`
`
`
`Paper No. 8
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CALLIDUS SOFTWARE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. AND VERSATA DEVELOPMENT
`GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case CBM2013-00054
`Patent 7,098,304
`____________
`
`Filed: September 17, 2013
`
`
`Before PATRICK E. BAKER, Trial Paralegal
`
`MOTION FOR ASSAD H. RAJANI TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Petitioner moves the Board to recognize
`
`Assad H. Rajani pro hac vice in connection with the Petition for Covered Business
`
`Method Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,098,304.
`
`Petitioner provides the following information in support of this Motion, as
`
`required by the Board’s “Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`-- 37 C.F.R. § 42.10” in Case IPR2013-00010 (“Pro Hac Order”).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (a), good cause exists for Assad H.
`
`Rajani to appear pro hac vice in connection with the subject Petition for Covered
`
`Business Method Review because: (1) Mr. Rajani is an associate at the law firm
`
`Dickstein Shapiro LLP and a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of
`
`California; (2) Mr. Rajani is an experienced patent litigator with over 5 years of
`
`experience litigating patent suits; (3) Mr. Rajani has litigated patent validity and
`
`enforceability issues numerous times in federal court; (4) Mr. Rajani is especially
`
`familiar with the subject matter at issue because he represents Petitioner in the
`
`related proceeding Versata Software, Inc. and Versata Development Group, Inc. v.
`
`Callidus Software Inc., C.A. No. 1:12-cv-00931-SLR (D. Del.) concerning U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,098,304; and (5) Deborah Fishman, lead counsel for Petitioner with
`
`respect to the subject Petition for Covered Business Method review, is a partner at
`
`Dickstein Shapiro LLP and a registered practitioner before the United States Patent
`
`and Trademark Office (Reg. No. 48,621).
`
`The information required by the Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (b)(i)-(viii), can be
`
`found in the accompanying Declaration of Assad H. Rajani in support of this
`
`Motion (Exh. 1014).
`
`The undersigned attorney welcomes a telephone call should the Office have
`
`any requests or questions. If there are any additional fees due in connection with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the filing of this paper, please charge the required fees to our deposit account no.
`
`04-1073.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
` /
`
` Deborah E. Fishman /
`Deborah E. Fishman (Reg. No. 48,621)
`Jeffrey A. Miller (Reg. No. 35,287)
`Assad H. Rajani (pro hac vice pending)
`Michael S. Tonkinson (pro hac vice pending)
`DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
`1841 Page Mill Road, Suite 150
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Phone: (650) 690-9500
`Fax: (650) 690-9501
`Email: fishmand@dicksteinshapiro.com
` millerj@dicksteinshapiro.com
` rajania@dicksteinshapiro.com
` tonkinsonm@dicksteinshapiro.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The undersigned certifies that the foregoing MOTION FOR ASSAD H.
`
`RAJANI TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE and associated Exhibit No. 1014, were
`
`served on September 17, 2013, by the methods set forth below at the following
`
`addresses of record for the subject patent:
`
`
`
`Via Federal Express
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Deborah E. Fishman /
`Deborah E. Fishman
`Reg. No. 48,621
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Terrile, Cannatti, Chambers
` & Holland, LLP
`(P.O. Box 203518)
`8911 North Capital of Texas Hwy.
`Suite 3150
`Austin, TX 78759
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
