`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. ____
`
`Filed: March 27, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION,
`TD AMERITRADE, INC., and
`TD AMERITRADE ONLINE HOLDINGS CORP.
`Petitioners
`v.
`
` TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`Case CBM2014-00131
`
`U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`_________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00131
` U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Further to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner Trading Technologies
`
`International, Inc. hereby submits a current listing of Trading Technologies
`
`Exhibits to counsel for Petitioners TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, TD
`
`Ameritrade Inc., and TD Ameritrade Online Holdings Corp.
`
`Exhibit 2003
`Exhibit 2004
`
`Exhibit 2005
`
`Filed Exhibits Description
`Exhibit 2001
`Communications regarding motion to disqualify
`Exhibit 2002
`PTAB Trail Blog-Drinker Biddle “Denying Leave to File Motion
`for Additional Discovery CBM2014-00131, 133, 135, 136, 137.”
`(August 18, 2014)
`Emails Between Parties Relating to Hilmert Memo
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`Internation, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-05312
`(N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 963, Memorandum Opinion and Order
`(September 12, 2007)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 409,
`Defendants’ Reply Memorandum of Law In Support Of Joint
`Motion For Summary Judgment That The ‘056 Patent Is Invalid
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 1 For Lack Of Written Description
`(October 7, 2011)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. Open E Cry, LLC et
`al., Case 2012-1583 (Federal Circuit Appeals), Decision (August
`30, 2013)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. GL Trade Americas,
`Inc., FuturePath Trading, LLC et al., Tutorial Presentation
`(February 19, 2014)
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Technical Areas
`National Aeronautics and Space Administration Web Page Print
`out, Human Computer Interaction Group
`University of Washington Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Degree Option
`Rochester Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Masters
`
`Exhibit 2006
`
`Exhibit 2007
`
`Exhibit 2008
`
`Exhibit 2009
`
`Exhibit 2010
`
`Exhibit 2011
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2012
`
`Exhibit 2013
`
`Exhibit 2014
`
`Exhibit 2015
`
`Exhibit 2016
`
`Exhibit 2017
`
`Exhibit 2018
`
`Exhibit 2019
`
`Exhibit 2020
`
`Exhibit 2021
`
`Exhibit 2022
`through 2087
`Exhibit 2088
`Exhibit 2089
`Exhibit 2090
`Exhibit 2091
`Exhibit 2092
`
`Exhibit 2093
`
`Exhibit 2094
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00131
` U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in Human Computer Interaction
`Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Web Page Print out, M.S. in
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Tufts University Web Page Print out, Human-Computer
`Interaction Certificate Program
`Georgia Institute of Technology Web Page Print out, Human-
`Computer Interaction Master’s Program
`DePaul University Web Page Print out, Master of Science
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Carnegie Mellon University Web Page Print out, Masters of
`Human-Computer Interaction
`Senate Congressional Record S5402, Leahy-Smith America
`Invents Act (September 8, 2011)
`Senate Congressional Record S1360, Patent Reform Act of 2011
`(March 8, 2011)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 448,
`Memorandum Opinion and Order (February 9, 2012)
`Pletz, John, “Crain’s Eureka Index Ranks Chicago’s Most
`Innovative Firms,” Crain’s Chicago Business, (April 29, 2013)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00715 (N.D. Ill.), Docket No. 372,
`Defendants’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment That the ‘056
`Patent Is Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 1 For Lack of Written
`Description (August 15, 2011)
`Reserved
`
`Served
`Served
`Served
`Served
`Deposition Transcript of Kendyl A. Román, dated February 6,
`2015
`Deposition Transcript of Courtney O’Connell, dated February
`13, 2015
`Deposition Transcript of Akiko Rosenberry, dated February 16,
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2095
`
`Exhibit 2096
`
`Exhibit 2097
`Exhibit 2098
`
`Exhibit 2099
`
`Exhibit 2100
`Exhibit 2101
`
`Exhibit 2102
`
`Exhibit 2103
`through 2199
`Exhibit 2200
`
`Exhibit 2201
`
`Exhibit 2202
`
`Exhibit 2203
`through 2205
`Exhibit 2206
`Exhibit 2207
`through 2209
`Exhibit 2210
`
`Exhibit 2211
`Exhibit 2212
`Exhibit 2213
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00131
` U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`
`
`
`2015
`Deposition Transcript of Maho Taniguchi-Speller, dated
`February 17, 2015
`Deposition Transcript of Ronald Skidmore, dated February 18,
`2015
`Declaration of Harold Abilock
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Verdict Form (October 10, 2007)
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Jury Instruction Form (October 10, 2007)
`Declaration of Richard Hartheimer
`Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., eSpeed,
`International, Ltd., and Ecco Ware Ltd., Case No. 1:04-CV-
`05312 (N.D. Ill.), Notification of Docket Entry (January 3, 2008)
`Plas-Pak Indus., Inc. v. Sulzer Mixpac AG, No. 2014-1447, 2015
`WL 328222, (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2015)
`Reserved
`
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. CQG, 05-cv-4811 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 24,
`2015) (Dkt. 1073)
`Exhibit A, Thomas Report, provided by TT to Court in Trading
`Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. CQG, 05-cv-4811 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 24, 2015)
`(Dkt. 1073),.
`Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. v. CQG, 05-cv-4811, TT 101 Hearing
`Presentation.
`Reserved
`
`Thinkorswim thinkManual
`Reserved
`
`Case Nos. 6:13-CV-447-JRG-KNM, 448-JRGKNM, Smartflash
`LLC v. Apple, Inc., Dkt. 423 at 18, 20 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2015)
`Served
`Served
`Served
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Description
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2014-00131
` U.S. Patent 7,533,056
`
`
`
`
`Served
`Documents
`Exhibit 2088
`Exhibit 2089
`Exhibit 2090
`
`Exhibit 2091
`Exhibit 2211
`Exhibit 2212
`Exhibit 2213
`
`
`Dated: March 27, 2015
`
`Investopedia Definition “brand”
`Kenkyusha Online Dictionary Definition “meigara”
`Kenkyusha’s New Japanese-English Dictionary (4th Ed., 1974)
`“meigara”
`Second Declaration of Ronald E. Skidmore
`Declaration of Christopher Thomas
`Declaration of Jay Q. Knoblock
`Declaration of Cory C. Bell
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`By: /Joshua L. Goldberg/
`Erika H. Arner, Lead Counsel
`Registration No. 57,540
`Joshua L. Goldberg, Backup Counsel
`Registration No. 59,369
`Kevin D. Rodkey, Backup Counsel
`Registration No. 65,506
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
`& Dunner, LLP
`
`Steven F. Borsand, Backup Counsel
`Registration No. 36,752
`Trading Technologies International, Inc.
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner Trading
`Technologies International, Inc.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`
`
`
`Owner’s Updated Exhibit List was served on March 27, 2015, via email directed
`
`to counsel of record for the Petitioner at the following:
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`lgordon-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Jonathan M. Strang
`jstrang-ptab@skgf.com
`
`Robert E. Sokohl
`rsokohl-ptab@skgf.com
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Lisa C. Hines/
`Lisa C. Hines
`Litigation Clerk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`