`
`Filed in Open C urt
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICX~H:. ~ ~~~~ " ' -- (cid:173)
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF ~_x:_::_rffj,~~~===-- - -
`
`LOGANTREE LP,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Case No. 6:17-CV-01217
`
`GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`VERDICT
`
`We, the jury, answer the questions submitted by the Court as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Did Logan Tree prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Garmin has infringed
`
`the following claims of the '576 Patent?
`
`Separately answer "Yes" or "No" for each Claim.
`
`Claim 1:
`
`Nro
`tJo
`,
`Claim 36: No
`
`Claim 4:
`
`Note: Answer Question 2 only if you have answered "Yes" with respect to one or more of the
`claims in Question 1. Otherwise, skip Question 2, answer Question 3, and sign and date the
`Verdict form.
`
`2.
`
`What sum of money do you find Logan Tree has proven by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence would fairly and reasonably compensate LoganTree for its damages resulting from
`
`infringement of the ' 576 patent?
`
`$_a __ _
`
`
`
`Case 6:17-cv-01217-EFM Document 287 Filed 10/27/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`3.
`
`Were your answers unanimous?
`
`Yes: X
`
`No: - - - -
`
`Signed this 'v'l~day of October, 2022.
`
`JURY FORElERSON
`
`2
`
`