throbber
Case: 1:16-cv-00651 Document #: 81-4 Filed: 01/16/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:2477
`Case: 1:16-cv-00651 Document #: 81-4 Filed: 01/16/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:2477
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-00651 Document #: 81-4 Filed: 01/16/18 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:2478
`
`
`Page 1
`
`1
`2
`
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
` EASTERN DIVISION
`HOSPIRA, INC., )
` )
` Plaintiff, )C.A. No.
` )1:16-cv-00651
`vs. )
` )
` )
`FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC., )
` )
` )
` Defendant. )
`____________________________)
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`HOSPIRA, INC., )
` )
` Plaintiff/Counterclaim )C.A. No.
` Defendant. )15-cv-697-RGA
`vs. )
` )
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC )
` )
` Defendant/Counterclaim )
` Plaintiff. )
`____________________________)
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF RAO TATA-VENKATA
` Wednesday, November 9, 2016
` Chicago, Illinois
`Reported By:
`TRICIA J. FLASKA, CSR, RPR
`JOB NO. 115353
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-00651 Document #: 81-4 Filed: 01/16/18 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:2479
`
`
`Page 270
`
`Page 271
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`48 hours, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. So it's not 24 hours?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And there's -- and it refers to data
`on file.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q And so that's referring to an internal
`Hospira study?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And that's a study that would have
`been performed within the R&D group?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And so it's actually 48 hours that
`this is available -- that this is stable, correct?
` A That is correct.
` Q Okay. Now, you also said that it would --
`would have been unexpected for a formulation of
`dexmedetomidine to be stable in a glass container at
`a -- what you called a low concentration, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. Now, the range in the Wu Declaration
`and in the patent we saw was up to 50 micrograms per
`
`Page 272
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`outcome?
` Q Yeah.
` A That was the purpose of the experiment.
` Q You didn't have an expectation --
` A Yes.
` Q -- ahead of time?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. But you previously said that you
`would have expected that, for a low concentration
`product in a glass vial, it would not show stability
`because of the low concentration, correct?
` MR. RAY: Objection. Mischaracterizes
`testimony.
`BY MR. WALLACE:
` Q Is that not your testimony?
` A No.
` Q Maybe I got it wrong.
` A No, the 100 microgram per mil is a
`concentration that we -- we had whatever data we had
`as far as stability is concerned.
` Q Okay.
` A When we go to low concentrations, things --
`phenomena can occur at low concentrations that will
`not -- can occur at low concentrations that do not
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`milliliter.
` Do you remember that?
` A Yes. Yes.
` Q Okay. So would you consider anything less
`than 50 micrograms per milliliter a low
`concentration?
` A The term "low concentration" is very broad
`unless it's actually defined. What do you mean by
`that? Tell me.
` Q Well, you said there was an expectation of
`-- of -- that it wouldn't be stable in a glass
`container at a low concentration.
` A Right.
` Q And the claims of the patent go up to 50
`micrograms per milliliter.
` So my question is: Is that 50 micrograms
`per milliliter included in your expectation for a
`lack of stability?
` A The data was generated across a range from
`one microgram per mil to 50 microgram per mil.
`So --
` Q Right.
` A -- if -- if your question is what
`expectations did we have -- did we have about the
`
`Page 273
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`occur at high concentrations.
` Q Okay.
` A And that would have to be only determined
`and confirmed with studies.
` Q Okay. And were you aware of any studies
`involving concentrations of dexmedetomidine at a
`concentration of less than 100 micrograms per
`milliliter in a glass container before you began
`your work -- or before Hospira began its work --
` A No.
` Q -- on dexmedetomidine?
` A No.
` Q Okay. Okay. I'll give you the next
`document.
` (Exhibit 17 marked for identification.)
`BY MR. WALLACE:
` Q I'm giving you what's been marked as
`Defendant's Exhibit -- or Exhibit 17 --
` A Okay.
` Q -- documents bearing the Bates number
`Hospira00308480 through 308778.
` A Yes.
` Q And I can tell you this is only the first
`300 pages of this document because it actually is a
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`69
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-00651 Document #: 81-4 Filed: 01/16/18 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:2480
`
`
`Page 274
`
`Page 275
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`2,000-page document, but I --
` A Okay.
` Q -- we chopped it down for -- for ease of
`carrying it around.
` Have you ever seen this document before?
` A Yes. I -- as you said, it's a very large
`document. I scrolled through it very quickly.
` Q Okay. And this is the Investigational New
`Drug Application for Dexmedetomidine, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q And the name of the drug is identified in
`box 5 on the front page, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And so an investigational new drug
`application is the application even before any
`clinical studies can be run, correct?
` A Yes. Yes.
` Q Okay. And this is -- this was data that
`was available to -- to -- that was used by Abbott in
`order -- in order to develop its clinical program,
`correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And this is data that would have --
`that was in -- that was available to Hospira's
`
`Page 276
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. So this is stability data that was
`generated on these products --
` A Yes.
` Q -- correct? Okay.
` So let's turn to that stability data. It's
`internal page three hundred and about -- well, it's
`about 278, but I'll tell you the Bates number at the
`bottom ends in 8761. It's most of the way to the
`back.
` A Yes.
` Q You see there's a cover sheet, "Stability
`data" -- you know what, I'm sorry. I jumped too far
`ahead.
` It's actually, we're going to start on page
`-- the number ends in 751. And it says, "Stability
`data from batch NI027L1 is enclosed."
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And so we turn to the next page,
`page Bates number 8752 of Exhibit 17 --
` A Yes.
` Q -- and we see an identification of the same
`batch number, NI027L1.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`regulatory group in order to maintain the new drug
`application and the regulatory file for
`dexmedetomidine, correct?
` A That would be available with the Regulatory
`Affairs, yes.
` Q Okay. Available with the Regulatory
`Affairs within Hospira, correct?
` A Right.
` Q Okay. I want to jump ahead -- I'm sorry --
`first we'll look at the Table of Contents, and you
`can see the Table Of Contents extends on for several
`pages and describes both -- well, protocols,
`chemistry, manufacturing, pharmacology, toxicology
`and many other studies.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And included with -- within those,
`if you look on page 2 of the Table of Contents,
`which is -- ends in Bates number 8483 under section
`7, you see chemistry, manufacturing and control
`data?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And you see that the second to last
`entry here is stability?
`
`Page 277
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q And the strength is 20 micrograms per
`milliliter.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q This is a product manufactured in September
`of 1987?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And I want you to look down at the
`entry three package. It's packaged in a clear,
`colorless, glass ampoule.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q And as you described earlier, an ampoule is
`a glass container that's sealed on itself, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q So it's a completely sealed glass
`container, right?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And we see, in part 2 here, the
`conditions of storage.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`70
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-00651 Document #: 81-4 Filed: 01/16/18 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:2481
`
`
`Page 278
`
`Page 279
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
` Q And it was stored for up to 12 months at
`25C?
` A Yes.
` Q And that's considered a room temperature
`storage condition?
` A Yes.
` Q And that's the same type of storage
`conditions that were used in the -- the Wu
`Declaration, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q And it's the same storage conditions that
`were used for the submission of the Precedex premix
`to the FDA?
` A Along with other conditions, but this is
`one of the conditions.
` Q Yes. Okay. And it says, "The results are
`presented in table 1."
` Do you see that?
` A Uh-huh.
` Q And so if we turn to Bates number 8756, we
`find table 1.
` You see that, Doctor?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And we see that at the initial time
`
`Page 280
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q Stored at 25C?
` A Yes.
` Q And here the assay is 98 percent again,
`correct?
` A Uh-huh.
` Q So it's identical to the initial assay of
`-- for this sample, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And then if we turn -- if we go to
`the next line, we have nine month data for the same
`sample, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q And we see the assay is a hundred percent?
` A Yes.
` Q So it's still -- it has not lost potency at
`this point, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q And then we see 12 month data here.
` Do you see that, the line for 12 months?
` A Yes.
` Q And we're back, again, at 97 percent assay.
` You see that?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`point, the assay here is 98 percent.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q And do you understand that the assay refers
`to the amount of dexmedetomidine as compared to the
`claimed concentration of 20 micrograms per
`milliliter?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And then we see that, after two
`months of being stored at 25C, the result is 97
`percent of assay, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q So it has lost no more than one percent of
`concentration, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And then the next entry is three
`months of 25C and the assay is, again, 97 percent,
`correct?
` A Yes.
` Q So, again, it has lost no more than one
`percent from the initial assay, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. If we turn to the third entry, we
`have six months data.
`
`Page 281
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
` A Yes.
` Q So it has lost no more than one percent
`from the -- from when it was initially placed on
`stability, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Now, to be clear, a 20 microgram per
`milliliter concentration of dexmedetomidine falls
`within the range that is claimed in the patents that
`we looked at before, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q So there was data that would provide an
`expectation for stability of dexmedetomidine in a
`sealed glass container at a concentration of less
`than 100 micrograms per milliliter, correct?
` A According to this data that's here, yes.
` Q Okay. And this is an IND, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q So an IND is data that is provided to the
`FDA?
` A Yes.
` Q So it is accurate data, presumption is that
`it's accurate data?
` A The date is accurate.
` Q Okay. If we turn, now, to the page ending
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`71
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-00651 Document #: 81-4 Filed: 01/16/18 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:2482
`
`
`Page 282
`
`Page 283
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`in 8761, we have stability data on another batch of
`product. This is -- I'm sorry, it's -- if you turn
`to 762, you see a batch number, OK029L1.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. So that's a different batch from the
`one we were just looking at, right?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And, again, this is a -- packaged in
`a glass ampoule again, right?
` A Yes.
` Q This is a sealed glass container, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And, I guess, if you look back at
`page 761, it identifies this as a 20 microgram per
`milliliter injection.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And if we look on page 8765, there's
`a heading, "Seven Shelf Life."
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q And in the IND it reads, "A shelf life of
`12 months is proposed based on the results of the
`
`Page 284
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`having been used in clinical trials, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. So these would be used in human
`patients to provide sedation?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And the batch OK029L1 is being used
`in clinical trials in The United States, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q And if we turn to page Bates number ending
`in 8777. It's the second to last page. It's turned
`on its side. Actually, I can't read that. Not
`going to worry about it. I can't read that data.
`It's on its side, so...
` MR. RAY: Is that the end of this document?
` MR. WALLACE: That's the end of this document.
` MR. RAY: Can we take a quick break?
` MR. WALLACE: Sure.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're off the record. The
`time is 4:14 p.m.
` (Recess held.)
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're back on the record.
`The time is 6:19 (sic) p.m.
` MR. WALLACE: I'll ask the court reporter to
`mark the next document.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
`batch NI027L1 stability report September 1988 when
`stormed at -- stored at room temperature."
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q So this is data provided to the FDA saying
`that when dexmedetomidine at, a concentration of 20
`micrograms per milliliter, will be shelf stable for
`12 months; is that correct?
` A Yes.
` Q And was that consistent with the data we
`just looked at for the batch NI027L1?
` A Yes.
` Q And if we look on the next page, we see an
`ongoing stability study for batch OK029L1.
` Do you see that?
` A Yes.
` Q And they are proposing both room
`temperature and accelerated conditions, correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And if we turn to page in -- with --
`with the Bates number ending 8768, the heading
`"Stability Studies."
` A Yes.
` Q Each of these two batches are identified as
`
`Page 285
`
` RAO TATA-VENKATA
` (Exhibit 18 marked for identification.)
`BY MR. WALLACE:
` Q Handing you what's been marked as Exhibit
`18, which bears production numbers Hospira00001187
`through 1881. And is what appears to be the prior
`approval supplement for the Precedex premix product.
` A Yes.
` Q Do you see that?
` A Uh-huh.
` Q Do you -- did you review this or portions
`of this for your deposition today?
` A Yeah, I think this is the one I was
`actually glancing through, not this.
` Q Okay. Well, this is -- this is the
`submission that was given to the FDA --
` A DA.
` Q -- for the Precedex premix products,
`correct?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. And this was submitted on October
`12th, 2012.
` You see that?
` A Yes.
` Q Okay. So this is after the patents had
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`72
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket