., No. 2:12-cv-
`01604-JFC
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-01628-
`JFC (dismissed May 22, 2014, Dkt. 800)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Target Corp., No. 2:12-cv-01629-
`JFC (dismissed April 23, 2014, Dkt. 821)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Wells Fargo & Co., No. 2:12-cv-
`01639-JFC (dismissed May 1, 2014, Dkt. 831)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Bank of Am. Corp., No. 2:12-cv-
`01640-JFC (dismissed June 19, 2014, Dkt. 861)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. U.S. Bancorp, No. 2:12-cv-01642-
`JFC (dismissed August 20, 2014, Dkt. 888)
` Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc. v. Walmart Stores, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-
`01643-JFC (dismissed February 6, 2014, Dkt. 764)
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00178
`Patent 6,105,013
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-002USCBM
`
`II. Proceedings Involving Other US Patents.
`
`
`
`
`US Patent No. 6,105,013 is a continuation of application No. 08/594,983,
`
`which claims priority to provisional application No. 60/004,510, to which US
`
`Patent No. 6,237,095 also claims priority. US 6,237,095 is a divisional from
`
`application No. 08/595,014, from which the US Patent No. 5,805,702 issued. US
`
`Patent No. 5,940,510 contains related subject matter to and incorporates by
`
`reference application No. 08/595,014, from which the application issuing as US
`
`6,237,095 was a divisional. US Patent No. 5,949,880 is a divisional from
`
`application no. 08/594,975, from which US 5,940,510 issued. Numerous related
`
`proceedings identified above involving the ’013 Patent also involve one or all of
`
`these patents.
`
`Patent Owner identifies below the following additional proceedings not
`
`directly involving the ’013 Patent but relating to one or more of US 5,805,702, US
`
`5,940,510, US 5,949,880, and US 6,237,095. As noted in connection with the
`
`individual proceedings, several of the identified proceedings have been dismissed.
`
`a. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered
`Business Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2013-00059, of US
`5,949,880 (petition for institution of review denied March 20, 2014,
`paper 12);
`b. PNC Bank N.A. et al. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00038, of US 5,940,510
`(petition for institution of review denied June 3, 2014, paper 19);
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00178
`Patent 6,105,013
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-002USCBM
`
`c. PNC Bank N.A. et al. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00039, of US 5,949,880
`(petition for institution of review denied June 3, 2014, paper 20);
`d. PNC Bank N.A. et al. v. Maxim Integrated Prods., Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00041, of US 6,237,095
`(petition for institution of review denied June 3, 2014, paper 19);
`e. Ex Parte Reexamination, Control No. 90/013,063, of USP 5,940,510
`(request accorded filing date of December 16, 2013);
`f. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. Maxim integrated Products, Inc., Covered
`Business Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00177, of US
`6,237,095 (petition accorded filing date of August 21, 2014);
`g. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. Maxim integrated Products, Inc., Covered
`Business Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00179, of US
`5,940,510 (petition accorded filing date of August 21, 2014);
`h. JPMorgan Chase & Co. v. Maxim integrated Products, Inc., Covered
`Business Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00180, of US
`5,949,880 (petition accorded filing date of August 21, 2014);
`i. Groupon Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Covered Business
`Method Patent Review, Case No. CBM2014-00090, of US 5,805,702
`(terminated August 20, 2014, paper 12).
`
`
`
`
`
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. Lead and Back-Up Counsel
`
`Case CBM2014-00178
`Patent 6,105,013
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-002USCBM
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3), Patent Owner identifies Kenneth
`
`J. Weatherwax as lead counsel and Parham Hendifar as back-up counsel:
`
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Lead Counsel
`USPTO Reg. No. 54,528
`
`GOLDBERG, LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`11400 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 400
`Los Angeles, California 90064
`Telephone: (310) 307-4503
`Facsimile: (310) 307-4509
`Email: weatherwax@glwllp.com
`
`Parham Hendifar, Back-Up Counsel
`USPTO Reg. No. 71,470
`
`GOLDBERG, LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`11400 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 400
`Los Angeles, California 90064
`Telephone: (310) 307-4510
`Facsimile: (310) 307-4509
`Email: hendifar@glwllp.com
`
`6
`
`
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`//
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4. Service Information
`
`Case CBM2014-00178
`Patent 6,105,013
`Attorney Docket No. 140828-002USCBM
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(4), Patent Owner identifies the
`
`following service information:
`
`Stefani Smith, Esq.
`Tensegrity Law Group, LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
`Redwood Shores, California 94065
`
`Email: stefani.smith@tensegritylawgroup.com
`Telephone: 650-802-6050
`Facsimile: 650-802-6001
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`____/Kenneth J. Weatherwax/_________
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Reg. No. 54,528
`Goldberg, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP
`Date: September 11, 2014
`
`7
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In re: Covered Business Method Review of
`U.S. Patent No. 6,105,013
`Case No. CBM2014-00178
`Filed: September 11, 2014
`For: METHOD, APPARATUS, SYSTEM
`AND FIRMWARE FOR SECURE
`TRANSACTIONS
`
`
`
`Administrative Patent Judge: Mitchell
`Weatherly
`Atty. Docket: 140828-002USCBM
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`September 11, 2014
`Sir:
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned, on behalf of the Patent Owner,
`hereby certifies that a copy of the following document is being served on the Petitioner by
`Express Mail and electronic mail on September 11, 2014.
`
`PATENT OWNER MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.’S
`MANDATORY NOTICES
`POWER OF ATTORNEY
`The names and addresses of the parties being served are as follows:
`
`Andrea G. Reister
`Jay I. Alexander
`Gregory S. Discher
`Covington & Burling LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`
`
`Very truly yours,
`____/ Kenneth J. Weatherwax /_________
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Reg. No. 54,528
`Goldberg, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP
`
`